Post: #1

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/has-the-federal-government-ever-had-sex/article/2565963

Quote:But the draft explains that the "default position" should be to err on the side of the prosecution.

Murphy's answer was simply that "hopefully" there would be enough evidence to say one way or the other.

For now, their draft is going nowhere at ALI as long as members continue to oppose it as they did this year. The next chance for comment, and to see if Schulhofer and Murphy listened to criticism and updated their draft, will be in October.

Even though "yes means yes" has failed to gain traction in most states where it's been introduced, with the continued focus on sexual assault in the media and academia, Schulhofer and Murphy will not be the only ones to propose expanding California's policy across the nation. Unless more people take notice of the proposals, we could be just a few years away from having the government tell us how to have sex.

I keep thinking the Science fiction articles about how bad it is going to get in the West is just that, science fiction, but current events just keep proving me wrong. What the fuck is "affirmative consent" anyway? I don't get it. I'm not kidding either. I really don't get it. It's hard enough to get laid as it is, but many girls want it super rough anyway, so, I don't understand how this approach to sex wouldn't be a tacit outlawing of normal sexual relations.

Post: #2

(06-28-2015 09:48 PM)KorbenDallas Wrote:  http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/has-the-federal-government-ever-had-sex/article/2565963

Quote:But the draft explains that the "default position" should be to err on the side of the prosecution.

Murphy's answer was simply that "hopefully" there would be enough evidence to say one way or the other.

For now, their draft is going nowhere at ALI as long as members continue to oppose it as they did this year. The next chance for comment, and to see if Schulhofer and Murphy listened to criticism and updated their draft, will be in October.

Even though "yes means yes" has failed to gain traction in most states where it's been introduced, with the continued focus on sexual assault in the media and academia, Schulhofer and Murphy will not be the only ones to propose expanding California's policy across the nation. Unless more people take notice of the proposals, we could be just a few years away from having the government tell us how to have sex.

I keep thinking the Science fiction articles about how bad it is going to get in the West is just that, science fiction, but current events just keep proving me wrong. What the fuck is "affirmative consent" anyway? I don't get it. I'm not kidding either. I really don't get it. It's hard enough to get laid as it is, but many girls want it super rough anyway, so, I don't understand how this approach to sex wouldn't be a tacit outlawing of normal sexual relations.

What the fuck. Did whatever legal fuckhole who typed that not get haunted by the whole 'innocent until proven guilty' mantra as their keystrokes hit the computer?

They should 'err on the side of the entire fucking reason there is a court to begin with. It would save a shit load of money to just 'err on the side of the prosecution' and let the cops administer sentences. Justice would be so much 'easier and efficient' if a woman can call the cops with a rape whistle and say "oh that guy raped me. Shoot him in the face now officer" and have the cops 'err on the side of the prosecution' and gun the man down.

Post: #3

That's her on the right. I'm sure she's a barrel of fun in bed.

Post: #4

Affirmative consent vs consent? Can anyone tell me the difference?

Post: #5

Affirmative consent is whatever they say it is before castrating you in the public square. Consent used to be how power is derived from the governed. Even that is now lacking.

Post: #6

I'm always torn between thinking this whole shitstorm of bad policies and social trends are due to some intelligent force that has a purpose, and the idea that it is just too wild to have been brought about by design.

Either way, a tinfoil hat sounds incredibly comforting right now.

Post: #7

(06-28-2015 10:09 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Affirmative consent vs consent? Can anyone tell me the difference?

Consent
Girl and guy making out on the bed. Girl reaches into the guy's pants and grabs his dick. Guy escalates by removing her clothes. Girl responds enthusiastically by removing his belt. Girl and guy have sex. At no time was permission verbally sought and at no time did the girl verbally affirm her consent. A sexual assault has taken place.

Affirmative consent
Guy: Um, like, is it, I mean, would it be OK if I, like, kissed you?
Girl: Um, I guess.

Girl and guy make out. At no time is there anything other than mouth to mouth contact, as that is all she has consented to thus far.

The girl starts to get a bit frustrated because, as a healthy young woman, she naturally desires a man who will take charge sexually. Although her vagina is starting to dry up, she thinks what the hell and reaches for his dick, hoping that this will encourage him to be less of a pussy.

Guy(thinking, heart pounding): Yes, today is the day! Finally I might get to see a real life vagina! But I need to remember what I learnt in sex ed class.

Guy: Um, can I, like touch your thigh.

Girl takes guy's hand and places it on her thigh to indicate an affirmative response. Although she hasn't actually verbally consented, guy is so excited that he lets it slide.

Guy: Um, like, it would, like, be totally awesome if we, like, took our tops off. Like, is that OK?

Girl: Yeah, maybe this isn't such a good idea. I really don't wanna ruin our friendship.

Post: #8

The government likes to believe that people have sex like this.

semi-NSFW

Post: #9

Yes, the federal government have sex by fucking over men especially through draconian child support laws.

Post: #10

It's now legally mandated to say "You like that baby?" about every minute or two, and record it

Post: #11

I can see the headline now:

Obama signs federal "yes means yes law", Mexico summons the US Ambassador as it is flooded with American immigrants.

Post: #12

(06-28-2015 10:46 PM)CH-Toronto Wrote:  The government likes to believe that people have sex like this.

semi-NSFW

Jesus Christ, its like puritan ideals reborn, unnaturally absurd. More to the point it allows feminists dykes to come into the bedroom of men and women, and be ever present. This is what happens when God is replaced without any philosophy, reason or purpose.

Post: #13

(06-28-2015 10:46 PM)CH-Toronto Wrote:  The government likes to believe that people have sex like this.

semi-NSFW