The media is erupting over this point about Trump not accepting the legitimacy of the election and rolling out all the platitudes about the sanctity of the 240 year Republic and this and that. Meanwhile they sternly object to the most simple of voter ID rules and clearing of the voter rolls so people who died in 1979 are cleared off, for reasons unknown, when literally the only reason to object to that sort of thing is to commit voter fraud.

Thankfully the public is seeing things like the Podesta emails and O'Keefe videos, which render Trump's point valid. I don't think average voters will care as much about the SANCTITY OF AMERICAN ELECTIONS when they're seeing emails that show collusion where it shouldn't happen, and see video of Clinton people describing in a step by step manner how to rig an election on the ground without getting caught.

It wasn't like he said that if he lost he was going to march on the White House, he's basically saying 'I'll be ok with it as long as there is no BS.'

That won't prevent the freaking out though. Buckle up, the gaslighting/blackpilling, whatever you want to call it is going to be hitting stratospheric levels over these next 3 weeks.

(10-19-2016 10:58 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  Is it classified information that Crooked gave up when she said there's a 4 minute response time on deploying nuclear weapons?

Not anymore!

http://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2016/10/1...ar-launch/

Since I haven't said it yet, credit to Chris Wallace for being by far the best moderator I've seen so far in terms of fairness. Not great at controlling the candidates, but that's all part of the show I suppose.

Tonight marks the third time (by my count) in three debates that Trump was asked if he would accept the results of the election...Doesn't that strike anyone else as odd? Especially given the fact they don't bother asking Crooked Hillary the same question.

Here's my take, she is planning on stealing the election (we all know she's going to try) and they wanted to lock Trump in on saying he won't contest the result. The first debate he said he would accept the results and (((they))) wanted to reaffirm that one last time, but he didn't go by their script and now they're pissed and running with the "Trump won't accept the results" headline.

He may be getting heat for it, but the simple fact of the matter is -- after the recent WikiLeaks and Project Veritas videos, Trump has more than enough reason to question the legitimacy of the election. The media is once again making a mountain out of a molehill (Trump's comment) and a molehill out of a mountain (Clinton corruption).

I absolutely think he made the right move by saying what he said.

^

Yep, they're trying to do the same shit they tried during the Republican primary, they want to lock him into saying he'll accept whatever happens to undermine any claims later on.

Just one more part of trying to condition the American people to unquestioningly accept a Hillary win, no matter how fucking shady it is.

I noticed something fishy during the debate...as did others:

Watch below, around the 10 minutes mark, how D. Trump destroys her on the Clinton foundation receiving money from Saudi Arabia, a country that crushes women... look at Hillary's reaction, she's very ill at ease, grimacing...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5177685337001...show-clips

The arrogance of these elites is really over the top. This is another trap they have pre -planned. Now the news rags are all leading with the story that Trump won't automatically accept the results of the election without reviewing the results. The Democrats now believe that they have the right to register millions of dead people and if you ask a dead person for an ID you are prejudiced. It has to be made clear and up front that if there is massive fraud, there is no democracy, because we have been disenfranchised. And it has nothing to do with Trump. It is not his decision. It is our decision on whether to accept disenfranchisement and civil war is always an option on the table. Giving nice responses to them will only embolden them to take away everything we have.

(10-19-2016 11:17 PM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  I noticed something fishy during the debate...as did others:

I was wrong... she's not a reptoid. She's possessed.

Idiot.

(10-19-2016 11:24 PM)weambulance Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 11:17 PM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  I noticed something fishy during the debate...as did others:

I was wrong... she's not a reptoid. She's possessed.

I fixed that photo for you, god damn I want to sleep tonight.

(10-19-2016 10:18 PM)iop890 Wrote:  Impoverished peasants living in New Delhi slums have voter IDs.

The racism charge is horse shit.

How the fuck can you have a bank account without an ID? File taxes? Claim Medicaid? Unemployment? Receive Mail? Identify where to send your Obama phone? Participate in Chipolte's loyalty program? Travel? Prove unemployment?

I need a fucking ID to take a piss. I need a god damn ID to do a christmas return at macys, because fuck you for trying to cuck our country, and you want to tell me there is voter intimidation?

You can begin to see all of the lefts strawman tactics used to hurt our country beginning to collapse under their own weight.

I'll say it again..people can be liberal in resource rich times. If you want to drain the country of its wealth a liberal, altruistic, community minded benefit of the doubt mindset goes with it. And people push back because there is no PS6 sedating them from the reality they're facing.

(10-19-2016 11:27 PM)Adonis Wrote:  

Add

"Solar panels",

And,

"We make THEM pay their fair share"

That is her whole campaign. She is full of shit.

She just wants this job to stroke her fucking ego.

If she wins she will break GW Bush II record for vacation days. Bush worked so little they had to force him to build a sub-office at his Ranch to justify him being way from DC so much. If I recall he was in DC only 120 days a year on average.

Trump needed to get way better at the pivot. He gets bogged down in weeds - weeds created by unfair mods and Clinton herself (which is her job) - on trivial matters like the Trump Foundation.

I know he talked about Bill's women last time but I'm still very mad that he didn't make Hillary answer the question about those women. She successfully made both of their time about the accusation about him - that was one of her biggest wins today. Ofcourse it is the moderator's job to make her answer - he sure as hell made Trump answer question! - but Mr. Trump should know these things will be rigged. He needs to push back and calmly call out the fact that the question was never answered.

I blink, and now I have 43 pages to go through.

No idea how it went.

Hillary was just asked on her plane if she would accept the results of the elections. She has been blathering on about history and about Mr. Trump for at least 90 seconds now and hasn't actually said "yes". ...And she never did say yes, either.

Maybe I misheard the question, or maybe she just completely deflected the question and the reporters let her slide.

Edit - She was just asked about her Democrat operatives doing dirty tricks and she instantly shut down the interview. "I can't deal with all [Mr Trump's] conspiracy theories. I hope you all have something to eat and drink on the way back [wtf?]. THANK YOU!" (turns to walk away)

iop890 should become a pundit, his own political media LLC.

Do you think she was staring down, because she jotted down some stuff or had pre-written talking points?

Amazing how the CNN frame is "OMG, he won't commit to accepting the results of the election!!! Threat to democracy!!!"

Gore didn't accept right away, for good reasons. Kerry should not have been so quick, given what happened in Ohio in 2004. Democrats of all people should know that.

I guess the Hillary people think Americans have no historical memory. They might be right.

My takeaway from the debate was Hillary = no fly zone in Syria = war with Russia.

(10-20-2016 12:05 AM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  iop890 should become a pundit, his own political media LLC.

(10-19-2016 10:13 PM)iop890 Wrote:  Just WBs and Trump ads 24/7.

Imagine...

I wasn't able to watch the debate since I had to finish up an exam. I read through the entire thread, and everyone's reactions gave me an entertaining spin on the debate results thus far.

Kudos to iop890. Your last picture went absolutely perfect with your signature. I burst out laughing when I made the connection:

(10-20-2016 12:19 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  I guess the Hillary people think Americans have no historical memory. They might be right.

They don't.

I've already had to bring up the Kansas-Nebraska Act/ Bleeding Kansas, Tammany Hall, and Bush v Gore to people who disputed my rigged election claims.

Kansas fucking Nebraska. Nobody but me seems to have payed attention in history class. I did get 5's on all my AP exams thought.

(10-19-2016 09:53 PM)Bushido Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 09:50 PM)Repo Wrote:  Voted minor win for Trump, I don't agree that we are looking good going into this election, especially with the corrupt media telling nonstop lies. If I were a betting man, I'd bet he will lose.

The bookies have actually slashed the odds on Trump. The smart money is moving towards him!

"It's looking very similar to Brexit" (William Hill)

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-gambl...2016-10-17

Misleading article.

The odds for Mr.Trump have not gone down significantly. They shot up after Pussygate, from approx 2/1(around 2.5-2.75) to 4/1(reaching a peak of 5/1), they have settled at around 4/1, no change after a positive debate for Mr.Trump.

The article says more money has been placed on Clinton. That's because her odds are stupidly low, so a punter has to place a large sum to see even a modest return.

The article basically says 0.5 has been taken off Mr.Trump's price because of a $12K bet. Wow!

The bookies will easily break even if Mr.Trump wins, despite making some large payouts. All covered by the large bets needed to make money betting on the Nasty Woman.