Post: #26

(01-25-2016 01:09 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  The real problem is of course not that a bunch of fat fucks are mentally ill and acting out their fantasies on Tumblr - God bless them! It's that massive corporations like Facebook legitimize that crap and egg these freaks on, having a vested interest (more money and power) in producing a degenerate society.

What an absolute joke. It's amazing how corporations pander to freaks like this in the name of political correctness.

Reminds me of a petition that was done asking Mark Zuckerberg to let his new child be "gender neutral" - even though transgenders are less than 0.001% of the population, the far-left SJWs apparently want to give the impression that someone has a 50/50 chance of being transgender.

It's disgusting to me but the good thing I think is that these guys have gone so far off the deep end more and more people are beginning to realize it and along with the internet, this will help to kill off political correctness (with 72% of Americans now finding PC a bad thing according to polls).

Post: #27

ABP's candid post on this thread really touched me.

Some of you may have suspected it, but I sexually identify as a cigar. I've learned to accept my body for what it is--a sleek torpedo of hand-rolled tobacco. People have mocked me and suggested I look like a penis, but that doesn't bother me anymore. There are certain advantages to being me; people love to take me and put me in their holes. Few things make me happier than when someone takes the time to suck me off. The only thing that makes me unhappy is that after people smoke me, they crush me out and call my body a "faggot." I can't believe such prejudice and hate exists in 2016! In conclusion, Sigmund Freud was wrong. A cigar is not always a cigar. Cigars are people too.

Post: #28

Just a reminder, gentlemen, people have sexes, not genders; nouns have genders.

The scientist who pushed the word gender onto people was a pedophile trying to push degeneracy.

Post: #29

(01-25-2016 02:32 PM)Aurini Wrote:  Just a reminder, gentlemen, people have sexes, not genders; nouns have genders.

The scientist who pushed the word gender onto people was a pedophile trying to push degeneracy.

Why am I not suprised? So many cultural Marxists have infiltrated universities

Post: #30

I always found people using those tags to make my own personalized categorization quite simplified.

It follows as:

[ human ] and [ Damaged goods ]

Post: #31

(01-25-2016 01:09 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  The real problem is of course not that a bunch of fat fucks are mentally ill and acting out their fantasies on Tumblr - God bless them! It's that massive corporations like Facebook legitimize that crap and egg these freaks on, having a vested interest (more money and power) in producing a degenerate society.

Word.

Back in the days we had just 2 genders: Male and Female.

If you were born as a male but dress like a female, take hormones, and love boys, you are a male. Acting like a female.

Fortunately here in Thailand, sex changes aren't allowed. Let's hope that the degeneration won't catch up here.
Edit: Unfortunately allowed under certain conditions, but same-sex couples do not get the same legal privileges like real couples, and relationships aren't officially recognized.

Post: #32

Oh..., mother nature only gave us XX or XY chromosomes. Go & take it up with her ya' mental midget, retards.

Plus, even if someone was foolish enough to try & be tolerant of all this pronoun nonsense.
There's nothing to say it won't all change next week or that there won't be another host of
special pronouns.
Social conventions exist for a reason.

Post: #33

(01-26-2016 06:05 AM)Rawmeo Wrote:  

(01-25-2016 01:09 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  The real problem is of course not that a bunch of fat fucks are mentally ill and acting out their fantasies on Tumblr - God bless them! It's that massive corporations like Facebook legitimize that crap and egg these freaks on, having a vested interest (more money and power) in producing a degenerate society.

Word.

Back in the days we had just 2 genders: Male and Female.

If you were born as a male but dress like a female, take hormones, and love boys, you are a male. Acting like a female.

Fortunately here in Thailand, sex changes aren't allowed. Let's hope that the degeneration won't catch up here.
Edit: Unfortunately allowed under certain conditions, but same-sex couples do not get the same legal privileges like real couples, and relationships aren't officially recognized.

I'd heard Thailand was the tranny capital of the world, was I wrong?

Post: #34

I'm a God trapped in a human's body - worship me, and give me all your money and virgin daughters.

If you refuse you're just bigoted against divine avatars. I'll have the SPLC label you as a hate group.

Post: #35

(01-26-2016 06:05 AM)Rawmeo Wrote:  ...

Fortunately here in Thailand, sex changes aren't allowed. Let's hope that the degeneration won't catch up here.
Edit: Unfortunately allowed under certain conditions, but same-sex couples do not get the same legal privileges like real couples, and relationships aren't officially recognized.

Are there two countries called Thailand? Because I have a hard time imagining anywhere else in the world where you'll see as many trannies/ladyboys as in Bangkok - and not solely in and around the red light districts.

Post: #36

I'm in love with two school bags - I'm bisatchel.

Post: #37

From what I know (never been there though), Thailand is very relaxed and always has been relaxed about trannies for some Buddhist or whatever reasons.

However, "relaxed" means "trannies aren't insulted or attacked in everyday life", not "trannies are godlike creatures with special privileges" like here in the west.

Post: #38

In the UK, the British Government's Department of Education sent out questionnaires for 13 to 18 year old students which (among other questions regarding whether they would prefer unisex toilets) also asked them how they define their gender:



This is the woman responsible for the questionnaire, the "Children’s Commissioner for England", Anne Longfield OBE, a "former charity boss":



It was co-authored by this woman (on the left), Professor Jessica Ringrose (University College London):



Mrs Ringrose...

Quote:says that she teaches ‘in the areas of social justice, gender, sexuality and feminist qualitative research’.

Ringrose is the co-author of articles entitled ‘Boobs and Barbie: Feminist posthuman perspectives on gender, bodies and practice’; ‘Sexting, Ratings and (Mis)Recognition: Teen Boys Performing Classed and Racialised Masculinities in Digitally Networked Publics’;

According to this article, the questionnaire, which had already been sent out to some schools and was published online "mysteriously disappeared from the Children’s Commissioner’s website after the Daily Mail asked her about it"

Even if the questionnaire was withdrawn (for now) - exploring a story like this shows me once more how well set up these people are:

• titles (professor, OBE, etc.)
• budgets
• staff
• positions (in the government, the universities, etc.)
• access to the young minds (students in schools, in universities)
  

Post: #39

(01-30-2016 05:43 AM)Sgt Wrote:  

Reviewing my post, I just noticed - why would they give heterosexual, non-confused girls and boys the choice between three completely overlapping options:

• Girl / Female / young woman
• Boy / Male / Young man
  

My guess is - they know that most students would just tick "Boy" or "Girl" and that it will only be a minuscule number that chooses one of the other options, giving them a result that they can't further their agenda with. So by dividing heterosexuals up between three options which are essentially the same, they might get a result like this:

• 50% Male
• 30% Boy
• 19% Young man
• 1% other
  

... which means they can make press releases like "only 50% of young male students identify as male"

Post: #40

(01-26-2016 03:05 PM)Matsufubu Wrote:  I'm in love with two school bags - I'm bisatchel.

I groaned. I'm also blatantly stealing it. ;-)

Post: #41

I would love to go back in time 40 years and show this list to the educational elite and ask them what they truly think of the fruit of their teaching.

I suspect 80% would be delighted and 20% would resign on the spot and take up chicken farming.