Post: #1

http://www.salon.com/2014/08/21/college_...sex_lives/

"Sex and relationships are always tricky terrain for college students. Those arriving this year are finding schools awash in complaints and headlines about sexual assault and responding with programs aimed at changing campus culture that has been blamed for glorifying dorm-bed conquests, excusing rape and providing a safe haven for assailants. For many young men, it’s an added dimension in a campus scene that already appears daunting, said William Pollack, a Harvard Medical School psychologist.

Pollack said a patient recently told him about making out with a girl at a party. Things were going fine, the student said, when suddenly a vision of his school’s disciplinary board flew into his head.

“‘I want to go to law school or medical school after this,’” Pollack said, recounting the student’s comments. “‘I said to her, it’s been nice seeing you.’”

Post: #2

Hate to say it, but it might be the smart thing to do...

Post: #3

And, unsurprisingly, the author of this piece of tripe bitterly clings to her feminist SJW talking points.

'It's still George's Will's fault they're scared! False accusations are actually rare! Men need to assume responsibility for preventing sexual assault!'

College chicks who are actually not ugly need to realize the uggos on their campus are conspiring with miserable old cat ladies to deprive them of alpha dick through their terroristic campaign to make everything "sexual assault."

I'm also amused that Katie McDonough (the author) gets paid to be a bitter unfuckable fat girl.

Post: #4

This is a f'ing nightmare.

It is important to understand that the the "sexual assault" hysteria on US campuses is not just going to affect the (limited) number of young guys whose lives are actually ruined by these accusations and kangaroo courts. It is also going to affect millions of dudes who have to live in this feverish, ugly and evil atmosphere and watch their step just when they're supposed to be enjoying their lives.



I mean really, think about it. You're an 18 year old kid coming to college. It's the first time in your life you're going to have a place of your own without your parents looking over your shoulder, and you will be surrounded by hundreds or thousands of pieces of pussy.

If you are a normal male, your first, second, and last concern is going to be how to fuck all this pussy and enjoy every precious second of this unprecedented bonanza.

But no. Because of evil feminist hags and their white-knight allies, you are immediately subjected to propaganda that makes you realize that at any time, some slut could accuse you of "sexual assault" because she liked you better when she was drunk than when she is hung over. And your career and legitimate life are basically over.

That is the reality that greets you when you arrive to start the "best years of your life".

Unreal.

Post: #5

What it means is those of us who don't have to report to a review board are free to act as we please.

Enjoy the decline.

Post: #6

This just shows that there is no satisfying SJWs and feminists.

When guys were actually going out and trying to pick up the co-eds, they responded by saying that this was an example of entitled white males thinking that deserve sex and that such behavior was predatory.

Now that guys are backing off from pursuing girls in response what is the response of these SJWs? "This is another example of the sexist attitudes of men towards women thinking that females are nothing more then hysterical ticking rape accusation bombs waiting to ruin the lives of men. PATRIARCHY"

You just can't win with these people if you were born a male.

Post: #7

They won.

Post: #8

(08-27-2014 03:32 PM)Dusty Wrote:  They won.

For now, Dusty. For now.

These things don't go on forever.

But every second they go on is a disgrace.

Post: #9

I'm at college and they haven't won yet.

Post: #10

(08-27-2014 03:40 PM)Coldfire Wrote:  I'm at college and they haven't won yet.

Good.

Post: #11

Guys can always go off-campus and meet townies. I see this ultimately affecting the girls.

That's because I see a more insidious goal here by feminists. I think what they're trying to do is what the Catholic Church did with boys circa 1950-1990. It's all about grooming.

Catholics scared boys into thinking their feelings of lust toward women were unnatural, evil and dirty, which confused boys and left them open to be groomed by molesting priests.

Similarly, by making women think normal heterosexual relations are inherently abusive or violent, women's studies departments are grooming these impressionable 18-year-old girls to become lesbians.

Add to that the normalization of homosexuality by the media, and I see a major change ahead. That change will be when someone (mark my words) redefines homosexuality as "more moral" than heterosexuality because it's a "love between equals" as opposed to the male-female dynamic, which is "inherently unequal."

Soon you'll have girls (and their parents) insisting they have to date other girls because it's important to "date your equal." I also see this trickling down into the high schools.

We already have "LUGs" (lesbians until graduation) and the more these colleges make women fearful of men (and vice-versa), the more of this we'll see.

Post: #12

Notice a pattern. Street harassment (ihollaback started in Philly and spreading to multiple cities) and sexual assualt rage spreading to colleges. This is a big problem. Approaching is like smoking in NYC.

Post: #13

(08-27-2014 03:46 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Guys can always go off-campus and meet townies. I see this ultimately affecting the girls.

Yeah, I don't see the point of banging on campus. You can try and fuck a woman who has been poisoned by anti-male indoctrination, and whose privilege has guaranteed she'll be uncomfortable with her own sexuality enough to not even be sure if she's been raped or not, or you can bang a high-resilient lower class girl who knows she wants some dick.

If it gets through to the men who think of themselves as 'elite' that the female proles aren't always the fat, loud slobs they're demonised as - and, by now, the upper class women are just as likely to be fat, abrasive and slovenly anyway - then lesbianism will be the obvious choice for the upper class women because the men on campus will just vanish.

Post: #14

(08-27-2014 03:46 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Guys can always go off-campus and meet townies. I see this ultimately affecting the girls.

That's because I see a more insidious goal here by feminists. I think what they're trying to do is what the Catholic Church did with boys circa 1950-1990. It's all about grooming.

Catholics scared boys into thinking their feelings of lust toward women were unnatural, evil and dirty, which confused boys and left them open to be groomed by molesting priests.

The Catholic Church also teaches against homosexuality so shouldn't that have inoculated against priests trying to feel up boys? I'm not denying that there's been lots of man on boy action within the Church just your assertion that boys were being groomed by being taught that having lust towards women was sinful since I'm assuming these same educators would have been also teaching these boys that male on male action is also sinful.

Post: #15

(08-27-2014 04:05 PM)Wutang Wrote:  

(08-27-2014 03:46 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Guys can always go off-campus and meet townies. I see this ultimately affecting the girls.

That's because I see a more insidious goal here by feminists. I think what they're trying to do is what the Catholic Church did with boys circa 1950-1990. It's all about grooming.

Catholics scared boys into thinking their feelings of lust toward women were unnatural, evil and dirty, which confused boys and left them open to be groomed by molesting priests.

The Catholic Church also teaches against homosexuality so shouldn't that have inoculated against priests trying to feel up boys? I'm not denying that there's been lots of man on boy action within the Church just your assertion that boys were being groomed by being taught that having lust towards women was sinful since I'm assuming these same educators would have been also teaching these boys that male on male action is also sinful.

I went to Catholic school and back then any mention of nothing gay-related was in the curriculum. Nor did I ever hear about it in church. I think it was the evangelicals or fundamentalists who were on about homosexuality. I do remember our priest giving a sermon where he railed against some TV star who had posed in Playboy, which should give you an idea about their priorities.

Anyway, they definitely scared you about being straight. Three years ago I went on a date with a woman who was in Catholic school the same time I was and said she became so scared of men, she didn't even kiss until college. Needless to say, she's been single all her life.

Post: #16

It will never happen, for any number of reasons, but if college men started ignoring college women en masse because of this, Feminism would end within a week.

Post: #17

INteresting timing on this thread comming up now. In the game section someone had a thread going about college gaming in the fall and a few seemed to say things along the lines of girls away at college, never drank much before as if to go after those chicks. I was bringing up this very point some chick away from home the first time, has a few drinks, is having fun but regrets things in the morning could mean trouble for a dude. Doesnt help that liberal education pushes this type of rape culture crap either. I think most colleges say on record in handbooks and stuff if someone is drunk its rape...HELLLO, thats what college is geting hammered, hooking up and making poor decisions.

Post: #18

I've gone to a few different colleges and they all have required me to take these hookup culture/sexual assault, alcohol awareness, and LGBT courses at the start of each semester. The one I took a few days ago was a bit extreme. I hate how they used the "Lets watch a movie" line in it. Apparently, it is sexual coercion.

Some screen caps:
   
   
   
   

There was a survey at the end and a place for comments. I wrote "Fucking garbage." Now watch how this 'anonymous program' turns out to be not so anonymous and I get placed on some list

Also note that this required course took 3 hours to complete.

Post: #19

(08-27-2014 04:05 PM)Wutang Wrote:  

(08-27-2014 03:46 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Guys can always go off-campus and meet townies. I see this ultimately affecting the girls.

That's because I see a more insidious goal here by feminists. I think what they're trying to do is what the Catholic Church did with boys circa 1950-1990. It's all about grooming.

Catholics scared boys into thinking their feelings of lust toward women were unnatural, evil and dirty, which confused boys and left them open to be groomed by molesting priests.

The Catholic Church also teaches against homosexuality so shouldn't that have inoculated against priests trying to feel up boys? I'm not denying that there's been lots of man on boy action within the Church just your assertion that boys were being groomed by being taught that having lust towards women was sinful since I'm assuming these same educators would have been also teaching these boys that male on male action is also sinful.

Worked the opposite way...the kids were so ashamed of the gay acts, they would keep it a secret. And these things were NOT shamed the same way. After the scandal hit, it turned out the church had been far harsher against priests sexing and marrying adult women than molesting boys. If you married an adult woman, you were immediately defrocked, if you molested boys, they would hide it and try to "rehabilitate" you.

Post: #20

There is a crusty old Homicide cop from my neighborhood. Very religious, he went to the Seminary as a young man to become a priest. He came back a few months later saying "You wouldn't believe it! They're all [email protected]!". This was before the scandals, everyone just looked at him like he was crazy and he learned to stop talking about it.

Things might be better in South America, where it's more common for a priest to have a side piece. In America, one defrocked priest stated "Priest" was his "first identity as a gay man".

Post: #21

(08-27-2014 02:59 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Pollack said a patient recently told him about making out with a girl at a party. Things were going fine, the student said, when suddenly a vision of his school’s disciplinary board flew into his head.

For fuck's sake - this reminds of the threads which ask where to have sex as a teen while driving around in a car. Do it like your grandfather did - in the bloody car.

And for fuck's sake get yourself a micro-recorder or a phone app that records the encounter if you have sex at her place. At home and in the car get yourself a hidden motion camera. It is not illegal and any allegation is quickly refuted. Besides - it makes for a good private porn collection.

But yeah - you can become a Shut-In-Omega and leave the sluttiest of times at college a virgin. You may prepare yourself for marriage to your post-wall-ex-slut by getting a taste for cuckold-porn.

And for the rest of guys with some balls left:

   

@Kickb - that kind of indoctrination is terrible. I can understand that Betas and Omegas get completely insecure because of that. They get this shit in addition to constant useless Rom-Com-TV-Movie-Dating-Advice where the bumbling fool gets the hottest chicks in the end. Thankfully technology & learning Game can help - the others will be ever more fucked.


@DarkTriad - though that is a bit off topic. I had a friend once who was stationed in an army base right next to a Carmelite Monastery (100% nuns). The first weekend he saw as some of the guys went over the wall to the monastery. His buddy said: "We all go and have sex with the nuns on weekends or some nights. They are women and need some "love" too, you know." I guess an army based filled with young men next to them was too much of a temptation for the nuns.

Post: #22

This will only affect the less attractive girls. The cuties and the hotties will still be getting pumped and dumped. Only now they'll have to share themselves amongst fewer men, since the good looking white knights will take the DON'T RAEP MEH hysteria to heart and abstain from all relationships with the college honeys - lest they date rape them accidentally by raping her with a goodnight kiss on the cheek after their date.

Good time to be a player in university. Just don't compromise and ONS with anything less than a 7.5; we only need to look at the countless stories about rape accusation to see that it's almost always the uglier chicks falsely crying about rape.

Post: #23

(08-27-2014 06:28 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(08-27-2014 02:59 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Pollack said a patient recently told him about making out with a girl at a party. Things were going fine, the student said, when suddenly a vision of his school’s disciplinary board flew into his head.

For fuck's sake - this reminds of the threads which ask where to have sex as a teen while driving around in a car. Do it like your grandfather did - in the bloody car.

And for fuck's sake get yourself a micro-recorder or a phone app that records the encounter if you have sex at her place. At home and in the car get yourself a hidden motion camera. It is not illegal and any allegation is quickly refuted. Besides - it makes for a good private porn collection.

But yeah - you can become a Shut-In-Omega and leave the sluttiest of times at college a virgin. You may prepare yourself for marriage to your post-wall-ex-slut by getting a taste for cuckold-porn.

And for the rest of guys with some balls left:



@Kickb - that kind of indoctrination is terrible. I can understand that Betas and Omegas get completely insecure because of that. They get this shit in addition to constant useless Rom-Com-TV-Movie-Dating-Advice where the bumbling fool gets the hottest chicks in the end. Thankfully technology & learning Game can help - the others will be ever more fucked.


@DarkTriad - though that is a bit off topic. I had a friend once who was stationed in an army base right next to a Carmelite Monastery (100% nuns). The first weekend he saw as some of the guys went over the wall to the monastery. His buddy said: "We all go and have sex with the nuns on weekends or some nights. They are women and need some "love" too, you know." I guess an army based filled with young men next to them was too much of a temptation for the nuns.

Zel, the problem with recording is that under the new rules and guidelines, this isn't about rational standards. One guy was sanctioned for "nonconsensual sex" because he called her a prude and later that night she gave him a handjob. Calling her a prude was considered "coercive". You could document clearly consensual sex and STILL have it used against you as evidence. Remember that drunk girl smiling and laughing having a guy publicly go down on her outside a bar in that cellphone video a few months back? Under the new rules he would be expelled, not exonerated.

Post: #24

I don't see why this is detrimental at all?!?! This is a forum about going abroad to get your women. This is GREAT!!! This means that all these self entitled princesses will be hurting for it, while at the same time, driving more men into the red pill sphere and to dating and marrying foreign girls. This will leave all those feminist try hards staring out into the void of date-able males. Its a win win situation for us. Smart guys will marry good quality women and campus princesses will either go gay, marry omegas or tear down the system when they quickly figure out, sh1t ain't gonna work out in their favor.

Lets be real here, the early 20's are the best time for a woman to get married... if she attends uni now, its not gonna happen. Now more than ever, young women will be saying to themselves "You know, is college worth it?".

They are destroying themselves from the inside. If guys were smart they would take a complete and total 100%, hands-off American women altogether.

Post: #25

(08-27-2014 03:46 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Guys can always go off-campus and meet townies. I see this ultimately affecting the girls.

(08-27-2014 07:43 PM)BadWolf Wrote:  I don't see why this is detrimental at all?!?! This is a forum about going abroad to get your women. This is GREAT!!!

Come on guys, have some realism please. We're not talking about professional playboys or international players here. They're just normal American dudes out of high school. They're not going to "go off-campus" or "travel abroad". They're not "red pill" or even "blue pill".

They're going to do what they've always done: hang out on campus, try to meet girls, occasionally get drunk and hook up with them. There is not going to be some mass exodus or rebellion. These are all fantasies.

The only difference is that there is always going to be this nagging worry in the back of their minds that things can go wrong at any time, and the drunk slut who is eagerly and inexpertly sucking their dick right now holds their very life in her no-longer-so-tender hands. They will see an example or two of dudes actually expelled because of some disgusting accusation. It's not going to change that much on the surface but this nagging worry, this undercurrent of fear and ugliness, is enough to poison so many experiences that should be innocent and unselfconscious.

That is the real evil -- because the difference between a happy and a miserable experience can be subtle, a matter of just a few moments in which one should not feel anxious or distracted, but one does. And these moments seep into and ruin memories and emotions that should never be ruined in this way.

Step out of yourself -- think about these young dudes, and the subtly poisoned atmosphere they have to be steeped in. And realize what an infamy has been perpetrated here.