(04-21-2016 07:38 AM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/04/60...42240.html

Africans sailing to the American continent ..... The fact that they reached Costa Rica is a miracle already. One of them said it's harder to get into Europe (lol?) So they are trying to reach the USA instead.

Once they reach Brazil by crossing the ocean (in fair weather), nobody can stop them until they reach Costa Rica (because Brazil, Colombia, Panama have a quite big Afro-descendant community, which helps these new African migrants and would not tolerate energetic police action against them).

If Costa Rica and Mexico let them through , then Americans better pray that Trump will have the wall built, indeed and soon!

Relevant: https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-53234...pid1282698

This is all pretty grim reading.

You've got to think that if even half of this information on this thread got to the British voters in the upcoming Brexit referendum, there would be a massive 'out' vote.

This is surely the future for countries within the EU. As the situation escalates within Germany and the flood of migrants flows, more and more countries will have to go back to closed and manned borders, Visa controls and a return to independent currencies.

I think what we are witnessing is the beginning of the end game for the EU. There will be a tipping point where it's obvious to everyone that it no longer works.

I fear that it may have to get a lot worse before this happens though.

------

Edit - Personally, I'm taking steps to consolidate my domicile in Switzerland. At least they've got a half decent military budget, and natural terrain borders in a lot of regions. (And apparently, all the major passes into Switzerland are set with explosives to be set off in the event of war - probably a myth though). But it's reassuring to see the military flying fighter jets regularly overhead.

May I ask someone from German speaking participants to validate the following quotation, please.

Quote:On the anniversary of “60 years Christian-Democratic-Union (CDU)” on June 16th, 2005 in Berlin, she [Merke] explained how many changes in society which were triggered in 1968 have shaped the old German Republic and continue to influence the CDU to this day. As she put it: “We don’t want to return to the family concept, to the 1950s image of a woman and we don’t want to return to the sociopolitical frame of that time. We as women must march through the institutions und take our place in the key power positions in the leadership of this country”.

@FebGun - where did you get that?

Caravaggio, a quick search points the quote to this article posted yesterday. Tried finding the source of the original quote, but I'm at work and can't dig in deeper.

It still baffles me how a childless shrew with a background in the communist party could ever become the leader of a (theoretically) christian conservative party. Some may think she's virtue signaling and double downed (full-retard) by rejecting to stop the invasion. I suspect she never really dropped her Marxist ideology, but infiltrated the conservative party and slowly but surely escalated the ladder until she could have sufficient power to carry out her ideology.

(04-21-2016 05:54 PM)FebGun Wrote:  May I ask someone from German speaking participants to validate the following quotation, please.

Quote:On the anniversary of “60 years Christian-Democratic-Union (CDU)” on June 16th, 2005 in Berlin, she [Merke] explained how many changes in society which were triggered in 1968 have shaped the old German Republic and continue to influence the CDU to this day. As she put it: “We don’t want to return to the family concept, to the 1950s image of a woman and we don’t want to return to the sociopolitical frame of that time. We as women must march through the institutions und take our place in the key power positions in the leadership of this country”.

Here is a pdf with the speech of Merkel at this anniversary:
http://antiterror-info.org/exchange/latr...re_CDU.pdf

Quote:

Es geht auch nicht darum, so zu tun, als wüssten wir alles immer besser als die anderen. Manches an gesellschaftlicher Veränderung, was 1968 und danach die alte Bundesrepublik und auch die CDU bewegte, ist heute Allgemeingut. Wir können und wir wollen nicht zurück zum Familien- und Frauenbild der 50er Jahre. Wir können und wir wollen nicht zurück zum gesellschaftspolitischen Rahmen jener Zeit. Wir alle sind gemeinsam weiter als damals. Aber alle erkennen jetzt auch: Die geistigen Ressourcen von 1968 waren zu eng für die Zukunft unseres Landes. Die Utopien dieser Generation müssen der Realität Platz machen, wenn das Land eine gute Zukunft haben soll. Nun übernimmt die nächste Generation. Es ist Zeit für eine realistische Politik.

She did not say that women have to march trough the institutions nor that women have to take key positions of power. What she say, the family model did change since the 50s and you can't nor they wan't to go back. She say that the 50s are not now, and times change.

Anyway, the family model did change quite a lot since then:
In 1959 they cut the family head, this means there was no legal right any longer for someone - man or woman! - to lead the family. In 1977 they cut the vagueness of the marriage contract. Divorce was now more easy. In 1979 they did cut the parental force to parental care. This means, the parents can no longer make the decision so far, because the care of the kid is now in the centre. In an extreme, the care and needs of the kid are more important then the ones of the parents. In 2012 they made man and women equal in the case, that the family is not the only centre.

The main goal is to destroy the power of the family and the head of the family. Now the family is nothing special any longer. Other kinds of relationship models are equal. They try to destroy the family, because its a treat to the power of the state. When the family has the power of boundary, education and rise the kids, the state has no influence. But now, everyone is an individual, the boundaries are cut and so are the traditional values. People don't have to put in effort any longer. Everything did become relative and equal. You cheat on your husband? No problem, or your kids become jerks? Their right matter more. You want to put on some values? I hope they better match with the ones of the state, if not he will interact and take your kids away. Also they did destroy the boundary between man and women to stand together.

For them the family is like a mysterious hidden cell where they had no influence for their NWO creation of gender mainstream and multicultural habits. So they had to destroy it by make it relative and easy to drop out - of course for women. Men have still to pay. No easy drop out for them. At the end they want to destroy culture and values that have a strong boundary for people. Without those boundaries, people are just like leaves in the wind. No more the strong tree with deep roots. Then they have a mulatto race of consume orientate individuals with no culture, no values, no moral. Easy to manipulate. They will jump like little monkeys for their careers and to buy stuff. Materialism is the new god, not the value of the family.

This is the whole speech: http://antiterror-info.org/exchange/latr...re_CDU.pdf

The translation you posted is flawed and the "translator" made the entire last sentence up.

The part you refer to reads as follows:
"Some of the societal changes that swayed the 1968s and after them the old German Government and also the CDU is common good today. We cannot and we don't want to return to the family concept and the image of women of the 1950s. We cannot and we don't want to return to the sociopolitical frame of that time. [...] But all of us also realize: the intellectual resources of 1968 were too narrow for the future of our country. The utopia of that generation has to make way for reality if our country is to have a good future. The next generation takes over now. It is time for realistic politics."

She's basically saying she likes wimminz rights but she's conservative. No politician - no matter how right wing - could openly state they are agaisnt women voting. So this is not a big deal.

The big deal is actually another part in that speech where she says:
"Courageous politics are important again. As we truly do not have an eternal right to democracy and a social market economy. Our values also have to hold their ground in the age of globalization and "information society". And if they are to hold their ground, we'll have to be willing to set the course right. Again, we'll have to overcome obstacles/opposition. We'll have to set our priorities yet again. The important has to have precedence over the less important."

So here, she's basically saying "yeah, stick to our values - whatever, but in order to push globalization, we're gonna have to shit on everything that's in the way. And don't think, democracy or social market economy is your right. We'll have to fuck you over soon for our plans to work.

So much made up stuff or even hidden stuff will come into the light one day. Like the story, Neonazis set an Asylum camp on fire, at the and it was a Syrian guy that was not happy, he even painted swastikas to create a wrong track for the police. Or the refugee that get killed by a knife attack, not Neonazis did it, it was another refugee.

The last days there was a big media sensation. A NPD politician - the NPD is the far right wing party in Germany - had a car accident and was saved by two refugees. Just imagine, a Neonazi got saved by two refugees. How ironic. Well the story was made up.
http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/a...rheit.html

Then some blogger did some research and found, the actual journalist made his own conclusion. Never was there a proof that the refugees did help. At the end he made a statement that his story was made up. His statement get 129 likes at Facebook and never shared on Twitter. But his first - fake - story got 15,000 likes and was twittered 2000 times. Meanwhile the "journalist" get a lot of hate mails.

Thank you very much to everybody for helping me with the question.

Yes, it would be too brazen to say it publicly back in 2005, but I can imagine that it’ll be a mainstream in a couple years from now. Also it is possible that she said it off record.

I believe that the main thing that killed family is a child labor laws; another one is a mandatory 12 years education. And it amazing how many people who believe that these laws are actually protecting children. People like that basically believe that state loves children more than parents do.
In old times the more children – the stronger family because parents knew the child that supposed to learn for success and the child that has to start working for success. Now children are burden for family.

Hungarian PM Viktor Orban gave a radio interview today. He had lots to say about Schengen and PC culture in the west.

http://dailynewshungary.com/orban-brusse...e-stopped/

Quote:Budapest, April 22 (MTI) – Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said in an interview to public radio on Friday that the alliance of Brussels and the Hungarian left wing, whose intention is to “import many millions to Europe”, must be stopped.

He said the Schengen 2.0 action plan must be promulgated because Brussels had put forward an impossible proposal according to which Europe’s demographic and economic problems must be solved by allowing in more and more migrants.

Orbán added that all this tied in with a document published by former Socialist governments on migration policy, he said. “This figured in the programme of previous Socialist governments: a tenth of the country would consist of foreigners within the foreseeable future,” he said, adding that this would be a “nightmare”.

He said the EU’s youth unemployment problems should be addressed by giving jobs European workers instead of bringing in “people from other cultures” who would raise social tensions and “increase the threat of terrorism”. But this issue cannot be discussed openly in western Europe where people “live in a bubble” and under “intellectual oppression”, he said.

Orbán said that while originally Germany and Hungary had taken two entirely different approaches to handling the migrant crisis, Germany, too, has started focusing on protecting the EU’s external borders. Although they will never admit it, EU leaders are now prioritising border protection, just as Hungary did from the start, he said. The dispute within the bloc now centers on what to do with the people who have already been taken in or are currently entering the EU on their own, mainly through Italy, he said.

If a member state, at national level, decides to admit migrants without controls, the consequences of that decision would spread beyond its borders and this cannot be borne internationally, he added. Orbán said that if his government’s referendum on refugee quotas failed to stop Brussels, Hungary could be put in a position where the EU would be the one to decide whom Hungarians have to live with.

Speaking about the Schengen area, the prime minister said member states must fulfill their Schengen responsibilities. If a member state is located on the area’s periphery, that state must ensure the protection of the external border. Member states that fail to comply with the Schengen rules should relinquish their border protection rights to the EU, and if they don’t, their Schengen membership should be suspended or they should be expelled from the bloc, Orbán said.

Orbán urged the EU to make a deal with the Libyan government as soon as possible on setting up a refugee camp on the country’s coast from where refugees can come to Europe in a controlled manner, provided that there is an EU country ready to take them in. The camp and the procedure as a whole should be financed completely by the EU, he said.

Cultural enrichment goes on:

http://www.krone.at/Oesterreich/Studenti...ory-506719

21 old student girl get raped by 3 Afghani refugees age 16 to 17 in Vienna. The girl went to a public toilet, seems like the men did follow her some time ago. Then they use force, even smashed her head against the wall an rape her. Police did catch all 3 of them. This is just one among many rapes in the last month with refugees as offenders.


http://www.badische-zeitung.de/unbekannt...schleppend

Police don't care much about Syrian child molester:

Quote:The cops in Freiburg is investigating an unknown man who had brought two children from a playground in the past week. He was stopped by adventitious father of the children. It also gave three other similar cases, as was now known. Criticism there at the police, which is a concrete indication of the possible perpetrators weekend reluctant explore how the children's father and his lawyer can prove.

Quote:"I'm sorry", should the man have said and that he was Syrian. Then he fled, the father says.

Quote:The police made the incident on Friday with extremely defensive formulations public. It pointed also to an incident that had occurred on the same day in the city garden.

Meanwhile the police don't investigate nor did they catch the guy. They fight who is in charge in this case.

^ i was about posting the story about the raped girl in Vienna, you're too fast parzival!

The comments in this article in a left newspaper (http://derstandard.at/2000035503971/Stud...rgewaltigt) at least show that the majority is fed up with this whole rapefuge guilt-driven-save-them-all campaign. This Sunday we have presidential election and it looks like the candidate of the right wing party fpö is going to get many votes. Even though the president doesn't have much power, a succeeding right wing politician would put the government even more under pressure because the people definitely don't want more cultural enrichment.
Currently they shut down the border of Italy and Hungary and pretend to completely stop any additional influx after a certain (undefined) amount of people entered. Basically that what Hungary did last summer. We'll see if they walk the talk...

And I have a question to our Viennese members: how's the sentiment regarding refugees, safety, etc on the ground? My mother recently was in Vienna for work and told me that the city has changed to the worse: people harrasing her on the subway, minor fights on the tram,... Is it that bad or just the perception of Styrians unfamiliar with the big city?

I'm not that fast, the news pop out just regular when you know where you have to look. Of course just a few make it into the mainstream. The ordinary citizen will not get it. And I just post a few of the stuff because there is something going on everyday.
Some days ago I did post how the Berlin police did make a raid against members of an arab family clan, there is an article with some good comments about the whole situation:

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschlan...87915.html

Quote:Last week 220 police officers, including 60 elite policemen of SEK, stormed several apartments in Berlin's Neukölln district, eight men arrest, whit a number of offences in the area of serious crime. They show that Berlin will not tolerate lawless areas, Berlin's Senator Frank Henkel told then.
Probably you have to be politicians to come to such a sunny assessment. If that were in my district, where you need two squadrons to enforce eight arrest warrants. I would not feel safe, but rather uncomfortable as citizens.

Quote:As for the crimes committed by foreigners, there is good and bad news. The good is that the overwhelming majority of people living here non-Germans behaves the same law-abiding as the native population. The worrying is: Where foreigners are criminal, things get out of control quickly. In Saxony, the state police has found that 1.3 per cent of asylum seekers are responsible for 50 percent of crimes by immigrants. Such figures are not normally charged, neither foreign nor German offenders. Therefore the Saxon example is so valuable, even if in Saxony fewer foreigners live than elsewhere. We have no problem with foreign criminality. Germany has an alien offenders problem.

Quote:In February, the Left Party has requested information from the government, against how many foreigners at the end of last year was present a deportation order. Answer: 285,073. The statement on the question of how many foreigners had to leave the country in 2015 actually: 2030. So are the numbers.

The article has the same conclusion I already made. Some of them become die hard criminals and the legal system in Germany don't know how to deal with them or goes very soft on them. There are always excuses why someone with a multiple page criminal record still don't have to go to prison. Maybe Germany need a three strokes law. When you commit three certain crimes, you just get a bulled in the head. Or you go to a labour camp for the rest of your life.

But the biggest absurdity is that virtually nobody gets deported after committing a crime because their hone countries don't take them back. They eventually go to our 5* jail and after 3 years they hit the road again. This is just incompressible and if nothing else is the definitive evidence that our government or whoever gets to decide something consciously jeopardise our wellbeing.

Maybe the state will do something when citizens start to take the law into their own hands. Wonder how they will react, when there is really a death refugee by German hands. At the moment the refugees kill each other or Germans - at least one case I know. When a group of Germans kick one of them to dead after he tried to attack a kid or a women. Still I guess they will to a demonstration against Neonazis. They even did this, after the case where the refugee set an refugee camp on fire and painted swastikas all over. Insane. In the worst case only rivers of blood will bring back sanity.

I dug out some of my old Conspiracy books from my 80's punk days before I left Oz, and chucked a couple of them in my bag to read on plane / bus trips as I knew I'd be moving around regularly in Europe.

I never took these books too seriously - I read the Illuminatus! trilogy in my early teenage years and they were just the sort of thing you found in independent bookstores along with movies like 'Freaks', '2000 Maniacs', and anything by Russ Meyer'.

I was curious because I remember how the phrase 'New World Order' was supposed to be the sign of the end times, but I only really remembered it from a Ministry song circa '92 which sampled Bush saying it, which freaked all the Conspiritards out at the time.

There's a lot of discussion about the MK Ultra programme, the Freemasons, and the programming of lone nuts with guns. I'll reprint a brief paragraph:

Quote:"Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, Sirhan Sirhan and other phoney 'lone nut assassins were added to the bloody stew, terrorising and conditioning us to live in stark fear of random violence, until we beg for a police state which will only solidify the conspirators' tyrannical rule. Citizens will beg for more cops and their privacy to be invaded and homes to be searched in the name of discovering the Lone Nuts."

You can see how Radical Islam makes the need for MK Ultra programming irrelevant.

Quote:"The Ultimate Goal? Nothing less than this flawed world's destruction, followed by the creation of a New World Order - Masonry's perfection of creation. Novus ordo seclorum, found on the mason-designed seal of the United States means 'Dawn of a New Age.'"

Part of Mason doctrine is, of course, publicly-revealing the secret intentions.

Wooh, spooky....



The thing is, all of this fits if you're being paranoid, but, if you're not, it also fits with dippy-hippy 70's Leftism, where every classroom poster was "It's A Small World After All"; where books about the inevitable population bomb meant we were all supposed be eating each other by the 90's; and there was this popular rise in Gaia theory by braless teachers with sad tits in tie-dye, who at least had moved on from 'Jonathon Livingstone Seagull'. By the Mid-80's this line of thinking becomes 'We Are The World', Greenpeace and 'Think Global, Act Local'.

So, either what we're seeing is some ultra-efficient conspiracy to re-organise the world designed by some secret elite cabal who all think the exact same way and don't want sole power for themselves; when five people in a room can barely agree on what to have for dinner; or it's just simply what happens when you combine patchouli oil and macrame fern holder with a Che Guevara t-shirt.

For context: I happened to be reading up on the '82 Greenie Protests about stopping Tasmania's Franklin river from being dammed for Hydroelectric Power, which then damned Hydroelectric power's future entirely in Australia. Here's the Judge's summary back in the day. See how Wooh Scary New World Order and Stinky Greenie Hippies sound interchangeable?

Quote:"The preservation of the world's heritage must not be looked at in isolation but as part of the co-operation between nations which is calculated to achieve intellectual and moral solidarity of mankind and so reinforce the bonds between people which promote peace and displace those of narrow nationalism and alienation which promote war...[t]he encouragement of people to think internationally, to regard the culture of their own country as part of world culture, to conceive a physical, spiritual and intellectual world heritage, is important in the endeavour to avoid the destruction of humanity."

It's probably a coin toss as to what's going on, though I tend to fall on the side of The Sad Tits crew, and I don't see them winning.

^ Wrong thread guys, sorry.

I think it fit quite well. Every time something happen in Germany or somewhere else, some politicians pull out always the agenda for more police, military inside the country and more surveillance. You can read this as an agenda for a police state and all the terrorism and radical Islam is just a pawn in this big game. People will beg for this because they will not safe any longer. Still I'm not into this theory that the migrant invasion and terrorism is part of a big master plan.
When I see what kind of politicians bring up those plans, they are always the same. They have a general mistrust against the common sense of people. They believe people need control because if not, they will act mad. Even more in Germany there is an obsession with laws and rules, the love of order. Because of the Nazi times and the Holocaust. In the past many did fear something like this can happen again and thats why Germans need a strict control. This control became the German Angst for everything outside the norm. So we have a lot of regulations, because if not, there will be chaos. And chaos even start when someone just cross a red light or do wrong parking. You see quite a lot of older people walk around in their neighbourhood and write down "park sinners". The deeper mindset is, a person that can't stick to basic rules will mostly commit more heavy crimes and at the end you have a holocaust again. Quite strange mindset. But this brought the strong regulations in Germany and out of this the bureaucratic mindset did grow. The person that is insecure deep down and clinch to laws, rules and order in general.
Out of this mindset there did rise a counter movement in the 60s and 70s. The left wing movement that want to break out of this regulation. Those people did glorify everything non German. For them the Germans are the past and natural born Nazis. So only an big wave of immigrants can solve this issue. There couldn't be anything positive at Germany. So there was never anything at all that did stop migrants from misbehaviour. For example, Japan just kick out all foreigners that don't behave but Germany didn't because of the guild complex. So the whole issues had be ignored. Even more the traditional family is seen as the root of all evil so it has to be destroyed and only immigration in masses can out breed the nazi genetics of the Germans. The last point is important because the globalist elites love that, no boundaries that can hold them down.

The conflicts in the world did grow, there was a rise of immigrations since the last 15 years, and the migrant invasion is not Merkels fault. The people had be there before. Yes Merkel did open the gates more but they had be knocking on them long before. The question is, who made those people move by bombing their countries? Its a mix between destroy their countries and those people are unable to build a country and stable society on their own. So there a two things that come together. Your country get destroyed and your society suck anyway. Why not follow the promises that you can see now every day on your smartphone and move to the land of milk and honey? Go to Europe. Even more Germany when there is a women that seems to invite you.
The most strange thing is, that those people are always seen as enrichment, as equal and a benefit. This is because of the left wing cultural marxism mindset.

(04-22-2016 02:03 PM)Parzival Wrote:  Cultural enrichment goes on:

http://www.krone.at/Oesterreich/Studenti...ory-506719

21 old student girl get raped by 3 Afghani refugees age 16 to 17 in Vienna. The girl went to a public toilet, seems like the men did follow her some time ago. Then they use force, even smashed her head against the wall an rape her. Police did catch all 3 of them. This is just one among many rapes in the last month with refugees as offenders.

The story of the toilet rape has some interesting tidbits in it:

Quote:Laut Kriminalstatistik wurden im vergangenen Jahr 948 nichtösterreichischen Tatverdächtigen strafbare Handlungen gegen die sexuelle Integrität und Selbstbestimmung zur Last gelegt. Ein Jahr davor waren es 885 Delikte. Die Zahl der Straftaten durch Asylwerber stieg von 2014 auf 2015 um 38,8 Prozent. Bei einer Gegenüberstellung mit der gestiegenen Anzahl der Asylsuchenden ist die Zahl der tatverdächtigen Asylwerber aber stark rückläufig. (APA, red, 22.4.2016) - derstandard.at/2000035503971/Studentin-in-Wien-von-drei-Jugendlichen-vergewaltigt

Essentially there were 948 sexual crimes committed by non-Austrians - a rise of 39% from 2014. Furthermore the real number is probably much higher, since whenever someone is not caught he is at best described as a "Southerner" and could theoretically be an Austrian. I am certain that the cops doctor the statistics tremendously.

Probably thousands of women get assaulted and raped in Austria by rapefugees and immigrants from real rape-cultures.

____________

http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/a...rheit.html

Also the story about the actual Neonazi party politician who was supposedly helped by rapefugees happened of course differently:

He had an accident, a bus full with a new batch of rapefugees comes along (the new German Wirtschaftswunder makes the transportation companies and rental real estate owners earn a good buck). The two busdrivers (probably Germans) get out and help the NPD politician. Next the rapefugees get out and WATCH. So essentially the man was helped by two busdrivers while the invaders watched. Also I might add that most Germans and certainly no rapefugees know whether a driver is a local NPD, CDU or AfD politician. Even if he had received help by some rapefugees, then it would not matter at all. The story went viral as some kind of message, that the Rapefugees are wonderful folk who would help even their enemies. No - they are going to rape and kill the Kufars and most would likely join ISIS if the buggers ever came to Germany.

----


https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/04/uk-na...lamophobia

UK: National Union of Students top dog says condemning the Islamic State would be “blatant Islamophobia”


The UK National Union of Students thought it would be a good idea to elect a Muslim woman of color as her president.

That decision already backfired:

Quote:Bouattia has also previously attacked what she called “Zionist-led media outlets,” the report said, and more recently, voted against a NUS motion condemning ISIS because it would be “blatant Islamophobia.”

We would not want to be Islamophobes, wouldn't we?




____

In further news - the MMA world has a little Jihadi-scandal:

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=54652

Quote:Switzerland: Muslim MMA Fighter Screams 'Allahu Akbar' And Dedicates Victory to Terrorists

Why not? The two terrorists he praised were good proper Muslims.

_________

In further news - Sweden has slowed the illigal invasion to some 700/week (still the equivalent of 1.4 mio if Sweden were the US - relative to the size) rapefugees after new border controls have been implemented.

Turns out that there is a 2 week gab mandated by law, so....

Quote:According to the current law, the government can only operate border controls six months at a time, and there is a two week waiting period before the controls can be reinstated. The gap will occur July 4-17, right in the middle of the European vacation period. Many people fear that tens of thousands of migrants will seize the opportunity to enter Sweden during this time. ...

The Minister for Justice and Migration, Morgan Johansson, pointed out that sustaining the border controls sends an important signal to the half a million migrants now staying in Germany who have not sought asylum there. Neither minister mentioned anything, however, about how Sweden should avoid being flooded by these people during the two-week lapse in border controls.

From 4-17th of July it will be like:




Maybe Sweden will get a new record and 300.000+ rapefugees making it to Swedistan within 2 weeks.

Quote:According to the current law, the government can only operate border controls six months at a time, and there is a two week waiting period before the controls can be reinstated.

Why? What's the rationale behind this? It's like saying "the military can only operate aircraft six months at a time, and then all of them must be grounded for two weeks."

Another fantastic video by Molyneux!

Remember that the invaders are not the enemy. They are a weapon.

The people who protect them and usher them in, who wield the weapon, are.

Impressive victory for the anti-illegal migrants, FPO right-wing party in Austria, today!



http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36124256

"Austria's right Freedom Party candidate has come top in the first round of presidential elections, preliminary results show.

Norbert Hofer has about 36% of the votes ...

He is likely to face independent (Green) contender Alexander Van der Bellen, who is polling 20%.

For the first time since World War Two, the candidates from Austria's two main parties did not make it to the run-off."

(04-24-2016 02:18 PM)hydrogonian Wrote:  Remember that the invaders are not the enemy. They are a weapon.

The people who protect them and usher them in, who wield the weapon, are.

Of course the invaders are the weapon, but they are willing ones. It is not as if they will be secular and peaceful accepting the rules of their new homeland. Also - they are a weapon and will serve as the sacrifice upon the altar of the coming New World Order.

Nice vid of cutscenes and an American talkshow over it:





It is only a matter of time before all of Europe consists of right and far-right parties being in power. Maybe some countries won't manage since the demographics will shift towards them.

And of course one day will come when all of this diversity blows up, such massive terror attacks are perpetrated that Europeans fight back. Personally I don't expect anything like that until there are sufficient numbers in the West for WW3. So it's still some 2 decades away.





This vid is funny by a Swedish Youtuber - the politician talks about profiting from refugees within a timescale of 10-45 years maybe.

Turns out that Sweden has not profited from the last batch of Middle Eastern and Muslim immigrants in the last 20 years. The effective unemployment of them is 80% and even that is faulty since the statistics are manipulated by government created one hour/week jobs which pull them out of the stats. That is why you see many of those guys drinking coffee and attacking camera crews during the day. They do have the time.

In any case Sweden would not even have the jobs for the local population since the economic system is changing, jobs are offshored like everywhere else and usury in such a late stage of the cycle is squeezing out ever more resources from the bottom 99%.

A war will reset all of that.

http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/a...nacht.html

More about the Cologne attacks.

Quote:One day before the next meeting of the committee of inquiry to Cologne New Years Eve questions rise how well the direct environment of the NRW state premier Hannelore Kraft was aware of the explosive nature of the incidents. Until now it was known only the "Staatskanzlei" was informed in the afternoon on January 1 by the Situation Centre - according to data of the State Chancellery and the Ministry of Interior in a standard procedure, because due to the crime with the Justice Department was concerned a second resort.

The "Express" (Cologne) quoted from documents of the Ministry of Interior, to leaders had been informed early "due to the exposed location and the possible factual connection with the refugee issue."

So its more and more true that the leading politicians did know what was going on and tried to hide it. There had be already cases where the Police play such cases down or get calls and advice from higher positions to play it down. Just today I read about a sex attack in an other city where the police did not release the information. But the victim itself posted in on Facebook and social media did rise the question. Police then confessed there did happen something. I guess I did already post it, I lost a little bit track because its so many stuff that going on:
http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/a...erden.html

Quote:Email the Cologne police describes how a message should be defused through sexual assaults on New Years Eve. The NRW interior ministry denied that there was any attempt at manipulation.
Its a letter that the police should not mention the word rape and the whole stuff should played down.

You guys already know it and there have be already some other proofs that the politicians lie and play the danger down that comes with all the migrant invasion. The summer will be hot when girls show more skin. Then the last naive German will maybe wake up for the terror that was brought into Germany. There will be blood.