Post: #26

(02-17-2018 05:59 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:  [...] obviously nobody should be encouraging other guys to break the law.

Law is often a matter of interpretation. Only simple cases (the speed limit was 50mph, yours was 70mph) ca be adjudicated without more than an eye blink. Not to mention that jurisprudence, on which the variety of public laws are based, is an epistemic endeavour prone to countless changes back and forth.

Imagine a 15 years old Polish boy (legal age of consent in Poland) having sex with 16 years old girl from Minnesota (legal age of consent in her state) in Cyprus (where legal age of consent is 17). Things get tricky...

(02-17-2018 05:59 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:  Girls were not only allowed, but encouraged, to get married relatively quickly, because society was aware that if she waited too long, high-quality men would no longer want to marry her. Also, they knew that the longer a young maiden remained unmarried, the greater the chance she would engage in premarital sex (all but guaranteeing no worthy man would agree to marry her).

"An age of consent statute first appeared in secular law in 1275 in England as part of the rape law. The statute, Westminster 1, made it a misdemeanor to "ravish" a "maiden within age," whether with or without her consent. The phrase "within age" was interpreted by jurist Sir Edward Coke as meaning the age of marriage, which at the time was 12 years of age."

Now, the education takes years longer for there is much more to learn. Average lifespan dramatically increased. Legal, moral, political, psychological, philosophical and social perspectives evolved a lot over so many centuries.

Post: #27

(02-17-2018 06:50 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:  Repo, as you can see, I deleted my post above.

So are we really not allowed to discuss the concept of modern-day "age of consent" laws? It seems like it would be relevant to red-pill ideas to be able to discuss how people in the past (in patriarchal societies) would get married younger than they do today. I mean, this is a historical fact. Are you sure that we're not allowed to discuss these aspects of history on the forum?

Again, I deleted my previous post because I don't want to break the rules. I just want some clarification on this.

Yes I'm sure but feel free to pm a mod

Post: #28

ksbms,

I want to clarity that you quoted from a post that I deleted. Repo points out that it is against the rules to discuss the history of "age of consent" laws on the forum, so I would keep that in mind if I were you.

I would hate for me or somebody else to get banned over a misunderstanding of the forum rules, so maybe Repo, or someone else, could clarify exactly what the rules are when it comes to this. Repo, you say that we're not supposed to talk about "age of consent" laws at all, but there are a lot or posts on this thread that subject, so I'm a bit confused.

Or is it okay to talk about "age of consent" laws as long as you are defending the status quo (current laws), but not if you are criticizing it?

I will avoid discussing the subject for now, but I would appreciate if someone (maybe a mod) could clarify this for me?

Post: #29

< It is logical that Roosh wants this not discussed on the forum, because such a topic would only be used as ammo by the radical left to shut down the forum by claiming that pedos are frequenting it and those sexist predatory men want to fuck underage girls who are easier.

Nowadays men in public life cannot comment on any woman's ass - regardless whether she is 20 days shy of 18 or aged 39. The new feminazi prudes are in power and we have to face this reality.

Post: #30

I did before you deleted it. Can't do anything about it as it's 60 minutes to edit only. Well, we can close this thread if you guys want to. Pitiful times men using their nom de guerres on this piazza can't in a country in which freedom of speech is firmly a part of constitution engage between themselves in a rational debate about legal ramifications of the age of consent. It's mind blogging we've handed in our balls on a silver plate to such an extent already.

Post: #31

I think once she's 18 she'll be right up Suits alley. An Asian 5.

Post: #32

(02-18-2018 08:07 AM)ksbms Wrote:  I did before you deleted it. Can't do anything about it as it's 60 minutes to edit only. Well, we can close this thread if you guys want to. Pitiful times men using their nom de guerres on this piazza can't in a country in which freedom of speech is firmly a part of constitution engage between themselves in a rational debate about legal ramifications of the age of consent. It's mind blogging we've handed in our balls on a silver plate to such an extent already.

You can engage on whatever topic you like between yourself and whoever else you want to engage with.

Just not here about this topic, because it's Roosh's house and he doesn't want his reputation tarred with that sort of chatter.

If you don't get that then you clearly have little respect for the kind of time, effort and personal sacrifice that building a forum like this entails.