Post: #26

Post: #27

I think he is controlled opposition whether or not he is Bill Hicks.

Post: #28

How do you figure? He was talking about pizzagate on Joe Rogans show ffs

Post: #29

(02-25-2017 12:14 PM)Enoch Wrote:  How do you figure? He was talking about pizzagate on Joe Rogans show ffs

Well obviously. Controlled opposition is going to talk about all that stuff.

I think he is controlled opposition because #1 he's not dead. He's on the radio, if I remember correctly the station he was/is on is owned by ABC. He 'infiltrated' Bohemian Grove- I don't think it's possible for a normal person do that, especially with no consequences.

Post: #30

I thought I remember many years ago, that he was friends with one of the black sheep of the Rothschild family. A rogue Rothschild could certainly be a valuable friend in his line of work.

Post: #31

The editing at 0:52 kills me every time

Post: #32

(02-25-2017 12:42 PM)zoom Wrote:  

(02-25-2017 12:14 PM)Enoch Wrote:  How do you figure? He was talking about pizzagate on Joe Rogans show ffs

Well obviously. Controlled opposition is going to talk about all that stuff.

I think he is controlled opposition because #1 he's not dead. He's on the radio, if I remember correctly the station he was/is on is owned by ABC. He 'infiltrated' Bohemian Grove- I don't think it's possible for a normal person do that, especially with no consequences.

I don't think he's controlled opposition, but he serves the same purpose. He'll get 80-90% of certain things right but the last 10-20% makes the guy look like a fool. I really think he would be better in a longer format type of show based on just a few topics. His 3+ long hour shows where he talks about 50+ different topics just clouds and confuses everything.

I think he's genuine but money hungry.

Post: #33

The White house needs to give Infowars access to press conferences. I like the fact that Trump kicked out CNN. Alex Jones is really under attack and he has been a loyal supporter of the president. He deserves the credibility and it would be a huge slap in the face to the mainstream Fake News outlets who think they are legitimate because they say so.

Post: #34

He allegedly has business ties with the Bronfmans. He's definitely a gatekeeper. He drops truth bombs, that he genuinely believes in, but will stop just short of opening the very last door.

Jones believes that 9/11 was an inside job, but he will not give away the full story behind who did it and why, stopping at Bush/Cheney/"globalists". He will never have someone like Christopher Bollyn, probably the researcher that best nails the perpetrators of 9/11, on his program, and he's been evasive about Bollyn's research:

https://youtu.be/sGcb21alfHo?t=39s

http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book

Here's a lecture where Christopher Bollyn lays his case about the 9/11 perpetrators:





Jones' other major flaw is that he lacks gravitas, and his carnival barker persona makes is easy for the general public to dismiss the "conspiracy theories". He's therefore a good gatekeeper, who is allowed to grow.

This being said, his influence is positive overall, as seen in the last elections cycle. A lot of serious people like Corbett credit his network for setting them on the right path.

Post: #35

Jones makes many great points. He's got a deep knowledge on many topics and, most of all, on how they come together and connect and create the zeitgeist.

But his delivery is all over the place and that turns people off.

He has potential to be much more than an alt-journalism and conspiracy theory figure. No one does it better than him but if he wanted to move from cult following to a more wide recognition he should get someone to help organize his thoughts in a more linear, sharp, clean and CONCISE delivery. He's said before himself - he's so passionate and he's got so much information overflowing his mind that it's hard not to lose his own train of thought.

Then again, his delivery is what makes people watch him. If he were logic, clear spoken and objective, he wouldn't have the audience he does.

His standard approach is: talk, rant, sidestep - but ever so often drop gold. So you keep tuning in to look for those little nuggets. That's why he waters down so much of his content. It's not a profitable to save up content and make, say, 3-4 excellent videos a month going deep and leaving no stone unturned.

Gotta love the guy though.

Post: #36

(02-25-2017 12:58 PM)Laner Wrote:  I thought I remember many years ago, that he was friends with one of the black sheep of the Rothschild family. A rogue Rothschild could certainly be a valuable friend in his line of work.

I think you might be referring to Aaron Russo. He had connections with the Rockefeller family and was killed shortly after making his movie America: Freedom To Fascism

Post: #37

Haven't listened to him much; I think he's too much of an infotainer who tries to market himself to the "tin foil hat" crowd like Jesse Ventura; it's also worth noting that he earns income from IHeartMedia, which is owned by "global corporation" Bain Capital, so I'm not sure how much he really believes what he says.

If he'd just focus on legitimate non-mainstream topics of interest rather than milk the stereotypical "conspiracy theories" involving stuff like Illuminati, etc then I think he'd be a lot more credible.

Post: #38

Alex Jones is going through a divorce. His ex-wife wants to divorce rape him for $7 million. The reason? "Emotional distress."

Quote:Earlier this year, her lawyers had moved to add to the trial a $7 million emotional distress tort claim against Alex Jones.

His lawyers said it was too late to prepare a defense against a new claim with 172 separate allegations. Naranjo agreed and promised to expedite a second trail on the tort claim.

“They’d like to drag it out for two years, and she’ll be crushed and she’ll be bankrupt,” said Robert Hoffman, the Houston attorney who is Kelly Jones’ lead counsel, in arguing for rolling the tort claim into the trial.

“She already is, for all practical purposes,” said Hoffman, who said she owed his firm $200,000, about all she had in the bank.

Her attorneys also filed a motion to require Alex Jones to help pay her interim legal fees to better enable her to rescue her children from his clutches.

http://www.mystatesman.com/news/state--r...OPgP3A34J/

Post: #39

(04-16-2017 05:53 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Alex Jones is going through a divorce. His ex-wife wants to divorce rape him for $7 million. The reason? "Emotional distress."

Quote:Earlier this year, her lawyers had moved to add to the trial a $7 million emotional distress tort claim against Alex Jones.

His lawyers said it was too late to prepare a defense against a new claim with 172 separate allegations. Naranjo agreed and promised to expedite a second trail on the tort claim.

“They’d like to drag it out for two years, and she’ll be crushed and she’ll be bankrupt,” said Robert Hoffman, the Houston attorney who is Kelly Jones’ lead counsel, in arguing for rolling the tort claim into the trial.

“She already is, for all practical purposes,” said Hoffman, who said she owed his firm $200,000, about all she had in the bank.

Her attorneys also filed a motion to require Alex Jones to help pay her interim legal fees to better enable her to rescue her children from his clutches.

http://www.mystatesman.com/news/state--r...OPgP3A34J/

What a mess. I'm glad I'm not married.

Post: #40

The obligatory ones concerning that newsarticle:

“He says he wants to break Alec Baldwin’s neck. "





"“I’m concerned that he is engaged in felonious behavior, threatening a member of Congress,"





Say what you will about his tantrums but the question is would he even be that popular if it was not for his entertaining persona.

Post: #41

Google searches on this recent topic throw up rogue websites that claim his ex wife Kelly is jewish, but nothing official.

Post: #42

And then there's this from the new yorker magazine:

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/201...awyer.html

Quote:Alex Jones Is Just ‘Playing a Character,’ According to His Lawyer
By Margaret Hartmann
April 17, 2017

Alex Jones isn’t a conspiracy theorist who thinks “globalist” elites staged the Boston Marathon bombing, and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama reek of sulfur because they are demons – he just plays one one the radio.

At least, that’s what Jones’s lawyer claimed in the custody battle over his three children, arguing that judging his client by his Infowars persona would be like evaluating Jack Nicholson’s parenting skills by watching him play The Joker in Batman.

“He’s playing a character,” attorney Randall Wilhite argued at a pretrial hearing, according to the Austin American-Statesman. “He is a performance artist.”

Over the next two weeks, a Texas jury will decide whether Jones’s “performance” reflects who he is in private life, and whether that has any bearing on his fitness as a parent. His ex-wife, Kelly Jones, says there is only one Alex Jones, and his on-air persona is part of the reason that she should have custody of their children. Their 14-year-old son and 12- and 9-year-old daughters have lived with Alex Jones since they divorced in 2015.

Post: #43

Joe Rogan insists that he's actually like that, and they're on the record good friends. On the podcast they did, he certainly came across as 100% genuine. The hilarious, over the top ranting is probably for ratings though, I guess.

Post: #44

His ex-wife is indeed Jewish:

Post: #45

(04-17-2017 05:00 PM)Roosh Wrote:  His ex-wife is indeed Jewish:

I really don't know what to make of Alex Jones. I've only recently started listening to his radio show, and he has a history of dropping confirmed truth bomb after truth bomb -- and while, yes, he's clearly developed a persona which has great entertainment value, I find it hard to believe that someone who's gone as far down the rabbit hole as he would have you believe so readily dismisses the "Jewish question". It's hard not to connect the dots once you begin to develop a basic understanding of history and talmudism's role in shaping our current world.

Side note -- watched Passion of the Christ yesterday in honor of the Easter holiday, and couldn't help thinking to myself, the Pharisees haven't changed a damn bit. Same shit, different millennium.

I want to believe Alex Jones is who he says he is, and that his defense of Judaism is calculated to avoid being labeled and dismissed as anti-Semitic -- similar to how Gary Allen was sure to state up front, in None Dare Call it Conspiracy, that new world order globalism and Judaism have no correlation. But there are definite red flags with respect to AJ, including who pays his salary, that I can't get past. Not to say there's zero value in him if he's compromised, but I do take his sometimes insane ramblings with a grain of salt.

Post: #46

No one pays his salary. He owns the company, which is funded by their products and ad revenue.

Post: #47

(04-16-2017 05:53 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Alex Jones is going through a divorce. His ex-wife wants to divorce rape him for $7 million. The reason? "Emotional distress."

To be honest, if any bitch had a reasonable claim to "emotional distress" in this day of no-fault divorce, it'd be Jones' ex wife.

Post: #48

Anyone here try "Super Male Vitality"?

Post: #49

(04-17-2017 10:29 PM)Seth_Rose Wrote:  No one pays his salary. He owns the company, which is funded by their products and ad revenue.

I assume most of his revenue is royalty income from syndication with iheartmedia, Sirius XM, etc. as opposed to sales of caveman bone broth with CHAGA MUSHROOM. My point being that someone is permitting him to reach a wide audience via their radio network.

Post: #50

(04-17-2017 05:00 PM)Roosh Wrote:  His ex-wife is indeed Jewish:

Nice find Roosh.
That video above where he talks about his wife, is with the radio talk show host Howard Stern who is also jewish.

I had conflicting thoughts about whether Alex Jones was controlled opposition or not for many years now.

After he recently publically apologized and totally backed down from the pizzagate child abuse issue, and now this revelation about his ex wife's religion, I am afraid that Jones is proving to be nothing more than a small time "Emmanuel Goldstein" type character from the novel 1984.

Meaning he is indeed controlled opposition.