(04-22-2014 11:55 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

Would bang. LM, I feel that you are derailing this thread by posting pics of chicks rated 6.5+ when this thread is meant for chicks who'd be 4-5.5.

(04-23-2014 12:35 AM)xpatplayer Wrote:  

(04-22-2014 11:55 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

Would bang. LM, I feel that you are derailing this thread by posting pics of chicks rated 6.5+ when this thread is meant for chicks who'd be 4-5.5.

I may have messed up with the marriage one but the others were all fair game. This girl is not a 6.5

Look at her face and all that flabby skin. She is a 4/4.5 at most

(04-23-2014 12:53 AM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

(04-23-2014 12:35 AM)xpatplayer Wrote:  

(04-22-2014 11:55 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

Would bang. LM, I feel that you are derailing this thread by posting pics of chicks rated 6.5+ when this thread is meant for chicks who'd be 4-5.5.

I may have messed up with the marriage one but the others were all fair game. This girl is not a 6.5

Look at her face and all that flabby skin. She is a 4/4.5 at most

Maybe if you've spent the last decade or so in Ukraine, Russia or East Asia, yeah. If you're used to seeing white American chicks, this one is an easy 6.5, especially considering how she's well above average in most American cities and how she's wearing no makeup in the pic.

Let's not bring up the mixed-eye chick or the big nose chick.

Not trying to start a fight, but trying to keep this a legitimate thread, as the Great Lord of WYB El Mechanico desires. If we keep posting bangable chicks (the blonde one is by no means attractive. Doesn't mean she isn't bangable), we are derailing his glorious thread.

(04-23-2014 01:03 AM)xpatplayer Wrote:  

(04-23-2014 12:53 AM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

(04-23-2014 12:35 AM)xpatplayer Wrote:  

(04-22-2014 11:55 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

Would bang. LM, I feel that you are derailing this thread by posting pics of chicks rated 6.5+ when this thread is meant for chicks who'd be 4-5.5.

I may have messed up with the marriage one but the others were all fair game. This girl is not a 6.5

Look at her face and all that flabby skin. She is a 4/4.5 at most

Maybe if you've spent the last decade or so in Ukraine, Russia or East Asia, yeah. If you're used to seeing white American chicks, this one is an easy 6.5, especially considering how she's well above average in most American cities and how she's wearing no makeup in the pic.

Let's not bring up the mixed-eye chick or the big nose chick.

Not trying to start a fight, but trying to keep this a legitimate thread, as the Great Lord of WYB El Mechanico desires. If we keep posting bangable chicks (the blonde one is by no means attractive. Doesn't mean she isn't bangable), we are derailing his glorious thread.

lol, its fine if you disagree with my posts, I'm open to all opinions/scrutiny

2 people said they would NOT bang the mixed eyed chick.

The big nosed chick was a great example IMO. A cute face with one major flaw, a great WYB question. Think of it as a cute girl covered in tats. Or a hot girl that's a die hard feminist.

black girl with that fat ass? Naked blondie with all the tats? Plenty of people have posted 7+s

The thing is that people add and subtract numbers differently. For example some guys give more points for a fat ass or for being skinny as compared to guys who love boobs and guys who love thick women with curves.

Its why if you head on over to the 10s page, you will see many people saying "wtf that's a 10?" or "that girl does not belong here"

but to conclude my post: "To each his own."

Fool these girls are perfectly bangable. We need something that makes the dick questionable. Butter faces with great bods, really thick borderline fatties, or girls who dress like as well as treat their body as trash. Even a 6.5 is too high.

how about now?

I WB

(04-23-2014 05:33 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  how about now?

I WB

I wouldn't bang either this girl or the one that L M McCoy posted. Maybe I live in a pussy paradise but I wouldn't. She's fat, you can tell..bet the bottom half is chunky and cellulite-laden.

(04-23-2014 08:09 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

(04-23-2014 05:33 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  how about now?

I WB

I wouldn't bang either this girl or the one that L M McCoy posted. Maybe I live in a pussy paradise but I wouldn't. She's fat, you can tell..bet the bottom half is chunky and cellulite-laden.

Exactly what I was trying to say!

Which ones from this group?

All but second from left. Although far lefts nose reminds me of Nick Cage.

(04-23-2014 10:45 PM)DWF Wrote:  Which ones from this group?

Fedora and and the one on the very left are completely my type, but I would bang all.

All of them. Simultaneously if possible.

In spirit of the Wendy Williams thread started in the lounge. Searching for pictures I found this gem of easily the two ugliest dogs in Hollywood:



You have to pick one.

Kidding. The scenario is WOULD YOU HIT IT lets say you share a cab and she invites you into her place..

From the OP himself

All these girls pass the test on this page other than the butter face and Wendy Williams/random white chick photo.

Let's be honest now. It's not like you have to be seen with her in public.

(04-25-2014 12:52 AM)Mentavious Wrote:  Kidding. The scenario is WOULD YOU HIT IT lets say you share a cab and she invites you into her place..

From the OP himself

All these girls pass the test on this page other than the butter face and Wendy Williams/random white chick photo.

Let's be honest now. It's not like you have to be seen with her in public.

The first post has no such stipulation, thus the argument is invalid.

Here's a good one for this thread:





Josie Cunningham, 24, had a £5,000 breast enlargement on the NHS

(04-25-2014 05:00 PM)RexImperator Wrote:  Here's a good one for this thread:

Josie Cunningham, 24, had a £5,000 breast enlargement on the NHS

Not even with another dude's dick.

(04-25-2014 12:54 AM)hwuzhere Wrote:  

(04-25-2014 12:52 AM)Mentavious Wrote:  Kidding. The scenario is WOULD YOU HIT IT lets say you share a cab and she invites you into her place..

From the OP himself

All these girls pass the test on this page other than the butter face and Wendy Williams/random white chick photo.

Let's be honest now. It's not like you have to be seen with her in public.

The first post has no such stipulation, thus the argument is invalid.

It wasn't in his first post but if you read a bit further he amends the qualifications.

Big nose and cross eye can get it fiercely ( hot girl with that one flaw ) . The busty chick Ll McCoy posted can get it too . DWF , 2nd blonde , fedora chick , and the brunette at the end can get it .

(04-24-2014 11:13 PM)kosko Wrote:  In spirit of the Wendy Williams thread started in the lounge. Searching for pictures I found this gem of easily the two ugliest dogs in Hollywood:



You have to pick one.

Going by the bottom two picture, I'd pick Wendy due to her face looking less fucked up by plastic surgery than Tori.

(04-22-2014 12:50 PM)Cr33pin Wrote:  

I've got a thing for broads with big noses. That chick should be sitting on the shoulder of a villain. WB while simultaneously pulling her feathers.

L M McCoy Wrote:

WB for sure. I bet she can whip up a deadly meal too. Buttcheeks and aprons.

I would bend her over and grope her tits while I hit it. WB!

I feel that the ripped chicks people have posted have been a bit extreme. So without further ado