Post: #1

Doritos commercial is under fire, but not for having an typically idiotic commercial husband, for something FAR worse! They had the nerve to try and humanize a fetus, thus possibly causing a woman to rethink murdering her baby.

Quote:A pro-choice group kicked off a corn chip controversy Sunday night when it mocked a Doritos commercial as being “anti-choice” for using the “tactic of humanizing fetuses.”

Some viewers laughed, while others were a little put off by the “Ultrasound” ad, which showed a fictitious fetus kicking around in the womb as its oblivious and expectant father munched on Doritos. But few took the advertisement as seriously as NARAL Pro-Choice America, which tweeted “#NotBuyingIt – that @Doritos ad using #antichoice tactic of humanizing fetuses & sexist tropes of dads as clueless & moms as uptight. #SB50.”

The tweet – part of a barrage criticizing various aspects of Super Bowl commercials seen as sexist or anti-choice – received 348 retweets and 325 favorites.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/08/pro...sound.html

Post: #2

Pro choice folks offended that a man is depicted as a bumbling idiot with an uptight wife?

Am I reading this right?

Post: #3

"A pro-choice group kicked off a corn chip controversy Sunday night when it mocked a Doritos commercial as being “anti-choice” for using the “tactic of humanizing fetuses.”"

So I guess their next step would be to change the law that says when a pregnant woman is murdered, the killer is charged with the death of the unborn child too, right?

When I Googled convicted murderer Scott Peterson, here is what came up:
"Scott Lee Peterson is an American prisoner currently on death row in California, convicted of murdering his wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son in Modesto, California, in 2002."

So long as fetuses are alive in the eyes of the law, then they're going to be perceived as alive by most humans. If these people really want to change things up, they should change the law.

Of course, they'd never do that because they're a bunch of hypocrites more concerned with getting attention for their whining than actual social change.

You can't have it both ways, though. Fetuses are either alive or they aren't and if they aren't, well, you just gave license for anyone to kick a pregnant women into miscarriage with no repercussions.

Post: #4

I saw Cernovich tweet about this. I also hread the same group lost there mind over a Shockers comercail featuring William Dafoe.

I never heard of Narval until now. I guess outrage means free publicity.

Post: #5

(02-09-2016 04:37 AM)metalfan20 Wrote:  I saw Cernovich tweet about this. I also hread the same group lost there mind over a Shockers comercail featuring William Dafoe.

I never heard of Narval until now. I guess outrage means free publicity.

It certainly does for the Australian guy who did the ad. He didn't even give a fuck his ad didn't win the Superbowl competition; he just wanted the exposure and publicity.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #6

I have to admit that the ad had me laughing, which doesn't happen that often with ads. The fact that feminazis are butt hurt over it just makes it that much more enjoyable

Post: #7

Of course the only ad that made me laugh is now under fire by SJWs. If they get their way, there might no longer be a point in watching superbowls.

Post: #8

Quote: “tactic of humanizing fetuses.”

These people are monsters.

Post: #9

Quote:humanizing fetuses

When will we stop humanizing leftists?