Post: #1

Nationalism is undoubtedly far superior to our current globalist-leaning societies, but is the direction it's currently headed going to go far enough?

From a globalist perspective there are a number of possible benefits to allowing nationalism to grow the way it is currently:

1) The Elimination of Nationalists
As Roosh has noted, a war could later be started against an "evil nationalist country" like Russia. This would weed out nationalists throughout the world by sending them to die or having them arrested at home for “subversion” or “treason.”

2) The End of Ethnonationalism
As has been already discussed thoroughly in the Richard Spencer/alt-right thread, it's caused civic/liberal nationalists as a group to divorce from ethno/white nationalists.

Not only does it divide two groups who otherwise share 90% of the same beliefs, but arguably without white nationalism we'll never address some of the root problems which threaten civilisation.

We could eventually have a population who are majority leftists (as it's mainly whites who vote conservative), high proliferation of Islam/reduction of Christianity and high crime society (as diversity + proximity = war) for example.

3) A Distraction From Globalist Elites
Trump, Breitbart and InfoWars are undoubtedly the biggest advocates for nationalism.

But notice how they all give for example PizzaGate no coverage. They also don't discuss the fact that Jewish influence reigns supreme across all industries. Nor do they point out who the globalist elite actually are. You can even find evidence that they are pro-Israel.

I don't think it's simply a credibility thing, trying to look authoritative by avoiding covering "conspiracy theories" as they're no strangers to covering other stories the Old Media refuse to (especially Alex Jones).

The fact is that they may just be controlled opposition, as they're not attacking the causes that the elite really cares about.

That doesn't necessarily mean that any of them are getting paid off or told what to say or anything like that, but as far as the globalist elite are concerned they're not truly threatened yet with all their moves. It's just a speed bump for their plans.

These three are the biggest nationalism advocates, which is a huge step in the right direction but never forget that it doesn't go far enough. Unless you eliminate the root cause (Jewish globalist central bankers) then they will still remain in power and able to influence the world towards their intended goals.

Post: #2

It could be. Im not sure. But Democrats and Republicans are %100 controlled opposition.

Post: #3

I think all who know the matter of what we talk about and decide not to tell it to public do it for a good reason.

If we exclude possibility of controlled opposition, what about shock and impact of these things? To clarify. I think if suddenly they start to talk openly about occult connection (I avoid term Satanism, as its used incorrectly), Jews controlled media and such, they could produce unwanted effect of disbelief and mockery.

Its okay when you talk about regular motives such as money, control, psychopathy; but when you put memetics, meme magick, powerful Jews and such (no matter how true it is) you are digging hole beneath you. People would laugh at the idea that memes could influence ("hahah, you believe that cartoon frog means something!"), scorn you for talking about Jews (we all know why), laugh at occult ("jeez, you believe in entities? what a wacko!").
Credibility would drop and only those who understand would remain, a minority.

My opinion.