|
British Politics Thread
|
|
| Author | Message |
(05-01-2017 01:08 PM)IronShark Wrote: Not too long to the Snap Election in Britain and this thread is so quite?
(05-01-2017 06:23 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote: Tell you what though, Tony Blair getting in on the action must make a lot of old Labourites moist. If that guy can come back and woo people to his cause and enlists the Dark Lord (Mandelson) for political tactics the Tories will struggle in the 2020s. They have free reign to do what they please at the minute so he see's an opportunity.
Corbyn is useful in the way that Tories get fat and lazy and don't see the real threat growing. May should hope that Le Pen wins because Macron will be used as a blunt hammer against the UK.
(05-03-2017 12:04 PM)rudebwoy Wrote: ^Curious as to where you would move too?
(05-03-2017 12:00 PM)britchard Wrote: I too look on with increasing worry about the state of the UK. I still love the UK, especially my part of it, but I am seriously considering moving abroad in the future. Immigration/diversity is a ticking timebomb and relations don't seem to be improving.
The entire culture is vapid and soulless. Lots of millennials slave away at a desk for 40 hours a week just to get off their face on alcohol at the weekend. They are more concerned about having pictures taken with the 'boys' or 'girls' on holiday in Spain than starting a family. It is quite literally a mass brainwashing.
(05-03-2017 12:37 PM)britchard Wrote:(05-03-2017 12:04 PM)rudebwoy Wrote: ^Curious as to where you would move too?
I know that my time on this Earth is finite, and I am determined to make the most of it and see all of the beauty it holds. Ideally I would make base somewhere (for working and healthcare and social ties etc..) and then use that as a springboard to explore the world.
My problem is that the world is ever changing and within 10 years places that seem attractive now could be awful, and vice versa. Are we going to go another 20 years without a major war? Probably not. Fuck, I'm young enough to even have the chance to travel to the Moon or Mars before I become too aged to do so.
I wouldn't want to be completely isolated ethnically, so perhaps somewhere like South Africa or New Zealand. Most likely a Commonwealth country, although Eastern Europe is also nice.
(05-03-2017 01:28 PM)Constitution45 Wrote:(05-03-2017 12:37 PM)britchard Wrote:(05-03-2017 12:04 PM)rudebwoy Wrote: ^Curious as to where you would move too?
I know that my time on this Earth is finite, and I am determined to make the most of it and see all of the beauty it holds. Ideally I would make base somewhere (for working and healthcare and social ties etc..) and then use that as a springboard to explore the world.
My problem is that the world is ever changing and within 10 years places that seem attractive now could be awful, and vice versa. Are we going to go another 20 years without a major war? Probably not. Fuck, I'm young enough to even have the chance to travel to the Moon or Mars before I become too aged to do so.
I wouldn't want to be completely isolated ethnically, so perhaps somewhere like South Africa or New Zealand. Most likely a Commonwealth country, although Eastern Europe is also nice.
Good thing with being British, is that the rest of the world hasn't sussed out yet, that most of us are shit. Do three to four years in London in whatever sector and make some effort to learn a second language; and you could move to most places around the world. And I am not talking about being a TEFL teacher. Plus our perceived sexual market value as English blokes is ridiculously high.
I think the only issue for expats, is that a lot of them seem to be escaping. So they become TEFL teachers for longer than they should, or work in fields that are really not interesting for them. In the long run it catches up with them and they move back to the U.K with less opportunities than when they left.
It is why it is paramount to move somewhere which will help move your chosen career or business forward.

(05-03-2017 01:16 AM)Praetor Lupus Wrote:(05-01-2017 06:23 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote: Tell you what though, Tony Blair getting in on the action must make a lot of old Labourites moist. If that guy can come back and woo people to his cause and enlists the Dark Lord (Mandelson) for political tactics the Tories will struggle in the 2020s. They have free reign to do what they please at the minute so he see's an opportunity.
Corbyn is useful in the way that Tories get fat and lazy and don't see the real threat growing. May should hope that Le Pen wins because Macron will be used as a blunt hammer against the UK.
I have to agree with Britchard. Tony Blair's brand is utterly toxic amongst pretty much every demographic, despite GQ's laughable attempts to rehabilitate him a few years ago. If it's not the Iraq war, it's the years and years of spin, the years after leaving office of cashing in on the speaker and business circuit, and finally being a Middle East peace envoy without anything to show for it.
What they need is David Miliband, who has also reportedly been trying to edge his way back in.
Quote:Burnham told the BBC: “I had made it clear … that I wouldn’t be able to be at the rally at 7 o’clock, because I had a lot of commitments, including family commitments. Jeremy came, fair enough, because people wanted to enjoy the moment.”
(05-07-2017 04:53 PM)Transsimian Wrote: I really don't know why Corbyn allowed this election.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|