Post: #26

I see the similarities.

Post: #27

(02-28-2017 08:12 PM)Tex Cruise Wrote:  You lot are so picky.
A slightly chubby 5 with small tits.(I don't think the hairy armpit one is her but one of her friends)
WB

She looks like a ghost in that photo. There are hotter women who I would rather haunt my dreams than this.

Post: #28

Agree, WNB. Even with the hand of Photoshop apparent in that picture, the nose ring alone is enough to make fucking James Deen's dick wilt. What the fuck is up with that shit, anyway? Those fucking things either look like massive boogers she can't be arsed to wipe off or pick, or they make her look more like the mad cow she obviously is.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #29

(02-28-2017 09:04 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  Jesus Tex. The mental illness doesn't put you off?

Nah, just a very plain and uninteresting girl with the mistaken belief that she deserves the same level of attention as one that is hot or talented (she's a musician apparently).
On the mental illness scale of girls-who-have-their-own-thread, that's pretty mild.

Anyhow, since I'm apparently the only RVF member willing to give her one, and that must therefore make me the highest value man ever likely to bang her, If she could just go ahead and find this thread then track me down so I can send her a dick pic to seal the deal...

Post: #30

She's the very definition of a slump buster.

I bet you she's wild in bed.

Post: #31

I once knew a fucked up art chick in the periphery of my social circle. Uglyish mug, tight body on the lean side. Emotional issues but reputedly a tiger in the sack. She turns up to a small gathering one day to share some artistic nude shots of her own body, up to and including close range pussy shots.

The three other guys there (friends of mine) were furiously suiting up in the white knight armour. "Much art! So lighting! Many contrast!"

I was the only one hanging back, apparently disinterested. This must have set her hamster off. She specifically calls me over. "What do you think?"

I shrugged and told her that I didn't see art. I just saw naked her. Qualified it with the generic "but I'm not an artistic type and I have trouble appreciating blah blah blah" knowing that she didn't buy it because I never intended her to.

So for the rest of the day the three guys ran hamster for her and she ran hamster for me. Shame I was young and only at the fringe of the red-pill at the time. In hindsight I could have easily gotten the bang but she had a (faggy) boyfriend at the time and my indoctrination led me to believe that she was off limits for that reason.

"What do you think of my artistic nudes" is a pre-screening technique to find men with a pair of balls between their legs.

Post: #32

I have no interest in A cups so I haven't encountered many in the wild other than a few girls throwing themselves at me as a kid, B cup is a basic requirement for me.

The A cups I've seen are standard breasts but small.

There's something wrong with this girls(?) tits, they look more like a man injecting estrogen sprouting deformities.

WNB

Post: #33

I want to thank all forum members who checked these pictures and wrote a comment, so I don't have to open the link and be triggered!

Post: #34

(03-01-2017 07:40 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I once knew a fucked up art chick in the periphery of my social circle. Uglyish mug, tight body on the lean side. Emotional issues but reputedly a tiger in the sack. She turns up to a small gathering one day to share some artistic nude shots of her own body, up to and including close range pussy shots.

The three other guys there (friends of mine) were furiously suiting up in the white knight armour. "Much art! So lighting! Many contrast!"

I was the only one hanging back, apparently disinterested. This must have set her hamster off. She specifically calls me over. "What do you think?"

I shrugged and told her that I didn't see art. I just saw naked her. Qualified it with the generic "but I'm not an artistic type and I have trouble appreciating blah blah blah" knowing that she didn't buy it because I never intended her to.

So for the rest of the day the three guys ran hamster for her and she ran hamster for me. Shame I was young and only at the fringe of the red-pill at the time. In hindsight I could have easily gotten the bang but she had a (faggy) boyfriend at the time and my indoctrination led me to believe that she was off limits for that reason.

"What do you think of my artistic nudes" is a pre-screening technique to find men with a pair of balls between their legs.

I agree. When I looked at the photos and the poses she was using, it seemed clear that she wanted the recipient to come bang her. She claims otherwise, but this is pure hamstring.

Post: #35

(03-01-2017 07:40 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I once knew a fucked up art chick in the periphery of my social circle. Uglyish mug, tight body on the lean side. Emotional issues but reputedly a tiger in the sack. She turns up to a small gathering one day to share some artistic nude shots of her own body, up to and including close range pussy shots.

The three other guys there (friends of mine) were furiously suiting up in the white knight armour. "Much art! So lighting! Many contrast!"

I was the only one hanging back, apparently disinterested. This must have set her hamster off. She specifically calls me over. "What do you think?"

I shrugged and told her that I didn't see art. I just saw naked her. Qualified it with the generic "but I'm not an artistic type and I have trouble appreciating blah blah blah" knowing that she didn't buy it because I never intended her to.

So for the rest of the day the three guys ran hamster for her and she ran hamster for me. Shame I was young and only at the fringe of the red-pill at the time. In hindsight I could have easily gotten the bang but she had a (faggy) boyfriend at the time and my indoctrination led me to believe that she was off limits for that reason.

"What do you think of my artistic nudes" is a pre-screening technique to find men with a pair of balls between their legs.

This reminds me of an episode of the 90's comedy Newsradio called

"No, This Is Not Based Entirely on Julie's Life"

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x54jsch...s-life_fun

From 14:24 to 16:07

Text version:

Quote:Beth: Bill, what do you think of this photo?
Bill McNeal: Who is that?
Beth: Oh, it's a friend of mine who's doing a thesis at NYU. It's a fine arts program.
Bill McNeal: Uh huh. Well, it's an interesting commentary on the objectification of the female form, and of course the masks women are forced to wear in our society. If I were the NEA, I'd give her five, six grand.
Beth: Well, Bill, do you think it's sexy?
Bill McNeal: Well I don't think that's really germain to a discussion of the statement the artist is trying to make.
Beth: Thank you, Bill.
[walks over to Matthew]
Bill McNeal: Beth's showing nudie photos of herself with a paper bag over her head. Check it out.

Phil Hartman for the win.

Post: #36

Reminds me of the girl who was giving blowjobs to all her friends "platonically" and her boyfriend didn't break up with her