Post: #26

(09-30-2014 03:27 AM)Wayout Wrote:  I think 99% of men will agree she is an 8 in the first picture. That's one big difference between men and women, we rate women about the same.

Not true. The big difference is that most of us will agree on who is attractive or not. But we still rate differences based on personal taste. I think she is a 7 at best. OP says 6.5..that debunks your theory a bit.

Women on the other hand can't even agree who is attractive or not when it is a non celebrity/media personality or their look alike. That is why one girl thinks a short guy with baggy pants is hot when her friend thinks he is a toad lol.

They lack objectivity and logical analysis.! Plus their math abilities SUCK!

Post: #27

This thread is why I know most guys saying they always date 7.5 to 8+ are lying to themselves.

This chick has no rack and a dopey slut face.

Dolled up by make up artists with a pro photographer she is 8 looking.

Something tells me walking by her on the street in broad day light she is a low 7.

If she is a solid 8 I have banged a handful of 9s over the last year which isn't remotely true.

Post: #28

Let's be honest here..

2/10 wnb

Post: #29

(09-30-2014 03:54 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  She's quite hot in both. I don't understand the need to posture about her being plain or average in the first photo. We have nothing to prove here.

Personally while the gif is indeed sexier overall, I find the long colored socks in the first picture to be more of a turn on than this hula hoop thingy.

She looks like the girl that gets the lemonade @ Chick Fil A.
TX is FULL of college freshmen that look like this, (or is that freshwomen?)

I see it so much, that it's not special at all.

WIA

Post: #30

smh.

1. 6.5 is hot. Remy is girl next door hot, commonplace attractiveness.
2. my picture shows off her curves. She's got that traditional white girl cute booty.
3. your picture is glam, and purposefully makes her much whiter than she regularly appears
4. you guys are overly impressed with nubile young flesh. Move to the South, you'll tons of Remy's all over.

And most importantly, you're trying to push this thread off the track with your assessment of my assessment - instead of posting something on topic.

WIA

(09-30-2014 09:52 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  I find that a lot of guys can't "extrapolate" from a picture as good as others. Unless the picture is a total glamour shot, they can't make the leap from snap-shot to what she would look like in 3-D or in motion. This is very common in the Internet age, where we see so many pics of chicks online, that we've almost developed a different scale for pictures on your screen versus what that girl would look like in real life. WIA needed to see the girl hoola-hooping in order to recognize that she's hot. He couldn't make that conclusion based on a less-than-ideal picture where she's wearing some stupid, unflattering, non-matching lingering and is trying so hard to look sexy that she looks retarded. Even though her pose is not doing her any favors, you can see from her hips that she has a massive ass and she has a cute-ass, trouble-maker face.

You see a similar principle at play in the tendency of a lot of guys to overrate their own bangs, while low-balling others' catches. I have a friend like this. He's a great guy but, god love him, he rates all his chicks at "near-model level" while calling everything else a "6 at best."

I can extrapolate. If you show me a girl in a picture or, better yet, multiple pictures--even if it's/they're not the most flattering--I can make an accurate educated-guess as to how she actually looks. Perhaps this is why I've met several girls online who actually look a lot better than their profile pics, when the opposite is almost always the case (being SIF'd or having them look at least a half a point worse).

For guys who can't extrapolate. This is what Remy LaCroix looks like more dolled up and with a better photographer. Still 6.5?

Post: #31

[attachment=21868]

I though we were using this as our guide? It puts Remi at 8 or so.


Still not good enough for me though.

Post: #32

^ None of those girls are that hot compared to what I hit. The 10s all look like 6s.

Post: #33

Back on topic: WEAR BRIGHT WHITE SNEAKERS on tan legs.

Granted, this girl would be hot without them, but the shoes just send me over the edge.

Post: #34

Hot girls surfing/other water sports:

Watching a hot girl with a great ass paddle by is one of surfings extra little treats.

Post: #35

Alot of times with chicks there'sthat thing that you can't really put your finger on exactly what it is that attracts you but there's just soemthing about her that makes her irresistable even though she's not your type or maybe even not that sexy on traditional scales but something about her look, way she moves, talks, etc something that you can't call out but that makes a chick irresistable.

Post: #36

A 6.5? I'm getting dizzy from the disbelief. I may need to go sit down.

Some of you guys are trippin. I could see someone trying to be a hardass saying she is a 7, but no way in hell is she in the 6 ranges. I don't care if she disgraced her own race and took 10 black dicks last week and gave you revulsion. This is damn near trolling.

Is it because she is a porn star? 6's are for women that are a bit above average. She is well past average, her profession aside. She is not some barely above average woman looks wise. That's a bad bitch. You would all break your necks if you saw her in the mall out of the corner of your eyes. Thirsty or not. If she was wearing a short skirt, your radar would pop immediately to at least break stride to walk closer to get a closer look.

And do not say you never do shit like that. That's how everyone knows you are lying. We all do that at the mall or whatever.

Post: #37

(09-30-2014 01:26 PM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  And most importantly, you're trying to push this thread off the track with your assessment of my assessment - instead of posting something on topic.

   

It's your own fault for distracting us with that massive low-balling. Overall, though, this is a good thread idea. I'll make a contribution.

Here's one for me. Thick-ass eyebrows:

   

Alternatively, kinda wild eyebrows that aren't necessarily intensely thick:

   

Post: #38

Curly or very wavy hair, especially if on the darker side (super blonde curls don't do it as much). It's fucking maddening, I'm not sure why I'm attracted to it, but if any of you remember Assanova aka Real Made Men, he would put it really well, something along the lines of, "I'd just like to run my fingers into those curls, grip them tight."

They just seem like they'd make a great handhold.

It's not a requirement, but for some reason it makes a girl even sexier if I'm attracted to her.

Also, button noses. I'm pretty turned off by a girl with a big honker. See attached examples.

Post: #39

Drinking a beer from a stein or pint glass. I don't know why but it makes a girl seen way hotter to me, maybe cause she's drinking a real drink rather than some feminine vodka nonsense.

When I've mentioned this to other guys they tend to agree or disagree depending upon where they are from. It's much more common for girls to drink beer in mainland Europe I guess.

Post: #40

I'm totally fine with big and beaked noses.

Post: #41

That Remy chick looks pretty good to me, which reminds me I love when a girl has a phat ass and small tits.

Post: #42

Tuthmosis is spot on. That's why I avoid online dating - people look different in pictures than in real life. And your standards are completely different.

We've gotten to the point where when we look at a screen, we expect perfect glamor shots and use that as a standard - even judging our own pics. Photos take away a lot from a person's charisma. If you saw the same girl in real life you wouldn't compare her to the photoshop standard but the real human being standard.

Girls do the same when picking guys online. That explains why lots of guys say "I get better quality in real life than onlines." When girls look at a profile they look for a brand name guy, who has the "whole package" on paper. If she was approached by a less-than-perfect guy in real life she'd might fall in love. I suspect this is why minority bros do better in real life than online because the majority race is more brand name.

I've gone on dates with girls recently that I know for a fact would have rejected me if I hit on them on OKCupid. Since I met them in real life they were down.

Post: #43

(09-30-2014 05:42 AM)RonnieB Wrote:  6.5, fuck off! Next she will be in the Would you hit it thread

She is!

Post: #44

Wide belts.

Gals in blue, like the lower-left photo about three posts above.

Girls who are intellectually adventuresome are worth +2 points. I know we dismiss it as feminist tripe, but I'm one of those guys who really connects with a woman based on what's going on upstairs, and if a chick is flat-out dumb, 50% chance I can't even stick around long enough to bang her. (Note I said adventuresome...intellectually curious would also work. I know some smart girls who spend their free time reading fashion magazines and watching Real Housewives. Do Not Want and a waste of a good brain.)

Post: #45

(09-30-2014 05:42 AM)RonnieB Wrote:  6.5, fuck off! Next she will be in the Would you hit it thread

She is!

Post: #46

Nothing wrong with Giada De Laurentis. She can cook well and wears low cuts tops. Its hard to follow what she is making for some reason. I think the act of cooking raises smv 2+ due to a woman being in the kitchen.

Post: #47

^^^ I've always said her show is terrible because I can't learn anything for that very reason.

Post: #48

I have nice calf muscles. So I have a deep appreciation of women with nice calf muscles as well.

This girl at the gym...mexican probably.... 6/10. She's dedicated to working out, lifting weights, running, etc. That in itself is attractive, but she has such muscular calf muscles that it turns me on to make her a 7/10 or 7.5/10.

Weird stuff but at least it's not a foot fetish.

Post: #49

Leggings...

Post: #50

Being a bigger guy myself 6'3 at 225lbs a tiny girl like her does it for me. The face is ok but the body is good enough to smash through the mattress into the floor below.