Post: #76

for a billionaire that is pocket change,, the equivalent of regular guys buying a measly $20 lap dance. Cheaper than getting married and having to fork over more assets in case of an exit. Getting married seems like it has worse odds than playing blackjack in succeeding. Yet many do it.

Post: #77

(05-19-2015 04:52 PM)tomtud Wrote:  for a billionaire that is pocket change,, the equivalent of regular guys buying a measly $20 lap dance. Cheaper than getting married and having to fork over more assets in case of an exit. Getting married seems like it has worse odds than playing blackjack in succeeding. Yet many do it.

While it's true that high net worth people could easily "buy" time with women, it's not as simple as you think. First, these gold-diggers/hookers are running their own version of game. They will take advantage of the guy any way they can. This includes getting pregnant, exposing secrets, etc.

Just as big an issue is the slippery slope of using money to get what you want. If you start paying women to be with you, where does it end? Why not just stay in your bed 24/7, watch TV, and have a string of models come in every 4 hours. Money is the easy way, but men aren't built to take the easy way. We are the ones that struggle and overcome. I think that's why most people on the forum are against paying for women.