Post: #101

(03-01-2018 03:09 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

Look at this guy's ARMS! He barely looks human! He looks like something that's going to mutilate your cattle and leave weird-looking circles in your wheat field!

Something's in the water. I swear something is in the water that's doing this to people. Humans shouldn't look like this.

My wrist and his bicep are probably similar circumference.

Post: #102

(03-07-2018 11:39 AM)Canopus Wrote:  Jesus Christ, with a gun to my head I would have sworn this was satire but it's real.

As Voxday says.
SJW's always double down.

So demented is their mentality, that they embrace an insult. Almost akin to sado-masochism...

Oh well.
I suppose the ultimate benefit is that their embrace of soy means they'll naturally select themselves out of the gene pool.

Post: #103

Elon Musk has also been on a soy rehabilitation program.



A team of Russian scientists are still trying to cure his soy debasment syndrome:

Post: #104

^ The hair implant was surely a better investment than marrying his ex for a second time.

Post: #105

Noting the Silicon Valley schmuck in the photo above.
I would not normally put forth Sebastian Stan as the epitome of masculinity.

Yet the disparity between the two is undeniable.

Me thinks Sharon had more tingles in that one segment than she's had in the past five years.

Post: #106

(03-07-2018 05:43 PM)Selembao Wrote:  ^ The hair implant was surely a better investment than marrying his ex for a second time.

He probably used only a hair transplant from the sides and the back. It's his own hair.

To his defense - his ex was smoking hot:



And he fucked another super-hottie recently:



You can say what you want about him - at least he is a billionaire who is using his wealth to get some hair and some top-shelf pussy. Plenty of other simps out there with billions who are getting together with 5s and 6s.

Post: #107

(03-07-2018 06:21 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Noting the Silicon Valley schmuck in the photo above.
I would not normally put forth Sebastian Stan as the epitome of masculinity.

Yet the disparity between the two is undeniable.

Me thinks Sharon had more tingles in that one segment than she's had in the past five years.

That's the perfect example of Alpha pickup with Game. He probably banged her. She is past her prime and not too many good-looking men with self-confidence try to seduce her.



The fat moderator cannot believe what is happening since he sees a man joke about Sharon Stone swallowing cum all while being completely unfazed in front of the cameras. And he is right to seize the moment instantly. Alpha makes his intentions known as soon as possible and the asking for a date backstage is what the other simps might attempt, but it hits her harder when she is in the limelight and he is utterly unimpressed by her fame.

Sure - she is way past her prime, but good enough for a bang.

Post: #108

(03-07-2018 06:21 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Noting the Silicon Valley schmuck in the photo above.
I would not normally put forth Sebastian Stan as the epitome of masculinity.

Yet the disparity between the two is undeniable.

Me thinks Sharon had more tingles in that one segment than she's had in the past five years.

It is a tragedy because he can only get away with this with an older past her date Sharon Stone. Sharon, as a seasoned woman is normalized around men and can run with the candid lightness of this in good spirit. Imagine if this was an 18-25-year-old Hollywood girl. She would be shaken and terribly awkward with the exchange.

Stan has a classic troll masculine vibe about him. The EE/Romania background helps Mr Stan as well big time. He sold it as he could keep his poker face and keep on pushing which leaves the female to have to do the guessing game if he is trolling or actually trying to dig in.

The other guy looks weird with odd body language. You can tell who has had to work to get laid (Mr Stan) versus some goofy tall guy that probably just fucks ugly FOB Asians who don't know any better but to date a tall western man.

Post: #109

(03-07-2018 07:30 PM)kosko Wrote:  

(03-07-2018 06:21 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Noting the Silicon Valley schmuck in the photo above.
I would not normally put forth Sebastian Stan as the epitome of masculinity.

Yet the disparity between the two is undeniable.

Me thinks Sharon had more tingles in that one segment than she's had in the past five years.

It is a tragedy because he can only get away with this with an older past her date Sharon Stone. Sharon, as a seasoned woman is normalized around men and can run with the candid lightness of this in good spirit. Imagine if this was an 18-25-year-old Hollywood girl. She would be shaken and terribly awkward with the exchange.

Stan has a classic troll masculine vibe about him. The EE/Romania background helps Mr Stan as well big time. He sold it as he could keep his poker face and keep on pushing which leaves the female to have to do the guessing game if he is trolling or actually trying to dig in.

The other guy looks weird with odd body language. You can tell who has had to work to get laid (Mr Stan) versus some goofy tall guy that probably just fucks ugly FOB Asians who don't know any better but to date a tall western man.

Do you reckon? I would say my game is quite similar to his, and it works better if anything on the younger girls. Here's my read:

What it looks like he does here to me is that he first puts himself out there, and gives her just enough power to feel secure for the rest of the interaction. He does the big move first, of making it absolutely known that he wants her, and he is funny, self-depricating, and charming about it. That gets the audience onside immediately, because it is ballsy and vulnerable, and people warm to that. (Pretty sure the tall guy is just gay, and even if he isn't, he gets handled expertly by Stan. His whole existence on that show is at Stan's bequest from that first handshake and 'oh shit, you're here' moment that precedes it.)

He then does the fake beta thing of telling her how wonderful she is ('I've been wanting to tell you this for a while, probably about 15 years...'). But it's not really about her, it's about his relaxed, amusing demeanour, the story he tells, and the audience thrilling to his masterful handling of the whole scene. Although he tells her she's the star, and she is the star of his affections and he comes across as sincere in that, she is also just a prop to help him amuse the audience and be the absolute centre of attention, and it's made very clear to her that she's his to bring in or send out of the frame as he chooses. He makes her everything and nothing at exactly the same time, and in my experience that can be very effective with girls.

He then get's called out for 'really sticking with it', and he absolutely ownes that he is. He ignores her and looks the host right in the eye and says he is really serious about hitting on her, and all his body language communicates that he is. Again, he's sincere, and operating from a position of good looks and some status. She comes to his rescue, and gives him the first encouragement - 'you are pretty cute'. She's encouraged that this isn't a wind up and so she can afford to put herself out there at this point. Then she does a bunch of reaching for him etc later on, and the deal is pretty much done if he wants it.

My experience has been that if you are good looking, and charming with some status then girls can find it very unsettling and you have to put yourself out there a couple of times, whilst still showing that the status is deserved and you are in fact the master of the environment, before they'll allow themselves to give you any encouragement, particularly in front of their friends. I think you have to communicate that there is something special enough about her for you to take an unusual risk, so that she doesn't feel you're just another cad who swoops everything just because you're attractive with a nice smile.

To address your original point, I think this type of game from this type of man is very effective, and would work very well on a younger actress too for all the same reasons. It wouldn't work coming from a lot of other actors, good looking or otherwise, because their vibe is different and it is hard to strike that balance of charming and complimentary without seeming overly nice or like you're trying to supplicate your way into her knickers. You never get that feeling with this guy. You get the feeling that here is a guy who could/does get laid a lot, but who is putting himself out there in a way he doesn't need to because there is something particular about this woman that means he wants to take a risk where he needn't. That is powerful if that's your vibe.

Post: #110

(03-07-2018 11:39 AM)Canopus Wrote:  Jesus Christ, with a gun to my head I would have sworn this was satire but it's real.

Well, there’s one more reason (or four) to steer clear of California/L.A./Hollywood.

Post: #111

(03-07-2018 07:30 PM)kosko Wrote:  

(03-07-2018 06:21 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Me thinks Sharon had more tingles in that one segment than she's had in the past five years.

That little vid merits some attention on what was happening there.

a) initially he complimented her and she instantly deflected looking at the other guy

b) then he reigned in her ego by the 15 year comment and that 15 years are almost his entire life - she being old and you can see how she stares at him then, as he obviously beat the shit-test

c) then he settles the deal by making the comment about her "having great headshots back in the d..." He did not end it with "back in the day", pulled back a bit, because Sharon Stone is too old to tease too much about her age too much - even despite her fame.

But since he did in such a charming way, then he pulled it off. Actually it's a good example of how public seduction can go. In addition he did not hesitate and lunged at her when she said "Bite me". I am sure that she banged scores and scores of men on any whim, so who knows - maybe he made it unless she has a multi-millionaire BetaBucks boyfriend and does not want to risk it at her age.

Post: #112

I take back the nice things I said about VG, the guy is a bloody sociopath.
He lectured his dying grandfather on veganism and produced this video the morning after the funeral.

Post: #113

VG is an avatar of everything that is perfectly fucked in Ontario.

I look forward to his future meltdown and (hopefully public) suicide.

Post: #114

(03-23-2018 05:39 AM)TooFineAPoint Wrote:  VG is an avatar of everything that is perfectly fucked in Ontario.

I look forward to his future meltdown and (hopefully public) suicide.

What's worse; that he may have pulled off one of the most elaborate troll jobs.
Or.
That he is genuine in his presentation & he really is that insufferable...?

Post: #115

(03-23-2018 04:57 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  I take back the nice things I said about VG, the guy is a bloody sociopath.
He lectured his dying grandfather on veganism and produced this video the morning after the funeral.

I already thought this guy was a human car crash, but damn. Yeah dude, can't imagine why your family would be mad at you for trying to put your own grandfather's death on YouTube. What a head-scratcher...

Post: #116

It looks like the only gainz Vegan is making are in his waist measurement and oestrogen levels. He looks awful in his latest video:





I don't eat meat, but I always found that vegetarians were the most annoying people around. That is until social justice warriors used similar tactics to weaponise every political issue they could. Most people I knew from childhood were vegetarians. All of the ones that have gone back to meat have leaned heavily to the left to replace the feeling of moral superiority they used to get from giving up something they craved. And all that have gravitated heavily to freedom are still meat free. Vegetarianism is largely a symptom a narcissism and guilt and most of them find in later life they can better indulge and expunge them by just saying nice things about certified victim groups.

Vegan's behaviour appears to be pathological,

"How do I feel about him being dead? I'm actually pretty happy."

Saying that in public for 10,000s+ people to see shows a crying lack for self-awareness probably born out of narcissism and he's more interested in pushing his narrative regarding how he wants people to live longer by following his diet, while at the same time celebrating the death of his own grandfather. Hard not to see the conflict here. It's all about him, his positive image of himself and his authority to the extent he can't see what a boob he has become. And I wouldn't follow any diet advice from a boy who has pushed 20% body fat.

Post: #117

(03-23-2018 04:57 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  I take back the nice things I said about VG, the guy is a bloody sociopath.
He lectured his dying grandfather on veganism and produced this video the morning after the funeral.

I'm usually not one to wish ill will upon people (except Hillary Clinton) however I really hope this is the final straw in this guys "youtube" career and life in any kind of limelight.

Post: #118

From August 2015?

Post: #119

(03-23-2018 09:27 AM)spokepoker Wrote:  From August 2015?

Looks like shortly after he posted that video his channel went inactive.

Post: #120

There is a particular characteristic of these types of guys that has (grimly) fascinated me for some time. It's that...smile. You know the one. That overexuberant, open-mouthed "freakout" selfie smile that's always married to these bugged-out eyes, scraggly facial hair, glass jaw, and disgusting coffee-browned teeth. It would look feral if it weren't so screechingly feminine.





Did some digging and /pol/ apparently refers to it as the Soylent Grin.

Post: #121

(03-23-2018 11:31 AM)Canopus Wrote:  

Did some digging and /pol/ apparently refers to it as the Soylent Grin.

That pic on the left is the stuff of TMJ nightmares. Trim off the context and it could easily show a guy who yawned too far, locked his jaw, and is screaming in cranium-engulfing agony while waiting for paramedics to show up with morphine and muscle relaxers.

One can hope, anyway.

ETA: just tried to make the Soylent Grin in the mirror. Couldn't do it. It looked like I had the dry heaves.

Post: #122

(03-07-2018 05:29 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

(03-07-2018 11:39 AM)Canopus Wrote:  Jesus Christ, with a gun to my head I would have sworn this was satire but it's real.

As Voxday says.
SJW's always double down.

So demented is their mentality, that they embrace an insult. Almost akin to sado-masochism...

Oh well.
I suppose the ultimate benefit is that their embrace of soy means they'll naturally select themselves out of the gene pool.

You can clearly see the fear in some of their eyes.

Something more is going on than it appears. Or it may just be a coincidence

Post: #123

(04-08-2018 09:53 PM)monsquid Wrote:  She's a heinous troll with terrible writing skills. Without the sensational click bait headlines her articles would be worthless.

She's married to a soyboy.

Post: #124

(04-11-2018 10:34 PM)getdownonit Wrote:  

(04-08-2018 09:53 PM)monsquid Wrote:  She's a heinous troll with terrible writing skills. Without the sensational click bait headlines her articles would be worthless.

She's married to a soyboy.

Why would someone use soy to make a baked product in the first place???? If you're allergic to gluten or whatever the latest fad is these days, there's corn, rice, potatoes, cassava, plantains...

Post: #125

The sign says "soymilk doughnuts" whatever that means. My guess is that it still contains flour and gluten, but not cow's milk since Asians often don't digest it properly. Soy is a common and traditional food in Japan, so maybe people there also like the flavor of it.