Post: #51

I can see a guy stating that he preferred pre-wall women in their late 20's over 18 year olds for spending longer amounts of time together on account of the fact that they can handle a conversation. I've met plenty of women 23+ who can and make for excellent company.

But to prefer MILFs over all?

Don't lie to yourself.

Post: #52

I live in a college town. I find when I am here the only way to get early 20s women is to isolate them from their vapid social circles (a difficult task). Thus, most of my women here are older. When I travel its a different story.

It is very fun to bang late 20s-early 40s. They can be really good in bed, intellectually stimulating and even cool to hang out with. Many American early 20s women are too vapid for me to tolerate for anything more than a one night stand/ fuck buddy relationship, but in terms of raw, caveman attraction, a 20 year old 6 beats a 35 year old 8 any day of the week.

Post: #53

(12-03-2015 04:58 AM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  Young chicks are dumb, inexperienced, drama prone, can't make conversation, are self obsessed and have no class. They are also a lot of work to get and maintain.

I'm willing to bet most of us (me included) don't have near enough sample size to make statements like this. Perhaps you met a few young girls like that. I have met lots of people like that, men and women, old and young. My gal is 21, and certainly not dumb, inexperienced, drama-prone, incapable of conversation, self-obsessed, or classless. She doesn't have all of the life experiences I have, because I have 13 years on her. But she brings other stuff to the table, like openness and kindness to outsiders, that I don't have as much time for. So it's a nice trade-off. My sample size is also small, so I can't say this is the norm, but if one is not happy with the results sometimes it helps to cast the glance into the mirror.