Post: #451

(08-23-2018 11:56 PM)ShotgunUppercuts Wrote:  https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continu...LQQIneyKFU


Seems they know what they are getting themselves into. History is watching. Again time will tell.

Nice Che beret he's wearing. Seems to be the default headgear for bloodletting in Communist regimes.

I particularly like his suggestion that right-wingers are being trained to be snipers by (((Jews))). Can't even get their own conspiracy theories, they have to steal that of the white man.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #452

Sent my mother the tucker video the other night along with a note that basically said these people in charge want people like you dead. They vacation in SA often.

She already knew and said that it's too late to change their plans for this year but she wrote that

'It has always been muted since the anc took over. The whites have been oppressed apartheid in reverse. It will ruin a beautiful country. Very sad.'

Enough said.

Post: #453

The best part is at the end when he unintentionally betrays the fact, that even if you give blacks houses and land, then very soon they will be in debt and someone else will own it.

That is the big problem with so-called inequity. When output differences are too great between tribes, then it appears as if one side has "stolen" it. That is why the Chinese descendants in some SEA countries own 50% of the country while being just 10% of the population. An average IQ difference of 25-20 there is simply too powerful. Even if Haiti which had a very anti-White system and bias - even there the top leaders were the ones with the most White admixture - they were actively discriminated against, but still came out on top.

Similar tribes can have similar outcomes - Asians in the West do extremely well, but they don't end up owning half the country after 50 years, because the tribes are of similar enough output efficiency.

And EFF-supporter - I get where you are coming from, but it's all based on propaganda made up by guys like Marx and Lenin. Even the land reform or any such moves - you should not trust them. What might happen over time is that all of that land and resources of SA will end up being owned by large corporations that have seemingly black CEOs and PR people, but are 90% owned by White and Jewish folk. The poorer farmers and workers will leave and the top 0.1% will keep on owning even more than before.

Post: #454

Post: #455

One SA farm CCTV unit captured footage of a cell-jamming device being used by the attakers. Way too rare and expensive to be employed by common thugs.

The implications are clear. Farm invasions have always occurred with the tacit approval if not outright material support of the anti-white racist communist government of South Africa.

Post: #456

Post: #457

If I were a South African farmer, then I would walk around like this half the time:



Just taking a leisurely stroll around the property.

Son going to the toilet at night:

Post: #458

Well they seized one farm so far.

Post: #459

If they're going to kick out the whites, might as well kick out the Bantu too. Justice for the Khoisan.

Post: #460

Question:

Is it not possible to carve out a chunk of SA, similar to Lesotho and Swaziland?

Post: #461

(08-24-2018 08:30 PM)Laner Wrote:  Question:

Is it not possible to carve out a chunk of SA, similar to Lesotho and Swaziland?

Heh - that would be a sensible solution, but they are not going to give it to them. They could even give the Whites some fresh region that is less desirable.

The problem is of course the following:

1) White SA is built, successful and prosperous within 20 years.

2) Black SA becomes a dysfunctional shithole

3) Black SA blames their relative lack of success on the new White SA and declares war on White SA

Obviously that would be a better choice and dealing with open war isn't that difficult. But this is not about a logical or sane solution.

Post: #462

I've read up on the history of the Boer in the last few days.

The city of Orania is an interesting case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orania,_Northern_Cape

It's a Boer freetown, something like an amish town, just with modern tech, a religious city, living alone to escape having to deal with the rest of South Africa.

They've been there since the 60's but never got above a few hundred inhabitants until the 2000s. Now they have 1500+ with a quarter of those children.

They receive zero funding or help from the government, purely self sufficient.

They are growing now, exporting crops to China, they have school (100% graduation), cinema, shopping mall, public pools, all the things you expect from a normal city.

They also have their own currency.

The city is so safe they don't even have a policeforce and they use mostly arbitration and negotiation to settle legal disputes, only use the courts in South Africa in serious cases.

This is a perfect example of how South Africa came to be. Orania is nothing special, just another European frontier town. Just like any other frontiner town through history. They're 1500 now, in 50 years they can be 15.000, in 100 years they can be 100.000.

The question is, what is stopping the Bantu from doing the exact same thing?

Orania receives no government money, they do all the manual labor themselves, they mockingly got called poor by foreign media (claimed 80% poverty rate lol).

Even Molema and Mandela have visited. They have no problem with Orania.

The problem is, once Orania starts growing and becoming successful, then history will repeat itself.

Post: #463

(08-24-2018 01:44 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(08-23-2018 11:56 PM)ShotgunUppercuts Wrote:  https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continu...LQQIneyKFU


Seems they know what they are getting themselves into. History is watching. Again time will tell.

Nice Che beret he's wearing. Seems to be the default headgear for bloodletting in Communist regimes.

I particularly like his suggestion that right-wingers are being trained to be snipers by (((Jews))). Can't even get their own conspiracy theories, they have to steal that of the white man.

Most be why they love the color red. Bloodstains are more easier to hide in it.

Post: #464

(08-25-2018 04:57 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

(08-24-2018 01:44 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(08-23-2018 11:56 PM)ShotgunUppercuts Wrote:  https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continu...LQQIneyKFU


Seems they know what they are getting themselves into. History is watching. Again time will tell.

Nice Che beret he's wearing. Seems to be the default headgear for bloodletting in Communist regimes.

I particularly like his suggestion that right-wingers are being trained to be snipers by (((Jews))). Can't even get their own conspiracy theories, they have to steal that of the white man.

Most be why they love the color red. Bloodstains are more easier to hide in it.

The communists picked the color red as a symbol for all the bloodshed that would come with the "revolution". I read somewhere that they intended to change it into green later when communism had stabilized as the world power, but never got around to it. It just went from red to shit.

Post: #465

Yet several "green parties" exist around the world, for example the Australian one, which is very crypto-commie.

Post: #466

(08-25-2018 03:08 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  I've read up on the history of the Boer in the last few days.

The city of Orania is an interesting case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orania,_Northern_Cape

It's a Boer freetown, something like an amish town, just with modern tech, a religious city, living alone to escape having to deal with the rest of South Africa.

They've been there since the 60's but never got above a few hundred inhabitants until the 2000s. Now they have 1500+ with a quarter of those children.

They receive zero funding or help from the government, purely self sufficient.

They are growing now, exporting crops to China, they have school (100% graduation), cinema, shopping mall, public pools, all the things you expect from a normal city.

They also have their own currency.

The city is so safe they don't even have a policeforce and they use mostly arbitration and negotiation to settle legal disputes, only use the courts in South Africa in serious cases.

This is a perfect example of how South Africa came to be. Orania is nothing special, just another European frontier town. Just like any other frontiner town through history. They're 1500 now, in 50 years they can be 15.000, in 100 years they can be 100.000.

The question is, what is stopping the Bantu from doing the exact same thing?

Orania receives no government money, they do all the manual labor themselves, they mockingly got called poor by foreign media (claimed 80% poverty rate lol).

Even Molema and Mandela have visited. They have no problem with Orania.

The problem is, once Orania starts growing and becoming successful, then history will repeat itself.

That right there is the problem. Why cant blacks do it? Because we cant and probably deep down, we have no interest in civilisation. I just dont think it is part of our genetic make up, this civilisation stuff. In a sane world, we blacks would just stabilise our population and let whites run the whole gambit.

I think whites will be fine. Like in Zimbabwe where I'm from they are still alright. Most of them got out and are doing fine wherever they migrated to. It is the blacks who will suffer the most. I guess we dont know where are bread is buttered, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, killing the goose that lays the golden egg and all that shit.

Post: #467

(08-25-2018 06:44 AM)Pride male Wrote:  That right there is the problem. Why cant blacks do it? Because we cant and probably deep down, we have no interest in civilisation. I just dont think it is part of our genetic make up, this civilisation stuff. In a sane world, we blacks would just stabilise our population and let whites run the whole gambit.

I think whites will be fine. Like in Zimbabwe where I'm from they are still alright. Most of them got out and are doing fine wherever they migrated to. It is the blacks who will suffer the most. I guess we dont know where are bread is buttered, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, killing the goose that lays the golden egg and all that shit.

That's awfully black-pilled. I would not go as far as that.

Imagine you took the smartest 10 mio. African blacks and put them into a country - avg. IQ over 110.

Don't you think that such a bunch would do as good as Oranje or even much better?
Renegade of Funk is a 160IQ black guy with an 85% black genome. He is even contributing to the Japanese government writing proposals on how to kickstart population growth there.

Sure - there is a certain culture that is problematic, but those can change - it's mostly evolution set for different results than with other tribes. You adjust that and make the shift within generations to a completely different selection process. As Renegade put it himself - the first country that enacts positive intelligence-affirming eugenics will simply outcompete any other country on Earth. We don't even know our genetic human limits at all. The averages could very well shift to 140+ some day. You just need to reach 96/97 and you get a far more stable black-dominated South Africa.

I wonder if one of the big reasons the globalists are denying all of that at least publicly (I am 100% certain that they privately share this view) despite all the data is because they don't want any country get ideas. A smarter population would be much harder to control. They don't even want obedient tribes like the Chinese adopting positive IQ-based eugenics, because a 130+ IQ Chinese tribe will be much harder to control. And they obviously don't give a shit whether Africans stay in poverty and dysfunction, because raising Africans to 100 will just cause them more problems - they would suddenly have a 1.5-2.5 bio.+ continent on their hands who can actually become dangerous to them.

Their main goal is world domination - not to create a nice prosperous peaceful place to live for the serfs.

Post: #468

^The most dangerous black person is the 'educated' one. The Robert Mugabes, Kwame Nkrumahs, Mandelas, Cyril Ramaphosas, Martin Luther Kings, Malema are the ones who turn around and act like savages. These 10 million smart blacks that you talk about will be cannibals if left to their own devices. Even ants can form a complex society, but for us blacks its a lost cause.

Post: #469

(08-25-2018 06:28 AM)fokker Wrote:  Yet several "green parties" exist around the world, for example the Australian one, which is very crypto-commie.

Greens/environmentalists tend to be watermelons. Green on the outside, Red on the inside.

Post: #470

(08-25-2018 08:20 AM)Labienus Wrote:  

(08-25-2018 06:28 AM)fokker Wrote:  Yet several "green parties" exist around the world, for example the Australian one, which is very crypto-commie.

Greens/environmentalists tend to be watermelons. Green on the outside, Red on the inside.

Also in the end their ineffective production methods tend to pollute much more then mildly regulated capitalist enterprises.

Post: #471

(08-25-2018 07:48 AM)Pride male Wrote:  ^The most dangerous black person is the 'educated' one. The Robert Mugabes, Kwame Nkrumahs, Mandelas, Cyril Ramaphosas, Martin Luther Kings, Malema are the ones who turn around and act like savages. These 10 million smart blacks that you talk about will be cannibals if left to their own devices. Even ants can form a complex society, but for us blacks its a lost cause.

Actually the less smart people there are in a country, the easier it is for smart psychopaths to manipulate and rule the rest. Plus - even with a psycho-ruler then the people become far more efficient. Africa did not have only bad rulers - early presidents of Senegal or Bostwana at the top of my head were intelligent somewhat ethical men. A few other countries also had not-so bad rulers - even Liberia was dominated by high-IQ Freemason blacks. But the problem is that the rest did not follow suit.

And as you put it well - if you have a psycho on top of a negative system - communism, Islamic rule (the more adherence to sharia the worse it gets) etc. - then it is more dysfunctional.

So I don't agree - it's not a lost cause. It's solvable just not the way they attempted it up to now. Next time a positive shitlord like Botswana's first president comes to power and has some good cash flow, then he must implement a positive eugenics program. In 2 generations he would already start to enjoy the bounties so long as he does not get executed by a Mugabe - gotta watch out always for those.

Post: #472

“Most be why they love the color red. Bloodstains are more easier to hide in it.”


Just like the maga.

Interesting.

Post: #473

(08-25-2018 10:04 AM)ShotgunUppercuts Wrote:  “Most be why they love the color red. Bloodstains are more easier to hide in it.”


Just like the maga.

Interesting.

That was speculation on my part. Simeon's explanation suffices and makes much more sense.

Post: #474

(08-25-2018 11:13 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

(08-25-2018 10:04 AM)ShotgunUppercuts Wrote:  “Most be why they love the color red. Bloodstains are more easier to hide in it.”


Just like the maga.

Interesting.

That was speculation on my part. Simeon's explanation suffices and makes much more sense.

Actually communists have said so a few times - even Gorbachev said it in his 1980s that the red color which stood for blood was to be exchanged for green. So who knows - Agenda 21 is a mix of green and extreme communist system.

The red MAGA caps were certainly not chosen to symbolize blood - most blood spilled were by the ones wearing those caps since all the dreamers, BLM supporters and Antifa were happily attacking them. The reverse hardly ever happened, but it's all the same to commies.

Post: #475

As a South African native I have never read such delusional claptrap before, whites must return the land they stole and go back to Europe if they want. We will take it by force if we have too.