Post: #26

(08-14-2016 01:06 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  DOBA making rock solid infallible points here. He's absolutely right; in a society where same sex couples are granted legal rights to be married and even have children, it does not make any sense why couples who are blood related can't do the same.

...just as a society that embraces same-sex marriage cannot logically deny polygamy.

Post: #27

This is utterly disgusting. Not to mention the mother is busted as hell and could easily pass for a 70 year old. I almost did a double take after reading the story and looking at the pictures.

Post: #28

Mother-son incest is a shock to some, but these two persons are adults, and there was no sign of the son being "sexually groomed prior".

Ironic how a female teacher of the same age as the mother would only get as maximum as one year in prison for licking the oil pipelines of the entire Grade 8 class though. #ConsentingIncestAdultsAreTreatedMoreHarshlyThanPervertedFemaleTeachers.

Post: #29

How come it's new guys on the forum that post stuff like this?

Post: #30

(08-13-2016 04:30 AM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  I'm fairly sure i've read about this on this very forum today, in another thread.

You have.

Apocalypse Now: The Gay Marriage Fallout Thread.

Post: #31

Props to DOBA for presenting bulletproof arguments for legalized incest and exposing the liberal facade for what it truly is. I've pondered the male-female incest question after gay marriage was legalized and concluded that while opposite-sex relationships can be denied, there is no reason why same-sex incestual relationships shouldn't be legal.

I wrote about this very issue back in January of this year for ROK:

Quote:“Consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want if they’re not hurting anyone.”

This has been the rallying cry for homosexual marriage advocates over the last two decades, along with “why do you care what people do if it doesn’t affect you?” In this article, I’ll take this rationale to its logical conclusion: Incest and polygamy.

Support for homosexual marriage has been buttressed by the idea that loving, consenting adults should be allowed the same status as traditional couples. They’re “born this way” and by denying them the right to marry society is treating them as second-class citizens. Consent has been of utmost importance to same-sex marriage supporters, as it has been in other debates centering on sex. But consider the following scenario:

John is a 58-year-old man who is on vacation with his 30 year-old son. One day they decide it would be fun if they tried making love. They both found they enjoyed it and after a few more sessions decide they want legal recognition in the form of marriage for their newfound commitment to each other. Should they be allowed to do this?

Provide some reasons why they shouldn’t, and they’ll likely be the same reasons opponents of same-sex marriage have given for why homosexuals shouldn’t get married. “It’s disgusting,” “It’s wrong,” “It’s unnatural.” Yet by the reasoning of allowing same-sex marriage, this scenario should be perfectly fine. Incest between opposite sex family members can be shot down by citing biological deformities that can occur in their offspring.

But why shouldn’t a man be allowed to marry his grandson if they’re both adults? Why shouldn’t a woman be allowed to marry her mother? These are ideas that can’t be refuted if we accept that consenting adults should be allowed to do whatever they want, the standard refrain from homosexual marriage supporters. By the way, bestiality, the idea that leftists point to and laugh at, does not fit into this framework—animals can’t consent, but a man and his brother can.

Post: #32

^^^^^^^^
Good points. Your Return of Kings article definitely preceded my posts on this subject. But I think it's time to mention that there's a man who beat us both to the punch when it came to justifying incest.

This man is truly a legend for our times. One of the many misdeeds he committed was dating his cousin as a way to get back at his parents. And so, I present to you the one, the only...George Costanza!

(Isn't there a saying that goes something like "What was once comedy returns as tragedy?")

Post: #33

Casanova banged his daughter (that he did not raise) of an ex lover. Incest has been happening for hundreds and likely thousands of years.

While it is quite disturbing in concept, the worst part about this particular case is that the kid's mother is a hog.

Post: #34

(08-17-2016 12:38 AM)bootyhuntah Wrote:  Casanova banged his daughter (that he did not raise) of an ex lover. Incest has been happening for hundreds and likely thousands of years.

While it is quite disturbing in concept, the worst part about this particular case is that the kid's mother is a hog.

Casanova claimed he banged a girl who could have been his daughter. That does not mean he did bang his daughter. Even if he did, however, the sexual misadventure of one man does not give credence to the claim that Incest has been happening for hundreds/ thousands of years and is therefore part of human nature. Even if there is a tendency for incest in some of the mutated dregs of society, a proclivity for socially malignant behavior is not a valid argument for sanctioning that behavior or implicitly endorsing it for the general population; something the fag hags and wannabe trannies should keep in mind. The worst part of this case is definitely not that the mother is ugly. Decent-looking guys bang ugly girls all the time. Nobody, however, bangs their mother. That is the crux of this issue.