Post: #26

Its more that they are going for the targets that will elicit the most outrage from society at large

Western society cares more about white lives than black lives.

Also:

Post: #27

It's more that they're going after easy targets, and they admit to this. Terrorists are chicken shit cowards.

Post: #28

(05-29-2017 08:07 AM)frenchcorporation Wrote:  Its more that they are going for the targets that will elicit the most outrage from society at large

Western society cares more about white lives than black lives.

Also:

[img]

http://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/im...1a0b32f44e[/img]



Unless they happen to be girls. Boko Haram had killed and captured x-times the amount of Nigerian boys, they even gruesomely murdered them. The media did not care. They only started to care, when it was girls who in the end actually were not killed.

The PR factor for Islam is greater with teen girls than with soccer fans. Also the attacks on soccer stadiums all failed. Another one will also become less likely since they will take precautions now. Concerts will be just more expensive to police.

Post: #29

Terrorists also attack people with such appearance http://africanamericanhairstyling.com/se...airstyles/. I think they don't care at all!

Post: #30

(05-24-2017 04:54 AM)Going strong Wrote:  So, the interesting, actionable thing is, we should start calling them, like President Trump recently did, losers, and specifically, racist losers!

It would be very important: removing the kinda "excuse" and smokescreen that religion provides them, to expose them as mere racists, something scorned upon in all societies (even the very religious ones).

Let's not call them Islamic suicide bombers anymore, let's call them for what they are: 21st century's terrorists are virgin racist losers!

I think you may not see the forest for the trees here. Of course white people are on the receiving end of terrorism as attacks are being committed in what still are predominantly white populations. This will increasingly change over time as whites are a) being discouraged from reproducing and b) are slowly displaced by the endless influx of migrants into Europe mostly from the ME and NA.

My father-in-law's best friend was killed at the Bataclan and what angered me the most about the media coverage was that none of the bodies were shown and the names were withheld. Do you know who they are? Are they being remembered on the anniversary of the event? The same is happening in Germany by the way, the names and faces of the Christmas market attack last December were only available on a handful of blogs consumed by a small minority of concerned Germans.

In the case of the Bataclan withholding all information about the victims was done for pretty obvious reasons as the they were tortured for nearly and hour and ended up horribly mutilated. Those goat fuckers cut off the genitalia of several male hostages and shoved them into their mouths, choking them with it. They stuffed broken bottles into the genitalia of several female hostages. None of that made the news of course and voilá it had the intended effect as Le Pen lost what I consider her last chance of becoming president.

Now regarding your suggestion to focus our message on the purported racist dispositions of Islamic terrorists. I pose that this would be a terrible mistake, as it would only play into the hands of the Marxist Left which is very actively attempting to divide us (and admittedly has already succeeded in doing so). It also reinforces their main ace in the game which is racism instead of the true cause of the unfolding crisis that has befallen the West, which is the intentional seeding of a fanatical violent religious death cult.

I understand that you want to fight fire with fire, but keep in mind that this will only work if you are prepared to fight a race war. Given current demographic trends I am not sure we would be able to win that one. So the position of conservatives/traditionalists should be one of inclusion, truth, and complete transparency.

And let me be clear, I am all for showing the faces of the victims as white people will be able to draw their own conclusions. And that is something we should work hard to achieve as omission to do so turns victims into faceless statistics (again, a feature not a bug). But at the same time we should avoid the word 'racist' as much as possible and when used on us, distance ourselves from the very concept. Because if we choose to decide to put on that shoe it will only serve to further polarize whites against non-whites across the West.

Post: #31

(09-14-2017 05:28 AM)redpillage Wrote:  My father-in-law's best friend was killed at the Bataclan and what angered me the most about the media coverage was that none of the bodies were shown and the names were withheld. Do you know who they are? Are they being remembered on the anniversary of the event? The same is happening in Germany by the way, the names and faces of the Christmas market attack last December were only available on a handful of blogs consumed by a small minority of concerned Germans.

It's amazing how small the world is. Co-workers of the mother of a girl of mine were murdered in Nice. They killed her and her daughter while the other daughter jumped to safety.

With each attack more people get impacted.

I say - let's begin. Islam vs Everyone Else. Let's go for open WWIII right now and get it over with. Islam had it coming for 1400 years - time for it to be wiped out and the survived to be offered the same options Mohammed did - convert or die.

Post: #32

There's no reason they aren't functionally targeting people based on both race AND religion.

Let's be honest. If you were a white Christian equivalent of a jihadist, would you go out of your way to find a bunch of white muslims, buddhists or hindus to blow up?

The hatred they have of people other than those of their own faith is going to be inherently linked with the static image they have of their enemy, up to and including race.

Anyone in the west that gives a shit about the survival of "their people" ought to stop worrying about trying to create some sort of infallible uber-meme that will destroy the left like sunlight destroys vampires. It's never going to work. Instead they should start taking a good, hard look at who "their people" really are and start figuring out how to galvanise that base toward the sole purpose of meaningful self defence.

Keep in mind that Hillary, for example, won something close to the popular vote in America when her platform was an utterly deranged patchwork quilt of anti-Americanism. On that basis even staunch nationalists need to pull their heads out of their asses when it comes to determining who "their people" are.

The centre cannot hold, but you can be damn sure that before it disintegrates that (((the powers that be))) will do their best to make sure that certain demographics are wiped out or at very least culled into irrelevance.

At this point trying desperately to preserve the West of the postWW2 era is a fools errand, and worse, an utter waste of energy that could actually spent productively.

Post: #33

The idea that people can be united based on "race" is for low IQ savages anyways. Look at the people running the Democrat party: mostly White skin (and a ridiculous number of Reform Talmuds). Where is the White solidarity?

Look at the people destroying each other in Africa, non-stop. Where is the Black solidarity? Why is the body count so high in Chicago?

Look at the drug gangs destroying Mexico, Brazil, and Columbia. Where is the Latino solidarity?


Anyone who believes in "their race" is a moron who has trouble seeing with their eyes. Your Neighbors are not based on race, they are based on those who fear and worship God. A God fearing man is the only one who will not betray you because they know the consequences in Hell are unbelievably severe.

Post: #34

(09-14-2017 11:37 AM)Samseau Wrote:  The idea that people can be united based on "race" is for low IQ savages anyways. Look at the people running the Democrat party: mostly White skin (and a ridiculous number of Reform Talmuds). Where is the White solidarity?

Look at the people destroying each other in Africa, non-stop. Where is the Black solidarity? Why is the body count so high in Chicago?

Look at the drug gangs destroying Mexico, Brazil, and Columbia. Where is the Latino solidarity?


Anyone who believes in "their race" is a moron who has trouble seeing with their eyes. Your Neighbors are not based on race, they are based on those who fear and worship God. A God fearing man is the only one who will not betray you because they know the consequences in Hell are unbelievably severe.

Whites and Western states have been clobbered by ideological negative counter-myths vs the positive previous foundation myths that they had until WWII.

US - slavery and "taking the land and slaughtering of the Indians" - even Holocoust by virtue of being white
Europe - Holocoust and colonialist guilt

And those things seemingly cannot get extinguished.

Normally the tribes would behave quite uniform and high-trust, but you can rip asunder any common group. Think of Sweden in the 1970s or Germany in the 1980s. Even families who have everything in common can be separated if you bring in a sufficiently strong disruptive element.

You have to remember one thing about Whites - they are generally highly individualistic and can be divided easier. Group-think cultures in the Far East are less individualistic - means that they don't change course easy, but if they do, then they do it in full.

And that is why they will remain that way and the US and Europe gets wiped out:

Post: #35

(09-14-2017 11:37 AM)Samseau Wrote:  The idea that people can be united based on "race" is for low IQ savages anyways. Look at the people running the Democrat party: mostly White skin (and a ridiculous number of Reform Talmuds). Where is the White solidarity?

Look at the people destroying each other in Africa, non-stop. Where is the Black solidarity? Why is the body count so high in Chicago?

Look at the drug gangs destroying Mexico, Brazil, and Columbia. Where is the Latino solidarity?


Anyone who believes in "their race" is a moron who has trouble seeing with their eyes. Your Neighbors are not based on race, they are based on those who fear and worship God. A God fearing man is the only one who will not betray you because they know the consequences in Hell are unbelievably severe.

"My people" is the only term that inspires me to act beyond my tribal unit. "My people" includes a lot of traditionalists non-whites and "not my people" includes a metric shitload of hostile whites among others.

All that remains beyond that is the will to power.

Post: #36

Pakistanis and Indians are the same race - so it's not race, it's about religion.

(09-14-2017 11:37 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Anyone who believes in "their race" is a moron who has trouble seeing with their eyes. Your Neighbors are not based on race, they are based on those who fear and worship God. A God fearing man is the only one who will not betray you because they know the consequences in Hell are unbelievably severe.

How do you explain Jews looking out for each other?

Post: #37

(09-15-2017 12:44 AM)WalterBlack Wrote:  Pakistanis and Indians are the same race - so it's not race, it's about religion.

(09-14-2017 11:37 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Anyone who believes in "their race" is a moron who has trouble seeing with their eyes. Your Neighbors are not based on race, they are based on those who fear and worship God. A God fearing man is the only one who will not betray you because they know the consequences in Hell are unbelievably severe.

How do you explain Jews looking out for each other?

Good points - while I like races to remain that way and not have blondes and redheads die out - culture and mental engrams of tribes matter tremendously.

Jews despite all the contrary claims are actually White. Ashkenazis especially are that way. Even many so-called Palestinians may be forcibly converted Sephardic Jews, which adds to clusterfuck over there.

And another example are Pakistanis and Indians - one tribe is killing people, murdering their daughters and raping thousands of British girls while being 60% inbred - the other tribe is not. And both have the same genetic makeup (now with inbreeding it deviated, but in a non-Muslim Pakistan that can return to sanity soon enough).

Post: #38

(09-15-2017 12:44 AM)WalterBlack Wrote:  Pakistanis and Indians are the same race - so it's not race, it's about religion.

(09-14-2017 11:37 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Anyone who believes in "their race" is a moron who has trouble seeing with their eyes. Your Neighbors are not based on race, they are based on those who fear and worship God. A God fearing man is the only one who will not betray you because they know the consequences in Hell are unbelievably severe.

How do you explain Jews looking out for each other?

I would never deny that religion is more important than race. Religion is magnitudes more important.

As for Jews - who have created a religion around their race - they still have divisions, even if the divisions aren't as pronounced as they are in other races.

For example, we've been talking a lot about the Reform Judaism (the spiritual descendent of Communism) vs. Zionism on this forum recently. How Reform Jews are left wing globalists and Zionists right wing nationalists.

But of course I would expect Jews to look out for each other even if they are on opposite sides of the political aisle because of their shared history of persecution.

However, it was not always this way. For example, when Rome genocided the Jews, we know that the Jews were engaged in civil war while the Romans were burning down Israel due to religious disagreements. So just because Jews are united today does not mean they always will be.

It is in our interests to further the division between Zionism and Reform Talmuds in order to free up the West.

Post: #39

Catastrophic terror event in Las Vegas: /thread-65066...pid1657238
More than 50 people shot dead at a country-music concert, in a crowd obviously (from the images on TV) made up of (Conservative-leaning) White people... Motivation of the monster shooter is quite obvious.

That's why at the moment, in the Western world, I avoid places with huge amounts of White people congregating (like concerts or some political meetings). I know they are, at all and any time, a soft and favorite target of racist terrorists.

Anyway, I also notice that most victims nowadays are children and women (like yesterday in Marseille, 2 women had their throats cut by an undocumented islamist, or in Barcelona where mostly females were run over), and, feminist activists keep mum on the subject...

Post: #40

(10-02-2017 06:16 AM)Going strong Wrote:  Catastrophic terror event in Las Vegas: /thread-65066...pid1657238
More than 50 people shot dead at a country-music concert, in a crowd obviously (from the images on TV) made up of (Conservative-leaning) White people... Motivation of the monster shooter is quite obvious.

That's why at the moment, in the Western world, I avoid places with huge amounts of White people congregating (like concerts or some political meetings). I know they are, at all and any time, a soft and favorite target of racist terrorists.

Anyway, I also notice that most victims nowadays are children and women (like yesterday in Marseille, 2 women had their throats cut by an undocumented islamist, or in Barcelona where mostly females were run over), and, feminist activists keep mum on the subject...

Perceived soft targets. Those very same people take human shields so that innocents can die with them.

Post: #41

(10-02-2017 06:16 AM)Going strong Wrote:  Catastrophic terror event in Las Vegas: /thread-65066...pid1657238
More than 50 people shot dead at a country-music concert, in a crowd obviously (from the images on TV) made up of (Conservative-leaning) White people... Motivation of the monster shooter is quite obvious.

That's why at the moment, in the Western world, I avoid places with huge amounts of White people congregating (like concerts or some political meetings). I know they are, at all and any time, a soft and favorite target of racist terrorists.

Anyway, I also notice that most victims nowadays are children and women (like yesterday in Marseille, 2 women had their throats cut by an undocumented islamist, or in Barcelona where mostly females were run over), and, feminist activists keep mum on the subject...

Religion of Peace - looks like it at least for now.

Also it's the most likely. The cultural marxists are a hateful bunch, but they only get frisky when they have overwhelming numbers or the government on their side (or both).

Post: #42

Wow, it would mean that Daesh-IS will now train and indoctrinate old leftist dudes from the West, and turn them into suicide Islamic terrorists?

Actually it makes sense: the West is full of old commies, who have nothing left in life, communism is humiliated and dead, Barry is humiliated and defeated: old commies are in despair, looking for a new guidance. Islam might fill the void that left communism in their stupid old hearts...