(09-11-2015 03:36 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote: What's weird is Merkel's complete 180 on the issue. Didn't she say a few years back how multiculturalism was a failure? And now she's cucking for the migrants. My guess is she's getting marching orders from the higher-ups of the Euro/NATO elite. No way she actually believes any of the bullshit she's spewing at the moment.Yes, but you have to remember that in the fucked up world of politics, when something is considered a failure, you don't throw in the towel. If you do, it means you take ownership of the failure. So what's the alternative? You double the fuck down, go all in, etc. If you can't drive that square peg into the round hole, get a bigger hammer.
(09-11-2015 01:25 PM)Dusty Wrote: They should build them affordable housing units in Martha's Vineyard or mill valley California. Places where rich white liberals sing the praises of diversity but live like white nationalists.
(09-11-2015 01:25 PM)Dusty Wrote:(09-11-2015 12:59 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:(09-11-2015 12:56 PM)kaotic Wrote:(09-11-2015 12:44 PM)Booyah Wrote: haha, americans have kindly agreed to accept 10 000 of immigrants XDD
country who has destabilized whole middle east accept the amount of immigrants which equal one day's income of immigrants to the greek islands XD
Not happening, it'll take years for the screening process and background checks.
Might as well hop across the south of the border.
It's 10,000 EXTRA "refugees". In addition to the 70,000 we already committed to. And there will probably be no background checks beyond routine questions.
They should build them affordable housing units in Martha's Vineyard or mill valley California. Places where rich white liberals sing the praises of diversity but live like white nationalists.
(09-11-2015 04:14 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:(09-11-2015 01:25 PM)Dusty Wrote: They should build them affordable housing units in Martha's Vineyard or mill valley California. Places where rich white liberals sing the praises of diversity but live like white nationalists.
I was thinking the other day that Roosh should troll by starting a Change.Org petition to bring 50,000 refugees to a city like Portland.
It's overwhelmingly Liberal but, unsurprisingly, mostly-White, which is obviously-problematic and needs to change.
The beauty of it is that Roosh is A Bad Man, so the PC crew will sign their own downfall just to both spite him and to prove that they're not racist. I mean, diversity is a good thing, right?
Check out Portland's shocking lack of diversity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portland,_...(2000).png
(09-11-2015 04:28 PM)Dusty Wrote: These people are not that different from white nationalists in Idaho, they just have more money and use their money as a "wall" to keep minorities out.
(09-11-2015 01:33 PM)TheWastelander Wrote:
The original video had 600,000+ views and was taken down due to copyright claims over the music. This is a reupload without copyrighted music. Who knows how long it'll stay up, though.
(09-11-2015 03:40 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:(09-11-2015 03:19 PM)Dusty Wrote: Everyone repeats the dogma of diversity and multiculturalism but no one wants to live it. Actions speak louder than words. It's like white liberals in the Bay Area. They repeat the diversity mantra like robots or trained parrots, but they pass up the opportunity to live in one of the most diverse cities in the world ( Oakland) and live in 90 percent white neighborhoods instead.
http://priceonomics.com/the-most-and-lea...n-america/
White liberals tend to be only comfortable around certain minorities. They tend to be OK with east-Asians, but anything darker than Filipino usually makes them hyperventilate (a few Indians are fine).
If a lot of Hispanics, blacks, Arabs or Muslims moved into their areas you will soon see "For Sale" signs outside their houses.
(09-11-2015 01:35 PM)Booyah Wrote:(09-11-2015 12:59 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:(09-11-2015 12:56 PM)kaotic Wrote: Not happening, it'll take years for the screening process and background checks.
Might as well hop across the south of the border.
It's 10,000 EXTRA "refugees". In addition to the 70,000 we already committed to. And there will probably be no background checks beyond routine questions.
still, the numbers are pathetic, what's 80,000 ? you should've take them all because nothing like this would've happened if it hadn't been you, besides, you're 300mln country, there are countries in Europe which have already taken more immigrants than you've comitted to and the other thing is if you will even make that promises happen
(09-11-2015 04:28 PM)Dusty Wrote: Yeah George Lucas wants to build affordable housing in Marin County California ( where Mill Valley is- basically San Franciscos richest suburb). It's overwhelmingly white and liberal ( Obama got something like 90% of the Marin vote). The people there are flipping their lids over Lucas' plan to build affordable housing. Diversity for thee but not for me.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morni...lionaires/
These people are not that different from white nationalists in Idaho, they just have more money and use their money as a "wall" to keep minorities out.
(09-11-2015 01:24 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:(09-10-2015 10:19 PM)BetaNoMore Wrote: I'm not sure if that makes sense to me.
If the goal is for ultimately for the corporate overloads to profit from a consumerist culture, how would it benefit them to bring in staunch anti-west peoples who, due to their strong religious beliefs will buffer them from assimilating into the original dominant culture?
A lot of the justified fears of these refugees not assimilating into the current culture contradict your theory. It can't be both. Either these people are going to assimilate or they won't. I believe that they won't so that means they won't be part of the consumerist culture.
None of this makes sense to me. These countries are opening a very dangerous pandora's box and I can't see how any of these politicians can think it's a good idea unless they're trying to have some sort of sort term solution to the population replacement problem.
Whilst I don't quite ascribe to the global conspiracy theory, I can see the argument that Teh Elitez are playing the long game. As the population becomes more Islamic, more violent, and more hating of other cultures, it breeds conflict. Arms companies like that. And conflict also provides an excuse to raise surveillance on everyone, since the Left will never accept racial or cultural profiling even when it's apparent a large segment of certain types of crime is being committed disproportionately by certain racial groups. It was not during the Cold War that domestic surveillance on every Western man, woman and child was heavily amped up, but during the war on terror.
The Elitez (the less smart among them, that is) may also be of the view that the "good" immigrants vastly outnumber the bad, and "good" immigrants are much, much less likely to question authoritarian regimes when they've come from such regimes themselves. (Consider the commentary here that the Middle East doesn't shut the fuck up and stop bombing others unless strongmen like Gaddafi or Saddam are in power there.)
"Good" immigrants coming from shitbox countries blasted apart by war also are less likely to form into the sort of bodies demanding wage rises at a macro level; quite the contrary, as education for children around the world heads for the toilet, such ethnic groups are more likely to ghettoise, manipulate the welfare system and pick up any minimum or low wage job around, thus keeping wages lower on sheer supply dwarfing demand.
Just some thoughts. Again, not sure if I buy these as such.
![[Image: Pg-12-eurozone-graphic.jpg]](http://www.independent.co.uk/incoming/article6264098.ece/alternates/w620/Pg-12-eurozone-graphic.jpg)
(09-11-2015 05:07 PM)iop890 Wrote: Germany wants to ban "hate speech" against refugees.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34220796
, and what is Merkel going to do on Monday, urgently, to address this situation?

![[Image: big-brother-watching.jpg?w=309&h=237]](https://antioligarch.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/big-brother-watching.jpg?w=309&h=237)
![[Image: 10nciys.jpg]](http://i59.tinypic.com/10nciys.jpg)

(09-11-2015 05:22 PM)Going strong Wrote:(09-11-2015 05:07 PM)iop890 Wrote: Germany wants to ban "hate speech" against refugees.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34220796
Incredible. Europe is being invaded by hundreds and hundreds of thousands of male illegal migrants without ID papers and means to sustain themselves, and what is Merkel going to do on Monday, urgently, to address this situation?
Meet with the head of German police? Meet with the head of German Intelligence services? Meet with Orban, or the head of Frontex (by the way, where has Frontex gone?? they are pulling a brilliant disappearing act)?
No, Merkel has something better, more urgent and important to do, on Monday:
Meet (along her Interior Minister) with Facebook executives, to try and criminalize anti-migrants speech on Facebook.
"German Chancellor Angela Merkel called for better Facebook enforcement of the rules against hate speech.
German Interior Minister Heiko Maas is expected to discuss the matter with Facebook executives on Monday.
"The rules need to be implemented," Mrs Merkel told the Rheinische Post newspaper.
"When people incite others on social networks, using their real name, not only the state must act, but also Facebook as a company must do something against those slogans," she said"
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34220796
The STASI is back. If they know your real name, they'll go after you...
Below, a picture for Libertas (and other posters), and in honor of former-Eastern German, Frau Merkel:
(09-11-2015 05:22 PM)Going strong Wrote:I think this is a good sign. It shows that the traitorous leaders of the EU are delusional, desperate, and stupidly arrogant for believing that their plan would work.(09-11-2015 05:07 PM)iop890 Wrote: Germany wants to ban "hate speech" against refugees.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34220796
Incredible. Europe is being invaded by hundreds and hundreds of thousands of male illegal migrants without ID papers and means to sustain themselves, and what is Merkel going to do on Monday, urgently, to address this situation?
Meet with the head of German police? Meet with the head of German Intelligence services? Meet with Orban, or the head of Frontex (by the way, where has Frontex gone?? they are pulling a brilliant disappearing act)?
No, Merkel has something better, more urgent and important to do, on Monday:
Meet (along her Interior Minister) with Facebook executives, to try and criminalize anti-migrants speech on Facebook.
"German Chancellor Angela Merkel called for better Facebook enforcement of the rules against hate speech.
German Interior Minister Heiko Maas is expected to discuss the matter with Facebook executives on Monday.
"The rules need to be implemented," Mrs Merkel told the Rheinische Post newspaper.
"When people incite others on social networks, using their real name, not only the state must act, but also Facebook as a company must do something against those slogans," she said"
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34220796
Quote:It鈥檚 time for us to look out for one another.
We have enough of our own problems, and charity starts at home.
It might seem like you鈥檙e alone, but you鈥檙e not.
We are here, and we have your back.
It鈥檚 going to be a long march to freedom, but you already knew it was never going to be easy to be a man.
Stay strong out there.