By the way, in Europe we have stories and ancient legends about witches, who, having offended God and morality, start coughing out frogs, and can't utter words anymore... just saying...



See the Charles Perrault short story, "Les Fees", about a bad, evil and... crooked woman who drinks from a silver bottle and then, instead of words, frogs get out of her mouth...

I mean, not "Hitler, literally", but "A witch, literally"!

(09-07-2016 11:58 AM)Going strong Wrote:  By the way, if you have religious beliefs, you can't but start feeling that Hillary getting incapacitated like that, does seem like divine intervention.

I mean, all over the world, the (sometimes openly satanist) Left is in despair: CFK broken, almost already inside Ezeiza penitenciary - Dilma and illiterate-Lula humiliated, kicked out by a conservative Christian Lebanese - Maduro seemingly days ago from popular uprising - Merkel crushed in the elections - Hillary deprived of speech ability - Hollande slapped by Macron, lagging far behind Marine - Brexit... it seems like God, after a temporary absence (a warning certainly?), is once again smiling on us, the good (conservative) people!

It's how God tests for faith. He lets things go to hell and pulls it right back from the brink to see which men have true faith and courage. Re-read the story of Jesus walking on water and saving Peter as the storm grows.

(09-07-2016 12:03 PM)Going strong Wrote:  By the way, in Europe we have stories and ancient legends about witches, who, having offended God and morality, start coughing out frogs, and can't utter words anymore... just saying...



See the Charles Perrault short story, "Les Fees", about a bad, evil and... crooked woman who drinks from a silver bottle and then, instead of words, frogs get out of her mouth...

I mean, not "Hitler, literally", but "A witch, literally"!

PEPEEEEEEEE!

(09-07-2016 11:58 AM)Hell_Is_Like_Newark Wrote:  last year I made a prediction that Hillary would not be the nominee. Even within a few months of the election, I and still have doubts she will be the nominee. I think the Elites didn't realize how bad her health actually was.

I won't be surprised if the Dems pull a Torricelli, replacing Hillary with Biden at the last minute.

Video of Biden refusing to be the nominee..

(09-07-2016 12:23 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(09-07-2016 11:58 AM)Going strong Wrote:  By the way, if you have religious beliefs, you can't but start feeling that Hillary getting incapacitated like that, does seem like divine intervention.

I mean, all over the world, the (sometimes openly satanist) Left is in despair: CFK broken, almost already inside Ezeiza penitenciary - Dilma and illiterate-Lula humiliated, kicked out by a conservative Christian Lebanese - Maduro seemingly days ago from popular uprising - Merkel crushed in the elections - Hillary deprived of speech ability - Hollande slapped by Macron, lagging far behind Marine - Brexit... it seems like God, after a temporary absence (a warning certainly?), is once again smiling on us, the good (conservative) people!

It's how God tests for faith. He lets things go to hell and pulls it right back from the brink to see which men have true faith and courage. Re-read the story of Jesus walking on water and saving Peter as the storm grows.

I met some mormon girls today, they tried to recruit me.

(09-07-2016 03:13 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(09-07-2016 12:23 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(09-07-2016 11:58 AM)Going strong Wrote:  By the way, if you have religious beliefs, you can't but start feeling that Hillary getting incapacitated like that, does seem like divine intervention.

I mean, all over the world, the (sometimes openly satanist) Left is in despair: CFK broken, almost already inside Ezeiza penitenciary - Dilma and illiterate-Lula humiliated, kicked out by a conservative Christian Lebanese - Maduro seemingly days ago from popular uprising - Merkel crushed in the elections - Hillary deprived of speech ability - Hollande slapped by Macron, lagging far behind Marine - Brexit... it seems like God, after a temporary absence (a warning certainly?), is once again smiling on us, the good (conservative) people!

It's how God tests for faith. He lets things go to hell and pulls it right back from the brink to see which men have true faith and courage. Re-read the story of Jesus walking on water and saving Peter as the storm grows.

I met some mormon girls today, they tried to recruit me.

They were spies sent by Romney, to lure you off the Trump train. Don't fall victim to temptation, brother! Fuck'em Mormon temptresses, sure, but after November election...

(09-07-2016 03:13 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  I met some mormon girls today, they tried to recruit me.

Did you at least get there number after failed recruitment?

(09-07-2016 04:21 PM)Thersites Wrote:  

(09-07-2016 03:13 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  I met some mormon girls today, they tried to recruit me.

Did you at least get there number after failed recruitment?

The other question is: can you just get one number, and one date with both of them? Not one bang though of course.

I found this article in Foreign Policy Magazine that outlines how Russia views the prospect of Clinton becoming President, and how we are very dangerously close to the beginning of a Second Cold War: http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/07/the-...mir-putin/

Quote:The Kremlin Really Believes That Hillary Wants to Start a War With Russia

If Hillary Clinton is elected president, the world will remember Aug. 25 as the day she began the Second Cold War.

In a speech last month nominally about Donald Trump, Clinton called Russian President Vladimir Putin the godfather of right-wing, extreme nationalism. To Kremlin-watchers, those were not random epithets. Two years earlier, in the most famous address of his career, Putin accused the West of backing an armed seizure of power in Ukraine by “extremists, nationalists, and right-wingers.” Clinton had not merely insulted Russia’s president: She had done so in his own words.

Worse, they were words originally directed at neo-Nazis. In Moscow, this was seen as a reprise of Clinton’s comments comparing Putin to Hitler. It injected an element of personal animus into an already strained relationship — but, more importantly, it set up Putin as the representative of an ideology that is fundamentally opposed to the United States.

Even as relations between Russia and the West have sunk to new lows in the wake of 2014’s revolution in Ukraine, the Kremlin has long contended that a Cold War II is impossible. That’s because, while there may be differences over, say, the fate of Donetsk, there is no longer a fundamental ideological struggle dividing East and West. To Russian ears, Clinton seemed determined in her speech to provide this missing ingredient for bipolar enmity, painting Moscow as the vanguard for racism, intolerance, and misogyny around the globe.

The nation Clinton described was unrecognizable to its citizens. Anti-woman? Putin’s government provides working mothers with three years of subsidized family leave. Intolerant? The president personally attended the opening of Moscow’s great mosque. Racist? Putin often touts Russia’s ethnic diversity. To Russians, it appeared that Clinton was straining to fabricate a rationale for hostilities.

I have been hard-pressed to offer a more comforting explanation for Clinton’s behavior — a task that has fallen to me as the sole Western researcher at the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Moscow State Institute of International Relations. Better known by its native acronym, MGIMO, the institute is the crown jewel of Russia’s national-security brain trust, which Henry Kissinger dubbed the “Harvard of Russia.”

In practice, the institute is more like a hybrid of West Point and Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service: MGIMO prepares the elite of Russia’s diplomatic corps and houses the country’s most influential think tanks. There is no better vantage point to gauge Moscow’s perceptions of a potential Hillary Clinton administration.

Let’s not mince words: Moscow perceives the former secretary of state as an existential threat. The Russian foreign-policy experts I consulted did not harbor even grudging respect for Clinton. The most damaging chapter of her tenure was the NATO intervention in Libya, which Russia could have prevented with its veto in the U.N. Security Council. Moscow allowed the mission to go forward only because Clinton had promised that a no-fly zone would not be used as cover for regime change.

Russia’s leaders were understandably furious when, not only was former Libyan President Muammar al-Qaddafi ousted, but a cellphone recording of his last moments showed U.S.-backed rebels sodomizing him with a bayonet. They were even more enraged by Clinton’s videotaped response to the same news: “We came, we saw, he died,” the secretary of state quipped before bursting into laughter, cementing her reputation in Moscow as a duplicitous warmonger.

As a candidate, Clinton has given Moscow déjà vu by once again demanding a humanitarian no-fly zone in the Middle East — this time in Syria. Russian analysts universally believe that this is another pretext for regime change. Putin is determined to prevent Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from meeting the same fate as Qaddafi — which is why he has deployed Russia’s air force, navy, and special operations forces to eliminate the anti-Assad insurgents, many of whom have received U.S. training and equipment.

Given the ongoing Russian operations, a “no-fly zone” is a polite euphemism for shooting down Russia’s planes unless it agrees to ground them. Clinton is aware of this fact. When asked in a debate whether she would shoot down Russian planes, she responded, “I do not think it would come to that.” In other words, if she backs Putin into a corner, she is confident he will flinch before the United States starts a shooting war with Russia.

That is a dubious assumption; the stakes are much higher for Moscow than they are for the White House. Syria has long been Russia’s strongest ally in the Middle East, hosting its only military installation outside the former Soviet Union. As relations with Turkey fray, the naval garrison at Tartus is of more strategic value than ever, because it enables Russia’s Black Sea Fleet to operate in the Mediterranean without transiting the Turkish Straits.

Two weeks ago, Putin redoubled his commitment to Syria by conducting airstrikes with strategic bombers from a base in northwest Iran — a privilege for which Russia paid significant diplomatic capital. Having come this far, there is no conceivable scenario in which Moscow rolls over and allows anti-Assad forces to take Damascus — which it views as Washington’s ultimate goal, based in part on publicly accessible intelligence reports.

Clinton has justified her threatened attack on Russia’s air force, saying that it “gives us some leverage in our conversations with Russia.” This sounds suspiciously like the “madman theory” of deterrence subscribed to by former President Richard Nixon, who tried to maximize his leverage by convincing the Soviets he was crazy enough to start a world war. Nixon’s bluff was a failure; even when he invaded Cambodia, Moscow never questioned his sanity. Today, Russian analysts do not retain the same confidence in Hillary Clinton’s soundness of mind.

Her temper became legendary in Moscow when she breached diplomatic protocol by storming out of a meeting with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov just moments after exchanging pleasantries. And the perception that she is unstable was exacerbated by reports that Clinton drank heavily while acting as America’s top diplomat — accusations that carry special weight in a country that faults alcoholism for many of Boris Yeltsin’s failures.

Cultural differences in decorum have made the situation worse. In Russia, where it is considered a sign of mental illness to so much as smile at a stranger on the street, leaders are expected to project an image of stern calm. Through that prism, Clinton has shown what looks like disturbing behavior on the campaign trail: barking like a dog, bobbing her head, and making exaggerated faces. (To be clear, my point is not that these are real signs of cognitive decay, but that many perceive them that way in Moscow.)

Another factor that disturbs Russian analysts is the fact that, unlike prior hawks such as John McCain, Clinton is a Democrat. This has allowed her to mute the West’s normal anti-interventionist voices, even as Iraq-war architect Robert Kagan boasts that Clinton will pursue a neocon foreign policy by another name. Currently, the only voice for rapprochement with Russia is Clinton’s opponent, Donald Trump. If she vanquishes him, she will have a free hand to take the aggressive action against Russia that Republican hawks have traditionally favored.

Moscow prefers Trump not because it sees him as easily manipulated, but because his “America First” agenda coincides with its view of international relations. Russia seeks a return to classical international law, in which states negotiate with one another based on mutually understood self-interests untainted by ideology. To Moscow, only the predictability of realpolitik can provide the coherence and stability necessary for a durable peace.

For example, the situation on the ground demonstrates that Crimea has, in fact, become part of Russia. Offering to officially recognize that fact is the most powerful bargaining chip the next president can play in future negotiations with Russia. Yet Clinton has castigated Trump for so much as putting the option on the table. For ideological reasons, she prefers to pretend that Crimea will someday be returned to Ukraine — even as Moscow builds a $4 billion bridge connecting the peninsula to the Russian mainland.

Moscow believes that Crimea and other major points of bipolar tension will evaporate if America simply elects a leader who will pursue the nation’s best interest, from supporting Assad against the Islamic State to shrinking NATO by ejecting free riders. Russia respects Trump for taking these realist positions on his own initiative, even though they were not politically expedient.

In Clinton, it sees the polar opposite — a progressive ideologue who will stubbornly adhere to moral postures regardless of their consequences. Clinton also has financial ties to George Soros, whose Open Society Foundations are considered the foremost threat to Russia’s internal stability, based on their alleged involvement in Eastern Europe’s prior “Color Revolutions.”

Russia’s security apparatus is certain that Soros aspires to overthrow Putin’s government using the same methods that felled President Viktor Yanukovych in Ukraine: covertly orchestrated mass protests concealing armed provocateurs. The Kremlin’s only question is whether Clinton is reckless enough to back those plans.

Putin condemned the United States for flirting with such an operation in 2011, when then-Secretary Clinton spoke out in favor of mass protests against his party’s victory in parliamentary elections. Her recent explosive rhetoric has given him no reason to believe that she has abandoned the dream of a Maidan on Red Square.

That fear was heightened when Clinton surrogate Harry Reid, the Senate minority leader, recently accused Putin of attempting to rig the U.S. election through cyberattacks. That is a grave allegation — the very kind of thing a President Clinton might repeat to justify war with Russia.

Another angle to a war with Russia..it would put the gulf arab oil states in an even stronger bargaining position as the main supplier of the world's oil.

Knocking out oil market rivals and forcing broader embargoes on Russia makes sense if you look at it from this perspective. We already know Hillary is in the pocket of the Saudis.

It would also push the Sunni elites one step closer to forming their own caliphate with Wahhabists in key positions to try and then knock out Iran.

This is an incredibly dangerous foreign policy for the U.S. to pursue. Let's assume it goes beyond cold war posturing and into full blown war and the nukes actually fly. An ill and corrupt Hillary Clinton will have just started WW3. It sounds alarmist at this point but it's still a serious possibility when you look at how all these different agendas support war with Russia. Billions of lives are at stake here.

All of the investigative grinding guys like Cernovich have been doing looks like it is paying off, some of these "Conspiracy Theories" are going mainstream! FOX Business is now asking questions on Hillarys Handler...





WHO IS THAT GUY?

What is in her ear?

Hearing aid (health issue)?
Earphone (crooked cheater)?

She's irritated and defensive.

looks like hillary has been getting coaching through a secret earpiece during her appearances including the "debate" last night.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NFJCqGQavPE


http://truepundit.com/nypd-hillary-clint...town-hall/

(09-07-2016 12:23 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(09-07-2016 11:58 AM)Going strong Wrote:  By the way, if you have religious beliefs, you can't but start feeling that Hillary getting incapacitated like that, does seem like divine intervention.

I mean, all over the world, the (sometimes openly satanist) Left is in despair: CFK broken, almost already inside Ezeiza penitenciary - Dilma and illiterate-Lula humiliated, kicked out by a conservative Christian Lebanese - Maduro seemingly days ago from popular uprising - Merkel crushed in the elections - Hillary deprived of speech ability - Hollande slapped by Macron, lagging far behind Marine - Brexit... it seems like God, after a temporary absence (a warning certainly?), is once again smiling on us, the good (conservative) people!

It's how God tests for faith. He lets things go to hell and pulls it right back from the brink to see which men have true faith and courage. Re-read the story of Jesus walking on water and saving Peter as the storm grows.

In the case of Brazil feminists went crazy when the new cabinet was changed to all male, and the new first lady is a hot woman.

The Hilarious Feminist Backlash To Brazil's Impeachment Fallout



The cover photo of the Veja magazine story on Brazil’s vice-president (and quite possibly soon-to-be-president) Michel Temer’s wife, Marcela. The controversial headline reads: “Beautiful, maidenlike, and ‘of the home’.” (Source: screenshot from Zero Hora entertainment).


She is even taller than him


The response? A whole lot of outrage. And a viral social media trend. “This article in Veja shows how our society is still extremely macho,” says Carol Schmitz, a designer in Florianopolis, Brazil. She reads the headline as saying, “A model woman is maidenlike, demure, dresses in an appropriate way, and stays in the home. The underlying idea is that a good woman must stay quiet and simply accompany a man.”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/shannonsims/...2534b359fa

(09-08-2016 05:00 AM)Fisto Wrote:  looks like hillary has been getting coaching through a secret earpiece during her appearances including the "debate" last night.
...

http://truepundit.com/nypd-hillary-clint...town-hall/

(09-08-2016 05:00 AM)Fisto Wrote:  looks like hillary has been getting coaching through a secret earpiece during her appearances including the "debate" last night.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NFJCqGQavPE


http://truepundit.com/nypd-hillary-clint...town-hall/

I hope trump gets a small radio interfering device to block it or better yet someone records the voice speaking to her and then blocks the signal.

If she loses her lifeline it's game over for her.

^Boom!

You are a frigging guru! I hope Trump's people are as smart as you.

Trump should not be the one to do it. I'm sure a blackhat would do it, maybe even for free if they could get access inside the show. Probably not worth trying because she has secret service detail for being a former first lady. If they caught you, they would slam you on the spot, and haul you off. You don't know what tech they probably have to catch SIGINT/COMINT interference. Maybe it cannot be caught, no idea, that is not an area of hacking I know much about.

Haha, so there's a wikileaks article mentioning the earpiece as well. Outlined in this short, sweet video with surprise coincidence in timing:

She's doing a press conference

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-08...-live-feed

Live feed posted via NBC on ZeroHedge

Edit, it's over. Really short, ten minutes maybe (with a long drawn out statement to start about Temperament and her "Plan" to end Isis). Lots of giggles with Andrea Mitchell, whined a lot about DJT. 5-6 questions I think, it was hard to tell because it was at an airport with her plane engine roaring in the background so you could hardly hear shit. Questions involved included "was Reince being sexist for saying you don't smile" etc, pure fluff

(09-07-2016 04:21 PM)Thersites Wrote:  

(09-07-2016 03:13 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  I met some mormon girls today, they tried to recruit me.

Did you at least get there number after failed recruitment?

Yes I did and not gonna lie, I was like sort of want because they had no makeup on but were feminine and presumably they are virgins and untouched by callous hands. They were quite impressed by my knowledge of their cult. I'm sure they deliberately put out their young attractive women and then when you're in they do the bate and switch.

(09-08-2016 07:50 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Trump should not be the one to do it. I'm sure a blackhat would do it, maybe even for free if they could get access inside the show. Probably not worth trying because she has secret service detail for being a former first lady. If they caught you, they would slam you on the spot, and haul you off. You don't know what tech they probably have to catch SIGINT/COMINT interference. Maybe it cannot be caught, no idea, that is not an area of hacking I know much about.

I don't even think the SS is in on it. It's not like her ear piece is a 10K$ mission impossible ear piece. It looks like a regular old hearing aid.

I had a friend in school with one of those and he would regularly hook it up to an FM radio to listen to mono tunes.

The fact we can see her ear piece means her own staff supplied it. It would be trivial to tune into the frequency at a close distance. I wouldn't be surprised if there are folks planning on doing just that.

She can't stand on her own two feet without external support. She'd fall apart under any close scrutiny especially without her handlers keeping a close arm on her.

Ok, in addition to above, I watched the Louis Theroux documentary on 'America Most Hated Family' about the Westboro Baptist Church and there are several late teenage and young twenties girls and they are obviously virgins and don't use makeup, not that pretty, but damn their femininity is off the charts even with their rabid hating, still WB.

Some days she's lucid and articulate, other days she needs help climbing the stairs.

Reminds me of a movie from the early 90's where Kevin Kline has to impersonate the President after the real President suffers a stroke.





I honestly wonder if she's got a double.