Post: #51

(07-02-2015 09:26 PM)Roosh Wrote:  I scanned my brain to remember if I really touched her or not but I can't be certain either way because so many things happened that day. I swear I don't normally touch large women.

Quote:he knows that one must quickly establish bodily contact with a woman. If she does not shrink away, that's a good sign.

You probably didn't. She's clearly read your stuff and fantasized about it, to the point she actually believes she was touched.

Just how large was this girl? Does she deserve a place in the "Would you hit it?" thread or the "Boner Killer" thread?

Post: #52

It may be time to take a look at the tapes

Post: #53

(07-02-2015 08:13 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:Hope they didn't take any pictures of attendees.

They didn't.

They could've recorded it.

(07-02-2015 09:26 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:True to hamster form, she reinterprets Roosh's gentlemanly forewarning and offer of reimbursement as a pick-up attempt:

I scanned my brain to remember if I really touched her or not but I can't be certain either way because so many things happened that day. I swear I don't normally touch large women.

Will this be a precedent for you to restrict who can enter? It mightn't be a very effective technique (but a reasonable filter nevertheless) to simply bar and refund fat women and gay looking men at the door.

They jumped the gun way too soon. They should've released this after the tour had concluded. This shot in the foot any following attempts to infiltrate your upcoming venues.

Post: #54

The funny thing about the banner they created for the article is that it reflects a lot more on the "journalist" than it does Roosh, but thats always the case.

Post: #55

I was going to write a response to this but I think the most appropriate answer is "wah". Professional whiners. It's funny that today you can make a living from being a crybaby.

I knew they were the type the moment I laid eyes on them.

Post: #56

I'm not going to read the article yet, I don't want the best parts of the event spoiled for me. I've said it before, they always quote the stuff that makes the most sense and then try to spin it as controversial.


Did a fatty and a gay really think they'd go unnoticed in an audience full of healthy-looking heterosexual guys? (aka. "normal")

"I'd hate myself if I had that kind of attitude, if I were that weak." - Arnold

Post: #57

(07-02-2015 09:26 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:True to hamster form, she reinterprets Roosh's gentlemanly forewarning and offer of reimbursement as a pick-up attempt:

I scanned my brain to remember if I really touched her or not but I can't be certain either way because so many things happened that day. I swear I don't normally touch large women.

It doesn't matter if you did or not. A confident man touches anyone.

Edit-To be clear touching them does not mean you want something. If they are way below your station they will know it and get tingles while not pursuing it.

Post: #58

I just tried to read the translation, she didn't even try to understand, and may as well have not even have gone.

Apart from a bullet point list of what neomasculinity involves, it didn't give away anything. Misogynists (I can't spell that word for some reason), Pro-rapist, future serial killers blah blah. It was just whining, talking about how Roosh promotes rape in own homes and shit like that misunderstood from his videos.

I can't make it to the London one. Is there any point to letting these losers in so they can just make up that they went to a pro-rape seminar? It's not like they're going to suddenly understand anyway, they just write what they wanted to write in the first place. Maybe it would be best if they're not allowed in?

Post: #59

The article reads worse in German.

The best term she used for the participants of the event were:

+ HIGH-PROFILE SOCIOPATHS

Personally I like that - she recognized relatively high value of the men and considered them just sociopaths. I guess that I am a high profile sociopath too and I can live with that.

She compares her visit to a meet-and greet with the Ku-Klux-Klan, because she was at one of their events too.

Also - the guy she was with was supposedly gay, which makes sense since SJWs are utterly unable to have decent relationships with heterosexual men.

Interesting how she explains her moods. At first she expected to be angry, but in fact is left just in disbelief about all the studies and facts cited by Roosh. To her it was just not backed up by any scientific consensus - I guess she compares it to gender studies and the enforced "consensus" of media and academia which claims that gender is a social construct etc.

But then she says that she felt incredible pity for the men there. In the end especially after the Q&A part her emotions take a sharp turn for the worse and she is becoming fearful. She writes that she was filled with utter fear like a lone woman who took the wrong subway and is now alone at midnight in the Bronx surrounded by potential rapists. That's why she disappeared quickly afraid for her life.

It's interesting that she calls the men there "slick" banker types and nerds, but then at the same time sees that the guys do have a certain above average male value. In her mind they are however hostile to women and that is when she becomes afraid.

It reminds me of the crazy feminists and SJWs who go to post-earthquake areas like Haiti and then are surprised if one of those desperate guys from a dirt-poor country simply rapes them. That is not what the feminist gender studies have told them - those oppressed men should be the enlightened ones.

TLDR; Headline should be: "Fat feminist and fat homosexual friend barely escape with their lives an event where several dozen high-profile sociopaths discuss dangerous anti-female and even anti-human ideas with their NAZI-like leader."

Edit: Her gay friend is about to publish an article too within the next couple of days.

Post: #60

She only felt "pity" for the guys there because it makes her story better.

The fact is not one guy there would have gave her the time of day.

Post: #61

I feel like it would be appropriate for these types to declare "YOU WILL BE ASSIMILATED" loudly and frequently.

Post: #62

(07-02-2015 09:55 PM)JWLZG Wrote:  Will this be a precedent for you to restrict who can enter? It mightn't be a very effective technique (but a reasonable filter nevertheless) to simply bar and refund fat women and gay looking men at the door.

Roosh, have you checked if both of them actually paid for the tickets ?

Post: #63

If they're only going to write articles slandering Roosh as a rape promoter and misogynist, and his followers as sociopaths, we may as well ban them.

They'll still write something bad, but at least they won't be able to make a whole article about it, with lies and it gives them legitimacy.

If we don't let them in, then no one will take anything they write seriously.

Edit: We could make it an invite only event, only RooshV forum members have invites, and can give unlimited invites to others.

Post: #64

The article translates really bad its like she is trying to make bad stuff up when she knows that what is being said is correct.

Post: #65

A couple of guys mentioned that there was a fat chick lurking on the periphery but I honestly don't remembering seeing her. I probably thought she was just a heavyset dude.

Post: #66

Here are other great quotes:
1

Quote:"The fact that the manipsulation and control of women is discussed in a form that allows no other conclusion than that you are currently in the midst of high-profile sociopaths and possibly future serial killers"

So
We are high profile?
Remebering CH -

Quote:"Women dig jerks and Dark Triad"

. Therefore we are on the right way.

2.

Quote:"After all, we know that women only go to the gym to to make sexy Selfies and thus appear more attractive to other men. Clear."

So she understood . Women are , and figure is crucial.
Now she should start practicing - less eating and more gym.

3.

Quote:" Few gelled banker types, more colorless men in their forties, some guys who look as if they would employ their free time mainly with World of Warcraft and a lot of young men who originally come from the USA, Australia or Canada"

TokioJoe - you and me - Colorless.
Wow. She must have tunnel vision, to miss us by that much.


Looking at the comments section, you sometime find untelligent responses. Suprise.
But most were along the line of

Post: #67

I must be a sociopath because I loved most of how our group was described in the article.

Slick banker types, intelligent, high profile, not angry, knows that lone women are the easiest to approach, likes submissive women, high value, heterosexual, not attracted to overweight women.

Pretty flattering if you ask me.

Post: #68

Quote:.... I am a risk factor, perhaps one of the "ugly feminists", of which he had already anticipated in advance that they would try to blow up the event.....

I love the quotes around ugly feminist.

Deluding herself that she isn't one.

Post: #69

(06-28-2015 07:39 AM)Sgt Wrote:  no feminist protest or anything disruptive - there was one woman attending (fat, sitting in the last row and "guarded" by a tall fat dude) -

(07-03-2015 12:20 PM)mogsy Wrote:  

Quote: In any case, I thought it was a very excellent idea to grab me a gay colleague and me very self to convince what is really behind men's rights movement as "Neomasculinity" infected

So the fat, gay guy realized it was better for him to be at this event than attend the gay pride parade outside? What little I know of gay men is being fat and out of shape is a bigger curse than a fat straight guy. That guy better hit the gym.

Post: #70

"heterosexual ideology"

Apparently not wanting to put your dick in a man's asshole is now an ideology.

Post: #71

^ And a fine ideology it is sir!

Post: #72

I'm disappointed in Milo Yiannapoulos; introducing someone to fish and chips by ordering it from a restaurant (as opposed to from a specialized takeaway) is all kinds of wrong. How was it, btw?

I'm more disappointed that I'm working tomorrow and miss the event, I'd very much would have liked to come. Ah well, maybe one day.

Post: #73

^ Nothing better than a grease-soaked newspaper-wrapped portion of fish and chips. I can only assume milo didn't want to put Roosh of it for life.

Post: #74

The fish and chips was quite tasty. I think they used a sort of beer batter. The bread coating was soft and moist.

I've had fish sticks before, but never "fish and chips".

Post: #75

Ha, you've never had fish and chips? That's a staple New England meal! Fish is plentiful here.