Post: #26

That's high level TRP deep theory post right there

(07-08-2017 06:01 AM)Malidon Wrote:  So how can a rational man cope with a reality where he is condemned to fucking human-looking mammals

Nobody condemned you to fuck anything, if you don't want to fuck human-looking mammals you can go fuck dog-looking mammals or whatever you want but there will be no help or empathy here

Post: #27

If somebody questions the mental ability of a gender class, then he may as well be sentimentally dependant on it. Then Arthur Schopenhauer could be the prototype of the modern player. Still my writing style could be erratic in the end.

Post: #28

^How's your relationship with your mother?

Post: #29

(07-09-2017 02:02 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Whenever I see a "deep" philosophy thread with a low post no rep OP and a low post no rep contributor giving a 500 word diatribe in response I immediately get the impression that they're the same person trying to create an elaborate interaction to springboard themselves out of the pit of irrelevance.

Probably I'm just paranoid.

Not really. Last year, we had one person's low ranked profile throw his high ranked profile under the bus to much scandal, only to be furiously-defended in the thread by this third and fourth profiles.

People really ARE that sad.

It's still not the worst thing I've ever seen. I once watched a long thread on another forum where one member was talking about how he was throwing himself a birthday party and his best and only friend on the forum was commenting on how he was at the party too, and all the cool people were there and they were having such a great time too and weren't you all just eating shit with jealousy that you weren't there?

They were the only two who commented in the whole thread. And, fuck me, it went on for pages.

Oddly, the guy's best friend ceased all activity with no explanation on the forum the same night that the first guy dropped dead of a stroke. The guy was almost sixty.

I'm sure I heard about some legendary thread in a forum online where some girl has written thousands of posts over a period of years, yet is the only person in the thread.

Post: #30

My problem is a combination of lack of sleep and affection: my health exam was great apart from vitamin D, which was very low indeed.

Post: #31

(07-09-2017 01:28 AM)Malidon Wrote:  I suggested they are mammals because they love sex and humanlike because they still wish to appeal as graceful. Abstract thinking is not masculine or feminine per se, it's simply humane: thus I am sure Womanosphere will come to full existence soon after educated women realise the fact marketing has neutralised their potential for so long. As for my perspective, I think it is in accordance with the redpill guidance suggesting we have to meditate our way through sociosexual dimorphism. Yet I think the timing was correct for my thread after Tramp's anachronistic statements.

fucking human-looking mammals: sleeping with humanlike mammals
keep his own perspective alive: keep his own spirit free

Put the fuckin' thesaurus down and write like a normal person. Your thinking isn't "abstract", it's pretentious.

If you could so lower your intellect to our meager, stunted level of comprehension, then perhaps you could get a real answer to your questions instead mockery.

Post: #32

(07-09-2017 02:02 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Whenever I see a "deep" philosophy thread with a low post no rep OP and a low post no rep contributor giving a 500 word diatribe in response I immediately get the impression that they're the same person trying to create an elaborate interaction to springboard themselves out of the pit of irrelevance.

Probably I'm just paranoid.

Trust me that OP is nothing like me. I don't have two personalities either.

Have a good day gents.