More censorship in action:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/7131...ela-Merkel

See the headline link? It reads on Drudge as HALF of Germans fear Islamisation... but now it's a 404 not found!

Civil War imminent. It's a matter of survival, the speed of which the war happens depends on how many Muzzies are let in. I still think a brutal winter will set things off in Europe. Last Winter never happened, let's see what happens when cold and snow hit the streets and force the Muzzies into peoples homes.

^ I'll give it till the numbers from Turkey start going up like we saw in 2015 and once that winter sets in. That would put a good 2-3 years between the first large invasion, their settling in and the criminality. You're basically adding onto the pile then and it will spill over.

Unless some massive welfare state failure were to happen between then and now in multiple European countries and food cahrities cannot cope. A nice TV is all very well but an immigrant wants food and he did not treck 2000 miles or more to see himself starve when weaker people of the host country eat well.

They will start mass looting the stores or going in gangs to shoplift. Like they do now but on a daily basis across larger areas. A modern day form of banditry but with no help from the authorities. It will only be a logical step to invade homes where there are ;

1: None or few weapons
2: occupants easily overpowered
3: Rape & beat the occupants
4: Steal valuables
5: the police will be too spread out.
6: More homes than shops

This is an extreme case but possible. Hell, 5 years ago this sort of invasion would have been laughed out of the forum but her we are. Worryingly.

(09-22-2016 06:20 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Ah well - the displacement of the Germans in Germany is already reality. Germany is already lost and so is Sweden, France, Netherlands, Belgium and Austria. Those countries won't be majority European in 2040.

I've made this point on many occasions right here in this thread over the past year. Nice to see that you guys are finally catching up ;-)

Sarcasm aside - yes, fully agree. There is no chance in hell the emerging Nationalists will be able to turn things around as they won't be able to gain a majority in any NE country in the next election cycle. They may be able to force the majority or in the best case their semi-liberal coalition parties to make drastic changes, sure. But it won't be enough to REVERSE the current dynamics. And four/five years later it will already be too late as the demographic momentum is now rapidly gaining velocity. With every new election cycle the existing native population will die off. And the Muzzies are doing their best to accelerate the process.

The are only two measures that would change this outcome:

1. Europeans start fucking like rabbits and women actually give birth to 3+ children each.
2. Mass exidus of the current Muslim population - voluntarily or by force.
   

Northern Europe is pretty much lost. We are now living on borrowed time. Enjoy it while it lasts.

Two things to consider:

1) Foreign roots does not mean "muslim roots". Even Russian-Germans (Ethnic Germans who lived in the USSR) are considered "foreign" in German demographic statistics. a LOT of these foreigners are just other Europeans.

2) Germany, unlike the USA & Canada, does not have birthright citizenship. Even many of the turkish people in Berlin do not have german citizenship despite being born here decades ago. The Naturalisation process is quite lengthy and difficult in Germany.

What I take from that is that its not quite the time to throw in the towel and start crying about the end of Europe. It could happen, but it hasn't yet, so don't quit. Too many here are content to just wallow in their hopelessness and give a snarky "i told you so".

Meanwhile, here's another approach: people taking action in the real world.

(09-22-2016 10:55 AM)redpillage Wrote:  The are only two measures that would change this outcome:

1. Europeans start fucking like rabbits and women actually give birth to 3+ children each.
2. Mass exidus of the current Muslim population - voluntarily or by force.
   

3. The screwfly solution

Seems like the refugee activists (mostly women) are having a good time in Calais.

Sex with minors in the Calais Jungle

Quote: Volunteers in the Calais Jungle have been accused of sexually exploiting refugees and even child migrants.

The Independent has discovered a serious row has broken out among some unpaid charity workers at the camp in northern France, with some believing forging sexual relationships with adult refugees is natural in such circumstances, while others say it breaches all usual codes of conduct.

One man who raised the alarm was later subjected to a barrage of online abuse.

After being told of the allegations, UNHCR, the United Nations Refugee Agency, called for charities in Calais to impose "zero tolerance" policies on any exploitation to help maintain the "integrity" of volunteer work.


READ MORE
End the misery of the Calais Jungle
Charity leaders working in the area have confirmed there is a serious problem, with worries about predatory behaviour by both male and female volunteers. But they say it is difficult to control due to the absence of universal humanitarian standards in the Jungle, meaning there are no official aid organisations on the ground and no controls over who can enter to volunteer.

Clare Mosely, founder of Care4Calais, one of the biggest charities working there, which has a zero tolerance policy regarding relationships with refugees, said: "At the end of the day it isn't recognised as an official refugee camp, it's an illegal settlement. So we’ve got no way of forcing anyone to leave. That is the difficulty."

The issue came to light after a bitter online discussion between volunteers that was later deleted after concerns were raised that it would become a scandal if it were seen by journalists. The Independent saved a copy before it was removed.

The exchanges were started by a male volunteer on a Facebook group for Jungle workers called Calais People to People Solidarity, which has more than 36,000 members. The Independent has decided not to publish his name.

The man wrote: “I have heard of boys, believed to be under the age of consent, having sex with volunteers. I have heard stories of men using the prostitutes in the Jungle too.

“I have heard of volunteers having sex with multiple partners in one day, only to carry on in the same vein the following day. And I know also, that I’m only hearing a small part of a wider scale of abuse."

The volunteer went on to say these sexual encounters were damaging for refugees, who are “in an entirely unequal position of power” and “entirely dependent on the aid that is provided by volunteers”.

“Sex from a person who is in a position of power or influence, in such a one-sided affair, especially where it is perceived that aid or better aid can be gained from it, that it is, and can be defined as sexual abuse,” he said.

He cited the code of conduct used by UNHCR, which states that sexual relationships between aid staff and beneficiaries are “strongly discouraged” due to “unequal power relationships”.

The man added that the majority of cases in question involved female volunteers and male refugees – which he claimed risked the objectification of women volunteering in the camp.

He wrote: “Female volunteers having sex enforces the view (that many have) that volunteers are here for sex. This impression objectifies women in the camp and increases the risks."

His comments prompted accusations of sexism and misogyny from female members of the group. One commented on the post: “I find this attitude incredibly patronising and paternalistic with added sexism and racism.

“There is a serious point in here among all the moralistic bullshit but I find it very off-putting. I find the assertion that women choosing to have sex encourages rape quite frankly disturbing.”

But others agreed with him and acknowledged that volunteer-refugee relationships were a serious issue in the camp that should not be “covered up”.

One commenter wrote: “I don’t think we should be covering this up, just that we should be dealing with it as organisations looking to impress upon individuals the gravity of the situation and the power imbalance of volunteer-refugee relationships. It’s a serious issue, and must be dealt with seriously.”

Another commented: “Sweeping this issue under the carpet will not make it go away. We were all in uncharted territory the first time we arrived in the camp and so this was bound to happen to a lesser or greater extent.”

Others meanwhile called for the group’s admin to remove the thread over fears a “news outlet would gain access to it”.

The post was deleted within several hours of it being posted, but it has since emerged that the issue is well known among charities working in the area.

Speaking to The Independent, Ms Mosely told how one male volunteer was recently reported for inappropriate behaviour with female refugees, but the charity leaders had no power to expel him from the camp.

She said: “He initially worked with another charity called Auberge des Migrants. But when he was reported for inappropriate behaviour with female refugees they told him to leave.

“He then came here for a day and they phoned us up and warned us. So we told him to leave, but then he went to the camp on his own and we had no power to force him out.

“Luckily a couple of our male volunteers went and spoke to him and persuaded him to leave. So he’s gone now. But it’s extremely difficult for us to control. A fifth of the volunteers are here independent of any organisation.”

Maya Konforti, who volunteers for Auberge des Migrants, told The Independent about another case in which a British female volunteer had built up a “bad reputation” in the camp by sleeping with multiple refugees.

Ms Konforti said: “I know one British woman who had a very bad reputation in the Jungle. If she had been volunteering with Auberge she would be thrown out, but she did it on her own, she was here independently.

“She found the right refugee and now she’s with him. That’s what I hear. She’s back in the UK and lives with a refugee.”

Both Care4Calais and Auberge des Migrants have stringent rules in their codes of conduct that explicitly condemn "potentially exploitative" sexual relationships between volunteers and refugees.

The codes of conduct used by both charities state: “Any pattern of potentially exploitative sexual activity between associates and adult beneficiaries will not be condoned, on the basis of recognising the fundamental vulnerability of residents in refugee camps and the possibility of exploitative behaviour.

“We recognise that associates are in a position of trust, which can create an imbalance of power and can lead to beneficiaries being put at risk of further harm.”

But Ms Konforti said the rules are impossible to enforce throughout the camp: “Calais is not a proper refugee camp where the entrance and exits are regulated.

“This is what makes the camp interesting and provides lots of opportunities for refugees and volunteers to meet, but the lack of regulation can lead to bad things as well.

“When you have volunteers and refugees in this environment, it’s going to happen. There will be people who will have sexual relationships with refugees.

"We can’t say it’s damaging for all refugees to have a sexual relationship with a volunteer, but we have strict rules to prevent this kind of thing happening because we know the risks. The problem is the independent volunteers who no one is watching out for.”

In response to the reports of sexual exploitation in the Jungle, UNHCR said such reports must be “promptly addressed” and called for the Jungle to be replaced with more acceptable conditions.

A spokesperson told The Independent: “UNHCR has zero tolerance for such behaviour as the abuse or exploitation of refugees, and that such reports and allegations should be promptly addressed –first and foremost – by the French authorities.

“Volunteers are doing important work for refugees and migrants in Calais and it is essential that the integrity of that work is guarded. This camp should be replaced as soon as possible with more acceptable reception conditions.”

International aid organisation Save the Children expressed concern at the lack of monitoring in Calais following the accusations. Ruairidh Valler, the charity's international media manager, said: “The policing in refugee camps is generally down to the state or UNHCR on the ground. But in the case of Calais, in the informal, irregular setting, this all gets more difficult.

“Nobody wants to criticise smaller NGOs that are doing their best and trying to do something really wonderful. But obviously with that comes the added risk of things going wrong. There’s lack of monitoring.

“It all stems from the fact that the Jungle has been this ignored black hole in one of the largest economies on the planet.”

Thom Davies, a human geographer from the University of Warwick and one of the authors of an academic study of the camp, said the alleged sexual exploitation was a symptom of the fact that the Jungle is not being recognised as an official refugee camp by the authorities.

Mr Davies said: “This issue exposes quite how exceptional the Calais camp and other informal camps in Europe are. In my research we compared the Jungle with the minimum standards for a regular refugee camp under the Sphere Project (an umbrella group for a wide range of humanitarian agencies) and UNHCR – and it just doesn’t match up.

Just when you think they could not sink any lower. Disgusting.

I found out last month that i am becoming a father. How am i going to raise this child in this disgusting world? This shit will come to my country too if we are not careful.

May christ save us all.

(09-22-2016 12:01 PM)leanmeansexmachine Wrote:  Just when you think they could not sink any lower. Disgusting.

I found out last month that i am becoming a father. How am i going to raise this child in this disgusting world? This shit will come to my country too if we are not careful.

May christ save us all.

make sure it has a lot of brothers

(09-22-2016 07:02 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  I suspect the second dark age will come after 2050. Muslims will destroy everything. I hope Asia will keep the light of civilization going.

The shadow is rapidly extending into a Dark Age right now.

I avoid talking about politics or any social issues now on my FB because of social circle and covert Thought Police. I'm saving my energy for the 10 X -current massive civil unrest and civil wars coming within a year for Europe and the Anglosphere....
Live in a safe suburb now near major urban area.
Anybody got an escape route planned?
I know this is coming very soon, but have not made strategic moves in my financial, residential, etc. realms, nor have procured any weaponry ...I just assume I will be safe where I am....

(09-22-2016 11:51 AM)Cosmonaut Wrote:  What I take from that is that its not quite the time to throw in the towel and start crying about the end of Europe. It could happen, but it hasn't yet, so don't quit. Too many here are content to just wallow in their hopelessness and give a snarky "i told you so".

It doesn't matter if they are carrying passports. Sure the elections may swing in our favor eventually but I don't think anyone will leave until the free money dries up. Given that 80 percent of the voting public is still supporting the Left in one way or the other I'd say fat chance that'll happen. Those fuckers ain't going to leave Germany unless they're forced to do so. And if they are unable to earn a living legally they'll do it their favorite way.

(09-22-2016 10:01 AM)Samseau Wrote:  More censorship in action:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/7131...ela-Merkel

See the headline link? It reads on Drudge as HALF of Germans fear Islamisation... but now it's a 404 not found!

Civil War imminent. It's a matter of survival, the speed of which the war happens depends on how many Muzzies are let in. I still think a brutal winter will set things off in Europe. Last Winter never happened, let's see what happens when cold and snow hit the streets and force the Muzzies into peoples homes.

Now the link works again... really weird stuff

(09-22-2016 06:20 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Let us imagine and go 20-30 years in the future.


Ah well ... life will go on afterwards as well.

It is happening right now and will get as worse within a few years. No gradual descent into the maelstrom. Monthly increase in chaos very soon.

(In a previous post I asked how is the situation currently over in Europe, but what I meant was , since my visit in 2011, are there any safe areas left? I suppose it is now only Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, etc.(?))

http://newobserveronline.com/invader-came-fk-women/

Quote:“I Came to F**k the Women”

Quote:A rejected “asylum seeker” from Algeria living in Austria, on trial for an attempted rape in Linz, has told the court that he only came to Europe to “f**k the women.”

It has not proven possible to deport the criminal because Algeria has no extradition agreement with Austria, and the invader is now being “tested for insanity,” the court was also told.

Fuck them willingly or unwillingly - nothing matters to them. Why learning Game if you can rape your way through Europe?

Quote:The woman, identified in another Nachtrichten report as Timea Lorenz, fought back bravely. After he had pulled off her pants and lay down on top of her, she had bitten him through the lip.

He then punched her several times in the face before running off. Timea suffered severe injuries, including a broken nose, and lost consciousness in the bushes where he had tried to carry out the attack.

Witnesses, alerted by the noise, observed the attacker running off half-naked, bleeding profusely.

Austria getting enriched every day - punching infidel whores means nothing to them. Heh - they even had plenty of Muslim secular girls getting beaten and raped. Not that being clad in a Niqab helped as many women report experiencing the same kind of shit in countries like Egypt.

The feminist rape culture is finally here.

(09-22-2016 01:26 PM)redpillage Wrote:  It doesn't matter if they are carrying passports. Sure the elections may swing in our favor eventually but I don't think anyone will leave until the free money dries up. Given that 80 percent of the voting public is still supporting the Left in one way or the other I'd say fat chance that'll happen. Those fuckers ain't going to leave Germany unless they're forced to do so. And if they are unable to earn a living legally they'll do it their favorite way.

the money will dry up and it will dry up soon. europe is already a basket case, germany cant keep this up, especially with the boomers set to retire soon. they cant afford it and eventually the taps will run dry. at that point it will be very easy to justify expulsions, and it will be easy to carry out if they do not have passports or citizenship. Im sure a lot would just leave willingly. many turks here still have deep connections to family and friends in Turkey. once the euro economy goes to shit, there wont be much for them here.

In the Thirty years war Germany lost 3/4 of its population. Even when there are just 20 Million Germans left, after the invaders are out its still possible to recreate the bloodline. But what should I say, I have no kids and even many of my married friends have none. Furthermore I wonder about this, what will be with the German bloodline when I get a Mexican or an Asian girl.
To add something, we have also many eastern Europeans in Germany within those Migrants but true, the "southerners" get more and more. In big cities you have classes with 95 % of them. Hasan, Murat and Ali. The future of Germany!

(09-22-2016 01:47 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

What is wrong with this picture? I give you a hint: W, W, W, W, W, M.

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/09/...r-vaginas/

Heartiste had a more Red Pill view about the reality of the Calais aid workers fucking migrants.

Quote:Sex with underage boys? Multiple migrant partners? Maybe you’re thinking this is a homosexual meeting place.

The man added that the majority of cases in question involved female volunteers and male refugees – which he claimed risked the objectification of women volunteering in the camp.

Bleeding heart (and bleeding bush) Frenchwomen are lining up to fuck the rapefugee dregs of humanity….in a romantic setting that looks like this:

Quote:Contrast: There are White beta males at this very moment paying for dinners and nights out in glittering cities to impress unenthusiastic dates, while women make pilgrimages to the Calais Sex Camp to volunteer as eager holsters for penniless, smelly migrant meatsticks. The Crimson Pills don’t get harder to swallow than that.

Savage - heh. 300$ dinners and 5 dates to get a whiff of pussy while the Calais jungle-men get it for a simple: "Let's fuck."

A refugee-fucking woman defends her 'freedom':

Quote:“There is a serious point in here among all the moralistic bullshit but I find it very off-putting. I find the assertion that women choosing to have sex encourages rape quite frankly disturbing.”

Quote:She’s right, of course, but her rightness is self-damning.

Weak beta males have a studied aversion to placing any blame for women’s ill-conceived romantic choices on women themselves. To do so, in the beta male mind, would mean having their puritanical romantic idealism dashed against the rocks of the bitter reality of primal female desire. The weak beta male suffers his morbid prostration to the pussy pedestal gladly, and is loathe to have it detached from his pursed lips. For if the day comes that his precious pussy pedestal is gone from his life, he’ll have no celibate space to retreat to for self-pitying comfort, and will be forced to deal with women as they are, not as they materialize unsullied in the brainscape of his sentimental daydreams.

tl;dr it was a big mistake to give women the vote.

Of course the Blue Pill men will not understand why women choose to fuck men who so obviously have little going for them. But we know that what it takes is more masculine behavior, bravado and the natural aptitude of treating the women like the sluts they are - they like it, so going to Calais for group-gang-bang sessions with unapologetically masculine Muslim men - why not? Besides - the added danger of potentially being raped by them is also so exciting as 50% of women have rape fantasies.

(09-22-2016 09:58 AM)RexImperator Wrote:  Two stories a day apart:

1) Hungary gets flak from EU for warning it's citizens of "no-go zones" in major European cities:
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/09/...migration/

2) Number of "no-go zones" increasing in Sweden; police discouraged and leaving the force:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/7130...se-control

I'm going to be completely honest here.

If I believed I was a member of a superior religion AND the local government that ruled over me was comprised of racial and religious inferiors who insisted on getting up in my grill then I would probably be burning police cars and creating no-go zones too.

That's what people just don't get about this situation. These are not the black ghettos of America where rebellion is an act of boredom or simple criminality. These people honestly believe that they are carving out a new and better world, like frontiersmen bringing civilisation to the new lands no matter how many savages they have to butcher.

Alex Jones may often be batshit crazy but he's saying things that many of us here feel. What a rant

(09-22-2016 12:01 PM)leanmeansexmachine Wrote:  ...
I found out last month that i am becoming a father. How am i going to raise this child in this disgusting world? This shit will come to my country too if we are not careful.

May christ save us all.

Congratulations. Always remember that your ancestors carried your line through far more difficult times.

Meanwhile, I seem to post this every dozen or so pages but here it comes again. The future for anyone choosing to remain in place is to form homogeneous communities that can be defended like a kind of modern day city-state.

A lot of people fear muslims overwhelming the ability of the police to do their job, and rightly so, but the police being overwhelmed works both ways. It means they will also have extremely limited means to interfere with loyal patriots building separate spaces and governing bodies.

In other words, imagine what the situation in Ireland a few decades ago would be like if the UK was also dealing with rampant muslim crime waves, both in Ireland and abroad. The IRA etc might have been able to bring about an entirely different outcome (for better or worse).

(09-22-2016 07:51 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(09-22-2016 12:01 PM)leanmeansexmachine Wrote:  ...
I found out last month that i am becoming a father. How am i going to raise this child in this disgusting world? This shit will come to my country too if we are not careful.

May christ save us all.

Congratulations. Always remember that your ancestors carried your line through far more difficult times.

“It is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean earth to till. What weather they shall have is not ours to rule.”


― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Return of the King

Just what we said so often here.

Anti-Mass Migration Leader: Culture of Welcoming Refugees Has Become A Substitute For Religion

The leader of the anti-mass migration Alternative for Germany (AfD) has slammed those sympathetic to migrants saying that their “refugees welcome” attitude has become the new German religion.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/09/...-religion/

Relevant to your comments about German demographics is this positive article:

http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/20...r-not.html

Quote:You'll have seen the story by now—"Germany: Nearly 40 Per Cent of Under Fives Now ‘Migrant Background"—accompanied, as in the linked article, by a picture of leering, brown-skinned urchins.

Under fives 40% kebab!!! you are invited to think—stick a fork in it, the land of the sausage is well and truly done:
"Following the release of figures which reveal almost four in ten children under five have foreign roots, Michael Paulwitz says the demographic change will be the death of Germany’s welfare state.

The journalist and historian predicts that 'hard struggles' over resources will take place when ethnic Germans are a minority, and that native Germans 'will inevitably lose out.'"
But is it? Now, I'm as much in favour of a bit of paranoia and panic as the next guy wishing for a revival of the West. Germany is clearly on the wrong road, and probably needs a real shock to get off its suicidal path, but this kind of data is somewhat alarmist and can also spread Black Pills, so we should at least try to have an accurate grasp of the situation.

What follows, therefore, is not an attempt to spread complacency about what is a terrible enough situation, but a reminder that Germany has quite a long way to go before the black flag of the Caliphate flies over Berlin, and will have plenty of chances to make the U-turn it needs in order to survive.



There are a few simple points to remember when reading news stories like this one. The first point is to ask what exactly do the words and phrases in the article or report mean. While "migrant" now conjures up grim imagery of gap-toothed Middle Eastern terrorists, living off welfare while leering at your blonde 12-year-old daughter, the term simply means someone from outside Germany.

Now, the key point about Germany is that for the last 20 years it has been overheating its export economy by artificially driving its currency down through a complex scam known as the Euro.

This means that Germany has become a society of overwork and crass materialism. This, of course, has had terrible effects on the birth rate of German women, but it has also drawn people from countries around Germany to the country in order to work.

This means that the vast majority of "migrants" in Germany are actually White Europeans, mainly from other EU countries. Of the top 10 countries of "foreign nationals" (in 2014) only one is outside Europe and part of it is actually in Europe (see chart). Unfortunately, this is Turkey, which has just over 1.5 million foreign nationals in Germany. There is also a slightly larger number of Turks who are officially counted as "Germans," giving a grand total of 3 to 3.5 million.

While this group has higher birth rates than the native population, the trend is sharply downwards, towards the German norm. Meanwhile, even in Turkey itself, there has been a dramatic fall in birth rates to barely above replacement level (2.174 children per woman).

Yes, but what about the latest wave of migrants—from other, poorer, and more fertile Middle Eastern countries?

While it is true that the countries they come from have higher birth rates than Turkey, it should also be remembered that the vast majority of these refugees were young males, mainly without women of their own. They have severe language, cultural, and financial barriers that prevent most of them getting off with the local women (hence the raping).

Unless this population is allowed to bring in hordes of Middle-Eastern women from somewhere (unlikely with an absence of slave markets and Alternative für Deutschland soaring in the polls) their prospects of organic growth will be severely limited, even if the Germans allow this this pool of "wombless" migrants to increase.

While the non-White population of Germany will no doubt increase for a few more years, the mechanisms that have enabled this madness are showing signs of severe wear and tear. In the meantime, the migrants, by introducing copious amounts of pain and dysfunction into the system, will continue to have a salutary effect on the attitudes of the German people. Let's hope they learn their lesson well.

I'm not so positive. The Germans, and all peoples of Europe, need to wake up.

(09-23-2016 12:52 AM)Lizard King Wrote:  Relevant to your comments about German demographics is this positive article:

http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/20...r-not.html

Quote:You'll have seen the story by now—"Germany: Nearly 40 Per Cent of Under Fives Now ‘Migrant Background"—accompanied, as in the linked article, by a picture of leering, brown-skinned urchins.

Under fives 40% kebab!!! you are invited to think—stick a fork in it, the land of the sausage is well and truly done:
"Following the release of figures which reveal almost four in ten children under five have foreign roots, Michael Paulwitz says the demographic change will be the death of Germany’s welfare state.

I'm not so positive. The Germans, and all peoples of Europe, need to wake up.

I agree - the numbers cited are for the entire population and they are usually lowered. There are plenty of Europeans living in Germany - that is true and those women have more children than in their homecountries - Anyone but Turks would be fighting against the Caliphate.

BUT - what the article fails to cite is how many children are born to those groups?

I heard the report once a few months ago as I listened to a guy who looked at the entire demographic situation. I remembered it when I read the article. That guy said clearly that Muslims won't be a majority in Europe in 2040-50, but THEY WILL BE A MAJORITY WHEN IT COMES TO COMBAT-AGE MEN OF 18-30. Sure - nowadays many men can fight until their 60s, but we should not underestimate the importance of that demographic number. Young men, mostly from the lower classes, angry, unemployed, getting ever more radical - and now they suddenly become a REAL MAJORITY! What can go wrong?

The article clearly misses the data from the children.

The new migrants arriving are mostly Muslim and THEY WILL HAVE MANY CHILDREN. Plus they will pull their uncles and brothers with them who in turn will have many children. Out of 2 mio. you get thus 20 mio. within a decade or two. And the flow continues at the speed of 500.000-1.000.000 PER YEAR regardless of contrary claims.

---

As Parzival pointed out - the German homecountry may be gone, but the German Teutonic tribe will survive. They can easily group together in certain cities and areas where they will constitute a 90% majority. The White race won't go extinct and I doubt the elite wants it that way. They just want to rule over them and prevent them from revolting by destroying their unified home countries. And they will likely accomplish that.

By the way - my American friends - the US is going the same way and will soon be a Latino-majority place. Trump or no Trump president - this will happen nonetheless. Even if Trump stems the flow for 8 years, he will be gone after that and the floodgates get opened again.

That alt right piece misses one important factor...any shift in migrant patterns would not only require a seismic shift in the political landscape but the existing cultural one too. The actual German people would need to assert their will and change existing social norms when it comes to immigration and acceptance of this denigration of their status. Also, just because existing migrants are "white" just means they can peacefully co-exist but it doesn't mean they will go to bat when the very cultural fabric of your society is endangered. That's a very foolish belief.

I don't see anything substantial happening anytime soon really. This is like steering the titanic away from the iceberg. Changes like this require not just a few years of realization they are fucked but sometimes decades to see the realistic impact it has on the average citizen. At that point it's already too late.

If you read posts from guys who are German and post here there's still a form of semi denial about what is happening to their country and people. There's an attitude of just letting the government sort everything out.

The idea that order, logic, and the rule of law will win in the end is totally misguided. I've never seen a more terrible leader who is determined to throw her own people under the bus as Merkel. She's absolutely evil.

Like I said before the fact that there aren't hundreds of attempts trying to take her out speaks a lot about the actual will of the German people at this point in time.

(09-22-2016 03:32 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(09-22-2016 01:47 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

What is wrong with this picture? I give you a hint: W, W, W, W, W, M.

You mean, W, W, W, H, W, M?

Astute point. A shame so few outside of here would recognise it as such.