Post: #26

ISF Instant Skull Fuck

definitive source

Post: #27

(10-19-2016 03:08 PM)TrifeLife Wrote:  ISF Instant Skull Fuck

definitive source

The much-dreaded Internet secret fatties...

Post: #28

(10-19-2016 10:14 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 03:08 PM)TrifeLife Wrote:  ISF Instant Skull Fuck

definitive source

The much-dreaded Internet secret fatties...

You mean SIFs? No one has ever called them ISFs.

Post: #29

(10-19-2016 10:19 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:14 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 03:08 PM)TrifeLife Wrote:  ISF Instant Skull Fuck

definitive source

The much-dreaded Internet secret fatties...

You mean SIFs? No one has ever called them ISFs.

I was therefore being... cryptic, literally.

Post: #30

(10-19-2016 10:22 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:19 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:14 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 03:08 PM)TrifeLife Wrote:  ISF Instant Skull Fuck

definitive source

The much-dreaded Internet secret fatties...

You mean SIFs? No one has ever called them ISFs.

I was therefore being... cryptic, literally.

Could you cite specific examples from this thread of forum members who you believe are (as you call them) ISWKs?

I'm unclear about the exact statement you are attempting to make.

Post: #31

(10-19-2016 10:24 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:22 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:19 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:14 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 03:08 PM)TrifeLife Wrote:  ISF Instant Skull Fuck

definitive source

The much-dreaded Internet secret fatties...

You mean SIFs? No one has ever called them ISFs.

I was therefore being... cryptic, literally.

Could you cite specific examples from this thread of forum members who you believe are (as you call them) ISWKs?

I'm unclear about the exact statement you are attempting to make.

No you aren't, my friend. You have me clear and loud.

Post: #32

I don't believe it's ok to use threats to get women to do anything sexual. And they are being threatened, maybe not with getting punched in the face, but their livelihoods are threatened if they don't comply.

Using threats, direct or implied, is lame.

I guess believing that it's better to get women to actually desire you, rather than fear the consequences, makes me an ISFSJSWK....

Post: #33

So, what kind of kissing are we talking about here?

A little peck on the mouth or full-on tongue sword fighting?

Very important distinction and the article doesn't give specifics.

Post: #34

(10-20-2016 12:34 AM)FireStarter Wrote:  I don't believe it's ok to use threats to get women to do anything sexual. And they are being threatened, maybe not with getting punched in the face, but their livelihoods are threatened if they don't comply.

Using threats, direct or implied, is lame.

I guess believing that it's better to get women to actually desire you, rather than fear the consequences, makes me an ISFSJSWK....

This is one of those subjects where there can be a a lot of misunderstanding and agreement and people might not realize they may be doing doing both.

Post: #35

(10-20-2016 12:34 AM)FireStarter Wrote:  I don't believe it's ok to use threats to get women to do anything sexual. And they are being threatened, maybe not with getting punched in the face, but their livelihoods are threatened if they don't comply.

Using threats, direct or implied, is lame.

I guess believing that it's better to get women to actually desire you, rather than fear the consequences, makes me an ISFSJSWK....

Except the story is quite obviously fabricated or grossly overplayed. Look at the pics, the female employees laugh and take cellphone pictures. Obviously staged.

But in any case, my Enigma didn't break your ISFSJSWK!...

Post: #36

(10-20-2016 04:23 AM)Going strong Wrote:  Obviously staged.

It's possible that it's a completely fabricated scenario, even likely. But the discussion wasn't on the veracity of the story.

There are now two main discussions happening here:

1. The story is fake/real. I agree that is most likely a fabricated story.

2. Is it ok to use a position of authority and implied threats to get women to perform sexual acts they don't want to do? My opinion is that it isn't.

So if you want accuse people of being nonsensical acronyms, at least make up your mind which argument you're choosing.

Maybe you could run "Ignoratio elenchi" through your Enigma.....

Post: #37

(10-20-2016 05:46 AM)FireStarter Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 04:23 AM)Going strong Wrote:  Obviously staged.

It's possible that it's a completely fabricated scenario, even likely. But the discussion wasn't on the veracity of the story.

Except one might argue that believing or wanting to believe such an outrageous, fabricated and comical story, is per se (seeing as you're a Latinist), tainted with a, say, unconscious, seeds-of-Western-education WK attitude. Nothing personal though, Qui sine peccato est Primum lapidem mittat and all that...

In any case, I just tried to run Latin language on my Enigma machine, and, no luck: Latin language beat the machine, just as Navajo did! Aloha, ITKS!

Post: #38

It's not a clearly fabricated story. The photos don't look staged to me and I've actually lived in China for 5 years.

While it could be entirely made up, weirder stuff happens every day here in China.

Nevertheless, the guys celebrating what could be a very real abuse of power need to get out and do some day-game.

Post: #39

(10-19-2016 12:23 PM)NomadofEU Wrote:  I don't get the hate... If you don't like it don't work there.

I exchange cheek kisses with my female students on a daily basis here in Kiev, sometimes just before or after giving their husbands a firm handshake. If I didn't do it they would think there's something wrong with me.

Some real white knights up in here

I seriously dislike the cheek kiss. It just seems like such an easy way to spread diseases.