Post: #26

(04-07-2016 08:33 PM)GoldHawkStar Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:23 PM)fokker Wrote:  Two years before Ben had married his wife Victoria, who he later split up with to be in a relationship with his mum.

Somebody needs to make a new cuck-related word in the Kings wiki just because of this - A woman being 'cuckolded' by her man having sex with his mom.

Oedipus Cuck-plex?

Post: #27

NSFW

http://www.sexylosers.com/comic/203/

Post: #28

(04-07-2016 08:23 PM)fokker Wrote:  At this stage, only a Trump win will save the West.

Daily Mirror Wrote:A mother reunited with the son she gave up for adoption 30 years ago says now they’re in love - and trying for a baby together.

Kim West, 51, has been in a relationship with her biological son Ben Ford, 32, for two years and believe they are ‘meant to be’ after she was forced to give him up for adoption just a week after he was born.

But the couple, who say their sex life is ‘incredible’ and are planning to get married, insist their relationship is not incest, the New Day reports.

Instead they claim it is ‘Genetic Sexual Attraction’, a term used for relatives who feel sexual attraction for each other after meeting as adults.

The couple were brought together after Ben, who was living in the US, sent his England-born mum a letter out of the blue in 2013.

Two years before Ben had married his wife Victoria, who he later split up with to be in a relationship with his mum.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/...le-7712560

Post: #29

Post: #30

Shouldn't they be in jail? I thought incest of this direct nature was illegal?

Post: #31

The mirror is one of worst of a bad bunch of UK newspapers but great quip in the comments section presumably from a us rewder : "In America we would call this happy couple Liberal Democrats or Socialists".
I enjoyed it anyhow.

Post: #32

This is fucking attention whoring and mind fucking to a whole different level.

Fuck new day magazine for publishing this "sensational" article - all for clicks and mag purchases.

Post: #33

(04-07-2016 08:30 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Semi-dupe.

...is apparently what their baby will be called.

Post: #34

I refuse to believe this is real. I think it's all an elaborate, but fake, troll piece.

Post: #35

(04-07-2016 08:50 PM)Horus Wrote:  This is King Charles II of Spain. He is an example of the reason incest is taboo.

So while reading about him I came upon the term "Habsburg Jaw", a deformed jaw typical for their family due to extensive inbreeding.



My first thought was "Shit, this looks familiar. Where have I seen this face before?"

Then it struck me:



Explains a lot.

Post: #36

It's the UK of course. The vast majority of Brits look like the product of incest/fetal alcohol syndrome. The UK club threads on the Misc are always good for laughs.

Post: #37

I wrote a ROK article earlier this year about the topic of incest.

There's no argument against incest if we use the Left's arguments supporting homosexual marriage.

Coming Soon To A Society Near You: Polygamy And Incest

Quote:“Consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want if they’re not hurting anyone.”

This has been the rallying cry for homosexual marriage advocates over the last two decades, along with “why do you care what people do if it doesn’t affect you?” In this article, I’ll take this rationale to its logical conclusion: Incest and polygamy.

[...]

consider the following scenario:

John is a 58-year-old man who is on vacation with his 30 year-old son. One day they decide it would be fun if they tried making love. They both found they enjoyed it and after a few more sessions decide they want legal recognition in the form of marriage for their newfound commitment to each other. Should they be allowed to do this?

Provide some reasons why they shouldn’t, and they’ll likely be the same reasons opponents of same-sex marriage have given for why homosexuals shouldn’t get married. “It’s disgusting,” “It’s wrong,” “It’s unnatural.” Yet by the reasoning of allowing same-sex marriage, this scenario should be perfectly fine.

Post: #38

The left is going to normalize this (if they haven't already) just like they normalized homosexuality and tried to with pedophilia (read Salon's article: "I'm a pedophile but not a monster.")

Post: #39

Is this his version of "born again Christian"?

Post: #40

Gives new meaning to the rule:

"Never go back to pussy you've been in before."