(09-23-2016 03:07 PM)RaccoonFace Wrote:  Where does this meme come from that any replacement for Shillary (Biden, Michelle, Kerry, ...) would simply beat Trump?

The only replacement candidate that could win against Trump is Bernie, because if the Democratic establishment picks any other candidate than him a significant part of his supporters are simply going to sit out the election and that would most likely mean a Trump victory.

Luckily for us, Bernie is not an insider so I don't think there's a big chance that they would pick him if Shillary dies.

Bernie would get massacred.

The establishment would all calculate they would be far better off with a Trump presidency than a weak old commie fool.

(09-22-2016 09:04 PM)Jvramerys Wrote:  

(09-22-2016 07:08 PM)911 Wrote:  Dr Noel has identified the object carried by Hillary's med handler (aka "Fat Albert"), it's not an injection device, it's in fact a laser pointer, and it is used for patients with P.D./Parkinsonian symptoms:





Bill Still covers this at the 4:38 mark, Still's channel is very good, he's been on top of the news and shares solid daily short updates. He's also made some great long docs on the history of the Fed and the US financial system.

Someone should relay this to Cernovitch.

Great video 911, this video is very enlightening especially that part where her handler is pointing with the laser(6:00 in the video) after she has a freeze you can see her following the laser with her head and then she starts walking.

Can you imagine if Trump brings his own laser pointer Monday ?

Hildebeast once Trump gets tired of her crap:

Here's an interesting read on what happens if a candidate dies:https://www.quora.com/What-would-happen-if-one-of-the-two-candidates-of-the-presidential-election-died-on-the-morning-of-the-election-day

I presume someone dropping out follows the same.

I got my absentee ballot by the way! Looking forward to sending it off!

Via WikiLeaks, FBI released more docs today (PDF - 169 pages):

Quote:New FBI-Clinton doc shows that State Dept was tipped off about WikiLeaks publications by "media" and managed to frequently censor stories.

5:48 PM - 23 Sep 2016

Alt-Right assemble! :

THIS



EDIT: Added better version of this video.

(09-23-2016 07:06 PM)Sam Malone Wrote:  

(09-22-2016 09:04 PM)Jvramerys Wrote:  

(09-22-2016 07:08 PM)911 Wrote:  Dr Noel has identified the object carried by Hillary's med handler (aka "Fat Albert"), it's not an injection device, it's in fact a laser pointer, and it is used for patients with P.D./Parkinsonian symptoms:





Bill Still covers this at the 4:38 mark, Still's channel is very good, he's been on top of the news and shares solid daily short updates. He's also made some great long docs on the history of the Fed and the US financial system.

Someone should relay this to Cernovitch.

Great video 911, this video is very enlightening especially that part where her handler is pointing with the laser(6:00 in the video) after she has a freeze you can see her following the laser with her head and then she starts walking.

Can you imagine if Trump brings his own laser pointer Monday ?

Hildebeast once Trump gets tired of her crap:

It shouldn't be Trump- he needs to stay like teflon, but if he had a plant in the audience that pulled out either a camera or a laser pointer at the start of the debate and put Hillary into a freezing gait, that would be the end of her candidacy.

While a laser pointer could be fun, if security saw even a glint, they'd assume it was a laser sight for some kind of weapon.
Reasonably enough, I think.

Could a hipster looking guy get away with bringing in an ancient flash camera?

^
Careful. Her head might explode.

(09-23-2016 10:53 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  Via WikiLeaks, FBI released more docs today (PDF - 169 pages):

Quote:New FBI-Clinton doc shows that State Dept was tipped off about WikiLeaks publications by "media" and managed to frequently censor stories.

5:48 PM - 23 Sep 2016

So far in the dump, what stands out to me the most so far, is Obama has been found to be a liar. He told one of the major networks in a interview that he found out about Hillary's server from the media. In the FBI dump he was emailing her with a pseudonym.

He may not have said this under oath, but it's not going to look good at all. I wonder how many outlets are going to run the story on Monday though.

(09-24-2016 08:06 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(09-23-2016 10:53 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  Via WikiLeaks, FBI released more docs today (PDF - 169 pages):

Quote:New FBI-Clinton doc shows that State Dept was tipped off about WikiLeaks publications by "media" and managed to frequently censor stories.

5:48 PM - 23 Sep 2016

So far in the dump, what stands out to me the most so far, is Obama has been found to be a liar. He told one of the major networks in a interview that he found out about Hillary's server from the media. In the FBI dump he was emailing her with a pseudonym.

He may not have said this under oath, but it's not going to look good at all. I wonder how many outlets are going to run the story on Monday though.

Fox news might, if someone points it out to them.

(09-24-2016 09:13 AM)eradicator Wrote:  

(09-24-2016 08:06 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(09-23-2016 10:53 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  Via WikiLeaks, FBI released more docs today (PDF - 169 pages):

Quote:New FBI-Clinton doc shows that State Dept was tipped off about WikiLeaks publications by "media" and managed to frequently censor stories.

5:48 PM - 23 Sep 2016

So far in the dump, what stands out to me the most so far, is Obama has been found to be a liar. He told one of the major networks in a interview that he found out about Hillary's server from the media. In the FBI dump he was emailing her with a pseudonym.

He may not have said this under oath, but it's not going to look good at all. I wonder how many outlets are going to run the story on Monday though.

Fox news might, if someone points it out to them.

Looks like they bit.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/...erver.html

Quote:Fox News
Politics
Expand/Collapse Search

Enter your search terms here...
Home

Video

Politics

U.S.

Opinion

Entertainment

Tech

Science

Health

Travel

Lifestyle

World

Sports

On Air
Close
- WATCH LIVE -

OFFICIALS GIVE UPDATE ON SEARCH FOR WASHINGTON MALL SHOOTER
Launch Live Player
POLITICS
Obama reportedly used pseudonym to email with Clinton on her private server
Published September 24, 2016
FoxNews.com
Facebook

Twitter

livefyre

Email
July 5, 2016: President Obama and Hillary Clinton getting off Air Force One in Charlotte, N.C. (AP)
July 5, 2016: President Obama and Hillary Clinton getting off Air Force One in Charlotte, N.C. (AP) (Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistribu)
President Obama used a pseudonym when sending or receiving emails through the private server system Hillary Clinton used as secretary of state, according to nearly 200 pages of documents released Friday by the FBI.


Roll Over to Expand

Included in the documents are notes from an April 2016 interview with long-time Clinton aide Huma Abedin, conducted in connection with the FBI’s two-year investigation into Clinton’s use of the private server for official correspondence.

One note was about the FBI showing Abedin an email address “believed to be a pseudonym used by the President,” as reported by Politico and other news-gathering agencies.

Abedin said she didn’t recognize the name and “expressed her amazement” that Obama apparently used a pseudonym.

She also exclaimed, “How is this not classified,” according to the documents.

That email exchange occurred in June 28, 2012, with the subject line “Congratulations,” perhaps regarding a Supreme Court ruling on ObamaCare. However, federal lawyers will not release the emails, citing executive privilege.


The FBI concluded its investigation this summer, finding that several Clinton emails included at least parts of classified information and that the now-Democratic presidential nominee was “extremely careless.”

However, the agency did not recommend criminal charges, and the investigation was concluded.

Abedin also reportedly told the FBI that Clinton’s team had to inform the White House that Clinton was changing her email address so that Obama could

Forgive the over pasting, I'm outside on my phone.

I told you guys Obama will be in trouble with this stuff if he is found to be involved in her scandal. He may claim presidential privilege for now, after he leaves he could get targeted if Trump allows it.

Fortunately for him it's too late for impeachment. Fortunately for the country it's not too late for people to not vote for Hillary.

CNN buried it in the general article about the 200 documents. It's not in the headline either.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/hi...fbi-228607

Funny how politico has one but the nytimes, msnbc, abcnews has nothing.

Actor James Woods on the Gennifer Flowers news :

@RealJamesWoods 50m
"Oh, what a wonderful world..."

All of the "conspiracy theories" we discuss about Clinton's health, a lot of stuff by Mike and PJW, such as the blue seizure glasses, being discussed on Water's World on Fox right now.

One of the analysts is talking about how she reads all of these internet theories, and finds them very plausible, but doesn't name any names.

So...The New York Times have finally came out with an endorsement, "Hillary Clinton for President". They wrote an editorial piece on it.

Quote:Our endorsement is rooted in respect for her intellect, experience and courage.
HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
SEPT. 24, 2016

In any normal election year, we’d compare the two presidential candidates side by side on the issues. But this is not a normal election year. A comparison like that would be an empty exercise in a race where one candidate — our choice, Hillary Clinton — has a record of service and a raft of pragmatic ideas, and the other, Donald Trump, discloses nothing concrete about himself or his plans while promising the moon and offering the stars on layaway. (We will explain in a subsequent editorial why we believe Mr. Trump to be the worst nominee put forward by a major party in modern American history.)

But this endorsement would also be an empty exercise if it merely affirmed the choice of Clinton supporters. We’re aiming instead to persuade those of you who are hesitating to vote for Mrs. Clinton — because you are reluctant to vote for a Democrat, or for another Clinton, or for a candidate who might appear, on the surface, not to offer change from an establishment that seems indifferent and a political system that seems broken.

Running down the other guy won’t suffice to make that argument. The best case for Hillary Clinton cannot be, and is not, that she isn’t Donald Trump.

The best case is, instead, about the challenges this country faces, and Mrs. Clinton’s capacity to rise to them.

The next president will take office with bigoted, tribalist movements and their leaders on the march. In the Middle East and across Asia, in Russia and Eastern Europe, even in Britain and the United States, war, terrorism and the pressures of globalization are eroding democratic values, fraying alliances and challenging the ideals of tolerance and charity.

The 2016 campaign has brought to the surface the despair and rage of poor and middle-class Americans who say their government has done little to ease the burdens that recession, technological change, foreign competition and war have heaped on their families.

Over 40 years in public life, Hillary Clinton has studied these forces and weighed responses to these problems. Our endorsement is rooted in respect for her intellect, experience, toughness and courage over a career of almost continuous public service, often as the first or only woman in the arena.

Mrs. Clinton’s work has been defined more by incremental successes than by moments of transformational change. As a candidate, she has struggled to step back from a pointillist collection of policy proposals to reveal the full pattern of her record. That is a weakness of her campaign, and a perplexing one, for the pattern is clear. It shows a determined leader intent on creating opportunity for struggling Americans at a time of economic upheaval and on ensuring that the United States remains a force for good in an often brutal world.

Similarly, Mrs. Clinton’s occasional missteps, combined with attacks on her trustworthiness, have distorted perceptions of her character. She is one of the most tenacious politicians of her generation, whose willingness to study and correct course is rare in an age of unyielding partisanship. As first lady, she rebounded from professional setbacks and personal trials with astounding resilience. Over eight years in the Senate and four as secretary of state, she built a reputation for grit and bipartisan collaboration. She displayed a command of policy and diplomatic nuance and an ability to listen to constituents and colleagues that are all too exceptional in Washington.

Mrs. Clinton’s record of service to children, women and families has spanned her adult life. One of her boldest acts as first lady was her 1995 speech in Beijing declaring that women’s rights are human rights. After a failed attempt to overhaul the nation’s health care system, she threw her support behind legislation to establish the Children’s Health Insurance Program, which now covers more than eight million lower-income young people. This year, she rallied mothers of gun-violence victims to join her in demanding comprehensive background checks for gun buyers and tighter reins on gun sales.

After opposing driver’s licenses for undocumented immigrants during the 2008 campaign, she now vows to push for comprehensive immigration legislation as president and to use executive power to protect law-abiding undocumented people from deportation and cruel detention. Some may dismiss her shift as opportunistic, but we credit her for arriving at the right position.

Mrs. Clinton and her team have produced detailed proposals on crime, policing and race relations, debt-free college and small-business incentives, climate change and affordable broadband. Most of these proposals would benefit from further elaboration on how to pay for them, beyond taxing the wealthiest Americans. They would also depend on passage by Congress.

That means that, to enact her agenda, Mrs. Clinton would need to find common ground with a destabilized Republican Party, whose unifying goal in Congress would be to discredit her. Despite her political scars, she has shown an unusual capacity to reach across the aisle.

When Mrs. Clinton was sworn in as a senator from New York in 2001, Republican leaders warned their caucus not to do anything that might make her look good. Yet as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, she earned the respect of Republicans like Senator John McCain with her determination to master intricate military matters.

Her most lasting achievements as a senator include a federal fund for long-term health monitoring of 9/11 first responders, an expansion of military benefits to cover reservists and the National Guard, and a law requiring drug companies to improve the safety of their medications for children.

Below the radar, she fought for money for farmers, hospitals, small businesses and environmental projects. Her vote in favor of the Iraq war is a black mark, but to her credit, she has explained her thinking rather than trying to rewrite that history.

As secretary of state, Mrs. Clinton was charged with repairing American credibility after eight years of the Bush administration’s unilateralism. She bears a share of the responsibility for the Obama administration’s foreign-policy failings, notably in Libya. But her achievements are substantial. She led efforts to strengthen sanctions against Iran, which eventually pushed it to the table for talks over its nuclear program, and in 2012, she helped negotiate a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas.

Mrs. Clinton led efforts to renew diplomatic relations with Myanmar, persuading its junta to adopt political reforms. She helped promote the Trans-Pacific Partnership, an important trade counterweight to China and a key component of the Obama administration’s pivot to Asia. Her election-year reversal on that pact has confused some of her supporters, but her underlying commitment to bolstering trade along with workers’ rights is not in doubt. Mrs. Clinton’s attempt to reset relations with Russia, though far from successful, was a sensible effort to improve interactions with a rivalrous nuclear power.

Mrs. Clinton has shown herself to be a realist who believes America cannot simply withdraw behind oceans and walls, but must engage confidently in the world to protect its interests and be true to its values, which include helping others escape poverty and oppression.

Mrs. Clinton’s husband, Bill Clinton, governed during what now looks like an optimistic and even gentle era. The end of the Cold War and the advance of technology and trade appeared to be awakening the world’s possibilities rather than its demons. Many in the news media, and in the country, and in that administration, were distracted by the scandal du jour — Mr. Clinton’s impeachment — during the very period in which a terrorist threat was growing. We are now living in a world darkened by the realization of that threat and its many consequences.

Mrs. Clinton’s service spans both eras, and she has learned hard lessons from the three presidents she has studied up close. She has also made her own share of mistakes. She has evinced a lamentable penchant for secrecy and made a poor decision to rely on a private email server while at the State Department. That decision deserved scrutiny, and it’s had it. Now, considered alongside the real challenges that will occupy the next president, that email server, which has consumed so much of this campaign, looks like a matter for the help desk. And, viewed against those challenges, Mr. Trump shrinks to his true small-screen, reality-show proportions, as we’ll argue in detail on Monday.

Through war and recession, Americans born since 9/11 have had to grow up fast, and they deserve a grown-up president. A lifetime’s commitment to solving problems in the real world qualifies Hillary Clinton for this job, and the country should put her to work.

Washington mall shooter is a Hillary supporter.

   

(09-24-2016 10:10 PM)Dusty Wrote:  Washington mall shooter is a Hillary supporter.

Should be rather amusing.
Aside from the usual 'not all muslims' nonsense.
How the MSM is going to twist all this, especially the Hillary support element...?

Trump should ask her during the debates if she disavows.

If only this was the real Trump Jr. :

@DenaldJTrumpJr 2h
"What's next? Hillary giving Arcan Cetin a front row seat at the debate?"

This is not beyond the realm of possibility.

Remember when Omar Mateen's father was 3 rows behind Hillary, in full view of the camera, at a rally very close to the site of the shooting?

(09-24-2016 11:55 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  If only this was the real Trump Jr. :

@DenaldJTrumpJr 2h
"What's next? Hillary giving Arcan Cetin a front row seat at the debate?"

   

(09-24-2016 05:38 AM)Wrec Wrote:  THIS



EDIT: Added better version of this video.

The flip on the parties this year is amazing, now is the Republican who are young well spoken with awesome comeback and confidence. Democrats are screaming out of touch old people who look mentally unstable.