Post: #1

http://www.welt.de/gesundheit/article156...nicht.html

Quote:Heart disease, cancer, arthritis and diabetes - which are threatening health risks to those who are working more than 40 hours a week. Mainly affects women.

A now in "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine" published study however found that overtime also have serious long-term consequences, especially for women.The researchers led by Allard Dembe of the Ohio State University studied data from more than 12,000 Americans who had given their working week and their health over a period of 32 years.The scientists found among women is a strong correlation between the number of overtime hours and serious chronic health problems partly decades later.

The more they worked, the greater was their risk for heart disease, cancer, arthritis and diabetes. Particularly from 50 hours per week, it looked dramatic, so the scientists. They worked more than 30 years more than 60 hours a week, which tripled their risk of heart problems, cancer, diabetes and arthritis get.
For the men who worked too much, on the other hand showed only an increased risk of arthritis. They worked more than 50 hours a week, they were protected even better against heart disease, lung disease and depression than their counterparts who completed their 40 hours.

Overall, however, worked only a minority 40 hours or less per week. Most, 65 percent, were up to 50 hours per week for the job in use. 13 percent came to 60 hours, three percent even worked more than 60th
"Especially women who have to lift different roles and tasks simultaneously, suffer the consequences of very intensive work," said Dembe. They are often responsible for most of the work within the family, the basis for the numerous would overtime however sometimes cause life-threatening illnesses and life limitations.
That is, they often just at the beginning of the career unaware. "Women who are 20, 30 or 40, thinking about not necessarily follow what problems it later on in life."

They put it on the multiple task that women have to do and its a hint how unfair the society and men seem towards women. I say its not in the nature of women to do long and hard labour and push for a career.
For men its also interesting, men need a purpose in life and most men identify stronger with their jobs then women do. Often it gives them a task and they get more social interaction in a job. Without a job many men get very passive and live an unhealthy life. Other research show that people with no jobs have a higher risk of depression - among men I would say.
Its insane how they try to get rid of the natural models of nature because their solution will be better support for women and not the idea that a full time career is not made for women in general.

Post: #2

Something's definitely happened to the left in the past ten years or so for them to go from worshipping science to outright denying basic scientific concepts, such as humans being born biologically male or female. It seems leftists are primarily interested in science when it might help disprove the existence of a Christian God. They're certainly not interested in it when its findings might run counter to their narrative. Is anyone surprised that feminism's plan to push women into the workforce isn't actually good for their health and well-being? I'm not. I do like having the science on our side to support that, though.

Post: #3

Clearly a toxic male privilege institutionalized and perpetuated by the oppressive patriarchy. Which is rape!

Nice google translation, btw.