Post: #26

Graininess is one quality of pussy I have never experienced and I don't think I want to. Is it like there's sand in it?

Post: #27

^I think that graininess is an attempt to refer to attributes that contribute to friction between the male penis and the female vajajaja.

Post: #28

The grainy stuff can be pretty good as long as she's the wet type. I don't like to stick it in and immediately get that sensation. I tend to like the more pillowy pussies with a hotter temperature. The graininess can be nice in its own way, but that friction is the number one cause of rawed dick in my experience. I don't like my dick feeling like a weakened balloon after sex. As the OP said, too wet is bad. It's the worst for me because I get bored really fast with that so my dick starts to drop.

Post: #29

Wow, this thread got moved to the newbie forum. I guess comparing and contrasting all the pussies you've fucked is a newbie thing. Who knew? hahaha

Post: #30

I agree with LoZ. If that post were written a little more eloquestly by a dude with more rep points, it would have been taken more seriously. Even if it is juvenile, who cares? Have you ever laughed at a fart joke? How juvenile

One point I'd like to differ on, though. Can we please not use the word 'graininess' to describe pussy? My god, that was the only part of the OP I found difficult to masturbate to. Makes me think of a disease infested, bump riddled pussy, or one lubed with ricotta cheese.

A more apt description would be 'ridged,' especially if you've seen those vids where they stick a camera up a pussy, gyno style.

Post: #31

(01-28-2015 10:50 PM)tallandblonde Wrote:  Graininess is one quality of pussy I have never experienced and I don't think I want to. Is it like there's sand in it?

LittleDark doesn't mind a little sand with his pussy.

Post: #32

(01-28-2015 10:39 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  Would you have a forum dedicated to wine in which its taste were never discussed? Would someone make a post on a forum like that saying "wine is wine" as if that were all there was to say about it?

It's strange to see such philistine disinterest and scornful prudery on a forum dedicated to the vigorous pursuit of pleasure.

It is profoundly gratifying to encounter a correct use of the English subjunctive in a thread dedicated to the tactile qualities of pussy.

Post: #33

I don't think this is a newbie topic. I think this thread should be moved back to game, regardless of suspicions on the OP.

There is a lot of variability in a variety of traits. This is a completely legitimate discussion. Chicks talk about our gear and it's performance, we can talk about theirs.

Post: #34

(01-29-2015 01:45 AM)WD-40 Wrote:  

(01-28-2015 10:39 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  Would you have a forum dedicated to wine in which its taste were never discussed? Would someone make a post on a forum like that saying "wine is wine" as if that were all there was to say about it?

It's strange to see such philistine disinterest and scornful prudery on a forum dedicated to the vigorous pursuit of pleasure.

It is profoundly gratifying to encounter a correct use of the English subjunctive in a thread dedicated to the tactile qualities of pussy.

It is profoundly sad that correct usage of the English subjunctive has nowadays become so rare that its appearance needs to be praised as if it were (no pun intended) a miracle

As for my opinion on pussy, I sure have an idea of what kind of pussy feels bad to me for its distinctive reason, but all good pussy is good, and the reasons for it don't really matter to me. In fact, to ponder it too much would destroy its sweetness. The act of analyzing it sucks out its primal joy, reducing it to something banal and not magically pleasurable anymore.

Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy, Anna Karenina Wrote:Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.

Thus, my scorn for the topic has nothing to do with prudery. It's a matter of appreciation. And if we must compare this matter to wine, I would say that the endless jargon and empty theorizing of wine tasting is precisely what turns people away from loving and seeking fine wine, because after a while it starts to feel like Emperor's new clothes.

Post: #35

My, my, this thread took a surprisingly intellectual turn. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. There are some pretty smart guys about.

Well, let us just plumb the depths, now why don't we.

As one of the more observant posters has commented, the anus is invariably tighter than the vagina, at least at first. Therefore, if tightness is your goal, become a master at talking her into anal. It's not that hard; most girls are curious if not downright eager. Just have a discreet bottle of lubricant handy; vaginal secretions and spit only work in porn and with girls that are more experienced anally than you would prefer to think about.

The downside of anal is that if you last longer than a few minutes or so, she will relax, and the inside of the rectum is unfortunately smooth and lacking in stimulation. It does not have the "rugae" or ridges that are present inside the vagina. Whether these ridges are there to stimulate you to orgasm or to hold sperm for later, I don't know.

Of course, the angle of penetration affects the encounter with the rugae. They appear designed to optimize the missionary position, though the G-spot and other assorted junk behind the pubic bone can do the trick in doggy style.

Any way you slice it, a major downside to being an experienced lover, or a good player, is that she will become highly aroused, and thus highly lubricated, and her vagina will become slippery to the point of losing sensation (see gang bang comment above). One can always pull out and insist she clean you off with her mouth.

The pleasant vaginal secretions come from the front of the vagina. Deep inside, demons may dwell. Foul odors may be encountered. Is it rotting fish? Who knows. Try not to think about it and concentrate on your own orgasm so you can get the hell out of there. These are times when it is nice to be responsible and have a condom to protect you from god knows what has been stirred up from deep inside.

Shaved, unshaved? I prefer unshaved. I prefer the friction of the hairs around the vaginal entrance. Cunnilingus is a different experience, but you learn to part the hair so it's out of the way. And it's kind of fun when the assorted sticky mess makes the pubes clump, especially when you blow your load on the hair-covered mons pubis. The poor girl, left to clean it up: It's like a damned sponge, or maybe one of those dreadlock style rope type floor mops. Still, I think most females like feeling messy and used. It fulfills them.

What about the oddness of discovering a cervix parked near the front entrance of the vagina, upon initial fingering? Yes, you're wondering if it will obstruct penetration. Not to worry, though: Mother Nature figured out how to make the uterus withdraw the cervix from harm's way upon arousal. In any event, the penis simply goes one side or the other; I don't think any has successfully attempted to penetrate the cervix itself.

Of course, at this point, if you notice a diaphragm present, you are left to wonder just when she inserted same. Do you remember her excusing herself recently, purse in hand? Or is she one of those freaky chicks that puts one in every time she goes out? Regardless, it's kind of exciting that upon inserting it, she mentally made a note that she was now ready for sex. So if you noticed her slinking off to the bathroom earlier, purse in hand, that meant that at that point she had decided that the two of you were going to fuck. If you don't remember her doing that, you ought to seriously consider a condom.

Is there a very thin string protruding from her cervix? That's attached to an IUD. That means two things: One is that she has made a long-term commitment to raw-dog no-pregnancy sex. Again, reevaluate your aversion to condoms. The other is that if you are well-endowed (cough) you will feel that damned string. Don't freak.

Is there a forgotten tampon in there? This is a warning sign. This is a disturbing level of neglect. A far more disturbing level is if you discover a condom. That is a serious issue. If it's your girlfriend, you have some talking to do. If it's casual sex, I recommend a quick excuse, such as your buddy that is still at the bar, and grab your clothes and run.

I was trying to figure out a way to tie this in to wine tasting, but I gave up. Cheers.

Post: #36

^^Bravo, what a breakdown.

I jist wish all pussies were tight. Nothing more depressing than fucking a bucket of water.

Post: #37

(01-30-2015 03:36 AM)Shortest Straw Wrote:  Is there a forgotten tampon in there? This is a warning sign. This is a disturbing level of neglect. A far more disturbing level is if you discover a condom.

Have any of you really encountered a condom or forgotten tampon? Holy fuck.

I've realized that most pussies aren't that different from each other. There are some outliers, but it seems to be a bell curve distribution (at least amongst feminine/in shape girls).

I kind of worry about you guys talking about grainyness. The only time I've ever felt anything grainy is when some sand fell out my shirt onto my cock. I also have almost zero experience with non-shaved chicks though, so perhaps that's part of it?

Post: #38

Lets talk about how pussy feels:

Post: #39

(01-30-2015 05:49 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  Have any of you really encountered a condom or forgotten tampon? Holy fuck.

I kind of worry about you guys talking about grainyness. The only time I've ever felt anything grainy is when some sand fell out my shirt onto my cock. I also have almost zero experience with non-shaved chicks though, so perhaps that's part of it?

Yah, I don't know what the hell that "graininess" comment was all about. I'm having a hard time imagining what it could be. Dried mucus that's been shoved back inside, like when you accidentally inhale a booger?

No, I've never encountered a VFO (vaginal foreign object). However, I have placed them there. In one drunken encounter, I was unaware of the tampon and shoved it in with my dick. She told me later that she furiously dug inside to retrieve it. On another occasion, the condom slipped off and, similarly unaware, it remained inside her and I blissfully stuffed it deeper and deeper with each stroke. It was a rude surprise to find it missing afterward. I suppose if the girl were enough of a slut, she would forget to retrieve the VFO and go on to the next guy.


I forgot to comment on the perfect vagina. You may sometimes encounter a woman who has had a complete hysterectomy. In this operation the uterus, and cervix, is removed, and the end of the vagina is sewn shut. The cervix is the source of all sorts of icky stuff, so its removal leaves you with an aesthetically perfect vagina that exists only for your pleasure. Bliss is yours.


My sincere apologies to Bigbait. Not only was he teased for his legitimate interest in vaginas, his thread has been utterly and completely hijacked.

Post: #40

(01-30-2015 05:49 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  Have any of you really encountered a condom or forgotten tampon? Holy fuck.

I have lost condoms in girls and the girl never noticed until I pointed it out.

I have have been with girls who forgot to take out their tampon. I pointed it out when I tried to put it in.

(01-30-2015 06:12 PM)Shortest Straw Wrote:  Yah, I don't know what the hell that "graininess" comment was all about. I'm having a hard time imagining what it could be. Dried mucus that's been shoved back inside, like when you accidentally inhale a booger?

Ok, I did some research and the quality that I was referring to as graininess is really called rugae. They are ridges and bumps. Next time I will do my research before posting hahaha!

I suppose it is confusing to refer to ridges as graininess, but the ridges look similar to the grain of a piece of wood.

Anyway, here is the quote from askalice

Quote:Yes, the inside of the vagina does have a corrugated surface, ...These folds, ridges, and bumps, known as vaginal rugae, are more prominent during a woman's reproductive years, which allows the vaginal canal to expand, making the vaginal lining less likely to tear during childbirth as well as sex. These rugae are similar to the ridges you feel when your tongue touches the roof of your mouth. Generally, the only time the vaginal canal is relatively smooth in texture is before puberty and after menopause.

(01-30-2015 06:12 PM)Shortest Straw Wrote:  I forgot to comment on the perfect vagina. You may sometimes encounter a woman who has had a complete hysterectomy. In this operation the uterus, and cervix, is removed, and the end of the vagina is sewn shut. The cervix is the source of all sorts of icky stuff, so its removal leaves you with an aesthetically perfect vagina that exists only for your pleasure. Bliss is yours.


My sincere apologies to Bigbait. Not only was he teased for his legitimate interest in vaginas, his thread has been utterly and completely hijacked.

Holy shit, no apologies necessary. It never occurred to me try to fuck a girl who has had a hysterectomy! This is exactly the type of new information I was hoping to get out of this thread!

I've also encountered a very small number of girls where the vagina gets much much tighter all the way at the back, almost like I'm sliding my dick in between the cervix and the vagina walls. I have no idea what to call that.

Post: #41

(01-29-2015 04:43 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  As for my opinion on pussy, I sure have an idea of what kind of pussy feels bad to me for its distinctive reason, but all good pussy is good, and the reasons for it don't really matter to me. In fact, to ponder it too much would destroy its sweetness. The act of analyzing it sucks out its primal joy, reducing it to something banal and not magically pleasurable anymore.

Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy, Anna Karenina Wrote:Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.

Thus, my scorn for the topic has nothing to do with prudery. It's a matter of appreciation. And if we must compare this matter to wine, I would say that the endless jargon and empty theorizing of wine tasting is precisely what turns people away from loving and seeking fine wine, because after a while it starts to feel like Emperor's new clothes.

HCE,

You are right about one thing: nothing kills all interest, joy and life in a subject, whether it be pussy, wine, or anything else, like the kind of thin, overdetermined, and falsely rigorous discourse that often passes for connoisseurship. A great deal of chatter between intelligent people on the Internet and elsewhere amounts to just such a rehashing of timidly and mincingly chosen words, which are imagined by their writers to give them some purchase on a subject that their senses, appetites, and experience are in no way equal to. Such discourse is stillborn on the page and on the screen, and I share your distaste for its affected precisions and its elaboration of false detail that lacks all weight and meaning.

However. It does not follow that to ponder a subject -- even a subject as irreducibly and gloriously physical as pussy -- is to destroy its sweetness; on the contrary -- to ponder it, to understand it in every way possible, to judge it with ever deeper and more intense concentration, is what makes it all the sweeter -- what gives the sweetness a more penetrating and more intense taste. And while many forms of sensual apprehension and learning do not always need to be put into words to be learned and savored over time, it is not true that putting them into words somehow magically destroys them and strips them of life and interest. No -- again, it only seems that way because the men who do the putting into words are precisely the men who lack the sensual understanding and the appetites required for those words to have life, meaning, and interest that are at all equal to the greasy and gritty depths of their subject.

Specifically, the reason almost all literary writing about pussy and about fucking is so terrible -- and indeed, so draining of all interest in that subject, even though it seems impossible to drain all interest from it -- is that the men who do it, the writers, know nothing about it and have no understanding of it. With some few exceptions (indeed Tolstoy was a partial exception and he had a few memorable sentences about pussy here and there) literary men are obsessed with eros in a way that is essentially psychological, and they simply do not care enough about the thing itself and all its luscious and dripping physical reality. And if you do not truly care about something in the objective world, if you are so wrapped up in psychology of one kind or another that you've lost the world and especially something as palpably precious as physical eros, then your words about it will die on the page, and the stench of that death will make it seem like any words ever uttered about the subject must be equally dead and worthless. (I discussed the subject of writers and eros a while ago in this post which some may find of interest).

But the truth is that for the man who is truly passionate about the objective world, or about some part of it -- the ability to express that passion in words that are equal to the matter at hand, and that are memorable and staining and communicate real knowledge and understanding, will only serve to deepen and expand his (and of course others') ability to understand and therefore enjoy the world, and that part of the world which these words encompass. And that is the whole point -- to communicate these insights and observations, not out of lip service to a thin and pretentious rigor, but so you, and others, can enjoy the world more. So that one day when you are balls deep in a particular kind of slut you laugh with recognition at the exact way her pussy feels which someone described with an absurdly accurate and memorable shorthand that stuck in your mind and which sweetens and deepens your experience of the moment and gives you a choice term that is equal to its task; and maybe even gives you a better intuitive understanding of just how you would fuck that kind of pussy to enjoy it all the more.

That is what language at its best can do, when it comes from experience that is met with relish and understanding and spiced with at least a little creativity; and there is nothing other than language that can really do it, that can really name a part of the physical world in a way that is permanent, staining, and places it in the right and proper context for contemplation and understanding. That is the whole game, and we would be nowhere without it.

Post: #42

as long as its not roast beef, and it's tight... who's gonna care? well, I do get attracted if the girl has extremely symetrical lips tho, admittedly.

Post: #43

(01-28-2015 05:17 PM)The Reactionary Tree Wrote:  like warm apple pie...

Was waiting for this response.

Post: #44

But seriously, it feels awesome. If you're not wrapped up. Anybody use lambskin?

Post: #45

Should have called this thread, the Vagina Dialogues.

Post: #46

The guy who only banged shaved women says he never felt a rigged sensation before. That makes me wonder if it really is related to pubic hair. That's very likely now that I recount all the shaved women versus the non-shaved.

Has anyone ever felt a particularly more solid or flatter, studier spot on the top of her vagina just a finger's length inside? I've looked at a few medical books and concluded that this is the famed g-spot, but I hope there's outside experience on this instead of me encountering malformed pussy more than once. You can feel the opening to the uterus for instance. It's softer and more swollen feeling.

Post: #47

I'm okay as long as there's no crazy beef curtains or something like that. I guess you can screen for that when you're fingering her, I guess? But usually that's when you're about to have sex with her anyway so you'll have had already invested the time it took to get her into bed.

Post: #48

This thread is worthless without pics.

Post: #49

I believe I encountered a certified "10" of pussies last night.

You can read about it on this thread.

If I kicked the bucket after that, I would be content in the knowledge that I'd climbed the proverbial Mount Everest of pussies.

Post: #50

Bumping this thread since it was a fun one and I want to hear guys opinions on this.

Since I've started concentrating on the feel of the pussy around my dick, Ive enjoyed sex a lot more.

Do you guys think that pussies that look better from the outside feel better?