Post: #26

(09-13-2016 02:22 PM)NewDayNewFace Wrote:  

(09-13-2016 02:09 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  

(09-13-2016 12:42 AM)NewDayNewFace Wrote:  I guess you want to be broke all the time too. Good luck with that!

Most people's legacy will only be their children. What have you done that suggests you'll be any different?

So one should have multiple kids with multiple mothers that will hunt you down for child support? Have fun with that buddy.

I have one son and I make great money. My money isn't being garnished and I can afford a lot of things that other people can't. That's better to me than knocking up a bunch of women and having this "legacy". Which really means shit.

In the OP he says a bunch of chicks. Everything I am saying is relating to the original post of having multiple kids with multiple women.

Post: #27

(09-15-2016 02:38 PM)NewMeta Wrote:  

(09-15-2016 09:32 AM)Constitution45 Wrote:  On a similar note, where would be a good country to raise a large family. I am not even talking about culture but economics and countries which offer a financial incentive to start Christian families. I have seen some strong solid families in even cities like London, however the parents are in tremendous amounts of debt and have to work exceptionally hard to prevent their children from getting indoctrinated from outside influences.

Pretty sure the V4 countries in Europe offer incentives for larger families.

In particular Hungary, Orban has given a huge and very generous benefit for Hungarian families with three children, ten million Hungarian Forint to be exact. You can use a currency calculator to exchange that to a currency you are more familiar with (as I type this it equals 36,288 dollars). The only condition is that you have to show proof you intend to buy a house with that amount of money, he truly puts family first here, this ensures that the family intends to use the money for the benefit of the unit and not for some pointless lavish holiday.

So yeah, marry a hungarian chick, gain citizenship, have 3 kids, buy house, profit.

In Poland they give you 500 zloty a month if you have 2 kids under the age of 18, and an extra 500 a month for every child born after the second child (e.g. 1000 a month for 3 kids under the age of 18).

Sounds like Marxism to me.

Post: #28

Kids are loud, they cost a lot, and they shit their pants. Why would you want children?

I couldn't take off work and go travel for 6 months at a time if I had kids. And that would be a fucking travesty.

Post: #29

(09-17-2016 08:37 PM)BrewDog Wrote:  Kids are loud, they cost a lot, and they shit their pants. Why would you want children?

I couldn't take off work and go travel for 6 months at a time if I had kids. And that would be a fucking travesty.

How long are you going to taking off work and travelling? I mean in your life span.

Post: #30

(09-18-2016 09:34 AM)Moma Wrote:  

(09-17-2016 08:37 PM)BrewDog Wrote:  Kids are loud, they cost a lot, and they shit their pants. Why would you want children?

I couldn't take off work and go travel for 6 months at a time if I had kids. And that would be a fucking travesty.

How long are you going to taking off work and travelling? I mean in your life span.

Forever until I'm dead. I hung out with a Canuck and an Ozzie in Colombia that were lifetime friends that were 70ish. They were cool as hell and had tons of traveling stories. I'll be like them one day if my liver makes it that long.

Are you really my Moma?

Post: #31

(09-18-2016 01:08 PM)BrewDog Wrote:  Are you really my Moma?

Yes, I am. Come hither, bring it in.