Post: #576

^ Got nothing to do with the papers and mother being black.

Anyone sane could have pointed out what a fucking twat this woman is, her career-advancement/ monkey branching from her ex husband being just one example. She's a bitch by all accounts, full of herself, alienating others and she's FOUR years older than him.. In what world is that a good idea?

Should have been ALL commentators saying, 'he could have lots of different girls and in choosing this one he's making a big mistake'

But No. We got virtue signalling from everyone, not least the media, we got this 'wonderful!' 'wonderful!' shit rammed down our throats.

How do I know the elites and their middle class liberal lackeys are so racist and sexist?

Because they try and enforce stupid fucking ideas a la Jussie Smollett, Barack Obama Nobel prize, Judge Kavanaugh, Migrant Caravans on everyone else and the moment anyone says "hang on, that doesn't seem to make much sens-.." they immediately start screaming 'Way-cism!! Xenophobia!!"

You're supposed to wear nice hats and grin like idiots at these events and then all the thorny issues about Race and Culture and Migration and Demographics and Being-Suitable-for-a-role-that-Very-Few-are-actually-Suitable-For just magically disappear.

(02-13-2018 08:40 PM)Bienvenuto Wrote:  Out last night.

Started chatting to some uk students. Turns out that they grew up in the same part of the UK I did.

Got on well for about half an hour then someone mentioned prince Harry - I said he was dumb to marry a woman that is older than him.

That earned me a frosty response. They called me a sexist. I said it's not sexist to point out that she is drying up. Then I was a Nazi, a racist,.. I was like what about making the point that marrying an older woman is a mistake is racist?

Then the ideological zeal kicked in and I was a sexist a racist a Nazi, my parents were qunts for raising a racist which means they probably racists themselves. Then they told me I better just leave.

Then they mentioned a *white trash * celebrity who died of cancer a few years ago and said "I suppose you think he should marry that whore"

I was like 'my parents were bombed as children by the Germans, plenty of my family died fighting the actual Nazis, my buddy's kids were friends with that *white trash whore' s* children all through her struggle with cancer, still are.. So I resent you insulting people you've never met.

It's a wonderful marriage! The royal family needs people of color in its blood line but you don't like that because... .. Racist! Nazi! She's a whore ! Etc.

The struggle is real..

I left out the fact that these people tried threatening me.
I had joined them at their table.
and then they went from threatening me to telling me to fuck off out of the pub ASAP.
I just laughed.
That turned into pretty quickly telling me that THEY were going to fuck off out of the premises ASAP.

"Good. Fuck Off."

"We are!"

"Good.."

"Yes! Good!"

Had their table to myself as they walked out the door.

The thing is about these maggots, they're like the elites whose Kool Aid they drink.

They live in such an unreal world that when the rubber meets the road in real life with strangers they just fold. But ---- **they're the experts**...

The Independent, The Guardian, The New York Times told them so.

Post: #577

The whole thing is a smart, loveless business transaction to promote the survival of the Royals in the newly multicultural UK, 'cos they know they are fucked otherwise once Lizzie is gone. The demographics of the country is changing fast (already irreversibly) and there's no way the Family can continue without the support of non-whites.

Being Harry, it can be seen as an early test-bed as he's merely the 'spare' anyway. It is what it is, nothing to make a fuss about, just a sensible survival measure. As for Meghan-mania, I lived through all the Diana Brouhaha and Meghan doesn't even come close. She's unlikely to now, as she's too old (no matter how 'woke' she becomes).

Post: #578

My best guess is that he was signalling to a wider group of insiders that he wanted some sort of revenge for his mother's killing (real or perceived).

Take a closer look at who put them together.

One tribe is taking advantage of the butthurt suffered by the son of another competing tribe. They're all snakes and all out to crush the proles but they're also in competition with each other for dominance.

The play is pretty easy to predict.

"Hey Harry, your bro is sucking the dick of all the people who killed your mum. Marry this chick and you'll really stick it to them."

Who knows. Maybe a few years from now bigger-brother dies in an unfortunate plane crash and suddenly Harry is in the number one spot with Tribe X's plant sitting right next to him. Impossible to rule out that she's been put through all that MKULTRA shit either. She fits the profile more or less.

Post: #579

200 years from now everyone will be taught that that the British Royal family has always been black...

Post: #580

(04-02-2019 02:59 AM)Richard Turpin Wrote:  The whole thing is a smart, loveless business transaction to promote the survival of the Royals in the newly multicultural UK, 'cos they know they are fucked otherwise once Lizzie is gone. The demographics of the country is changing fast (already irreversibly) and there's no way the Family can continue without the support of non-whites.

You Brits have really messed up

Post: #581

I wonder if Harry would have married Meghan if Mom was still around. Moms sometimes have better instincts on stuff like this than dads do.

Post: #582

(04-01-2019 09:58 PM)Heuristics Wrote:  

(04-01-2019 09:44 PM)Rorogue Wrote:  Prince Harry is fucking over men all over the western world by tolerating this bullshit

a faggot of the highest order

what's with guys like him and Bieber? Is their T level so low that they don't realize their options? Do they hate themselves for being men?

I suspect Meghan had some tricks up her sleeve she learned from her stint in hollywood, or demanded he wife her up after he got "enamored" with her. I bet the other gfs never demanded that because they didn't want to be too pushy, and lose their chance knowing that one day if they waited long enough, he would grow up and propose to the current girl he was dating.

Can we say maybe British guys have this weird post-colonial/ slaveowner plantation/ upstairs downstairs, fetish thing going on where maybe they're into mixed race girls, or girls from the former colonies, poorer girls, lower wealth class girls, american girls, etc. It's maybe rooted in their obsession with class and their white guilt for colonizing large parts of the world. Meghan would fit that bill in several ways: american, middle class, mixed race white-black, social and career climber, etc. Don't forget, that harry's great-great uncle, the former king, married wallace simpson and abdicated (much like megan, she was divorced and american)... and she worked her charm on him...

Part of me says that Harry didn't have a mother most of his life, so maybe he wanted a woman to play that "strong mother" part.

She is not even physically attractive. How Thirsty must he be?

Post: #583

(05-24-2018 01:09 PM)Samseau Wrote:  For the history buffs:

This wedding reminds me of Justinian the Great's marriage to the prostitute Theodora in 525 AD. Even though he was the most powerful man in the world, with access to a legit Christian empire full of virgins, he took a common theatre whore and gave her unprecedented power and control.

Justinian's mismanagement of the empire would cause it terminal damage. He taxed and worked his citizens to the bone to finance wars of glory and spending on his harlot wife. It briefly expanded to this:



Then reduced down to this almost immediately after his death:



Pretty much an inexorable decline, not because of the broken woman Theodora herself, but because of the judgement of a man who would marry such a woman.

This is in contrast to how the Chinese Empire historically expanded:





People setting down deep roots and expanding organically over time developing thick strategic depth is a far more sustainable empire than over-extension like how the Roman Empire and many empires around the world ran things.

Rather than relying on feeding one's army with constant conquests. Investing in one's own people, the local economy and infrastructure will ensure a much more sustainable and lasting impact and a far more sustainable base with which to fund the military.

Even as it was conquered it was able to co-opt the invaders many times.

Although China has many advantages in Geography. What it historically did especially in regards to never overextending itself most of the time can be learn't from.

Post: #584

Merely glorified walking meat-bags...

Post: #585

And the latest. Harry really screwed the Royal family with this.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/prince-harr...al-couple/

Quote:Meghan Markle and her baby will be liable for U.S. taxes

By Megan Cerullo

Updated on: April 9, 2019 / 3:50 PM / MoneyWatch

Because of Meghan Markle's American citizenship, her baby will be liable for U.S. income tax.
Children of American citizens are considered U.S. taxpayers no matter where in world they are born.
Prince Harry and Meghan's child could avoid U.S. taxes when he or she turns 18 by renouncing their American citizenship.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry won't be the only ones with their hands full when their baby arrives later this month — so will the royal tax accountants. Thanks to Markle's American citizenship, their firstborn child — who will be seventh in line to the British throne — will automatically become a U.S. citizen and thus be liable for federal income tax.

"When a child is born a U.S. citizen, they are a U.S. taxpayer irrespective of residency," international tax lawyer Stuart E. Horwich told CBS MoneyWatch. "The kid will have to list all foreign bank and financial accounts in which he or she has an interest," he said.

Post: #586

Id wager the British royalty has Rothschild blood floating around in that family tree.

Post: #587

(04-10-2019 05:27 AM)Brillynt Wrote:  And the latest. Harry really screwed the Royal family with this.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/prince-harr...al-couple/

Quote:Meghan Markle and her baby will be liable for U.S. taxes

By Megan Cerullo

Updated on: April 9, 2019 / 3:50 PM / MoneyWatch

Because of Meghan Markle's American citizenship, her baby will be liable for U.S. income tax.
Children of American citizens are considered U.S. taxpayers no matter where in world they are born.
Prince Harry and Meghan's child could avoid U.S. taxes when he or she turns 18 by renouncing their American citizenship.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry won't be the only ones with their hands full when their baby arrives later this month — so will the royal tax accountants. Thanks to Markle's American citizenship, their firstborn child — who will be seventh in line to the British throne — will automatically become a U.S. citizen and thus be liable for federal income tax.

"When a child is born a U.S. citizen, they are a U.S. taxpayer irrespective of residency," international tax lawyer Stuart E. Horwich told CBS MoneyWatch. "The kid will have to list all foreign bank and financial accounts in which he or she has an interest," he said.

If nothing else, I appreciate the historical irony of a member of the British Royal family having to pay taxes to Uncle Sam without being able to vote.

Post: #588

(04-10-2019 07:50 AM)Man of Truth Wrote:  Id wager the British royalty has Rothschild blood floating around in that family tree.

Yes. Diana's biological father is James Goldsmith, a close Rothschild relative. So the future king is at least a quarter from that stock. Not sure about the Charles/Saxe-Coburg side.

/thread-72140...pid1928670

Post: #589

(04-10-2019 12:28 PM)911 Wrote:  

(04-10-2019 07:50 AM)Man of Truth Wrote:  Id wager the British royalty has Rothschild blood floating around in that family tree.

Yes. Diana's biological father is James Goldsmith, a close Rothschild relative. So the future king is at least a quarter from that stock. Not sure about the Charles/Saxe-Coburg side.

/thread-72140...pid1928670

Interesting. Id say it goes back even further. A Rothschild from a few generations back mocked the British throne on how his family controlled the money supply and essentially controlled their Empire.

True monarchy has been killed by the new elite. The Royal family today is nothing more than a frivolous formality. Show ponies. A parasite upon its people really. What better place to park members of your tribe or bastard children to really cuck an enemy gentile nation.

Post: #590

Maybe she has royal blood from her father's side?

Post: #591

(04-10-2019 10:58 AM)DannyAlberta Wrote:  

(04-10-2019 05:27 AM)Brillynt Wrote:  And the latest. Harry really screwed the Royal family with this.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/prince-harr...al-couple/

Quote:Meghan Markle and her baby will be liable for U.S. taxes

By Megan Cerullo

Updated on: April 9, 2019 / 3:50 PM / MoneyWatch

Because of Meghan Markle's American citizenship, her baby will be liable for U.S. income tax.
Children of American citizens are considered U.S. taxpayers no matter where in world they are born.
Prince Harry and Meghan's child could avoid U.S. taxes when he or she turns 18 by renouncing their American citizenship.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry won't be the only ones with their hands full when their baby arrives later this month — so will the royal tax accountants. Thanks to Markle's American citizenship, their firstborn child — who will be seventh in line to the British throne — will automatically become a U.S. citizen and thus be liable for federal income tax.

"When a child is born a U.S. citizen, they are a U.S. taxpayer irrespective of residency," international tax lawyer Stuart E. Horwich told CBS MoneyWatch. "The kid will have to list all foreign bank and financial accounts in which he or she has an interest," he said.

If nothing else, I appreciate the historical irony of a member of the British Royal family having to pay taxes to Uncle Sam without being able to vote.

That would be quite funny... if it were to actually happen. But we know that the left in this country firmly believes in and embraces the concepts of royalty and social hierarchy so the kid’s position of utmost privilege will exempt it.

The kid will probably come out “challenged” since its mother has decided to be mostly vegan in addition to her advanced age. This has the effect of turning her womb into a retard factory.

Post: #592

(04-11-2019 03:07 AM)Man of Truth Wrote:  

(04-10-2019 12:28 PM)911 Wrote:  

(04-10-2019 07:50 AM)Man of Truth Wrote:  Id wager the British royalty has Rothschild blood floating around in that family tree.

Yes. Diana's biological father is James Goldsmith, a close Rothschild relative. So the future king is at least a quarter from that stock. Not sure about the Charles/Saxe-Coburg side.

/thread-72140...pid1928670

Interesting. Id say it goes back even further. A Rothschild from a few generations back mocked the British throne on how his family controlled the money supply and essentially controlled their Empire.

True monarchy has been killed by the new elite. The Royal family today is nothing more than a frivolous formality. Show ponies. A parasite upon its people really. What better place to park members of your tribe or bastard children to really cuck an enemy gentile nation.

I've been told that the royals are considered newcomers among the british nobles. Other nobles have lineages going back 1500 years to King Arthur (fictional but still). They have many interesting takes. Many british nobles seem to be British Israelities, believing that the Tribe of Dan and even Christ/Maria Magdalen fled to Britain. It's not completely impossible of course. The Tribe of Dan were Aegean Greeks, as were the Philistines, and Celts lived in the area. Phonecians had mined the British Isles for Tin. It's quite possibly why they allowed the jews in and intermarried to them. A sort of reunion I suppose. Unfortunately, most those jews, were not of Israel but Khazaria.

You see, the world looked quite different 2000 years ago. People looked different. There were blondes and blue eyed people in Anatolia and the Levant. Medieval historians believed Thor to be from Troy as well. It was easier to move around back then. Far less cities and fortresses. A marauding band of 10.000 warriors could really do some damage.

Post: #593

Is there a thread about Prince William cheating on Kate?

Post: #594

Perhaps its been pointed out earlier in this thread but if not - Prince Harry is most likely NOT a royal. That is why he could party so hard with many models and his relationship is propaganda.

He is the love child of Princess Diana and James Hewitt. See resemblance below. You can look it up online too.

Post: #595

Now the rumor is that Megan faked her pregnancy and is trying to blackmail the royal family.

Quote:torontopaper @torontopaper1
Darling, actions speak louder than words. A more united family than ever is exposing your lies. Your house of cards is collapsing. You will get the Tower instead of the paycheck!

torontopaper @torontopaper1
Darling, very telling that you are using your old US cellphone number again lately. By the way the 9 months are over already. Are you expecting an elephant or still looking for a way out where no way out is?

torontopaper @torontopaper1
9 months are over! Your husband is on his family's side! No paycheck! Your threats are making them laugh! They have more against you and you are alone! And now? Game over! Checkmate!

torontopaper @torontopaper1
Darling, so you are sitting there alone and humiliated in your house of glass with cracks everywhere. People have seen that the rumours became true. Lord Watchdog has shut you down!

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2019/05/where...-baby.html

Post: #596

Sometimes when I'd hear red pill guys say "when a woman fucks a ton of Chads, she is messed up for life after that", I'd think it was a bunch of bullshit.

Markle is just living proof of it, though. A woman who has had that level of promiscuity with those levels of men simply cannot respect any man (who is not an uber alpha- and then why would they comit to her) or conduct herself with any sort of dignity.

Post: #597

News announced today Megan birthed a baby boy, 7 pounds 3 ounces. After all the evidence she was faking it, how did they pull that off... Wonder what deal she had to make to get access to the surrogate. I thought originally she wasn't supposed to breed at all.

Post: #598

Poor baby. Wonder on what part of the autism spectrum he'd fall in.

Post: #599

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48204592

Quote:The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have named their baby son Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor.
A surprise choice, Archie was not among the bookmakers' favourites of Alexander, Arthur and Albert.
"I don't think anyone of us saw either of these names coming," says Joe Little, managing editor of Majesty royal magazine.
As far as he is aware, Archie does not have any British royal connotations - and Harrison too is a totally new name for the Royal Family.
Archie means "genuine", "bold" or "brave" - and is more popular in Britain than the US. It was originally a shortened form of Archibald but is now often used as a name on its own.
It was the 18th most-popular boy's name in England and Wales in 2017, with 2,803 baby boys called Archie that year, and has been in the top 50 consistently since 2003.

Harry and Meghan should have their royal titles removed for naming their kid Archie.

Post: #600

Well it could have been Keyshawn Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor.