Post: #1

Whole Article here:

http://anonhq.com/united-states-federal-...ts-public/

A victory for sjws and hypergamy, a loss for decency and men everywhere.

Excerpts from the article: "The law was quickly challenged in court in May 2016 by the activist group Free the Nipple. Free the Nipple is a movement that started from a 2012 film of the same name. The group staged protests throughout the city in the past, gathering topless in public spots. Commentators even suspect the activities of the group made city officials pass the law that banned them from exposing their breasts in public. Free the Nipple went to court demanding an injunction on the law.

The gender equality group said the ordinance was restrictive and discriminatory against women in the city. The group explained that if the law was fair, it should have banned both genders from exposing their breasts in public. But city officials countered this by saying the law did not discriminate because male and female breasts are different."

When the facts of the case were presented before the court, District Judge R. Brooke Jackson granted a preliminary injunction on ordinance No. 134. Jackson ruled that the law is discriminatory against women, as well as perpetuating stereotypes that sexualized female breasts.

The court stated that the primary difference between male and female breasts is the ability to breastfeed. Although the court noted the physical differences between the two, it stipulated that it was not enough to warrant different treatment from the government.

“I find that the ordinance discriminates against women based on the generalized notion that, regardless of a woman’s intent, the exposure of her breasts in public (or even in her private home if viewable by the public) is necessarily a sexualized act. Thus, it perpetuates a stereotype engrained in our society that female breasts are primarily objects of sexual desire whereas male breasts are not,” Jackson wrote in his ruling.

Although this is not the final ruling of the case, Jackson wrote that he granted the injunction in part because he believes he will ultimately find that the ordinance passed by the city violated the Equal Protection Clause.

He stated: “The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment bars state governmental entities from discriminating between the sexes unless they have an ‘exceedingly persuasive justification’ for doing so. In this case, Fort Collins has on the books an ordinance that on its face discriminates against women.”

City attorney, Carrie Daggett said in a statement after the ruling that the city will review the judge’s decision and consider the next steps. It now looks as though the city is reluctant to give up on the case.

Post: #2

(04-12-2017 04:16 PM)Mochihunter Wrote:  The gender equality group said the ordinance was restrictive and discriminatory against women in the city. The group explained that if the law was fair, it should have banned both genders from exposing their breasts in public. But city officials countered this by saying the law did not discriminate because male and female breasts are different."

When the facts of the case were presented before the court, District Judge R. Brooke Jackson granted a preliminary injunction on ordinance No. 134. Jackson ruled that the law is discriminatory against women, as well as perpetuating stereotypes that sexualized female breasts.

Yes, "perpetuating stereotypes" that men (and some women) love titties. What's next? "Boners are a social construct"?

Post: #3

Free titties it is then. I'm guessing it's not going to be the attractive ladies who are flashing though.

At least you won't have to go the strip club anymore. For some of the real beta virgins, this will be great.

Post: #4

I like titties. Free them.

Post: #5

I guess the Free Titties movement won't mind if I Free My Dick when I see those titties.

Post: #6

It is very unlikely that these women truly care about the right to bare their breasts legally.

They are just exhibitionists hiding behind a fake cause.

I know this because in my city it is legal for women to go around topless, and it happens to be a SJW heaven, and guess what.

No one ever does it.

I saw a little of it in the nineties, but lately, no.

Passing laws like this is like apologizing to SJWs. The minute they get what they want, they lose interest and want some other dumb thing.

As if allowing women to walk around topless will help fight against sexualizing the breast.

Next they will want to pass a law that no one can take a picture of a topless women.

Or men with the wrong expression on their face must leave the area.

Or that it is against the law to talk to a topless woman.

Or look at her.

Or think about her later.

Post: #7

(04-12-2017 05:07 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  I guess the Free Titties movement won't mind if I Free My Dick when I see those titties.

Well its six degrees and snowing there from the looks of things. Maybe wait until summer and let us know how it goes.

Aloha!

Post: #8

I've always thought indecent exposure laws were pretty silly, the way women are allowed to expose every last square inch of torso flesh except their nipples, as though the nipples themselves possess some magical boner inducing property. Is going topless really so much different than parading around in a bikini?

Fuck it, let people present themselves the way they want. Just don't complain when some guy pitches a tent in front of you.

Post: #9

If we lived in the world where most women were well kempt and normal BMI this would be a win from a casual point of view (obviously not a long term social point of view). But god, the real sin here is that we're going to see some blue haired whales roaming around with their oversized milk bags flopping around anytime you go to a big city.

Post: #10

Post: #11

+1 for being allowed to show your titties if you want to.

I'd rather men had to cover their armpits in public (no singlets) than womens tits being verboten.

Post: #12

In Ontario is has been legal for women to be out topless for almost 10 years and aside from the topless beach, Naked News Anchors, and those lesbian/pride things I have maybe seen 2-3 women topless in Toronto in 6-8 years and all were unattractive.

Women scream and fight about this but then never partake because human/hamster nature will always push women to be more mindful of their bodies and modest.

This is all for attention, you will never see a rush of young girls to walk around with the titties out.

Post: #13

Ohhh yeah, baby. Lemme see those tight nips!

Post: #14

(04-12-2017 05:07 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  I guess the Free Titties movement won't mind if I Free My Dick when I see those titties.

Free Willy!

Post: #15

(04-12-2017 05:34 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  It is very unlikely that these women truly care about the right to bare their breasts legally.

They are just exhibitionists hiding behind a fake cause.

I know this because in my city it is legal for women to go around topless, and it happens to be a SJW heaven, and guess what.

No one ever does it.

I saw a little of it in the nineties, but lately, no.

Passing laws like this is like apologizing to SJWs. The minute they get what they want, they lose interest and want some other dumb thing.

As if allowing women to walk around topless will help fight against sexualizing the breast.

Next they will want to pass a law that no one can take a picture of a topless women.

Or men with the wrong expression on their face must leave the area.

Or that it is against the law to talk to a topless woman.

Or look at her.

Or think about her later.

I believe that these YouTue videos should become Templates of what Legal Loopholes feminists utilize against men:

This is Roosh's favorite supporter confronting a white knight cop about the Topless woman falsely accusing him of "Harassment".

Cop trips out when questioned if the white woman can walk naked on the street harassing persons of color:




This feminist, though not nude, threatened a man to falsely complain on him to Toronto Police for "harassment" during a pro-nudity Slut walk Toronto rally last year:




If Emmet Till was alive in Toronto, he'd be already arrested by Toronto Police. So much for racial equality in Canada. The Police in Toronto only want to defend the Toronto women to walk naked on the street harassing colored people.

Be cautious when one see a naked feminist on the street. She WILL falsely accuse that person of harassment or other related crimes if she feels uncomfortable.

Post: #16

(04-13-2017 02:05 AM)kosko Wrote:  In Ontario is has been legal for women to be out topless for almost 10 years and aside from the topless beach, Naked News Anchors, and those lesbian/pride things I have maybe seen 2-3 women topless in Toronto in 6-8 years and all were unattractive.

Women scream and fight about this but then never partake because human/hamster nature will always push women to be more mindful of their bodies and modest.

This is all for attention, you will never see a rush of young girls to walk around with the titties out.

Those Toronto-Occupied-Ontario women only want to fight for their right to be naked with children while calling the police on men for a feminist cause.

In Montreal, those Hippie chicks show me their pussy by opening their frock to me, titties from their loose tops, and there isn't paranoia even though I look like an Arab-Ethiopian, Somalian in the summer, becuasemy skin turn black as Interracial porno.

There was even snow white Parisian chicks who dress very classily sexy, they don't even give off the vibes that I used to get in Ontario.

Even FEMEN in Quebec didn't fuck with Roosh while he was in Montreal hosting his world tour in 2015.

These pro-topless feminists want to rally to walk naked on the street to bait men and falsely accuse men of crimes in order to support the man-hating feminism in Ontario.

Toronto Police declared that if a female teacher strips nude in front of a classroom of minors, they are barred from investigating her, but they want to investigate Blazing Cat Fur for posting "hate speech" against the Toronto District School Board.

Fuck feminists who want to pose naked in front of a toddler!

Post: #17

I know you guys thought about it when you clicked on this thread... I did