Post: #26

Its vague because there is a million ways to get girls and that is what game is about.

Post: #27

Not really

It means
"can you bang bitches"

Post: #28

(02-13-2017 09:00 PM)Repo Wrote:  Its vague because there is a million ways to get girls and that is what game is about.

^ Co-signed.

There's more than one way to skin a cat, or snag pussy in this case. With all due respect to OP, to break down the concept of game into its "component parts" would only serve to make it needlessly more complicated. Game is, essentially, a series of stratagems and tactics which have been field-tested by men the world over and have effectively demonstrated their ability to produce positive results as it pertains to one's health, wealth and sex life.

Post: #29

What you are trying to do Phoenix is to come up with a more scientific explanation of Game with variou sub-fields and specifically defined processes.

The reason why this will be difficult is because current psychology is not researching it out of a contrary agenda.

Guys like Nick Krauser should have professorships being offered to them.
We should have gender behavior on different topics studied with secret cameras, with exact assessments and statistical analysis in the end.

So far we are at best each of us using what we know, what others have defined and assessed and we use terms that sound logical and somewhat make sense - we lack any scientific commong language.

Game is certainly the gender-specific seduction process that both genders use to a degree. Women use it mostly instinctively and men need to learn by far more to trigger the right kind of response. Women also make it especially difficult since they both don't know exactly how their attraction works and equally are not honest neither to themselves nor to the men. Part of it can be explained by the dichotomy of their mating system - AlphaFucksBetaBucks - also the different phases they find themselves in.

Either way - as for your terms - I would not define Game as courtship. That is an antiquated term that has a certain connotation.

Game in my definition encompasses the male seduction skills that men need to learn in order to seduce, charm and successfully fuck women.
But it reaches beyond that and can be applied for all women - grandmothers will shit-test you just as your daughters might later on. Being able to deflect that with Amused Mastery or Agree and Amplify is a cornerstone of Game. Thus in this way Game is applied non-sexually, but only covers the inter-gender behavior pattern.

Game also aids you to have a happy marriage - building and keeping Frame, being dominant, recognizing and deflecting shit-tests successfully etc.

This bullshit claim of Game being a myth and just "having to be more masculine" is so much crap that I have to vomit.

It goes well beyond courtship - it encompasses:

1. Seduction
2. Relationship
3. Inter-gender behavioral help

So essentially Game should become a language and behavioral tool that every man should be learning at age 14 in school. If I had my will then this would be taught in school - both full Red Pill awareness of women and their psychology and next Game to the full extent - not only how to seduce women, but also how to live with them and have a fulfilling relationship. By age 18 everyone should be getting out with a full knowledge of Red Pill and applied Game. How well everyone would do would depend on the usual factors, but such a society would have little tolerance for unruly women as well as feminist equalist men.

And the best part is - if psychology truly worked on it with good studies, then we could have certain scientific sounding terms that would be describing all those processes now in different terms that we currently call all colloquially Game.

But so long as you don't get that, we have to stick with Game I am afraid -

The science based art form of female seduction and inter-gender relationship management.