Post: #1

Globocorp elite's Time Inc. Ragazine has just put Merkel on its cover as the Person of the Year.



In response to that Trump had this to say:



Donald is right of course.

What I find comical in all this is their rationale for their choice:

"For asking more of her country than most politicians would dare, for standing firm against tyranny as well as expedience and for providing steadfast moral leadership in a world where it is in short supply, Angela Merkel is TIME's Person of the Year."

This trite shite was uttered by Time Inc. (Feminist) editor Nancy Gibbs (maiden name Gibbs :o), presumably on behalf of Norman Pearlswine, Time Inc. Executive VP and Chief Content Officer.

Content people, C-O-N-T-E-N-T.

timeinc.com/about/leadership/norman-pearlstine/

Unsurprisingly, Merkel's spokesman Steffen Seibert sees this as validation of the job well done.

"I'm sure the chancellor will regard this as an encouragement for her political work, for a good future for Germany as well as for Europe."

http://news.yahoo.com/angela-merkel-name...21986.html

And that's how Globocorp elites' goals are supported and sold to public at large. By way of incestuous synergy between various players along the chain, all working for the same ownership team. And if you, dear reader, don't work for them, OR against them, then that leaves you to be the recepient of the tangible world/reality they are creating on your absent behalf. However horrifying that reality gets to be upon your ass.

Post: #2

*Looks at surnames and prominent writers of all the head people at Time magazine*

*clicks on x*

Post: #3

Post: #4

Quote:"I'm sure the chancellor will regard this as an encouragement for her political work, for a good future for Germany as well as for Europe."

Well, since Baghdadi is second, I guess that is also a sign of encouragement for the future of fundamentalist islamic statehood.
Being first in a race where the second place is for the man who heads (probably) the biggest terrorist organization on this planet and using that as a justification for your policies is worse than dumb. It's liberal level dumb.

Post: #5

Like him or not, Bernie Sanders won the reader's poll, yet was not included on the shortlist for Person of the Year.

Time needs to please its corporate masters. Those "masters" are not its parent company, but its advertisers, board of advisors, etc., all of whom benefit from dumping Third World slave labor into Europe and America.

Merkel has been in the vanguard of that. The won't come out and say this, of course. They'll dress it up as "humanitarianism" and the sheeple will buy into it.

This is one of the problems with Christian countries that corporations have learned to take advantage of. They'll back anything, no matter how idiotic or heinous, if you make it into a bleeding-heart "cause" or a "charity."

Post: #6

Fuck this saggy old cunt.

Post: #7

Traitor of the free world is more like it.

Post: #8

Surely they could have picked a better picture.


Also, 1939:

Post: #9

I think it's been established for a while now that Germany is dead.

Time to start placing bets when we think it will become totally Islamic.

Post: #10

Some saboteur fucks are going to find themselves on the wrong side of an oil change.

Post: #11

Found a better image of her:



Ephialtes Merkel, the one who betrayed her nation by giving the invading army of the near east an alternate way into the heart of Europe.

Post: #12

What i dont think you guys realize is that the TIME person of the year is not necessarily someone with a positive influence, its somebody who changed the world for better or worse. Hitler won person of the year, and im pretty sure at no point he was considered a positive influence.

With that being said, she still could have been picked for her "hospitality of refugees and welcoming them in the face of terror".

Post: #13

(12-09-2015 02:32 PM)Cortés Wrote:  What i dont think you guys realize is that the TIME person of the year is not necessarily someone with a positive influence, its somebody who changed the world for better or worse. Hitler won person of the year, and im pretty sure at no point he was considered a positive influence.

With that being said, she still could have been picked for her "hospitality of refugees and welcoming them in the face of terror".

I was so certain I had missed a detail like that.

Why don't they explain that, instead of making themselves look like fools?

Post: #14

VIDEO: Why Angela Merkel - and not Donald Trump - for @TIME's Person of the Year? Nancy Gibbs explains.

Post: #15

Mother of God...how did this dour old bag ever get to the helm of Europe's most powerful economy?

If Bismarck were alive today, he would be too horrified for words.

Then again, I shouldn't open my mouth too much, either. Who do we have? Barry the Community Organizer.

As the Irish say, "Jesus, Mary, and Joseph! What proper assholes are these!"

Post: #16

I fully agree that Merkel should be person of the year - she has caused the most damage in the world this year. The person of the year is selected for influece not benevolence, I am surprised so many still don't know that.

Trump has not became president yet, so obviously he should't be selected this year.

Now if Trump wins the election then I would bet that he would definately become person of the year in at least one year of his presidency.

Actually I would bet that whoever wins the 2016 American presidential election will get selected as Time's person of the year 2016, be it Trump or be it Hillary.

Another good andidate for PotY in the few next years is ISIS or muslims in general or migrants or refugees - Time has nominated groups of people before.

Post: #17

(12-09-2015 02:32 PM)Cortés Wrote:  What i dont think you guys realize is that the TIME person of the year is not necessarily someone with a positive influence, its somebody who changed the world for better or worse. Hitler won person of the year, and im pretty sure at no point he was considered a positive influence.

With that being said, she still could have been picked for her "hospitality of refugees and welcoming them in the face of terror".

Argument invalid. It's a relevancy fallacy because you're talking about a broader category.


TIME explicitly picked her because they believe that she had a positive influence, and they say as much. The possible reasons really aren't relevant when the knee-jerk interpretation happens to be the correct one.

Post: #18

(12-09-2015 02:32 PM)Cortés Wrote:  What i dont think you guys realize is that the TIME person of the year is not necessarily someone with a positive influence, its somebody who changed the world for better or worse. Hitler won person of the year, and im pretty sure at no point he was considered a positive influence.

With that being said, she still could have been picked for her "hospitality of refugees and welcoming them in the face of terror".

The other candidates for 2015 were:
Trump
Bruce/Caitlin Jenner
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani
Black Lives Matter movement
ISIS Leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
Uber CEO Travis Kalanick

Post: #19

Oh god, if the choice is between Bruce Jenner and Angela Merkel, maybe this isn't so bad

Post: #20

Nobel peace price winner will be chosen this weekend.

Predictions?

Just kidding...

Post: #21

(12-09-2015 02:32 PM)Cortés Wrote:  What i dont think you guys realize is that the TIME person of the year is not necessarily someone with a positive influence, its somebody who changed the world for better or worse. Hitler won person of the year, and im pretty sure at no point he was considered a positive influence.

With that being said, she still could have been picked for her "hospitality of refugees and welcoming them in the face of terror".

Hitler pulled Germany out of the great depression and in his first year decreased unemployment from 10million people to 4 million people, introduced working standards across Germany and was so good at what he did that the Austrians were practically begging him to annex them.

He was a hero to Europe... Pre-holocaust of course.

Post: #22

It's just them doubling down on the narrative like Roosh said they would in September. Take this all as a positive sign. They are clearly losing control and are throwing everything they can at us to maintain it.

Post: #23

Posted on Euro crisis thread.... just thought you guys would appreciate it.....

Moderator: Removed NSFW image

Post: #24

For a head of state to be wearing a ridiculous low-cut dress like that, is disgraceful.

It reflects creditably neither on her, nor her office as chancellor.

She looks like she belongs at an over-50 dating event, or a bingo parlor.

Totally unacceptable for a head of state...

Post: #25

The look of love...