Post: #51

(02-16-2015 09:48 AM)bojangles Wrote:  In terms of declining beauty

the more sex a woman has - the quicker she approaches the wall

You are correct but not quite.

It's not that sex per se makes her age; it's sex with lots of different men stresses her out, which then leads to smoking, over-eating, binge drinking, poor sleep, poor diets, etc. AND THAT is what leads premature aging.

Not to mention being stressed out leads to aging as well.

Post: #52

Also the more cocks from different man a woman takes inside her, the more sexually transmitted diseases risks she carries, the more she gets that blank expressionless "hundreds cocks stare",
she becomes more materialistic and also she can put no real emotions into a new (passing-by for her) relationship

Post: #53

(02-16-2015 09:48 AM)bojangles Wrote:  In terms of declining beauty

the more sex a woman has - the quicker she approaches the wall

Where did you get this from? Sex reduces stress. I'd assume that if a woman has a lot of sex (at least in a monogamous relationship) that she'd stay younger for longer.

Post: #54

Problem is there is not an accurate way to measure promiscuity and on top of that, cheating, gang bangs, sex clubs have always been around through the ages. However sexual energy is a powerful tool that can be very constructive or it can be very destructive when not regulated. As sex is a very strong incentive, because marriage previously worked a lot like a contract. The man would sell his labour to the woman who in turn would sell her sex. This was essentially a social contract and allowed for men and women to tap into their innate desires, while brining children in the world that was a necessity in the turbulent past, where pensions/retirement homes/insurance wasn't a given.

However when working hard, building a business, getting promoted nor having children and families was the result or cause of having a wife, then nothing meant anything anymore. Well I would say this ties into women being promiscuous as being a bad thing for society. in the end of the day they are the gatekeepers of sex, and if sex is easy, doesn't matter if women are only giving it away to "playboys" or whatever; the value of it still diminishes.

Why should men go through the efforts of establishing themselves as family men when they can hook up and have one night stands at weekends. Then there are the men who perhaps are socially inept and not good at picking up women, have the problem of not being able to rely on marriage or traditional organic relationships to have sex, so they turn off and become recluses.

Genuinely I don't think promiscuous women is necessarily a bad thing however for a society, it defiantly does lead to problems further down the line.

Post: #55

This was covered in the Neomasculinity and I'm quoting.
http://www.rooshv.com/what-is-neomasculinity#12

"Sexual moderation

Men have a biological need for sex that must be sated for them to function normally, but if that need is overshot, such as in the case of sleeping with women only for ego gratification, the man begins sacrificing more important needs for fleeting pleasure that will provide no lasting meaning. It is normal for a man to pursue sex because he wants sex, but pursuing sex because he wants to impress others, hit an artificial notch count of women, or alleviate personal insecurities will invariably result in self-harm and lost time.

Game is a tool that allows a man to fulfill his sex and relationship needs, but once game is used outside of those needs, he will succumb to hedonistic urges that are no different than a woman uploading selfies every day on Facebook to receive validation for her appearance. A man must always check his sexual behavior with the needs of his body and spirit to make sure he is not trying to satisfy the bottomless pit of his animalistic hunger.

The sexual activity of women must be even more closely monitored than men. Repeated studies shows that a marriage is more likely to fail based on higher number of sexual partners a woman—but not a man—had before marrying (1, 2, 3, 4), a fact that should be obvious to any man who has experienced the highly impulsive and shallow behavior of easy women. The results of these studies clearly show that a marriage is at high risk of failure if a woman had more than two sexual partners before marrying. (An additional study showed that promiscuous women are more likely to abuse substances, regardless of her age.)

Post: #56

A high level of promiscuity on the part of the woman will also expose her to more sexually transmitted diseases, particularly the common infections of chlamydia and gonorrhea, that may render her sterile and incapable of reproducing. Lastly, the indigestion of birth control in pill form, which offers a frictionless path to promiscuity, impairs their ability to become pregnant up to a year (and possible longer) after they stop taking it, harming their reproductive potential.

Even though traditional marriage is the best path towards societal stability, it is becoming extremely difficult for a man today to find a woman with an acceptable sexual history and proper values that wouldn’t put a possible marriage at great risk of failure. This risk, combined with the fact that the state has marriage laws biased in disproportionate favor towards women, essentially turns husbands into hostages within their own homes, making them have to suffer a woman’s impulsive “no-fault” decision for divorce (80% of them are initiated by women). With the ensuing financial ruin and emotional turmoil that would result, it is no longer an automatic safe bet for men to marry in a Western nation."

Post: #57

This whole "what's so bad about women being promiscous, you like fucking them right?" is such a tired gotcha! question. BECAUSE women are promiscous I like cycling through them and enjoying the ease that they give up the poon. I'd be a fool not to, the same goes for all men. But I would GLADLY give up this ease of fucking a ton of them if they just became normal, stable, feminine, sweet and loyal. I think most men would also actually start enjoying the whole courting procedure if we ever reverted to more normal and stable traditional circumstances. Buuuuut since they don't exist, it's in every man's best interest right now to be as non commital and gamey as he can, because the women 1) are even more so 2) give it up easily.

Post: #58

Credit goes to LaidNyc for making me see it this way in a blog post he did a couple years ago.

A man's love is like a woman's sexuality. Ask a girl, "how would you feel if you found out the man you were about to marry had about 20 other girlfriends who he said he loved? It would make his love for you seem less special wouldn't it?" . As men, we must earn sexual access by being better than other men. Women must earn a man's love and commitment also. If you don't earn it, it's not as glorious when you receive it.

I have been in this convesation before and I could almost see smoke coming out of the girls ears when she began to think about it.

The more you dish out something unique, the less valuable it becomes. The lock and key analogy truly is the best though.

Post: #59

Why is it bad for women to be promiscuous?

It's not. They can have all the fun they want.

Just don't expect marriage after all that. Science shows that women who have had multiple sex partners make for bad long-terms prospects. Each successive partner makes them a bigger and bigger risk when it comes to marriage. Since men stand to lose A LOT after a divorce, men's aversion to wifing up sluts long-terms is based on their rational decision-making abilities, not bigotry, "sexism," or mindless judgmental thinking.

Since liberals "FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE," I'm sure all of them reading this will agree with my post 100 percent, after perusing this well-researched data on this very topic.

Post: #60

^ And marriage is the bedrock of civilization, which is one reason why women being promiscuous is bad.

Post: #61

Bump

Post: #62

(10-20-2015 10:01 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Just don't expect marriage after all that. Science shows that women who have had multiple sex partners make for bad long-terms prospects. Each successive partner makes them a bigger and bigger risk when it comes to marriage. Since men stand to lose A LOT after a divorce, men's aversion to wifing up sluts long-terms is based on their rational decision-making abilities, not bigotry, "sexism," or mindless judgmental thinking.

Since liberals "FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE," I'm sure all of them reading this will agree with my post 100 percent, after perusing this well-researched data on this very topic.

Liberals hate science. They just can't get over the fact that there are only 2 genders in every living species.

Post: #63

A world without promiscuous women is a world I don't want to live in. How could any male want to live in a world devoid of one night stands? That thrill of taking the clothes off of a girl you met an hour ago before you fuck her is like unwrapping a present on Christmas morning, but ten times better.

The key is locking down a relatively stable, not too slutty woman for a girlfriend/wife. And just having one night stands with the crazier, sluttier ones on the side.

Post: #64

I can tell you right now if I had a unicorn woman to bear sons with then I would happily hang up the cleats and settle down. I had no problem being a serial monogamist when I was younger. It was only when I realized having successful and trustworthy long-term relationships with women in my generation in this culture was nigh impossible that I just starting keeping my interactions with women at arm's length.

Here are my personal observations for why it is bad for women to be promiscuous:

Women with unhinged sexuality will always have it in their head that they have "options" and this mentality does not go away when/if they get married or when/if they start a family. When a woman finds it a cursory task to open her legs for other men then she does not value or guard her sexual assets enough to reserve it for just one man. This in turn makes it difficult for women to stay committed to a man and has a high potential to create broken families. The "grass is always greener" mentality. This leads to more divorces, more men going broke, and more sons and daughters growing up in single-parent split-custody households. The snowball effect is that men are less trusting of women because they get cheated on a lot so in-turn they become less trusting with women and abstain from engaging in any kind of serious relationship. Women are the masters of the sexual market. Men are more promiscuous because women are more promiscuous. It's also worth noting that most men think women who sleep around are unsavory. I would say this is a biological reaction (the master key/bad lock analogy).

Post: #65

The idea of bad/good...

Something isn't just bad or good, it is bad FOR someone or good FOR someone.

Promiscuity isn't objectively a bad thing. There are benefits for some, and negatives for others.

This is the simple answer: from what I've heard from guys who have experience in LTRs/marriage, slutty girls don't make good wives or mothers. So if you are looking to start a family, you want to be able to pick a good girl. It's 'bad' if girls are generally slutty then.

The other point is being promiscuous has a negative effect on girls' personalities. I like girly girls, and being a slut makes them less girly and less sweet.

But, if you want to fuck a lot of bitches like I do and like many of us on here want to, promiscuity of girls is fantastic. Or at least, being open sexually.

I think it is as simple as that. Of course, we are just looking at it from our own perspectives.

Maybe some girls really are a lot happier when they are sexually open. I don't know. I'm not a chick.

Post: #66

There are two directions in this aspect of life, slut or relationship material. Like anything else, pick one or the other, trying to do both half-assed is a recipe for disaster.

Post: #67

(12-07-2016 10:50 PM)elRey Wrote:  Maybe some girls really are a lot happier when they are sexually open. I don't know. I'm not a chick.

No. No, they're not. That's just leftist propaganda.

Leftists and feminists exploit the fuck out of the fact that men and women can never experience life in the other's shoes. They make women believe that what attracts men is a successful career and a witty sense of humor (and women believe it because that's what they're attracted to in a man). And they make men believe women are attracted mainly to a man's looks, and that women can enjoy promiscuity just like men.

Since no man or woman has experienced life in the other's shoes, these lies tend to be convincing. When I was a teenage boy, and I was told "girls are just as sexual as boys," I believed girls felt the same way I did about sex (i.e. walked around being horny all the time, wanted a variety of sexual partners, and chose men based mainly on looks). I used to believe that women got turned on by looking at naked male bodies the same way men do with female bodies.

People don't generally have deep conversations with members of the opposite sex about sexual arousal and attraction, so they end up believing the leftist lie that male and female sexuality are the same.