Post: #1

This is a very rough idea I wrote based on what happened this last weekend, where University of Virginia sororities were banned by their female leaders from attending frat parties, basically locking them up.
This is the end result of a long string of 'empowered' female error, starting with sabrina erdely, emily renda, jackie, teresa sullivan, and now jean mrasek, the head of greek panhellic council who forced women to stay in saturday night.

article:

University of Virginia sororities feel wrath of matriarchy.
The following is a case study of female leadership damaging women.

This past weekend, Sorority girls at the university of Virginia were banned from attending fraternity parties.
The ban implies
- sorority women lack the mental capacity to make their own decisions, and need a supervisor to tell them.
-Sorority women are completely helpless with any amount of alcohol around men.
-Females should carefully guard their sexuality, and they should not be as promiscuous as men.

The ban was especially devastating as saturday, January 31st is a big party night as fraternities have 'BID Night', where new members can finally party and socialize in the greek system.
Also the highly anticipated matchup between undefeated Duke vs Virignia's basketball team.
It is a big night on campus for sure, and the women in charge have decided young sorority women can't handle it, and need to have choices made for them.
who would enact such restrictive policies on female choice, a misogynyst? A white christian male? A evil republican? a reactionary bible-thumping conservative? It was jean mrasek, the highly educated matriarch of the greek panhellic council



Want to have sorority women at your party? too fuckin bad, the supply of sorority women is regulated and controlled. like the head of OPEC , jean mrasek controls sorority pussy how she sees fit, the futures market for hot pussy runs through the decisions of their wise matriarch.

   


These female leaders are using sorority women as a bargaining chip - a weapon to coerce fraternities into adopting whatever policies they see fit. Weaponized pussy! The sorority women are simply a pawn to punish fraternities, to be controlled by edicts from their matriarchal masters. Their social life is being dictated by agenda-driven matriarchs.
This restriction of young womens' choice is the latest in a long string of events entirely acted by educated, 'empowered women. Let's take a look at how we arrived here:

(brief detail on sabrina - emily renda - jackie - teresa sullivan - jean mrasek)

In summation, it was a chain of incompetant and irrational women imposing ridiculous policies which ultimately remove the rights of young people.
Is this what feminism meant by 'female empowerment'?

(end of article)

If any of you have any further ideas please feel free to add. I think it would get alot of clicks as alot of students are finally mad at these women.

Post: #2

You should mention that the policy is based on a total and complete fraud. And mention it again. And again.

Remark that this is just another symptom of narrative taking precedence over facts and should discredit everything feminists say.