Post: #26

(10-29-2015 09:46 AM)HankMoody Wrote:  I have a decent amount of hot female friends...

I wouldn't describe them as "red pill", but you'd be surprised how honest they are. They'll fully admit that they want to fuck hot guys, and that they don't like the fat blue haired feminists anymore than we do. They're also pretty honest about wanting to fuck around in their 20s and then settle down with a beta when they hit their 30s.

Quite frankly, we're the silent majority. Women want to be feminine, and they like masculine men. The only people who want men to act like females are academics and fat feminists with blue hair.

Jokes on them. I don't want to settle down with a chick in her 30s after she's been around the block 15 times.

Post: #27

(10-29-2015 09:46 AM)HankMoody Wrote:  I wouldn't describe them as "red pill", but you'd be surprised how honest they are. They'll fully admit that they want to fuck hot guys, and that they don't like the fat blue haired feminists anymore than we do. They're also pretty honest about wanting to fuck around in their 20s and then settle down with a beta when they hit their 30s.

I respectfully disagree.

They want to get fucked by a hot alpha AND wifed up by him in their twenties.
How desperate are all these young girls to lock down a sports star, a celebrity or simply the college quarterback or fraternity president?
But due to low supply of attractive men and high supply of free sex, these men have no intention to marry and instead they follow their natural polygamous instincts.

Women understand that:
1) attractive men will not commit to them because there are too many sluts and not enough attractive men.
2) after age 30, they won’t even be able to have sex with attractive men.
And that is why they already plan to marry a beta (=unattractive guy that provides for her).

I (and a lot of other posters) like to compare women to children.
Children have a lot of unreasonable demands: they only want to eat candy, they want all the toys, they want to stay up late…. Basically they want all the advantages of an adult without any of the obligations, even when they are physically and mentally completely unable to play that role.
And, unsurprisingly to us, children quickly lose all respect for adults that give in to their whims, while they respect and admire those that impose clear and firm boundaries.
The same holds true for women: by giving in to the feminist demands and world view, modern man has made himself unattractive to women. He simply doesn’t wet the pussy anymore. What we now consider an alpha man, a confident, dominant masculine man who takes no bullshit from women, was simply a regular man until a couple of decades ago.

By giving in to feminist demands, men have created a lose-lose situation.
Most women have become less attractive to men.
Most men have become less attractive to women.
Women can satisfy their hypergamous instinct in their 20’s and get fucked by the remaining attractive men, but these men will never commit to her.
Attractive man can satisfy their polygamous instinct and fuck a lot of girls, but they cannot find a decent mother for their children.
And unattractive men really get the short end of the stick; they have nearly no access to sex and when they finally manage to get with an old, unattractive women, she will be a terrible wife and mother and possibly ruin his life.

edit: In the above I have lumped men into two categories, attractive and unattractive, while I did not make this distinction for women.
It is absolutely true that in the Western world, the percentage of men that is objectively sexually attractive to women is far greater than the percentage of women that is objectively sexually attractive to men.
If you take the sum of all good-looking men, all rich men, all high-status men and all men with good game, you will definitely arrive at a greater number than the sum of all pretty, fit, young girls.
However, due to the polygamous nature of men and the hypergamous nature of women, nearly every women - no matter how unattractive she is - will probably have the chance to have sex with an attractive man while the reverse doesn't hold.
Hence the two categories for men (which I maybe should have called: man that can get laid and man that can't).