Post: #76

Me: I heard George Zimmerman got shot in the face today

Grandmother: looks like karma is coming.

---

Regardless of whether or not Zimmerman stalked Trayvon, or Trayvon provoked him, how the fuck does a guy get off after blasting a 17 year old? Meanwhile, people are getting sent to jail just for brandishing a weapon in a threatening manner at another adult. Something doesn't not add up.

I'm sick of hearing about this loser. Seriously, how the fuck does he keep getting into shit. Even O.J. Stayed out of trouble for a couple of years before stealing shit.

Post: #77

Can someone explain to me why firing at and killing somebody who is attempting to murder you is considered controversial in any way? Are our bodies our own? Or if attacked should we just sit still and wait to die?

Post: #78

(05-11-2015 10:49 PM)jariel Wrote:  Most of your evidence appears to come from Zimmerman's self-serving statements, his family full of non-witnesses, and Wikipedia.

My evidence is all on Wikipedia, which is a perfectly legitimate source. I've brought up plenty more than just Zimmerman and his family's statements, if you go back and read my posts.

Meanwhile, the only 'evidence' I'm seeing presented by those who disagree with me is "I mean look at at the shit he's gotten into since then, he's clearly a dick!" That's not how you show that someone should've been convicted of a crime.

Fortis Wrote:  Regardless of whether or not Zimmerman stalked Trayvon, or Trayvon provoked him, how the fuck does a guy get off after blasting a 17 year old?

So how old do you think a person should have to be before one can legally defend himself against him/her?

Post: #79

Wikipedia is never a legitimate source. While a sometimes handy source of information, it should by no means be considered unbiased or truthful.

(05-11-2015 10:32 PM)MasculineOfCenter Wrote:  There is no evidence that Zimmerman "stalked" Martin because of his race. Given the circumstances (night, hoody with hood up) he probably had trouble discerning what race Martin was. His stated reason for calling 911 was that he thought Martin looked like he was casing houses.

You keep citing facts but you leave out two details. I am concerned that you'd argue so much about the fact while inadvertently leaving out important info, I'm also concerned that you cite Wikipedia as your source.

Here's Zimmerman stating that his rationale was that Martin was a black teenager, and that he didn't like that criminals escape unpunished.

Quote:He's got his hand in his waistband. And he's a black male.
Dispatcher:
OK, how old would you say he looked?
Zimmerman:
He's got a button on his shirt. Late teens.
Dispatcher:
Late teens? OK.
Zimmerman:
Mhmm. Something's wrong with him. Yep, he's coming to check me out. He's got something in his hands. I don't know what his deal is.
Dispatcher:
Ah, OK, just let me know if he does anything.
Zimmerman:
Get an officer over here.
Dispatcher:
Yeah we got them on the way. Just let me know if this guy does anything else.
Zimmerman:
OK. [static] These a------- they always get away.

You also seem to forget that at some point, for some reason, Zimmerman got out of his vehicle. Had he stayed in his truck, none of this would have ever happened. The documented record of this event ends with Zimmerman in his vehicle, and begins anew with a 911 call saying that there is screaming and someone has been shot.

1.) Who is telling me this? The man who would go to jail for murder if he gave anyone reason to doubt his story.
2.) How does he know this? He's the only one living who was there for the encounter.
3.) Given 1 & 2, is it possible he's wrong? Yes, it's very possible he lied to cover his own ass.

Post: #80

Why are you guys rehashing this? It's over. Both men acted stupidly and Trayvon just happened to get shot and killed because he attacked the wrong guy.

This is the state of FL. It's not smart to try to get into street fights with random citizens here given how many carry guns. I wouldn't recommend it in Texas, either.

In honor of our Mad Max thread, here's some relevant advice:

Post: #81

All of these incidents indicate that Zimmerman is one of those people who looks for confrontations over stuff he doesn't think is right. Thus, he doesn't have the correct mentality to work in law enforcement which is what he originally wanted to do. Not being able to do that, he does all this faux law-enforcement stuff like participating in neighborhood watch, confronting drivers he thinks did something wrong, etc.

Unfortunately, because of this personality quirk of his, he will continue to get in trouble. I agree that he was within the law when he killed Martin to protect himself, but as others have said if he just held back a little the entire situation could have been prevented in the first place. This is what he needs to do when he doesn't like something that's going on, he needs to count to 10, take some deep breaths, and go through a deliberate decision-making process (like the OODA loop), so he will exercise better impulse control.

Post: #82

(05-11-2015 11:14 PM)MasculineOfCenter Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 10:49 PM)jariel Wrote:  Most of your evidence appears to come from Zimmerman's self-serving statements, his family full of non-witnesses, and Wikipedia.

My evidence is all on Wikipedia, which is a perfectly legitimate source. I've brought up plenty more than just Zimmerman and his family's statements, if you go back and read my posts.

Meanwhile, the only 'evidence' I'm seeing presented by those who disagree with me is "I mean look at at the shit he's gotten into since then, he's clearly a dick!" That's not how you show that someone should've been convicted of a crime.

Fortis Wrote:  Regardless of whether or not Zimmerman stalked Trayvon, or Trayvon provoked him, how the fuck does a guy get off after blasting a 17 year old?

So how old do you think a person should have to be before one can legally defend himself against him/her?

Wikipedia troll. Yet another new breed.

Post: #83

This guy was a good troll. I gotta give it to him. He totally got me sucked into this little brouhaha. Thank god for mods.

Post: #84

Eel beat me to it.

I try REALLY hard to be on his side. As one of the most hated men in America, I'd probably stay away from situations like this...

Post: #85

(05-11-2015 11:31 PM)Carlos100 Wrote:  This is what he needs to do when he doesn't like something that's going on, he needs to count to 10, take some deep breaths, and go through a deliberate decision-making process (like the OODA loop), so he will exercise better impulse control.

Or this but I doubt he would do it because I don't sense he likes minorities much. I could be wrong.

Post: #86

George Zimmerman is a cautionary tale, and indeed that is the point of this entire brouhaha

Post: #87

I'll sum it up one more time for anyone who needs it.

(1) George Zimmerman probably didn't break any law.

(2) George Zimmerman is a stupid fucking moron.



My dad used to say that there should be a criminal charge for "just being stupid." Sometimes someone is just so dumb that they should be removed from society for their own safety.

Trouble finds trouble.


(Edit: In case anyone is confused, I'm not recommending murdering people or spending tax money locking up dangerous people. There really is no workable solution for these people).

Post: #88

Suits, have you heard of the books Darwin Awards?

Post: #89

(05-12-2015 11:08 PM)Suits Wrote:  I'll sum it up one more time for anyone who needs it.

(1) George Zimmerman probably didn't break any law.

(2) George Zimmerman is a stupid fucking moron.



My dad used to say that there should be a criminal charge for "just being stupid." Sometimes someone is just so dumb that they should be removed from society for their own safety.

Trouble finds trouble.


(Edit: In case anyone is confused, I'm not recommending murdering people or spending tax money locking up dangerous people. There really is no workable solution for these people).

Give him another year (or possibly less than that). The guy is a ticking time bomb and it's just a matter of time before he commits a serious crime, gets convicted, and ends up in prison.

Post: #90

(05-12-2015 11:41 PM)KorbenDallas Wrote:  Suits, have you heard of the books Darwin Awards?

With fondness.

Post: #91

Quote:George Zimmerman, who was acquitted of second-degree murder in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, spoke with the Spanish language television show “Aqui y Ahora” (Here and Now) to discuss life after the landmark trial.

During the interview, which will air Sunday, Aug. 2 at 7pm, Zimmerman confesses that he’s now homeless, battles post traumatic stress disorder, wears a bullet proof vest and follows a safety plan when he’s in public.

Zimmerman also went onto say that despite raising $350,000 during the trial to pay for his legal defense, he’s $2.5 million in debt. The former neighborhood watchman said he’s in constant fear for his life, but still believes he was justified in killing Trayvon.

“In my mind and between God and me … I know that if I did not act the way I acted … I would not be here,” Zimmerman said.

http://www.vibe.com/2015/07/george-zimme...less-ptsd/

Post: #92

If I was him I'd just leave. $2.5M in debt and everyone irrationally hating you is completely insurmountable. I'd just say to the wife "this is fucked right?", "yes, dear", "OK, here's a map, pick somewhere".

Post: #93

How is he $2.5m in debt? Are legal fees not dischargable in bankruptcy?

Post: #94

Quote:“In my mind and between God and me … I know that if I did not act the way I acted … I would not be here,” Zimmerman said.

Maybe he knows he should have just left the kid alone.

Post: #95

Gee, I am utterly shocked that a man would lose his mind after being run into the wringer. He needs psych help and a vacation, and to move to a faraway land.

Post: #96

(08-02-2015 10:10 PM)zaqan Wrote:  Gee, I am utterly shocked that a man would lose his mind after being run into the wringer. He needs psych help and a vacation, and to move to a faraway land.

He did this to himself, that is the part everyone seems to forget. He is not a victim, he was the aggressor, despite stand your ground and not being convicted he pushed it. Should have let the police handle it. The way you are discussing it, it sounds like he was an SJW that started a internet fight and then claims to be a victim.

Post: #97

(08-02-2015 10:14 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

(08-02-2015 10:10 PM)zaqan Wrote:  Gee, I am utterly shocked that a man would lose his mind after being run into the wringer. He needs psych help and a vacation, and to move to a faraway land.

He did this to himself, that is the part everyone seems to forget. He is not a victim, he was the aggressor, despite stand your ground and not being convicted he pushed it. Should have let the police handle it. The way you are discussing it, it sounds like he was an SJW that started a internet fight and then claims to be a victim.

He most certainly was not. I cannot believe people still believe the Al Sharpton propaganda sketch. All the evidence points to a drug-addled criminal trying to break into houses. He followed along to check up on it as any responsible citizen does. And the criminal went into that special mode, whether due to drugs or something else, and attacked Zimmerman.

No one has time to wait for the police. That is such a ridiculous sentiment that has completely destroyed our society. Citizens are the first line of defense against crime and should be where it ends. If someone had taken action like he did much earlier, that thug would have gotten help or into some sort of program. In the old days, a neighborhood worked together and knew each other and prevented crime. Now, its "call the police" and stupid crap like that. The police never come until shit is stolen or people are dead.

The case never should have gone to trial. It was clear from the very beginning he was completely innocent, but the PC and special agenda brigade had to barge in and demand a trial. Now the poor guy got run in the wringer and lost his mind. Have you ever known someone who has been in court for something they did or did not do? I have. Its a living hell for them even when they are innocent, and they never come out the same.

Post: #98

Post: #99

Post: #100

(08-02-2015 11:04 PM)zaqan Wrote:  

(08-02-2015 10:14 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

(08-02-2015 10:10 PM)zaqan Wrote:  Gee, I am utterly shocked that a man would lose his mind after being run into the wringer. He needs psych help and a vacation, and to move to a faraway land.

He did this to himself, that is the part everyone seems to forget. He is not a victim, he was the aggressor, despite stand your ground and not being convicted he pushed it. Should have let the police handle it. The way you are discussing it, it sounds like he was an SJW that started a internet fight and then claims to be a victim.

He most certainly was not. I cannot believe people still believe the Al Sharpton propaganda sketch. All the evidence points to a drug-addled criminal trying to break into houses. He followed along to check up on it as any responsible citizen does. And the criminal went into that special mode, whether due to drugs or something else, and attacked Zimmerman.

No one has time to wait for the police. That is such a ridiculous sentiment that has completely destroyed our society. Citizens are the first line of defense against crime and should be where it ends. If someone had taken action like he did much earlier, that thug would have gotten help or into some sort of program. In the old days, a neighborhood worked together and knew each other and prevented crime. Now, its "call the police" and stupid crap like that. The police never come until shit is stolen or people are dead.

The case never should have gone to trial. It was clear from the very beginning he was completely innocent, but the PC and special agenda brigade had to barge in and demand a trial. Now the poor guy got run in the wringer and lost his mind. Have you ever known someone who has been in court for something they did or did not do? I have. Its a living hell for them even when they are innocent, and they never come out the same.