Post: #26

I'm not a fan of tit-for-tat, and at first glance this looks like white knighting. I'm not interested enough to go read it unfold on twitter, so if it's something else correct me if I'm wrong.

So what, he said he'd smash her laptop (probably an empty threat). I see that in response to the "meninist" t-shirt all the time, and as far as I know no one has ever been punched.

The horse-faced girl can probably defend her own honor, and laptop.

Post: #27

(02-10-2016 09:15 PM)Grodin Wrote:  I'm not a fan of tit-for-tat, and at first glance this looks like white knighting. I'm not interested enough to go read it unfold on twitter, so if it's something else correct me if I'm wrong.

So what, he said he'd smash her laptop (probably an empty threat). I see that in response to the "meninist" t-shirt all the time, and as far as I know no one has ever been punched.

The horse-faced girl can probably defend her own honor, and laptop.

What do you think would happen if a white, Trump supporting male threatened a black girl for having a Hillary sticker on her laptop and then engaged with her physically?

Not only are we making an example out of this kid by using their tactics against them, but this is an actual case of someone committing violence against someone else over their political opinions (and trying to get away with it by pulling the race card).

It's not white knighting because no one is doing this specifically to gain favor with the girl or feminists. We're doing it to attack the left. Mike is a genius, he immediately drew the link with Clifford and Black Lives Matter and blew that up.

Post: #28

Mike is basically fighting on the front lines of a culture war, doing a huge service for men like us, and guys want to hate because he gets his hands dirty. You don't win a fight by being nice. You don't win an argument with SJWs with logic.

While many of the community's dark triad alphas were scrambling to hide from Anonymous doxxes, Mike was publicly supporting Roosh using his real identity. He's also been one of the first to give his time, money, and influence to other men in need, whether it's an article, legal advice, or cash.

Post: #29

Her throwing her drink on him, wasn't cool.

She could've done so many things to fuck him over before technically assaulting him.

She's got balls to do that, more balls than he did, sneaking that creep picture.

I'm not siding with her on that, but I love how this dude is getting punked.

Post: #30

(02-11-2016 12:25 AM)iamdegaussed Wrote:  What do you think would happen if a white, Trump supporting male threatened a black girl for having a Hillary sticker on her laptop and then engaged with her physically?

Not only are we making an example out of this kid by using their tactics against them, but this is an actual case of someone committing violence against someone else over their political opinions (and trying to get away with it by pulling the race card).

It's not white knighting because no one is doing this specifically to gain favor with the girl or feminists. We're doing it to attack the left. Mike is a genius, he immediately drew the link with Clifford and Black Lives Matter and blew that up.

Mike is trolling, I can accept that. It's what he does on twitter.

Your question about what a bunch of idiots would do if a white guy "threatened" a black girl like this, they'd probably call for the dean to resign or some silly ish. What's the point of that question? I don't care to adopt the mindset of "them" just because they do.

The young man is getting kicked off twitter and probably disciplined by his school because of a histrionic reaction to an empty twitter threat. She fears for her safety? Bitch, you threw a cup of hot liquid on someone bigger than you, you should fear for your safety.

Trolling is one thing. Anyone who seriously endorses disciplinary actions on this man is white knighting for a girl who's under no real threat. I don't care about his politics.

Post: #31

There's no white knighting here.

White knighting us jumping to a woman's defence, no matter what provocation she exerted, solely because she's a woman, and the subconscious belief you'll get rewarded with pussy for your noble efforts.

What's happened here was an asshole was called out because #BLM has instilled the belief of black racial supremacy, that any view that deviates is defective and needs a beatdown, or in this case her laptop smashed.

The higher principal is freedom of political views. I find it galling a race quota entrant, too stupid for higher learning on merit feels qualified to comment on what's allowed in the political landscape?

Where does he get off thinking he has enough insight to comment in my shoes, let alone my political persuasion.

Post: #32

WW (Would Wife)

Yeah, I said it.

Post: #33

Would use for reproductive purposes to Make America Great Again.

Post: #34

(02-10-2016 09:08 PM)66Scorpio Wrote:  Point taken in that he was threatening property violence instead of physical violence, but it is still criminal mischief (under $5k? Over $5k? What model mac book is that?). Leftists love the excuse that property destruction isn't really violence and are outraged when tey get their assessment kicked by someone defending their property.

We're splitting hairs. He threatened violence towards her. It is an item of value that she can directly or indirectly protect, she would get harmed.

It isn't the same as vandalising her car or house.

There is no excuse for unnecessary violence towards a person. SJWs and progressives are quick as lightning to vilify someone who contravenes their codes of conduct, so their attempts to mitigate his threat because it was an item of property, not her person directly, are disingenuous.

Post: #35

It should have went down more like this

Post: #36

(02-11-2016 01:11 AM)T and A Man Wrote:  The higher principal is freedom of political views. I find it galling a race quota entrant, too stupid for higher learning on merit feels qualified to comment on what's allowed in the political landscape?

I find it galling that you automatically assume because he's black he's too stupid for higher learning based on merit alone.

Post: #37

(02-11-2016 10:32 AM)Huey Wrote:  

(02-11-2016 01:11 AM)T and A Man Wrote:  The higher principal is freedom of political views. I find it galling a race quota entrant, too stupid for higher learning on merit feels qualified to comment on what's allowed in the political landscape?

I find it galling that you automatically assume because he's black he's too stupid for higher learning based on merit alone.

Come on now. Have you seen the guys tweets or images. He looks like has to think hard to remember breathe, regardless of skin color.

T and A man was also referring to 'race quota entrant' but that he got a diversity pass for admissions. He's not there because he's a Rhodes Scholar that aced his entrance exams.

The key words here are "too stupid for higher learning based on merit alone"

If this was the south, that would be a redneck with a chewing tobbaco lip at free community college tweeting "7000 retweets and betcha I cain't smash her purty computer" but it would be an Obama sticker and she would be a white east coast girl that moved from out of state.

Stupid comes in many colors. Stupid comes more often when there are no, or lowered bars to access. Free college for all down here, or Free college for minorities somewhere else.

Post: #38

Huey, the man writes like he is only semi-literate.

I had better writing skills in fifth grade.

We wouldn't be calling him an affirmative action candidate if he showed some semblance of intelligence.

Post: #39

(02-11-2016 10:32 AM)Huey Wrote:  

(02-11-2016 01:11 AM)T and A Man Wrote:  The higher principal is freedom of political views. I find it galling a race quota entrant, too stupid for higher learning on merit feels qualified to comment on what's allowed in the political landscape?

I find it galling that you automatically assume because he's black he's too stupid for higher learning based on merit alone.

I find it even more ridiculous that someone would wife the girl up because of her alleged political views. She's probably a slut. A hot one, I give you that but still.

Doesn't the guy write like that on purpose though? I can't imagine someone could be that dumb and managed to get into college.

Post: #40

(02-11-2016 10:32 AM)Huey Wrote:  

(02-11-2016 01:11 AM)T and A Man Wrote:  The higher principal is freedom of political views. I find it galling a race quota entrant, too stupid for higher learning on merit feels qualified to comment on what's allowed in the political landscape?

I find it galling that you automatically assume because he's black he's too stupid for higher learning based on merit alone.

I've never met anyone intelligent who spells boy as "boi."

It's not about race but being a possibly dangerous and impulsive fuckwit has everything to do with it.

Post: #41

Not sure if you all read what kids say this days, but coming across like a lazy IDGAF half-wit is the in thing. All the "suh dude" and meme captions like:

   

That's humor these days.

Post: #42

(02-11-2016 12:51 AM)Grodin Wrote:  Mike is trolling, I can accept that. It's what he does on twitter.

Your question about what a bunch of idiots would do if a white guy "threatened" a black girl like this, they'd probably call for the dean to resign or some silly ish. What's the point of that question? I don't care to adopt the mindset of "them" just because they do.

The young man is getting kicked off twitter and probably disciplined by his school because of a histrionic reaction to an empty twitter threat. She fears for her safety? Bitch, you threw a cup of hot liquid on someone bigger than you, you should fear for your safety.

Trolling is one thing. Anyone who seriously endorses disciplinary actions on this man is white knighting for a girl who's under no real threat. I don't care about his politics.

This crock of shit again.

Sorry brah, but we are, and will continue to, use "their mentality" against them. If you want to keep spreading your ass cheeks and getting anally penetrated in order to "not be like them" instead then by all means do so, but do it in the privacy of your own home and don't bring us into it. Nobody likes to see that gay shit in public.

Post: #43

?? Did the race card get played ??

Its been asserted this guy has been granted an affirmative action scholarship. That alone says he's a quota entrant, not a merit entrant...

Some people want to spew outrage ehh?

Post: #44

(02-11-2016 12:21 PM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  This crock of shit again.

Sorry brah, but we are, and will continue to, use "their mentality" against them. If you want to keep spreading your ass cheeks and getting anally penetrated in order to "not be like them" instead then by all means do so, but do it in the privacy of your own home and don't bring us into it. Nobody likes to see that gay shit in public.

Sounds extremely passive aggressive to me.

Telling the guy to shut up because you don't like what he has to say? SJW 101 there.

You don't like their tactics and will use them against them. You lost the moral ground which has been discussed here quite a bit in the last week. Congrats, you are a SJW now.

Gay shit is bitching about the behavior of others and doing the same thing in order to exact revenge.

I understand the appeal, but you end up becoming the very same thing you say you abhor.

They way you fight is just as important as the fight itself.

Post: #45

(02-11-2016 06:14 PM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(02-11-2016 12:21 PM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  This crock of shit again.

Sorry brah, but we are, and will continue to, use "their mentality" against them. If you want to keep spreading your ass cheeks and getting anally penetrated in order to "not be like them" instead then by all means do so, but do it in the privacy of your own home and don't bring us into it. Nobody likes to see that gay shit in public.

Sounds extremely passive aggressive to me.

Telling the guy to shut up because you don't like what he has to say? SJW 101 there.

You don't like their tactics and will use them against them. You lost the moral ground which has been discussed here quite a bit in the last week. Congrats, you are a SJW now.

Gay shit is bitching about the behavior of others and doing the same thing in order to exact revenge.

I understand the appeal, but you end up becoming the very same thing you say you abhor.

They way you fight is just as important as the fight itself.

So what, we just shutup ? Let them keep eating away at morals to the point there is no high ground for it ?

What do you suggest then ? How do we combat it ? How do we fight ?

Empty threat or not, posting shit online is a guaranteed way to get shamed/bullied/slandered.

Post: #46

(02-11-2016 06:26 PM)kaotic Wrote:  So what, we just shutup ? Let them keep eating away at morals to the point there is no high ground for it ?

What do you suggest then ? How do we combat it ? How do we fight ?

Empty threat or not, posting shit online is a guaranteed way to get shamed/bullied/slandered.

Sounds like you are saying the only way to fight is to lower yourself to their level.

You really feel that helpless if you can't doxx or call employers on people you disagree with?

Is threatening people on social media really fighting the good fight?

Is that what you really believe?

Post: #47

Quote: Sorry brah, but we are, and will continue to, use "their mentality" against them.

How many times can you use "their mentality" before it becomes yours?

Post: #48

(02-11-2016 06:30 PM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(02-11-2016 06:26 PM)kaotic Wrote:  So what, we just shutup ? Let them keep eating away at morals to the point there is no high ground for it ?

What do you suggest then ? How do we combat it ? How do we fight ?

Empty threat or not, posting shit online is a guaranteed way to get shamed/bullied/slandered.

Sounds like you are saying the only way to fight is to lower yourself to their level.

You really feel that helpless if you can't doxx or call employers on people you disagree with?

Is threatening people on social media really fighting the good fight?

Is that what you really believe?

No I'm seriously asking how we should defend and go on the offensive for shit like this.

Writing blogs and hitting back against news outlets/writers is a start, but what else ?

Taking what I say out of context.

Over and over we hear...."well we don't need to stoop to their level" okay great. So what's changes we need to make to fight back effectively but in a manner that isn't SJW tactics ?

Calling someone out on some bullshit isn't an SJW tactic at all.

Doxxing and threatening someone is WHOLE different ball game.

Post: #49

Worldwide traveler, you're using a familiar argument that has a categorical error: equating tactics with ideology.

But tactics are not the same thing as ideology. Hitler's army used tanks, bombs, soldiers, and rifles to spread Nazi ideology. Allied forces used tanks, bombs, soldiers, and rifles to repel the Nazis.

When the Allies did this, they didn't become Nazis. And they never lost the moral high ground.

Nor will we when using doxxing and employment termination on SJWs.

Post: #50

(02-11-2016 06:34 PM)kaotic Wrote:  No I'm seriously asking how we should defend and go on the offensive for shit like this.

Writing blogs and hitting back against news outlets/writers is a start, but what else ?

Continue pushing the truth. You can do that without lowering yourself. Reason without emotion.

Arguing with people on social media won't help the cause anymore than showing the truth.

I have been watching this whole thing on twitter. Twitter looks to be a bunch of endless trolling, arguing and threats. I don't see how anything will get "solved" working in that type of environment.

Especially when participating.

Quote:Taking what I say out of context.

No, I did not. See next quote.

Quote:Over and over we hear...."well we don't need to stoop to their level" okay great. So what's changes we need to make to fight back effectively but in a manner that isn't SJW tactics ?

You honestly don't think this fight will be over in a year, 5 years or 10 years do you?

This isn't a marathon. This isn't a win and it's all over thing. It will take time but I do see some things changing. Look at Twitter's stock. Look at the trouble Reddit had when it was taken over by SJW.

I would also bet that the more false rapes that happen to men in universities will result in lower admissions.

Women complain about equality. No problem. There are more women working in management positions than before. If they do get married, which many won't be able to find a husband on their level, that means the divorce laws will be used against them like it has been for men for a long time.

Sometimes you give them what they say they want. Many will find out they really didn't want it to begin with.

Quote:Calling someone out on some bullshit isn't an SJW tactic at all.

Right, but doing so with reason and without emotion or trying to exact revenge.

Make them own their words and show why they are wrong. Continue to do so every chance you have.

Quote:Doxxing and threatening someone is WHOLE different ball game.

I agree and it should be called out on each side of the fence when it happens.