Post: #51

(04-25-2016 03:29 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  Giada was definitely an ugly duckling. Look at these high school before and after pics:

I bet even back then if you looked at her body you could tell she had enormous potential as a bedroom personal project.

Face was a bit dorky but not that bad actually. Braces and schoolgirl look adds a lot of fun times too especially if her body was probably banging then as it is now.

Post: #52

(04-24-2016 09:52 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  There is a video online where some guy claims she is a man.

yup, I linked his video earlier in the thread. his channel is `pocketsofthefuture` on YouTurd. With all the forced acceptance of transgenderism going on, I personally think it's a legit claim.

I want to add to this that he makes the point that the elite/controllers have a transhumanist goal. He says that they understand our psychology well and so with the goal of blurring the lines between the genders they have vaulted individuals like Jennifer Aniston into the spotlight to remove traditionalist views of biological sex. He says that it would be feasible for ultra-powerful elites to intervene with a baby that is male in the womb and inculcate it with female hormones to drive its development toward a female body.

I do believe the theory is a real stretch. However, if *I* were a member of the ultra-powerful elite with the evil intent of breaking down traditional roles and sexes, I would probably go about it the same way. People are imitators and followers. Celebrities culture is a way to make humans think that the King and Queen of the tribe are their best friend. So what better way to generate sympathy for something that goes against our natural drives by cuckolding that natural drive via the celebrity culture?