Post: #376

(03-13-2012 02:54 PM)mikeymike Wrote:  Hot Friend With Not Friend?

I assume you mean the girl on the right is the hot friend?

I would smash the girl on the left in a heartbeat.

Post: #377

Haha roosh is that girl from the industrial shithole? I'd hit it.

Post: #378

On the right.

Post: #379

(03-26-2012 04:32 PM)Walnuts Wrote:  Haha roosh is that girl from the industrial shithole? I'd hit it.

She's from Helsinki: http://www.hel-looks.com/20120317_02/

Post: #380

I've got a thing for tall chicks...the one on the right was 6'3.
My wingman had the shittiest job in the world that night..

Post: #381

(03-27-2012 02:43 AM)Sourcecode Wrote:  

I've got a thing for tall chicks...the one on the right was 6'3.
My wingman had the shittiest job in the world that night..

I'd do the tall one. The shorter one's face is too off for me (although I'd probably hit). She reminds me of a white version of Brandy (got mad space between her eyes).

Post: #382

Roosh: would bang her.

Sentrix: id smash both. Above id hit the one on the right. Shed look better with a smaller nose, its surprising how much a nose affects a girl.

Post: #383

(03-26-2012 04:15 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Roosh, I think your tastes may have been skewed upwards by spending so much time in EE.

She is better looking than the average American chick and I can't imagine any of the stateside guys here, except for the '2/10 Would Not Bang' crowd, would say no to this one, horrible sense of style notwithstanding.

Post: #384

Post: #385

I'd hit it for the novelty.
Wouldn't want to be seen with her in public though, that shit cray!

Aside from the two life rafts mounted on her chest, the rest of her is ok.

Disclaimer: for the safety of all within a three mile radius; do NOT attempt to motorboat!
Funbags are approaching critical mass! Nuclear detonation possible.

Post: #386

That broad makes no mention of her ginormous cans in her profile.

I might make a run at it for the hell of it. If I disappear from the forum it's because I suffocated.

Post: #387

Almost intriguing if they're real, but I can't imagine that (I also imagine that if they are real, they don't look terribly supported when uncaged).

Post: #388

Post: #389

(05-08-2012 12:49 AM)YoungGunner Wrote:  

Usually would not touch a girl that size with a barge pole but she has a great face ( although no doubt been touched up and thinned out in post editing ). Would bang.

Post: #390

I like thick girls, would hit it.

Post: #391

group of drunk manchester chicks

Post: #392

I'd hit all of them.

Hell, why not?

Post: #393

I'd hit the one on the left. The middle ones nasty and the one on the right I just don't like her.
Lol hotwheels, that's nasty bro. You on a dry spell?

Edit: on second thoughts, I'd hit the one on the right as well.

Post: #394

I'm on my laptop in my truck on a sunny day. Hence, I may be missing some details.

I do see boobs and blond hair though...

Post: #395

This broad is secretive hiding her face.

Post: #396

About the manchester trio picture, I'd bang the the right, I'm undecided about the middle. The left one, in addition to being moderately overweight like the middle one, has a duck-face so I just can't force myself.

Post: #397

(05-08-2012 06:57 AM)Sourcecode Wrote:  
group of drunk manchester chicks

Would unleash fury on the one on the right,she is totally my type.

Post: #398

Post: #399

(03-25-2012 01:05 AM)jariel Wrote:  Welcome To Atlanta


Thickum?

[/quote]

a definate yes to the first one all night long ( im surprised u even posted her)

second one i would too tbh

Post: #400

(05-08-2012 08:32 AM)Walnuts Wrote:  I'd hit the one on the left. The middle ones nasty and the one on the right I just don't like her.
Lol hotwheels, that's nasty bro. You on a dry spell?

Edit: on second thoughts, I'd hit the one on the right as well.

id hit the one on the right first then the one on the left and i would let the one in the middle watch


might have to make a trip to manchester