Post: #1

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/723323/...sation-IVF

Quote:PEOPLE who don’t have sex or struggle to find a sexual partner to have children with will now be considered as DISABLED, according to barmy new guidelines set to be announced.

Until now, infertility - the failure to achieve pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sex - was not considered a disability.

But now in dramatic move the World Health Organisation will change the standard to suggest that a person who is unable to find a suitable sexual partner or is lacking a sexual relationship to have children - will now be equally classified as disabled.

WHO says the change will give every individual “the right to reproduce”.

Under the new rules, heterosexual single men and women and gay men and women who want to have children will now be given the same priority as a couple seeking IVF because of medical fertility problems.

But critics branded the new laws as “absurd nonsense” arguing that the organisation has overstepped the mark by moving into social matters rather than health.

Gareth Johnson MP, former chair of the All Parliamentary Group on Infertility, whose own children were born thanks to fertility treatment, said: “I’m in general a supporter of IVF. But I’ve never regarded infertility as a disability or a disease but rather a medical matter.

“I’m the first to say you should have more availability of IVF to infertile couples but we need to ensure this whole subject retains credibility."

That aside: just think of the possibilities! All of a sudden you have a WHO-endorsed right to demand that she doesn't abort your kid! She can't give you LMR because you have a right to reproduce! You can call in the fucking UN if she insists you do other than raw dogging! Holy shit, man, the Catholic Church is back in business, baby!

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #2

Post: #3

This looks like some ridiculous NWO anti-family population control law. Basically if you don't reproduce you get disabled privileges, but if you do reproduce then you lose privilages.

Imagine how it looks: in a parking lot of a supermarket all the single people park their cars in disabled people zone near the entrance into the building, hop out and enter smilingly. The disabled zone would probably be extended to over half of the parking lot to accommodate the huge amount of newly "disabled". Meanwhile the families park their cars in the obscure corners of parking lot - drag the children trough the whole parking lot keeping eyes open they don't run under a car. When these families leave the supermarket they are overburdened with children and their grocery bags and must laboriously make their way back trough a maze of cars parked by singles.

Not to mention privileges disabled people in various countries get from reduction of taxes, reduction of public transportation fees et cetera.

Is there any info on whether this is already accepted or just a crazy proposal?

(10-21-2016 05:05 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  Holy shit, man, the Catholic Church is back in business, baby!

Catholic Church is against IVF as should be masculine men because it is a rather cuckish thing to do. You don't really have any control in whether the sperm and eggs used are that of the legal parents or not.

The IVF is a very big business catering to vanity of spoiled people similarly like plastic surgery. I have no doubt there are huge sums of money paid by IVF business to lobby this guideline. It seems to me they want taxpayer money to fund the poorer feminist spinster's choice to have a child without a father. Currently IVF is relatively expensive. If this passes then women will be able to get pregnant (as well as do abortions as suggested by other laws and proposals) on taxpayers money and their clientele would grow. Basically families and working men will fund the spinster ability to toy with baby lives as they wish and as however they change their mind.

Post: #4

(10-21-2016 05:05 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  Until now, infertility - the failure to achieve pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sex - was not considered a disability.

a person who is unable to find a suitable sexual partner or is lacking a sexual relationship to have children - will now be equally classified as disabled.

WHO says the change will give every individual “the right to reproduce”.

Under the new rules, heterosexual single men and women and gay men and women who want to have children will now be given the same priority as a couple seeking IVF because of medical fertility problems.

Summary: homosexuals are now "disabled" (in addition to discriminated!), and need adoption rights.

Post: #5

Same useless NWO organization that said eating red meat is unhealthy and lowers your life span.

We need Trump so badly it isn't even funny.

Post: #6

I used to be alarmed about U.N. nonsense, now I read things like this with glee.

Post: #7

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dysgenics

Quote:Dysgenics (also known as cacogenics) is the study of factors producing the accumulation and perpetuation of defective or disadvantageous genes and traits in offspring of a particular population or species.

The adjective "dysgenic" is the antonym of "eugenic". It was first used c. 1915 by David Starr Jordan, describing the supposed dysgenic effects of World War I. Jordan believed that healthy men were as likely to die in modern warfare as anyone else, and that war killed only the physically healthy men of the populace whilst preserving the disabled at home.

Dysgenic mutations have been studied in animals such as the mouse and the fruit fly.

In the context of human genetics, a dysgenic effect is the projected or observed tendency of a reduction in selection pressures and decreased infant mortality since the Industrial Revolution resulting in the increased propagation of deleterious traits and genetic disorders. Richard Lynn in his Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations (1996) identified three main concerns: deterioration in health, in intelligence and in conscientiousness.

I believe in SCIENCE.

But only the parts that agree with my own personal ends.

And any means that I can use, even ignoring SCIENCE, justifies my ends.

Post: #8

Hey. I guess I can go to my doctor and get a handicap tag.

Post: #9

Aside from the brilliant foresight of paying aspergers computer science majors not to reproduce, while paying Stacy to have 20 children by Chad, Kyle, Tyrone and Ackmed:

How do they prove someone's an incel? Do they take the ID photo in mixed groups and monitor for hover-hands?

Is it possible to surreptitiously sign someone else up to this scheme for shits and giggles? Getting an incel benefits card in the mail is the kind of thing guys would have pranked each other with at my college.

Honestly, if this makes it to the UK I might try and sign up just to fuck with people.

Post: #10

Quote:But now in dramatic move the World Health Organisation will change the standard to suggest that a person who is unable to find a suitable sexual partner or is lacking a sexual relationship to have children - will now be equally classified as disabled.

And this is how they sneak in Universal Basic Income and bachelor tax (or rather just player tax) through the backdoor.

Post: #11

We're already taxed brah. People with kids get extra deductions for each child they have. Meanwhile those who are kidless or uncucked (not married) pay cannot claim deductions or get stuck in a higher tax bracket, (65 vs 130k).

Post: #12

(10-21-2016 05:18 PM)Ocelot Wrote:  Aside from the brilliant foresight of paying aspergers computer science majors not to reproduce, while paying Stacy to have 20 children by Chad, Kyle, Tyrone and Ackmed:

How do they prove someone's an incel? Do they take the ID photo in mixed groups and monitor for hover-hands?

Is it possible to surreptitiously sign someone else up to this scheme for shits and giggles? Getting an incel benefits card in the mail is the kind of thing guys would have pranked each other with at my college.

Honestly, if this makes it to the UK I might try and sign up just to fuck with people.

aspergers people have a right to reproduce much as next guy.

Post: #13

This is great news. I am not the best-looking guy on the planet, and it is the primary reason I haven't been able to find a suitable sexual partner. Disability benefit. Ka-Ching!

Post: #14

(10-22-2016 02:21 AM)Alpha_Romeo Wrote:  This is great news. I am not the best-looking guy on the planet, and it is the primary reason I haven't been able to find a suitable sexual partner. Disability benefit. Ka-Ching!

Do you know that this world is constructed so that it's not only the single best looking guy on the planet who can find a suitable sexual partner? A world where only a single guy could find a sexual partner would be seriously fucked up and would lead to mass extinction.

Post: #15

With my epic dry spell still showing no signs of coming to an end, I think I'll be in line for the UNO-Incel Platinum Disability Card with additional lifetime benefits thrown in for good measure.

Post: #16

(10-21-2016 08:55 PM)TheWhiteWolf Wrote:  

(10-21-2016 05:18 PM)Ocelot Wrote:  Aside from the brilliant foresight of paying aspergers computer science majors not to reproduce, while paying Stacy to have 20 children by Chad, Kyle, Tyrone and Ackmed:

aspergers people have a right to reproduce much as next guy.

You seem to have entirely misunderstood: I was pointing out that this scheme will work with existing child support, alimony and no-fault divorce laws to further disincentivise the creation of productive, intelligent families, while ensuring low-IQ, fatherless children have the maximum financial incentive for creation. Our governments have been funding widespread dysgenic schemes since the end of WW2 and, unchecked, these promise to become humanity's greatest catastrophe.