Post: #1

Does it depend on the particular guy?

Or do you have a hard and fast rule?

Anyone can make it conditional on country or culture, just state what that qualification is.

Post: #2

Ask in this thread:
/thread-56391.html

or
/thread-9856.html

Stop johnbozzing up the forum.

Post: #3

I have no idea what or who bozz is

Post: #4

Enough with these question threads. I petition that "no threads may contain a question mark in the title" be added to the rules list.

Post: #5

I agree with islander, the he'll kind of post is that.

Don't even state your own opinion, just demand explanations from the forum membership. Give it your own opinions so suits can drop funny memes for the rest of the forum.

Post: #6

(06-14-2016 02:07 PM)Kid Twist Wrote:  Does it depend on the particular guy?

Or do you have a hard and fast rule?

Anyone can make it conditional on country or culture, just state what that qualification is.

I'm assuming that I'd be marrying her off between ages 15-20, when she's basically in her prime. Rather than set a maximum age of her suitor, I might suggest that she look for a guy in his 30s or early 40s (i.e. the usual prime age range for men), who is well-established in his career and ready to settle down. That would put her in a good position to start a family during her years of peak fertility.

However, plenty of young women will prefer a guy who's in his 20s (e.g. because there's a social stigma against large age differences), and many will be open to a guy who's in his 50s (maybe he's more suave, has more money, etc.). I'm not going to veto a suitor based solely on age, when there are so many other factors that together contribute to a guy's overall SMV.

Post: #7

Up to her. The only role parents should have in this is teaching good morals over the course of their rearing, including how to spot virtue in others, and in putting her in a community that isn't morally twisted. This of course, includes not sending her to a university.

Otherwise, you're just going to be in a miserable uphill losing battle against a slut anyway.

Post: #8

I'd say that up to ten years or so can be a decent age difference. If you push far north of that, you risk leaving your daughter a very long period of loneliness at the end of her life, or also financial burdens unless the husband has considerable assets or a good life insurance policy.

Post: #9

No limit. He can be as old as can be, so long as he's a good fit for her in the ways that matter (and age, while consistently obsessed over in the west, is not the only important indicator of romantic compatibility). I'll judge each man and each situation on an individual basis.

Post: #10

30 with some exceptions. I'd prefer no more than an 8 year gap. The man's wealth or ability to provide wouldn't effect my decision. His character would be far more important.

Post: #11

Is the hypothetical daughter over 18, or an emancipated minor after telling a judge I gave her daily lectures on appropriate sexual partners?

Post: #12

Dupe!