Excelsior 
Innovative Casanova
Posts: 15,023
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 216
|
RE: It's Only Sexist When Men Do It
(08-01-2011 07:22 PM)blurb Wrote: Do you guys really want to go back to "old school" and spend years contributing to society, advancing civilization, progressing medicine, constructing engineering marvels, and other badass shit just for one pathetic pussy in marriage, or would you rather be a homeless bum banging beautiful women left and right in today's world?
As for me, the choice is simple.
It isn't really a choice.
The genie will never go back into the bottle. The "old days", as we knew them, are not going to come back, at least not in quite the form we were once used to. That just isn't an option. We might get closer to it than we are now, but its true form will not grow again. Too much has changed.
That being said, modern feminism as it stands is not sustainable and will have to either change or die out eventually. Men are increasingly refusing to "man up" and marry the women who follow it, the women are unhappy, and they are not reproducing (more conservative/traditional/religious [and in many cases, non-white] elements are having far more children than feminism's largely urban core followers in Europe and the USA).
Women who follow the feminist models closely now are not going to multiply, are not snagging the men they really want (and thought they could have when they were told they'd "have it all"), and are not finding the gains they've made (ability to work like men) satisfying, while the quality men they're most attracted to are just using them as sex toys.
A poster over on The Spearhead in response to an article about Kay Hymowitz's " manning up"(why men won't marry) issue put it best, so I'll quote him:
Quote:By "imnobody", May 23, 2011 at 07:53
“For some reason, people don’t think in terms of incentives when it comes to men as a demographic.”
Oh, they do, they do. Not the average woman. But a thinker like Kay Hymowitz knows that the problem is the lack of incentives (she states so clearly) and, therefore, the solution is creating new incentives for men to create families.
But some incentives are impossible to create (going back to a manufacturing economy). And other incentives mean that women would have to give up some of their privileges….THE HORROR! When they realize, these fembots start issuing “syntax error! syntax error!” and their face turns into the “blue screen of death” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Screen_of_Death)
For the modern thinker, drowned in feminism from childhood, telling that women have to give up something (even if it is to get something better) is UNTHINKABLE. It is like telling a fundamentalist Muslim that the solution to his problem is to burn all the Qur’ans in the world and to paint pictures of Mohammed fucking a camel.
So they tie themselves in knots trying to solve this cognitive dissonance. They know that changes are necessary but any change will be something that women have to give up. So this is why the book ends up without solutions.
This is the plight of modern woman. The traditional woman had some excellent privileges (I call them the OLD privileges: family, kids, a male breadwinner). Feminism promised them to acquire NEW privileges (exciting career, money, casual sex with hot alpha men in their twenties, divorce with alimony and child support).
Women got along because they thought they would end up enjoying all the OLD privileges plus the NEW privileges. This is what the mantra “having it all” means. The thing worked for some decades, because of the inertia of the old system, that made men want to marry, even if the incentives were not there anymore.
But now women are discovering that, by acquiring the NEW privileges, they have unknowingly lost the OLD privileges (which is the thing they love most). Suddenly, it is harder and harder to get a husband to be a work slave. Women are desperate. They can’t live without the OLD privileges but they are not willing to give up the NEW privileges.
They are desperate and the only thing they know is to shame men (“man up”). But this is only a desperate measure and this is not working.
The solution will come with time, which is the better healer. After forty or sixty years of single motherhood, miserable life for women and social decay, new generations of young women will learn that the OLD privileges is what matters and these OLD privileges will be so rare that women will be willing to do anything and give up anything to get it. This will be the end of feminism.
But we won’t see this. Nowadays, women still harbor the hope of having the OLD with the NEW. As Clausewitz says, the purpose of a war is not to win battles, not to destroy the enemy, but to destroy the enemy’s hope and the willingness of the enemy to keep on fighting. Until hope is not destroyed, feminism won’t be beaten.
Soon they will be desperate to get a male breadwinner and will be willing to give everything to get it. But we won’t see this: this is the future.
The bottomline is this: if feminism continues on the path it is going, the end game for its followers is what you currently see in black America, with the status(or general lack thereof) that black women enjoy and the similar lack of men.
None of them want that.
For now, just enjoy the ride.
Know your enemy and know yourself, find naught in fear for 100 battles. Know yourself but not your enemy, find level of loss and victory. Know thy enemy but not yourself, wallow in defeat every time.
|
|
Home
RooshV.com
Search (Via Forum)
Member List
![[-]](images/collapse.gif)
