Post: #1

It's important to know, and name, one's enemies. Our enemies, as Conservative men, obviously are the SJWs, the globalists.

But SJW is a term that many people (less and less each year, granted, and thanks to internet) do not understand (especially outside of the US); and "Globalists" might be worn as a badge of honour by our enemies, who do not really hide the fact that they want to destroy the nations and implement a (devious, gay-friendly and perverted) world-government. They actually qualify themselves as globalists with some kind of twisted pride.

So, I was looking for new ways to describe and name them, and hurt their "feelings" in the process. And suddenly, Rocha here gave me an idea:

Let's call our enemies, Sons of Soros!



It has a nice rythm, a sharp ring to it, and it instantly conjures up the hideous face of the old destructor of nations, Soros... It sounds like Sons of Satanas, or Sons of Sam (remember, the evil mass murderer and his black dog), so it is charged with damning memories and references.

Anyway, I will start testing these words in real life, and see how SJWs react to my calling them, matter-of-factually, as if it were the most normal thing in political life and without raising my voice, Sons of Soros...

Like, you discuss with some blue-haired lesbian SJWs, and you tell them: "You, Sons of Soros, are against patriotism and traditional marriages". We'll see how triggered and hurt they get

And well, if you have other, inventive names for calling our enemies, please share on this thread!

Edit: I actually have another, to propose: instead of calling Hillary, Crooked Hillary, which is not bad I reckon, we Conservative men should call her, ELE Hillary. Extinction-Level Event Hillary. Cause if she wins, God forbid, it's extinction time for us!

E.L.E. Hillary and her faithful (unregistered) voters:

Post: #2

Just call them leftists. It's a catch-all, it's just 2 syllables, it has a clear and well-recognized and consistent meaning, and the enemy freely calls themselves it.

People forget that words themselves don't have any built-in negativity. "Fag" just comes from faggot - a bundle of sticks. It only gets its negative connotation by branding it as such.

The term leftist should be used exclusively, and all effort focused into painting that group in the most negative light possible. "Leftist" should be used as a "teaming off" signal. They can use all their various "ists" and "isms" they like -- we only need one, to signal sides of the battle. It needs only be consistent and recognizable, and carry the branding of anti-social sadomasochist behaviour.

So far it's recognizable, but consistency is terrible. People using dozens of different words, hunting for some existing negative branding that isn't there or is too new or specific (marxist, SJW, liberal, Democrat, communist, etc).


Just stick to leftist -- the oldest and most encompasing term, and then focus all effort on branding it in a negative light.

Post: #3

People who are willing to leave me and mine the fuck alone in return for same.

People who are not.

I dunno. Tyranannies?

Post: #4

(08-29-2016 09:20 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  Just call them leftists. It's a catch-all, it's just 2 syllables, it has a clear and well-recognized and consistent meaning, and the enemy freely calls themselves it.

People forget that words themselves don't have any built-in negativity. "Fag" just comes from faggot - a bundle of sticks. It only gets its negative connotation by branding it as such.

The term leftist should be used exclusively, and all effort focused into painting that group in the most negative light possible. "Leftist" should be used as a "teaming off" signal. They can use all their various "ists" and "isms" they like -- we only need one, to signal sides of the battle. It needs only be consistent and recognizable, and carry the branding of anti-social sadomasochist behaviour.

So far it's recognizable, but consistency is terrible. People using dozens of different words, hunting for some existing negative branding that isn't there or is too new or specific (marxist, SJW, liberal, Democrat, communist, etc).


Just stick to leftist -- the oldest and most encompassing term, and then focus all effort on branding it in a negative light.

I agree with your views (the bolded parts especially, a bit less the rest, as I do think that some words have inherent, immediate and instinctive negative meaning and sound in or about them), but leftist will not trigger them, as they don't see it, poor blind souls, as an insult.

In any case, I think my E.L.E. Hillary has true potential...
Especially as we are all conscious that Conservative values, what's left of them in the West, would not survive 4 years of Hillary (I'm quite sure she plans, among other nasty things, to divorce Bill and marry a woman, it's her long-delayed revenge).

Post: #5

Philippines' "macho" president, mister Duterte, taught us a new, "colorful" word: Putang Ina. I like it, especially as it seems partially taken from the Spanish, or French even, language... Putang ina ka!!

Post: #6

(08-29-2016 09:20 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  Just call them Low Energy Leftists.

Fixed it.

Post: #7

If I ever open a soft drink factory, I will name my first product Putangina.

Bottled in the Balkan mountains by 9/10 virgins, just for you!


In the meantime, I''ll be using that word a lot, especially on manginas.

Post: #8

(09-10-2016 08:08 PM)Irenicus Wrote:  If I ever open a soft drink factory, I will name my first product Putangina.

Bottled in the Balkan mountains by 9/10 virgins, just for you!


In the meantime, I''ll be using that word a lot, especially on manginas.

Post: #9

Macedonian media have invented, and are using, a nice one: Sorosoid bimbo

Sorosoid bimbo


"Ms Mogherini has been attacked in the press as a “fascistic Sorosoid bimbo”"

http://www.economist.com/news/europe/217...macedonian

Also, lol at: "George Soros, a philanthropist" Philanthropist, my arse!

Post: #10

"Sorons", as in Soros morons.

Post: #11

Anonymous Conservative makes a good case for calling them "fake Americans*". I like it. Unambiguous in the good vs bad spectrum, produces mental pain, and they can't try to turn it around on you without just making it worse.

* Should work fine for any people who once had national pride, e.g. Fake Brit/Scot/Englishman, fake Pole, fake German, etc.

Post: #12

I once wrote a KingsWiki article about Aleksandar Dzepovski, an Australian-Macedonian musician and critic of Soros. He used the term "sorosoid" in one of his songs, and recently wrote a song outright calling Soros a "vampire".

Aleksandar Dzepovski Wrote:Еј, Сорос вампирот
Омразен е тој меѓу народот
(Hey, Soros is a vampire
He's hated among the nations)

Post: #13

(03-25-2017 01:22 PM)Hoser Wrote:  Anonymous Conservative makes a good case for calling them "fake Americans*". I like it. Unambiguous in the good vs bad spectrum, produces mental pain, and they can't try to turn it around on you without just making it worse.

* Should work fine for any people who once had national pride, e.g. Fake Brit/Scot/Englishman, fake Pole, fake German, etc.

Adam Piggott had a blog post talking about this concept, inspired by the Anonymous Conservative, suggesting "fake Australians".

Post: #14

I think it's weapons grade political steel.

It would stop the phaggot leftists in their tracks. You know the kind. The ones who always talk about how the country needs to change from being so bigoted then suddenly start lecturing us about "our Australian values". The ones that tell us they love Australia then the next day after someone utters a racist remark they belatedly sob that they're ashamed to be Australian.

Same goes for Fake Americans. You call them fake because it backs them into a corner. Either they love the country and it's current values (so shut the fuck up, because we're fine, thank you very much) or they don't love the nation, they want to change it and they are indeed FAKE (nationality).

What's more, they can't flip it the way we flipped "fake news". Some pencil-necked phaggot waving an antifa flag can't call James Woods a fake American, nor could some stooge whore on CNN. It would instantly appear laughable and ridiculous, and it would receive zero propagation from their camp because in their heart of hearts they don't want to be American and so calling their enemies UnAmerican does doesn't sit right.

Post: #15

I actually love that last one. It plays into one key aspect off liberal psychology: they are terrified of losing group acceptance and calling them "fake Americans" triggers that unpleasant association.

Post: #16

(03-26-2017 06:11 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Same goes for Fake Americans. You call them fake because it backs them into a corner. Either they love the country and it's current values (so shut the fuck up, because we're fine, thank you very much) or they don't love the nation, they want to change it and they are indeed FAKE (nationality).

I wouldn't put it in exactly those terms though, because there isn't agreement on exactly what American values ARE currently. People like Obama and Pelosi basically say that anything a nationalist or any other non-cuck wants "isn't in line with our core values as Americans." Of course, they define those "American values" as the globalist corporatist leftist feminist multicultural transgender sewage that our subverted government and media have been pushing down our throats for the last couple of decades ... not the values of the previous 200+ years, or the values of the core of middle America (outside of those high density urban hellholes where they apparently drug everyone into submission to the matrix.) So maybe substitute "traditional" for "current", because mainstream interpretation of "current values" makes me want to burn it all down and start over.

Post: #17

^Nope. See, you just elected Trump.

"You have to go back" Trump.

"Build the wall" Trump.

"We will no longer surrender our nation to the false song of globalism" Trump.

Now is the time to call out fake Americans. Real Americans elected a real American and you'll never have a better opportunity to freeze out the liberty-hating globalists.

Post: #18

We elected Trump, but there are still huge problems with the news media, entertainment media, and universities, and we have a lot of people who have been indoctrinated deeply by that. I was just mentioning to someone recently how amazing it is that they still manage to portray Trump and his supporters as some sort of fringe radicals despite the fact that he won the freaking election. People who you would otherwise think were relatively intelligent and grounded buy into that propaganda. I don't even live in one of the really big cities that went blue, but just being around college-indoctrinated white collar corporate employees puts you in that sphere. White collar employees at big corps have it beaten into them that the only way to survive, much less get ahead, is to stick with the herd. Maybe there will be a tipping point where they change over in big numbers (like herd animals do) but we aren't there yet.

(03-26-2017 09:03 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Now is the time to call out fake Americans. Real Americans elected a real American and you'll never have a better opportunity to freeze out the liberty-hating globalists.

I couldn't agree more with this part. If we have any slippage at all I'm not at all confident there will ever be another chance. I'm just saying that winning the presidential election didn't give us a solid grip on the mainstream high ground. Most of those herd animals are still buying into the story that Trump is a fluke and anomaly and they think being on the winning side means staying away from him and us. I don't get that part from the media, that's the unfortunate conclusion I get from the corporate herd animals I know.

Post: #19

"Fake Americans" is great. It has some serious rhetorical punch to it, and anybody will understand exactly what it means. "Sons of Soros" is pretty good too, but maybe not real effective outside of a wider polemic, since an awful lot of people have no idea who he is.

I say "leftists" more than any other term, but it's pretty neutral sounding (compare to, say, calling a fake right winger a "cuck", even if you don't know what a cuckold is, it still sounds gross.) Personally, I like to call SJWs "Neo-Bolsheviks" but once again the average person probably doesn't know or remember what a Bolshevik even is.

I've always thought "SJW" was a weak term, it's too clunky in spoken conversation, many people I've dropped it around don't know what it stands for, and "social justice" is something that (at least in the abstract) has positive connotations to the average person. (When I came back from Japan about three years ago I don't think I'd ever heard the term before, and at first thought it mostly referred to stuff like breaking up forced prostitution rings and that sort of thing. Boy, was I wrong.)

Post: #20

Neubache, excellent job expounding upon and improving what I attempted to say. *thumbsup*

Post: #21

Re: Sons of Soros, how about "Spawn of Soros" or "Soros' Spawn" as a tweak?

Post: #22

Best to leave the Soros stuff to the side. HermeticAlly is correct. Not enough people know who he is and it'll make you sound like a fringe-world nut.

I also agree that "social justice warriors" is a term that plays into the hands of the enemies, since it makes them seem both noble (justice) and brave (warriors).

A good way to flip that energy would be to call them social justice zombies. SJZs has less syllables to pronounce. It takes the branding but adds a hook at the end which makes people stop and think, possibly causing them to ask "did you mean...." to which you can explain:

"Social justice zombies. They're a brainless mob after nothing but fresh victims."

It also lends itself to that powerful zombie branding which is currently in vogue while capturing perfectly the rabid and hateful inhumanity they generally possess (for example, telling people who commit the slightest infraction that they hope they choke and die). Beyond that it casts them in that entirely believable role of a pallid, flabby, weak and generally grotesque mob of human filth that are only dangerous due to their numbers and their mindless fanaticism.

I think SJZs (ess jay zees) has real potential.

Post: #23

LOL I never say "Social Justice Warriors" any more. For months, I've been calling them Social Justice Wankers.

It seems to be working, probably because it has such a strong truth component.

Post: #24

I really detest the word "elite" when the people in question look like shrivelled up testicles

"scrotumus prehistorus" has a much nicer ring to it.

Post: #25

Good point about elites. Perhaps engineer a less flattering term? How about Leeches? "Elite leeches" neuters their power while exposing their purpose.

I think I'll start using it.