Post: #26

(11-25-2017 08:22 PM)Bluto Wrote:  That bad news is that you better like "curvy" chicks:

http://www.curvesconnect.com

Quote:We often hear not to judge a book by its cover, but 99% of online daters do just that. If you don't post a photo fit for a fashion magazine, you get overlooked.

So now land whales have their own dating website.

Any form of fetish, preference, niche etc will have an extreme imbalance of the sex ratio online. So much in fact, I wonder that the evolutionary-psychological reason for kinks is to ensure that even the lowest ranking women are able to reproduce if they want to.

In general online dating sex ratios follow this pattern:

*Male status/ sugar daddy
*Elite/ professional dating

*Mainstream dating - Bumble
*Mainstream dating - Tinder
*Mainstream dating - POF/ OKC/ Match/ EH*

*"Flirty" dating
* Open hook up apps
* Swingers' apps
* Fetish site such as Fetlife

The numbers and ratios involved govern the quality therein hence a 3 on Fetlife can do some marketing product placement and find a niche and fetish to attract men well above her SMV. It is no coincidence that the women on Fetlife are the ugliest on the internet. Intra-group competition between women is extremely low. In contrast the sex ratio on Seeking Arrangement favours men and the women there are deemed to be the most attractive on the internet as female competition is high.


* Bumble and Tinder have hollowed out the female membership of mainstream dating sites. The wife of an ISIS jihadi remarrying a White IT simp who will take on the children that ISIS sired is an example of Match becoming a barren land for men. This woman apparently got well over 1000 messages.

When in doubt, look at the profiles of women of a certain age. If they don't look at your profile in return, send a "thanks for looking" message and they have a cunty profile such as "I only reply to men who use the Oxford comma" etc, then the sex ration is imbalanced, so delete your profile.

Post: #27

Its been over 3 years since I tried online dating, so it may have changed, but it has its advantages. This probably has been brought up in another thread, but to me it's a low risk, low-level investment that produces a small but steady output, like a savings bond.

The trick is to put in the work at the front end, when you first sign up. Like a bond, the more you put in at the beginning, the more lucrative the yield at the end. Spend an afternoon or two on your profile- It may seem like a lot of work, but it's worth it. I actually had fun, writing silly responses to the categories on OKCupid ("On a Friday night I usually am..."). Be as funny, cocky, and borderline outrageous as you can, since it will make you stand out (admittedly the climate is a little scarier now with all the sexual harassment stuff). I am a fairly ordinary looking guy and I had many unsolicited contacts from women regarding how my profile made them laugh. The vast majority of those didn't turn into anything, but a few did, which is my point.

"The Profile" should also include accumulating a few jokes/ humorous stories and funny stock responses for the initial message exchanges. Write them down. OKCupid wants you to answer dozens of questions to determine compatibility- answer as many as you can, because some women decide on whether or not to contact you based upon that number (I've actually had women tell me "no, I don't want to meet you for coffee because we are not high enough percentage of a match"). Of course the 'match' thing is crap but women don't know that, its simply a matter of maximizing your opportunities.

The one thing I made sure NOT to do on my profile, and rarely did when exchanging messages, was to give a straightforward answer to a woman's questions. It was always an opening to make a joke or silly comment, at least in the first few message exchanges or phone calls. Save the regular conversation crap for face to face meetings.

Its all about casting a wide net to grab some attention and sitting around waiting for the results. I treat it as a numbers game, a sort of a practical application of the 'abundance mentality'. No, I didn't get 15 messages every day in my inbox, but I did get 15 messages in my first month, a few of which I converted.

Many complain about the quality of women on line, their snarkiness, rampant obesity (and secret internet fatties) and those are all valid criticisms, but probably an argument or a different time.