way to many women at a time.. brain cant think..
passing on all them just because

Would you?

(11-05-2014 02:54 AM)boinerd Wrote:  

Would you?

I think most guys would fuck Rihanna.

That is a real tough choice for me, but ultimately she has herpes on her lips as far as I can tell from pictures circulated on the intardnet.

WNB

Too bad as she was very attractive in her umbrella days and before I ever heard her open her mouth. She sings way prettier than she speaks.

(11-05-2014 02:54 AM)boinerd Wrote:  

Would you?

DAFUQ? who wouldn't fuck rihanna?

Rihanna and Kendall Jenner are posted here and the self-appointed thread police officers are quiet as mice, lulz.

^

to call Rihanna "obvious" is a red flag on someone's standards.

No guys I know that have legit game would call Rihanna an "obvious" bang, but sure, if you're broke, unattractive, and/or game-less, maybe she's an easier call to make, I wouldn't know, she's a no-go for me, I can't fuck with chicks who's brain I can through her nostrils, I don't care what else is going on.





Edit: I changed maybe 5,7, or 10 words and deleted a chunk from your original post

For me Rihanna is a wnb. She changes her looks like her underwear and most times I see her latest setup it sucks. Her chin and forehead are a big turnoff too. Her skrillex cut was a major turn off. She looks like a scampy creature to me. Her mouth opening is a boner kill for me. For me I could get better looking black girls than that to bother with her. Sometimes singers get alot more pass in people's minds because they are on TV alot, when if they had no voice talent, they would easily be looked over

(11-05-2014 01:05 PM)jariel Wrote:  Rihanna and Kendall Jenner are posted here and the self-appointed thread police officers are quiet as mice, lulz.

rhianna is not a black white case. That kendall chick I agree, but did you notice his post was ignored? I guess that's what it has come down to.

I'm waiting for the day when I open this thread and see a girl I've banged. Instead of WB or WNB, I get to write IAB, I've already banged.

It's bound to happen.

Are you guys ready for me to pile on?

(11-05-2014 07:53 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  Are you guys ready for me to pile on?

I thought you'd never ask

(11-05-2014 07:53 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  Are you guys ready for me to pile on?

WYBs?

You guys are full of it. Yeah right. So you wake up and a naked Rihanna is sitting on the side of your bed, pussy dripping wet and y'all would be like 2/10 WNB. Get da fuck outta here...

(11-04-2014 03:40 AM)Valhalla Wrote:  

LOL....this is an interesting thread.

I don't "scale" women on the 1-10 scale. I have dated and nailed model material and beautiful 200lb BBW. I have had 5' 2'' 100lbrs and the girl next door. Personality and connection makes her a "10."

I'm a little more fussy now though I must say....but my best sexual partner was a 45 yr old woman with a pile of tattoos and 30lbs over weight. But the sex was out of this world and man could she squirt. Why bother with a perfect hotty who cant please when you can have an average woman and the sex and companionship be out of this world. In short, i'll take the girl next door....

...also, as a photographer, I can tell you...pics can be very deceiving. Both to the good and the bad side of people's looks....

(11-06-2014 01:02 AM)Nightwish Wrote:  LOL....this is an interesting thread.

I don't "scale" women on the 1-10 scale. I have dated and nailed model material and beautiful 200lb BBW. I have had 5' 2'' 100lbrs and the girl next door. Personality and connection makes her a "10."

I'm a little more fussy now though I must say....but my best sexual partner was a 45 yr old woman with a pile of tattoos and 30lbs over weight. But the sex was out of this world and man could she squirt. Why bother with a perfect hotty who cant please when you can have an average woman and the sex and companionship be out of this world. In short, i'll take the girl next door....

you can tell this is written by a chick

(11-06-2014 01:02 AM)Nightwish Wrote:  LOL....this is an interesting thread.

I don't "scale" women on the 1-10 scale. I have dated and nailed model material and beautiful 200lb BBW. I have had 5' 2'' 100lbrs and the girl next door. Personality and connection makes her a "10."

I'm a little more fussy now though I must say....but my best sexual partner was a 45 yr old woman with a pile of tattoos and 30lbs over weight. But the sex was out of this world and man could she squirt. Why bother with a perfect hotty who cant please when you can have an average woman and the sex and companionship be out of this world. In short, i'll take the girl next door....

Come on now this is a weak trolling,attempt y'all don't even try anymore.

(11-04-2014 03:40 AM)Valhalla Wrote:  2

Would

(11-06-2014 12:30 AM)speakeasy Wrote:  You guys are full of it. Yeah right. So you wake up and a naked Rihanna is sitting on the side of your bed, pussy dripping wet and y'all would be like 2/10 WNB. Get da fuck outta here...

I would fuck no woman with a skrillex cut. Period. I would point to the door. Wack hair, rats nests, bald heads/fades, are a complete and utter turn off for me. Just like how some of you guys hate chicks with bad teeth. Same thing.

She is like a 6 at best guys. She is one of the most overrated famous black females out there. Her body is pretty good but a good body is a dime a dozen. She got a face like TI!!



With no make up she probably looks like a dog. Look at that forehead. You could land a spaceship on that!



See how similar they look? They got that cresent moon head. Pointy chin and everything. This is like that peanut head little boy you make fun of in the barbershop, except he can sing and is on TV alot.

Not all singers, rappers, performers are hot or look like Mariah Carey or Christina Agulera (sp?). Even Jennifer Hudson after she lost the weight looked better than her on a basic level right now. She still might look better now, I haven't seen her in a while though.

She might be a 99% WB, but not for me. I could do better than that in my sleep. Chicks with tats are usually boner kill for me too.

I have to agree with you Kai, I find Rihanna repulsive. I think Skrillex haircuts are mutilation, I will not kiss, date or fuck a girl with short hair. There's many other girls I can fuck, why choose ones that mutilate themselves and could possibly mutilate me whilst I'm asleep.

No to this one.face is to annoying for me.
She is probably wider than picture shows

(11-06-2014 09:58 AM)bojangles Wrote:  I have to agree with you Kai, I find Rihanna repulsive. I think Skrillex haircuts are mutilation, I will not kiss, date or fuck a girl with short hair. There's many other girls I can fuck, why choose ones that mutilate themselves and could possibly mutilate me whilst I'm asleep.

This is even worse than ear length short hair. She got all that hard living and partying look to her too. She looks much older than she really is. She even has a tattoo in her freaking ear. Look closely and you can see it.

(11-06-2014 12:30 AM)speakeasy Wrote:  You guys are full of it. Yeah right. So you wake up and a naked Rihanna is sitting on the side of your bed, pussy dripping wet and y'all would be like 2/10 WNB. Get da fuck outta here...

It's a would you hit it thread. If they've got specific reasons why they wouldn't hit it, what's the problem exactly?

I agree with you that Rihanna is nowhere near a 2/10.

However, I have a dealbreaker called "known STD" and it's one that you can't get rid of.

Besides other aspects of her that I don't find particularly attractive, if I knew I wasn't catching an STD from her I have no qualms saying I would most definitely hit it.