Post: #126

(08-20-2016 01:41 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  They've always been whiny little bitches, snapping their fingers in applause at spoken poetry in the 70's, just now trading their berets and turtlenecks for black rimmed glasses and head side-shaves.
Only difference is now they have the internet to get attention with, to exponentially grow and fund their whine fest beat boxing.

Even longer than the 70's. You had the beatnik's back in the 50's

Post: #127

Yeah I couldn't remember which decade they were from, same strain as the flower children in the 60's.

Post: #128

Someone wrote a piece about this dude.

https://www.thecut.com/2016/01/jared-rut...c-v-r.html

Post: #129

(09-19-2015 11:37 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

There is absolutely nothing wrong with this sentence.

Quote:

She's right. She isn't a fucksock. You'd have to want to fuck a fucksock.

Post: #130

(09-18-2017 05:30 PM)MiscVs Wrote:  Someone wrote a piece about this dude.

https://www.thecut.com/2016/01/jared-rut...c-v-r.html

I'm not sure why he's still living in that small town. When you're made an outcast, it's just best you leave.

One good thing about my infamy is that it's diluted worldwide and not based in my hometown. If I ever live in DC again, I doubt people would care.

Post: #131

The only thing I find illuminating about that article is that the hamster wheels didn't start rolling until the women found out what the guy really thought about them.

Remember, not one of these women were looking for a relationship. Each and every one knew and accepted that the relationship was "casual", i.e. bumping uglies.

Quote:“Having my heart broken by someone I never had an emotional investment in — it’s awful,” said C.

It is awful, but not for the reason you think it is, love.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #132

(09-18-2017 11:15 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  The only thing I find illuminating about that article is that the hamster wheels didn't start rolling until the women found out what the guy really thought about them.

Remember, not one of these women were looking for a relationship. Each and every one knew and accepted that the relationship was "casual", i.e. bumping uglies.

Quote:“Having my heart broken by someone I never had an emotional investment in — it’s awful,” said C.

It is awful, but not for the reason you think it is, love.

And women talk all the time badly about men:

"That guy had the most awful strange dick."
"He could not fuck me good."
"His dick was tiny."
"He looked weird."

It's as if they never badmouth the men they were fucking.

It's like this one college girl who wrote her manifesto about the last 20+ guys she fucked and she rated them from 1 to 10. Half of them got off so bad that nothing HolisticGame did were coming even close. But she is fine, because she is a "lady".

We live in a Blue Pill matriarchy.

Post: #133

I can't possibly be the only one disappointed at their choice of blog title. "Putting the sweet D in the tender V since 2003" sounds much better.

So many wrong decisions these folks made

Post: #134

(09-18-2017 11:15 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  The only thing I find illuminating about that article is that the hamster wheels didn't start rolling until the women found out what the guy really thought about them.

Remember, not one of these women were looking for a relationship. Each and every one knew and accepted that the relationship was "casual", i.e. bumping uglies.

...you mean getting rawdogged in a dive bar bathroom wasn't about the "magic" between them?

This is an outrage!

Post: #135

I'm guessing these girls were saying that they didn't want to relationships only to save face. They originally went causal in hopes of locking him down. It didn't happen, so they go angry after his writings w the discovered. They are the classic jilted lover. If it was casual, they wouldn't have bothered with the witch hunt. Their actions betray their words.

Post: #136

(09-18-2017 11:15 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  The only thing I find illuminating about that article is that the hamster wheels didn't start rolling until the women found out what the guy really thought about them.

Remember, not one of these women were looking for a relationship. Each and every one knew and accepted that the relationship was "casual", i.e. bumping uglies.

Quote:“Having my heart broken by someone I never had an emotional investment in — it’s awful,” said C.

It is awful, but not for the reason you think it is, love.

(09-19-2017 10:00 AM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  I'm guessing these girls were saying that they didn't want to relationships only to save face. They originally went causal in hopes of locking him down. It didn't happen, so they go angry after his writings w the discovered. They are the classic jilted lover. If it was casual, they wouldn't have bothered with the witch hunt. Their actions betray their words.

That, and they just had their world view blown apart.

Grandma always said that men don't respect easy women, and stuff like "Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?" But grandma didn't know what she was talking about, she was a victim of the patriarchy, having been married to the same man her whole.

Mom on the other hand, grew up weaned on Sex Positive Feminism articles in magazines and books. The world view that taught that being a stripper or a porn "star" is empowering for women. Casual sex with multiple people is empowering so long as all are ethical and honest. That is why these actively girls encouraged each other to fuck that coffee shop owners. Nevermind that Mom is now alone and buys wine by the box, she is still pretending her way worked out. She believes it so long as she is drunk and occasionally gets fucked by 3 am slump-busters.

So these girls read the now-exposed blog and learned that grandma was right all along, these guys have no respect for them whatsoever, and in fact do see themselves as committing too, but not to an aging thot. But to admit it to themselves is an admission of failure and would require self-improvement and a new world view. Instead they double down and get angry at the men.