Thanks guys, just passing through - there's a lot of stuff grim going on my end - but this fuss had reached even me.
As for moral complexity:
You’ve all probably noticed the post-2008 retreat from encouraging an understanding of the adult complexities of the world from SJW’s / Feminists. There’s a shift in Academia towards protection from ideas and personal criticism: Safe Spaces; Trigger Words; Micro-aggressions; Rape Culture; right up to the absurdity of protesting a showing of American Sniper on a campus and replacing him with a showing of Paddington Bear.
Feminists require Useful Idiots unable to critically-think to question dogma, and, as such, it is in the interest of Academia to infantilise its female students to keep their moral reasoning in a simplified, childlike state. Children exposed to conflict are forced to self-reflect, develop a more complex understanding of social interactions, and create coping skills to deal with criticism and not getting their own way.
It greatly-empowers the movement if any of this is prevented from happening, because moral development is limited by one’s cognitive development, so follows behind. It’s possible to keep women in a childlike state, and it’s something we’ve all noticed, via the childlike interests; the shift into women needing the escapist power fantasies that were once the domain of teenage boys and immature adult men; the weird pre-sexual confusion as to the realities to human interaction and sexual intercourse; the clichéd desire of them all to be Young Adult Novelists and the general middle school reading level of their writing in general; and their fixation with scatological discourse, making their ‘shitlord / eat my cunt’ outbursts resemble teenage tough guys trying too hard.
This stupid comic – the artist actually thinks this makes her cool instead of desperately damaged – sums the mindset up.
There’s similar theories of Moral Development, but I’ll offer up this summation of Kohlberg’s Six Stage Theory, that’s divided into three tiers (Pre-Conventional, Conventional, Post-Conventional), as it’s easy to grasp:
The idea is a functioning moral adult should progress from the first – simple – stage to the sixth –complex - stage, though only about 15% of the population achieves a post-conventional morality – usually in their mid-30’s, though I'd reached it in my twenties through constant exposure to attempted religious indoctrination and attempted 1st and 2nd wave Feminist indoctrination.
Stages 1 and 2 are the Moral Constructs of Children, and are meant to be outgrown, though Narcissists can easily stop at Stage 2 – Self-Interest Driven. The less complex SJW types who doxx and dogpile have stopped here, the most famous example I've noticed being involved in Gamergate with her own set of similar-minded followers. Like tends to attract like.
However, in the interests of creating Social Justice Warriors to be furious agents of the desired change, Stage 3 must be reached – conform to the majority and thereby be a good person, whilst deliberately arresting advancement to Stage 4 where Social Authority would be respected, not challenged.
Basically, encourage the subject to remain in an early-teenage mindset – that awkward time where the conception dawns that your peers are judging you, which includes stopping them from developing the coping skills that would generate the emotional resilience to deal with social ostracisation and hardship. To that end, make them think they’re unreasonably-persecuted from an outside source – encourage a deep sense of inferiority - with the false hope that if said source is removed popularity is guaranteed, and encourage emotional hysteria as the correct reaction to minute challenges.
It is vitally-important to keep the subject free of any conflicting or challenging views, to sell the false belief that everyone in the wider world must think the same way as the subject.
With all this, you now have the perfect, obedient agent of social change, who won’t dare voice any previously-undictated dictated thought, due to threat of group exclusion, though the side effects will be obvious to a detached observer: an obvious fixation on trying to make oneself appear to have greater social capital via conspicuous consumption of the correct branded products (apple products, granny glasses, indie games); flitting from being emotionally-disengaged and ‘over’ everything to a full-on temper tantrum over not getting their own way; and an exaggerated, artificial presentation in general in a desperate attempt to appear more complex and interesting than they are, (stupid hair dyes, personal pronouns, tattoos, made up names).
They're trapped in Teen Angst and Teen Awkwardness forever. I can't think of a more hellish fate.
I can recognise Stage 3 stagnation by one other tell. You’re probably observed the transactional currency of the SJW’s by now, to the point it’s almost a cliché:
“You’re such a good person.”
Again and again, they bleat it at each other.
“You’re such a good person.”
They'll exaggerate stories and events to generate that phrase. How it must please them.
Now read the description of Stage 3 again.
Remember, they only
look like adults, in which point, it’s no point getting angry in any confrontation with them, however provoked, simply treat them like the bratty little sisters they are. They’re incapable of adult understanding, adult sexuality, adult relationships, and – increasingly – adult jobs because they’re not complex entities – they’re children. (My last job had an off-the-books rule to not hire anyone under 35).
As such, I’m not convinced you can argue with them, because the early, simple stages of moral development are rigid by nature, and dependent on moral standards given by others. As such, they offer little of the uniqueness you get with more advanced moral codes – early moral stages are conformist by nature - which is why I laughed at that Nix girl calling everyone ‘sheep’. I was banging Goth Girls using that exact same terminology for those they thought beneath them since before she was born. Yawn. It’s fitting her moral reasoning is labelled as “Conventional” as it is “Conformist” by its very nature. Once again, “I’m not like the other girls”.
Anyway, knowing all this, what use is it? It makes infiltration simple by showing how to stay in character because none of them are stage six unique entities. Therefore: use the language of a young adult reading level; always keep the appearance of your morality simple; use a black and white point of view; alternate withering contempt and out-of-control hysteria with a sprinkling of scatology; remember to praise the other person; exaggerate offense grossly; overshare; and remember to use the language of liars trying to convince people they’re telling the truth: literally, actually, seriously, legitimately.
Remember, we can outlast the enemy, because the less complex moral stages are instable by their very nature: black and white moral views have zero universal appeal, and are therefore under great threat by any form of diversity, (either of opinion, or cultural diversity). More hilariously, they’re inconsistent by nature – resulting in a lot of ‘do as we say not as we do’ – and, as such, can’t be adjusted on the fly to any kind of complex realities, so they don’t recognise when they’re overstepping legal boundaries when situations escalate. Nudge them – however slightly - in the right direction, and document the evidence. Mostly likely, you won’t even have to nudge them, since their moral simplicity means they’re naturally-conflictive by nature.
My Stage 6 nature means I tend to naturally shrug off minor conflict in opinion – it’s impossible for them to do the same. Black and white. Either Or. It must be like living inside a tornado that was seeded by those who were supposed to be building you a storm cellar. Poor, poor things.
I still believe there's a possibility of physical violence down the track, but I'm not sure if they're that disassociated from reality yet, or if enough Female Incels have been cultivated by Academia. So, be wary, but don't overreact to minor threats in a way that offers them ammunition against you.