Post: #51

(11-26-2014 07:37 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  She's also very jealous and catty towards women more attractive than her (like all women are). But it's amusing nonetheless.

Watch her burn with envy and resentment as she tries to interview Sofia Vergara:

You're manoffriendship?

Post: #52

(11-28-2014 03:16 PM)RioNomad Wrote:  

(11-27-2014 01:40 PM)Black Knight Wrote:  WB feverishly. She's an attention whore, but that is a damn good looking woman for 40.

Haters gonna hate.

She's only considered good looking because the other 40 year old American women have set the bar extremely low. She really isn't that good looking for 39. She's just good looking compared to the herds of 40 year old wildebeest that we've become accustomed to seeing in the west.

In the land of the morbidly obese, the size 8 is queen.

Post: #53

(11-26-2014 07:37 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  She's also very jealous and catty towards women more attractive than her (like all women are). But it's amusing nonetheless.

Watch her burn with envy and resentment as she tries to interview Sofia Vergara:

Latinas have developed a good method to expose American women insecurities. If you have ever been in company of two groups at the same time, you will notice how Latinas (especially the hot one) make American women see how despicable they really are, even considering that many of them come from poor parts from L.A yet they can make empowered strong Americans women feel like shit.

Post: #54

^^^^
Word on that...Sofia V. knows just how to zero in on Handler's insecurities and gives it right back. Expertly parries attempted put-downs about body, accent, reading, etc.

When Americhicks start in with their bullshit, Latinas be like:




Watching women cat-fight with each other should be the next Olympic sport.

Post: #55

(11-28-2014 08:17 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  ^^^^
Word on that...Sofia V. knows just how to zero in on Handler's insecurities and gives it right back. Expertly parries attempted put-downs about body, accent, reading, etc.

When Americhicks start in with their bullshit, Latinas be like:




Watching women cat-fight with each other should be the next Olympic sport.

Contrary to what most people believe, Latinas are very assertive, not submissive, they even will try to turn you into an alpha, they will shit test you to a whole new level compared to Americans women, they can be submissive but not to every men they come across, they are only to the right man, that is why Latinos men tend to be more macho, compared to American men, their women demand it, the only difference are upper class Latinas, they are not very different to your typical American women, they consume American media and many time spend a lot of time studying and living in USA.

Post: #56

The queen of attention whoing is back at it again this time humble bragging about her abortion(S) experiences:

http://www.playboy.com/articles/

my-choice-chelsea-handler

I refuse to link this you can do so above yourself.

Quote:When I got pregnant at the age of 16, getting an abortion wasn’t the first idea that popped into my unripened brain.

I was going through a very bad stage in my life. I hated my parents and I was having unprotected sex with my boyfriend, who was not someone I should’ve been having sex with in the first place, never mind unprotected sex. I wasn’t really playing with a full deck of cards, and when I got pregnant I just thought, Why not? I can have a baby. Maybe I’ll have twins and give them rhyming names! Of course, the idea that I would have a child and raise it by myself at that age, when I couldn’t even find my way home at night, was ridiculous. My parents recognized that, so they acted like parents for one of the very first times in my life and took me to Planned Parenthood. I felt parented, ironically, while I was getting an abortion. And when it was over, I was relieved in every possible way.

The hamster is strong in this one.

No your parents didn't recognize anything, they realized you'd be a fuck up with a child. Because THEY FUCKED UP as parents to begin with and didn't teach you any good ones.

Quote:And I didn’t have just one abortion; I had two in the same year, impregnated by the same guy. I didn’t have the money the second time. I had to scrape together the $230 to pay Planned Parenthood, but it was a safe abortion. Getting unintentionally pregnant more than once is irresponsible, but it’s still necessary to make a thoughtful decision. We all make mistakes all the time. I happened to fuck up twice at the age of 16. I’m grateful that I came to my senses and was able to get an abortion legally without risking my health or bankrupting myself or my family. I’m 41 now. I don’t ever look back and think, God, I wish I’d had that baby.

Oh good for you, you go girl ! Humble bragging once again !

Noone gets unintentionally pregnant, you KNOW the risk if you're fucking someone RAW and they don't pull out. You didn't use condoms or BC - you could've prevented this.

You could've avoided all of this and STD's as well. Having 2 abortions ISN'T fucking up and making mistakes all the time.

You learn a cold lesson when having to do that. I know I did when it happened to me.

Quote:Like millions of women, I can live my life without an unplanned child born out of an unhealthy relationship because of Roe v. Wade. It’s infuriating to hear politicians make bogus promises about overturning this ruling that has protected us for more than 40 years. It’s infuriating to hear them pander to the Christian right with promises they have no chance of keeping. (By the way: Even if there is a God, I highly doubt he wants everybody to go through with their pregnancies.) And it’s even more infuriating to watch politicians find ways to subvert Roe v. Wade, passing lesser laws that close clinics or restrict abortion access for women. At least five states—Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming—currently have only one clinic left within their borders.

I CAN LIVE MY LIFE - selfish narcissism oozes from her.

Don't forget about the life that was inside of you as well - or is it just called fetal tissue now ?

Even if there wasn't a god, human beings were created to mate and have offspring, it's wired in us biologically.

Quote:But despite all that, I don’t buy that Roe v. Wade is in danger. We’re too far ahead of the game. Once you go forward in history, you don’t go backward. That would be like the government saying, “Okay, we’re taking away your right to vote too.” You can’t introduce a black person and be like, “Oh, I just got a slave!” That era is over. It’s similar to what’s happening in Mississippi and some other states with gay-marriage discrimination—marriage equality is going to take. You can’t stop that. We’ve already made the decision, and now we’re moving on to transgender rights. And it’s a wrap on men deciding what women can do with their bodies.

Wrong, you may forward in history but are bound to repeat the same mistakes of the past.

Social decay has eaten away at our society.

No, noone has to stop anything, if there's a legal way to do something, you can't get pissed about it, just because it doesn't go with your beliefs.

Quote:I doubt this is something America will ever agree on. Again, it’s like racism and sexism: People will be racist if they’re innately built that way, but whether they can act on their racism or not is a separate issue. There are people who think women shouldn’t hold high-powered positions, or who think Obama is Muslim, and it’s okay for them to have those thoughts; they just can’t act on them in a civilized society. It’s okay if you think it’s not right for women to have abortions—but it’s not your problem, because we decide.

We have 7.3 billion people on this planet. Anybody who carefully decides not to become a parent—let alone a bad parent, which is what I would have become—should be applauded for making a smart and sustainable decision.

I’d love for somebody to try to tell me what to do with my body. I dare them.

That's a horrible example about racism.

If they can have those thoughts, they do act on them, we see it especially in this election.

WE decide, there you go again using that word.

You wouldn't be a shitty parent, you're just a shitty human being.

Post: #57

She doesn't have kids, right? How old is she?

Post: #58

(06-28-2016 03:33 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  She doesn't have kids, right? How old is she?

She's 41 with no kids.

Post: #59

(11-28-2014 08:17 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  ^^^^
Word on that...Sofia V. knows just how to zero in on Handler's insecurities and gives it right back. Expertly parries attempted put-downs about body, accent, reading, etc.

When Americhicks start in with their bullshit, Latinas be like:




Watching women cat-fight with each other should be the next Olympic sport.

Please start a thread!

I want to know more.

G

Post: #60

I apologise if this has been mentioned in this thread, but there is a popular theory that Chelsea has shaved a few years off her age. Some say around 10 years, and I'd be liable to believe them.

I remember seeing this chick about a decade ago and being shocked at the age she was saying she was. Back then she looked about 40 - at least.

I'd put her at late 40s by this stage.

Post: #61

This really isn't about Chelsea Handler. This is about the media attempting to alter people's morality away from religion and in the direction of mindless careerism and consumerism -- which makes them rich.

Handler was part of a story commissioned by Playboy magazine where they had five celebrity women write essays about their abortions. Fortune Magazine writer Valentina Zarya covered this and said (and I quote): "It's time to get rid of the stigma surrounding abortion."

Now let's ask ourselves:

1). Why would a so-called men's magazine like Playboy decide to do an article like this? It features five women (including Gloria Steinem) justifying their abortions. What is this doing in a men's magazine?

2). Why is Fortune telling us we need to "get rid of" the stigma about abortion. Making it legal is one thing. But there are lots of things that are legal but have stigmas because they deserve them. Examples: Drinking to excess, watching porn constantly, and chronic unemployment. All are legal, but they get stigmatized for good reason.

The idea that someone is saying there should be no stigma for anyone who commits an act as vile as abortion is mind-boggling. I'm all for arguments about keeping it legal. But saying it's essentially meaningless is pathological -- and the sign of a society (and a writer) with serious sociopath tendencies.

These celebrities are actually pawns in a bigger media game. Who owns the companies who assign these articles? Since when does a money mag like Fortune decide to tell its readers how they should feel about abortion?

What the hell is going on in this society?

I'll tell you what: This is corporatism masquerading as "liberation." And I'll bet none of the writers even realize this. Why are they for abortion? Because childless women make for better worker bees and better consumers.

The more the media can make us into soulless economic units -- as opposed to humans living in a society -- the more we'll buy into their crap. I still can't get over the fact that that line appeared in Fortune magazine, of all places.

Post: #62

Quote:"I’m 41 now. I don’t ever look back and think, God, I wish I’d had that baby."

You know how women break up with you by leaving you overdramatic voice messages or letters about how 'strong' and 'empowered' they are 'without you'. Writing pages and pages about how they 'don't need you' and 'you'll never hear from them again' only to discover years later that they're still haunted and obsessed by you?

I guarantee she has cried over her dead children, many, many times.

I mean, dressing up as Pregnant for Halloween is what happy middle-aged women who are completely-comfortable with their choice to remain child-free do, isn't it?



I'd feel sorry for her but, well, she's a Progressive Drone. Her having multiple abortions is better than her breeding.

Bonus: this was captioned 'Chelsea Handler Family Photos' in Google:

Post: #63

I still can't believe this slag is pretending to be 41.

I'd be surprised if she was under 50. And the weird part is, she actually looks good for her real age.

Post: #64

Let's look at the bright side. If girls are willing to her abortions. We can all raw-dog without the worries of kids. Take the good with the bad.

Post: #65

(06-29-2016 12:14 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Quote:"I’m 41 now. I don’t ever look back and think, God, I wish I’d had that baby."

You know how women break up with you by leaving you overdramatic voice messages or letters about how 'strong' and 'empowered' they are 'without you'. Writing pages and pages about how they 'don't need you' and 'you'll never hear from them again' only to discover years later that they're still haunted and obsessed by you?

I guarantee she has cried over her dead children, many, many times.

I mean, dressing up as Pregnant for Halloween is what happy middle-aged women who are completely-comfortable with their choice to remain child-free do, isn't it?

I'd feel sorry for her but, well, she's a Progressive Drone. Her having multiple abortions is better than her breeding...

Once again; don't focus on their speech.
Focus on their behaviour & actions.